Colorectal Cancer, Age, and Obesity-Related Comorbidities: A Large Database Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The association between obesity and colorectal cancer (CRC) is well established in older individuals, but evidence is limited in the younger population. The study aims to analyze the relationship of obesity and its related comorbidities in early-onset CRC (E-CRC) and compare it to late-onset CRC (L-CRC). METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed on average-risk individuals ≥ 20 years who were active patients in the commercial database, IBM Watson Health Explorys in the last 5 years. Individuals with CRC were compared to those without CRC across different age groups (20-39, 40-49, and 50-74 years). Individuals with CRC diagnosed < 50 years (E-CRC) were compared to those with CRC between 50 and 74 years (L-CRC). Variables included sex, smoking, obese BMI, diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), hypertension (HTN), and hyperlipidemia (HLD). Since Explorys aggregates population-level, de-identified data, approval from institutional review board was not required. RESULTS: Among 37,483,140 individuals, 162,150 cases of sporadic CRC were identified. Compared to the general population, obesity and HLD were independent risk factors for CRC across all age groups; DM2, HTN, and smoking were independent risk factors for CRC in men of all age groups and women with L-CRC. Compared to L-CRC, individuals with E-CRC had lower percentages of obesity-related comorbidities. CONCLUSION: In E-CRC, obesity, DM2, HTN, HLD, and smoking are independent risk factors for CRC among men; obesity and HLD are independent risk factors for CRC in women. These subgroups may benefit from a personalized screening approach to detect early-onset CRC.

Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices in a Midwest Urban Safety-Net Healthcare System.

AIMS: Although colorectal cancer screening (CRC) using stool-based test is well-studied, evidence on fecal immunochemical test (FIT) patterns in a safety-net healthcare system utilizing opportunistic screening is limited. We studied the FIT completion rates and adenoma detection rate (ADR) of positive FIT-colonoscopy (FIT-C) in an urban safety-net system. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional chart review on individuals ≥ 50 years who underwent CRC screening using FIT or screening colonoscopy, 09/01/2017-08/30/2018. Demographic differences in FIT completion were studied; ADR of FIT-C was compared to that of screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Among 13,427 individuals with FIT ordered, 7248 (54%) completed the stool test and 230 (48%) followed up a positive FIT with colonoscopy. Increasing age (OR 1.01, CI 1.01-1.02), non-Hispanic Blacks (OR 0.87, CI 0.80-0.95, p = 0.002), current smokers (OR 0.84, CI 0.77-0.92, p < 0.0001), those with Medicaid (OR 0.86, CI 0.77-0.96, p = 0.006), commercial insurance (OR 0.85, CI 0.78-0.94, p = 0.002), CCI score ≥ 3 (OR 0.82, CI 0.74-0.91, p < 0.0001), orders by family medicine providers (OR 0.87, CI 0.81-0.94, p < 0.0001) were associated with lower completion of stool test. Individuals from low median household income cities had lower follow-up of positive FIT, OR 0.43, CI 0.21-0.86, p = 0.017. ADR of FIT-C was higher than that of screening colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Adherence to CRC screening is low in safety-net systems employing opportunistic screening. Understanding demographic differences may allow providers to formulate targeted strategies in high-risk vulnerable groups.

Quantifying risk factors for ischemic colitis: A nationwide, retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite identifying numerous factors associated with colonic ischemia, the relative risk has been variable and not thoroughly evaluated. Hence, we aimed to quantify the risk of diseases and medications associated with ischemic colitis (IC). METHODS: A population-based retrospective analysis in International Business Machines (IBM) Explorys (1999-2018), a pooled, de-identified database of 57 million patients in the USA, was performed. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated between IC and other diseases/medications. IC patients were also stratified by age to assess trends of IC in different age groups. RESULTS: A total of 1560 patients had IC in the database. Hyperlipidemia had the highest association with IC (OR 15.3), consistent with prior reports of atherosclerosis being a major risk factor for IC. Hypertension, congestive heart failure, constipation, prior abdominal surgery, and atrial fibrillation all conferred odds greater than 10, which is consistent with prior reports. Novel findings of our study include that beta blockers (OR 9.6) and pro-inflammatory disease states such as vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and malignancy all increase the risk of IC. CONCLUSION: Early identification of IC is critical for minimizing morbidity and mortality. Epidemiologic information could be integrated with current clinical algorithms to more rapidly identify patients at risk.

