Multicenter registry of Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock in Poland (IMPELLA-PL).

BACKGROUND: Impella is a percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device for treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCIs). IMPELLA-PL is a national retrospective registry of Impella-treated CS and HR-PCI patients in 20 Polish interventional cardiological centers, conducted from January 2014 until December 2021. AIMS: We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of Impella using real-world data from IMPELLA-PL and compare these with other registries. METHODS: IMPELLA-PL data were analyzed to determine primary endpoints: in-hospital mortality and rates of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 12 months post-discharge. RESULTS: Of 308 patients, 18% had CS and 82% underwent HR-PCI. In-hospital mortality rates were 76.4% and 8.3% in the CS and HR-PCI groups, respectively. The 12-month mortality rates were 80.0% and 18.2%, and post-discharge MACCE rates were 9.1% and 22.5%, respectively. Any access site bleeding occurred in 30.9% of CS patients and 14.6% of HR-PCI patients, limb ischemia in 12.7% and 2.4%, and hemolysis in 10.9% and 1.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Impella is safe and effective during HR-PCIs, in accordance with previous registry analyses. The risk profile and mortality in CS patients were higher than in other registries, and the potential benefits of Impella in CS require investigation.

The impact of left circumflex coronary artery ostium stenosis on outcomes for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease.

BACKGROUND: The impact of left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) ostium atherosclerosis in left main coronary artery (LM) bifurcation disease is not well-known. AIM: The study aimed to assess whether the involvement of LCX ostium carries prognostic implications in patients undergoing unprotected LM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Consecutive 564 patients with unprotected LM (ULMCA) disease who underwent LM PCI between January 2015 and February 2021, with at least 1 year of available follow-up were included in the study. The first group was composed of 145 patients with ULMCA disease with LCX ostium stenosis, and the second group consisted of 419 patients with ULMCA disease without LCX ostium stenosis. RESULTS: Patients in the group with ULMCA disease with LCX ostium stenosis were significantly older and had more comorbidities. The two-stent technique was used more often in the group with LCX ostium stenosis (62.8% vs. 14.6%; P <0.001). During 7-year follow-up, all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between groups with and without LCX ostium stenosis (P = 0.50). The use of one-stent or two-stent technique also did not impact mortality in patients with LCX ostial lesions (P = 0.75). Long-term mortality subanalysis for three groups of patients: (1) patients with LM plus LCX ostium stenosis; (2) LM plus left anterior descending artery (LAD) ostium stenosis; (3) LM plus LCX ostium plus LAD ostium stenosis also did not differ significantly (P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: LCX ostium involvement in LM disease PCI is not associated with adverse long-term outcomes, which is highly beneficial for the Heart Team's decision-making process.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients Disqualified from Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

The study aims to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of left main percutaneous coronary interventions (LM PCI) in patients disqualified from coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). We included 459 patients (mean age: 68.4 ± 9.4 years, 24.4% females), with at least 1-year follow-up; 396 patients in whom PCI was offered as an alternative to CABG (Group 1); and 63 patients who were disqualified from CABG by the Heart Team (Group 2). The SYNTAX score (29.1 ± 9.5 vs. 23.2 ± 9.7; p < 0.001) and Euroscore II value (2.72 ± 2.01 vs. 2.15 ± 2.16; p = 0.007) were significantly higher and ejection fraction was significantly lower (46% vs. 51.4%; p < 0.001) in Group 2. Patients in Group 2 more often required complex stenting techniques (33.3% vs. 16.2%; p = 0.001). The procedure success rates were very high and did not differ between groups (100% vs. 99.2%; p = 0.882). We observed no difference in periprocedural complication rates (12.7% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.198), but the long-term all-cause mortality rate was higher in Group 2 (26% vs. 21%; p = 0.031). LM PCI in patients disqualified from CABG is an effective and safe procedure with a low in-hospital complication rate. Long-term results are satisfactory.

Very long-term follow-up of patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with bioresorbable scaffolds.

