Alzheimer biomarkers and clinical Alzheimer disease were not associated with increased cerebrovascular disease in a memory clinic population.

OBJECTIVE: Preclinical and post-mortem studies suggest that Alzheimer disease (AD) causes cerebrovascular dysfunction, and therefore may enhance susceptibility to cerebrovascular disease (CVD). The objective of this study was to investigate this association in a memory clinic population. METHODS: The AD biomarkers CSF amyloid ß42, amyloid ß40 and APOE-ε4 status have all been linked to increased CVD risk in AD, and therefore the first aim of this study was to analyze the association between these biomarkers and CVD. In 92 memory clinic patients the cross-sectional association between AD biomarkersand the severity of CVD was investigated with linear regression analysis. Additionally, we studied whether AD biomarkers modified the relation between vascular risk factors and CVD. CVD was assessed on MRI through a visual rating scale.Analyses were adjusted for age. The second aim of this study was to investigate the association between clinical AD and CVD, where 'clinical AD' was defined as follows: impairment in episodic memory, hippocampal atrophy and an aberrant concentration of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. 47 of the 92 patients had AD. RESULTS: No association between CSF amyloid ß42, amyloid ß40 or APOE-ε4 status and CVD severity was found, nor did these AD biomarkers modify the relation between vascular risk factors and CVD. Clinical AD was not associated with CVD severity (p=0.83). Patients with more vascular risk factors had more CVD, but this relationship was not convincingly modified by AD (p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In this memory clinic population, CVD in patients with AD was related to vascular risk factors and age, comparable to patients without AD. Therefore, in our study, the preclinical and post-mortem evidence that AD would predispose to CVD could not be translated clinically. Further work, including replication of this work in a different and larger sample, is warranted.

Hourly variability of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease subjects and healthy older volunteers.

Large hour-to-hour variability has previously been demonstrated in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers amyloid ß(42) (Aß(42)) and Aß(40) in healthy younger subjects. We investigated the within-subject variability over 36 hours in CSF Aß and tau proteins, in older subjects and AD patients. Six patients with mild stage AD (59-85 years, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) 16-26) and 6 healthy older volunteers (64-77 years) received an intrathecal catheter from which, during 36 hours, each hour 6 mL of CSF was drawn. Concentrations of Aß(42), Aß(40), total tau, and phosphorylated tau were determined and the variability was analyzed. Within-subject variability within 3-hour periods was assessed as the coefficient of variation, which was comparable for these 4 biomarkers in controls (4.2%-4.6%) and AD (3.1%-5.8%). Variability over 12 hour periods was 5.3% to 9.5%. These findings suggest that CSF biomarker variability is relatively low in healthy older controls and AD patients. Furthermore, continuous sampling of CSF proved to be a useful and robust method, which may also be used to investigate AD pathogenesis and to evaluate pharmacotherapeutic interventions.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease in Clinical Practice: An Illustration with 3 Case Reports.

Analysis of the brain specific biomarkers amyloid beta(42) (Abeta(42)) and total tau (t-tau) protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has a sensitivity and specificity of more than 85% for differentiating Alzheimer's Disease (AD) from non-demented controls. International guidelines are contradictory in their advice on the use of CSF biomarkers in AD diagnostics, resulting in a lack of consistency in clinical practice. We present three case reports that illustrate clinical practice according to the Dutch and European guidelines and portray the value of CSF biomarker analysis as an add-on diagnostic to the standard diagnostic workup for AD.

Cerebrospinal fluid alpha-synuclein does not discriminate between dementia disorders.

Alpha-synuclein is the major constituent of Lewy bodies found in neurons in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and might be of diagnostic value as a biomarker for DLB. We hypothesized that, as a consequence of increased accumulation of alpha-synuclein intraneuronally in DLB, the levels of alpha-synuclein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of DLB patients would be lower than in other dementias. Our objective was to investigate the CSF levels of alpha-synuclein in several dementia disorders compared to control levels and to investigate the diagnostic value of CSF alpha-synuclein as a marker to discriminate between DLB and other types of dementia. We analyzed the levels of alpha-synuclein in CSF of 40 DLB patients, 131 patients with Alzheimer's disease, 28 patients with vascular dementia, and 39 patients with frontotemporal dementia. We did not find any significant differences in CSF alpha-synuclein levels between DLB patients and patients with Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia or frontotemporal dementia. We conclude that in clinically diagnosed patients, alpha-synuclein does not appear to be a useful biomarker for the differentiation between DLB and other types of dementia.

Vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer's disease: Additional follow-up results of a pilot study through 1 year.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-enhancing effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) have been reported during 6 months of treatment in a pilot study of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Data through 1 year of VNS (collected from June 2000 to September 2003) are now reported. METHOD: All patients (N = 17) met the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for probable AD. Responder rates for the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were measured as improvement or absence of decline from baseline. Global change, depressive symptoms, and quality of life were also assessed. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels for total tau, tau phosphorylated at Thr181 (phosphotau), and Abeta42 were measured by standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: VNS was well tolerated. After 1 year, 7 (41.2%) of 17 patients and 12 (70.6%) of 17 patients improved or did not decline from baseline on the ADAS-cog and MMSE, respectively. Twelve of 17 patients were rated as having no change or some improvement from baseline on the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change (CIBIC+). No significant decline in mood, behavior, or quality of life occurred during 1 year of treatment. The median change in CSF tau at 1 year was a reduction of 4.8% (p = .057), with a 5.0% increase in phosphotau (p = .040; N = 14). CONCLUSION: The results of this study support long-term tolerability of VNS among patients with AD and warrant further investigation.

Cognition-enhancing effect of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established treatment method for therapy-refractory epilepsy and, in Europe, for treatment-resistant depression also. Clinical and experimental investigations have also shown positive effects of VNS on cognition in epilepsy and depression. The purpose of the present pilot study was to investigate the effect of VNS on cognition in patients with Alzheimer's disease. METHOD: All the included patients (N = 10) met the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Before the implantation of the vagus stimulator (NeuroCybernetic Prosthesis), the patients underwent neuropsychological tests (e.g., Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale [ADAS-cog] and Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]), computerized tomography of the brain, medical/neurologic and psychological examinations (status evaluation), and lumbar puncture with investigation of the cerebrospinal fluid. The presence of depressive symptoms was rated using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. The VNS was initiated 2 weeks after the implantation, and the patients were followed up with regular investigations and tests over 6 months. Response was defined as improvement or absence of impairment in ADAS-cog and MMSE scores after 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: After 3 months of treatment, 7 of 10 patients were responders according to the ADAS-cog (median improvement of 3.0 points), and 9 of 10 patients were responders according to the MMSE (median improvement of 1.5 points). After 6 months of treatment, 7 patients were responders on the ADAS-cog (median improvement of 2.5 points), and 7 patients were responders on the MMSE (median improvement of 2.5 points). VNS was well tolerated, and its side effects were mild and transient. CONCLUSION: The results of this open-label pilot study suggest a positive effect of VNS on cognition in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Further studies are warranted.