Nocturnal Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Sleep: An Important Relationship That Is Commonly Overlooked.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent, chronic medical condition that affects 13% of the adult population globally at least once a week. Sleep disturbances are frequently encountered in up to 25% of the GERD patients, likely due to nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux (GER). With advance in diagnostic techniques allowing for an improved understanding of involved physiological mechanisms of nocturnal reflux, there is growing evidence of a bidirectional relationship between GERD and sleep disturbances. Furthermore, nocturnal GER is associated with more complicated GERD. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and GERD also have been linked, but to what degree remains controversial. Treatment of nocturnal GER has been shown to improve both subjective and objective sleep measures. The therapeutic approach includes lifestyle modifications and medication individualization and optimization with proton-pump inhibitors serving as the mainstay of treatment. Antireflux surgery and newer endoscopic procedures have been demonstrated to control nocturnal GER.

Stop Blaming the Weatherman! A Retrospective Study of Endoscopy Show Rates at a Midwest Urban Safety-Net Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Weather patterns are well-known to affect human health and behavior and are often arbitrarily blamed for high no-show rates (NSRs). The NSR for outpatient gastrointestinal procedures ranges from 4% to 41% depending on the population and procedure performed. Identifying potential causes will allow for the optimization of endoscopy resource utilization. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a day of the year and weather conditions have on NSRs for outpatient endoscopic procedures at a safety-net hospital in Cleveland, Ohio, United States. METHODS: A 12-month, retrospective cohort study of the NSR for outpatient endoscopic procedures was performed using local weather data from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. Data was assessed by analysis of variance/t test, and the χ test was used to analyze weather impact on NSR. RESULTS: A total of 7935 patients had an average overall NSR of 11.8%. Average NSR for esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) were 9.9%, colonoscopies 12.3%, and advanced endoscopy procedures 11.1%. The NSR was highest in April (15.3%, P=0.01) and lowest in September (9.0%, P=0.04). There is a greater likelihood of procedural no-show for colonoscopies compared with EGDs when mean temperatures were at or below freezing (P=0.02) and with snowfall (P=0.03). NSR were also high for EGDs on federal holidays (25%, P=0.03) and colonoscopies on days following federal holidays (25.3%, P<0.01). Day of the week, wind speed, presence of precipitation, wind chill, the temperature change from the prior day, and temperature (high, low, and mean) had no significant impact on NSR. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that scheduling adjustments on federal holidays, days when temperatures are below freezing, and snowfall may improve department resource utilization. These data, along with other variables that affect NSR for endoscopic procedures, should be taken into consideration when attempting to optimize scheduling and available resources in a safety-net hospital.

Groove Pancreatitis, a Masquerading Yet Distinct Clinicopathological Entity: Analysis of Risk Factors and Differentiation.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to delineate predictive factors differentiating groove pancreatitis (GP) from other lesions involving the head of the pancreas (HOP). METHODS: A case-control study of patients older than 10 years was performed comparing patients with GP to those with other surgically resected HOP lesions. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with GP (mean ± SD age, 51.9 ± 10.5 years; 11 males [84.6%]), all with a history of smoking (mean, 37.54 ± 17.8 pack-years), were identified. Twelve patients (92.3%) had a history of heavy alcohol drinking (heavy alcohol [EtOH]). The mean lesion size was 2.6 ± 1.1 cm, and the CA 19-9 was elevated (>37 IU/mL) in 5 patients (45.5%). The most common histopathologic condition was duodenal wall cyst with myofibroblastic proliferation and changes of chronic pancreatitis in the HOP.Univariate analysis revealed decreasing age, male sex, weight loss, nausea/vomiting, heavy EtOH, smoking, and a history of chronic pancreatitis were predictive of GP. A multivariate analysis among smokers demonstrated that weight loss (P = 0.006; odds ratio, 11.96; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-70.2), and heavy EtOH (P < 0.001; odds ratio, 82.2; 95% confidence interval, 9.16-738.1) were most predictive of GP. Compared to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 183), weight loss and heavy EtOH remained predictive of GP. CONCLUSION: Groove pancreatitis in the HOP is associated with a history of heavy EtOH and weight loss. In the absence of these symptoms, it is essential to rule out a malignant lesion.