Developing a European urban health indicator system: results of EURO-URHIS 1.

Introduction: More than half of the world's population now live in cities, including over 70% in Europe. Cities bring opportunities but can be unhealthy places to live. The poorest urban dwellers live in the worst environments and are at the greatest risk of poor health outcomes. EURO-URHIS 1 set out to compile a cross-EU inventory of member states use of measures of urban health in order to support policymakers and improve public health policy. Following a literature review to define terms and find an appropriate model to guide urban health research, EURO-URHIS Urban Areas in all EU member states except Luxembourg, as well as Croatia, Turkey, Macedonia, Iceland and Norway, were defined and selected in collaboration with project partners. Following piloting of the survey tool, a the EURO-URHIS 45 data collection tool was sent out to contacts in all countries with identified EUA's, asking for data on 45 Urban Health Indicators (UHI) and 10 other indicators. 60 questionnaires were received from 30 countries, giving information on local health indicator availability, definitions and sources. Telephone interviews were also conducted with 14 respondents about their knowledge of sources of urban health data and barriers or problems experienced when collecting the data. Most participants had little problem identifying the sources of data, though some found that data was not always routinely recorded and was held by diverse sources or not at local level. Some participants found the data collection instrument to not be user-friendly and with UHI definitions that were sometimes unclear. However, the work has demonstrated that urban health and its measurement is of major relevance and importance for Public Health across Europe. The current study has constructed an initial system of European UHIs to meet the objectives of the project, but has also clearly demonstrated that further development work is required. The importance and value of examining UHIs has been confirmed, and the scene has been set for further studies on this topic.

First experiences with patient safety initiatives in Greek rural primary care. Action research by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Accreditation of primary care organizations within Greece is still in its infancy. Our task in Greece was to attempt to introduce a patient safety initiative in a local area, focusing on developing minimum standards for accreditation, assess whether a pragmatic approach would engage physicians, and provide evidence of improvement. OBJECTIVE: To use monitoring of clinical performance as the basis for the launch of an accreditation system for primary care in Greece and to report on the process and lessons learnt. METHODS: An established set of clinical indicators for patient safety was introduced in five Greek primary health centres. A web-based platform, for reporting practitioners' scores on the selected indicators, was used to record the activity of the practitioners. RESULTS: There was considerable variation in the use of clinical indicators by individual GPs. Following the intervention, the reporting on the indicators had increased while the scores on indicators only increased slightly. However, GPs engaged with the process and recognized its relevance to improving patient safety. CONCLUSION: We successfully piloted a means of engaging with GPs to improve patient safety using established indicators even where there was limited infrastructure to support such initiatives.

PARENT joint action: increasing the added value of patient registries in a cross-border setting.

Patient registries are poorly interoperable and as a result data exchange or aggregation across organizations, regions and countries for secondary purposes (i.e. research and public health) is difficult to perform. PARENT Joint Action aims to provide EU Member States with a set of guidelines, recommendations and tools to support setting-up, management and governance of interoperable patient registries, thus helping EU Member States to drive down cost and interoperability risks of patient registries as well as improving secondary us-age of registry data in a cross-border setting.

Implementing clinical protocols in oncology: quality gaps and the learning curve phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: The quality improvement effort in clinical practice has focused mostly on 'performance quality', i.e. on the development of comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines. This study aimed to assess the 'conformance quality', i.e. the extent to which guidelines once developed are correctly and consistently applied. It also aimed to assess the existence of quality gaps in the treatment of certain patient segments as defined by age or gender and to investigate methods to improve overall conformance quality. METHODS: A retrospective audit of clinical practice in a well-defined oncology setting was undertaken and the results compared to those obtained from prospectively applying an internally developed clinical protocol in the same setting and using specific tools to increase conformance quality. RESULTS: All indicators showed improvement after the implementation of the protocol that in many cases reached statistical significance, while in the entire cohort advanced age was associated (although not significantly) with sub-optimal delivery of care. A 'learning curve' phenomenon in the implementation of quality initiatives was detected, with all indicators improving substantially in the second part of the prospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should pay separate attention to the implementation of chosen protocols and employ specific tools to increase conformance quality in patient care.

Oxygen availability during orthotopic liver transplantation.

Studies have stressed the role of adequate tissue oxygenation in the light of an optimal patient outcome and allograft viability in liver transplantation. The practice of monitoring conventional hemodynamic parameters during liver transplantation could be complemented by parameters assessing real oxygen availability. In the present prospective study, real arterial available oxygen content (CavlO(2)) and its extraction ratio (O(2)ERavl) were calculated. These parameters include the effect of changes in oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve (ODC; expressed by P(50)) on oxygen availability, under the different circumstances occurring during liver transplantation. Sixteen adult cirrhotic patients were studied during orthotopic liver transplantation with the use of venovenous bypass. Classic hemodynamic measurements using a Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter and arterial and mixed venous blood gas analysis were performed, and P(50), oxygen delivery index (DO(2 ind)), oxygen consumption index (VO(2 ind)), oxygen extraction ratio (O(2)ER), CavlO(2), and O(2)ERavl were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA for repeated measures and Spearman correlation coefficient matrix among the six variables (DO(2 ind), VO(2 ind), O(2)ER, P(50), CavlO(2), and O(2)ERavl) taken two at a time at every phase. Parameter P(50) changed from 25.98 +/- 1.10 to 23.15 +/- 2.24 (at the end of operation). A leftward shift of the ODC was observed. The results showed positive association between P(50) and CavlO(2) after the removal of the native liver, and a weak and inconsistent relation of DO(2 ind) with any of the other study variables. The intraoperative changes in P(50) values, which represent a shift of the ODC to the left, may reflect a more accurate estimation of O(2) release to the tissues, than the hemoglobin, Pao(2) and Sao(2) alone. Besides conventional hemodynamic parameters, P(50), which includes the effect of alterations in ODC on oxygen availability, could be of value in monitoring the systemic oxygenation during liver transplantation.