BACKGROUNDS: The data concerning the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in coronary bifurcation lesions are limited. AIMS: The objective of the study was to evaluate the early and very long-term clinical outcomes of bifurcation stenting with ABSORB BVS. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with BVS were included. A total of 124 BVS were implanted. Provisional side branch stenting was performed in 66 patients, distal main stenting in 14 patients, systematic T stenting in 2, and T with minimal protrusion (TAP) in 5 patients. Side branch ostial stenting was performed in additional 12 patients. RESULTS: The procedural success was achieved in 98% of patients. In long-term follow-up, the rate of cardiac death was 4.0%, target vessel myocardial infarction was 5.0%, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 11%. The cumulative incidence of definite/probable scaffold thrombosis (ST) was 2% at long-term follow-up. Comparison with the historical drug-eluting stents (DES) group revealed higher mortality and major adverse cardiac events rate in the ABSORB group. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions of low-to-moderate complexity with BVS was feasible with good acute performance and acceptable results. However, the risk of death and major adverse cardiovascular events was higher as compared with DES.

Peri-Procedural Troponin Elevation after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Left main (LM) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are challenging and highly invasive procedures. Periprocedural myocardial injury (Troponin (Tn) elevation > 99th percentile) is frequently detected after LM PCI, being identified even in up to 67% of patients. However, the prognostic implications of periprocedural Tn elevation after LM PCI remain controversial. We aim to assess the impact and prognostic significance of the periprocedural troponin elevation on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing LM PCI in a real-world setting. Consecutive 673 patients who underwent LM PCI in our department between January 2015 to February 2021 were included in a prospective registry. The first group consisted of 323 patients with major cardiac Troponin I elevation defined as an elevation of Tn values > 5× the 99th percentile in patients with normal baseline values or post-procedure Tn rise by >20% in patients with elevated pre-procedure Tn in whom the Tn level was stable or falling (based on the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction). The second group consisted of patients without major cardiac Troponin I elevation. Seven-year long-term all-cause mortality was not higher in the group with major Tn elevation (36.9% vs. 40.6%; p = 0.818). Naturally, periprocedural myocardial infarction was diagnosed only in patients from groups with major Tn elevation (4.9% of all patients). In-hospital death and other periprocedural complications did not differ significantly between the two study groups. The adjusted HRs for mortality post-PCI in patients with a periprocedural myocardial infarction were not significant. Long-term mortality subanalysis for the group with criteria for cardiac procedural myocardial injury showed no significant differences (39.5% vs. 38.8%; p = 0.997). The occurrence of Tn elevation (>1×; >5×; >35× and >70× URL) after LM PCI was not associated with adverse long-term outcomes. The results of the study suggest that the isolated periprocedural troponin elevation is not clinically significant.

A Personalized Approach to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Left Main Coronary Artery-Is the Female Gender Associated with Worse Outcomes?

There is still controversy whether the female gender is associated with worse outcomes after the percutaneous coronary intervention within the left main (LM PCI). This study aimed to examine gender-based differences in real-life LM PCI patients and present a gender-personalized LM PCI approach. Consecutively, 613 patients underwent LM PCI in our department from January 2015 to June 2019. Five hundred and thirty-three patients, with at least a one-year follow-up, were included in the study. There were 130 (24.4%) women and 403 (75.6%) men. Compared with men, women were older (70.0 ± 9.4 vs. 67.7 ± 9.2; p = 0.006) and had higher diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease rates. Left ventricle ejection fraction was higher in women (53.5 ± 9.4 vs. 49.5 ± 11.2; p = 0.001). Euroscore II and SYNTAX scores did not differ between the genders. However, we observed a trend towards more frequent use of complex PCI techniques in women (26.2% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.098). The overall periprocedural complication rates (10.0% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.406) and the periprocedural myocardial infarction rates did not differ. Contrast-induced nephropathy was more frequent in women (6.9% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.044). Long-term all-cause mortality did not differ (20% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.069). Both genders presented similar rates of periprocedural complications, and no significant differences in long-term all-cause mortality were revealed. Our results suggest that the female gender in LM PCI is not a predictor of adverse outcomes. Further studies are required to determine the optimal revascularization strategy in women.

The impact of right coronary artery support on outcomes of patients with unprotected left main disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Many operators are discouraged from performing left main (LM) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in the absence of right coronary artery (RCA) support due to the increased procedure risk. AIMS: We aimed at assessing the impact of absent functional RCA on prognostic implications in patients undergoing unprotected LM PCI. METHODS: 613 patients underwent LM PCI in our department between 2015 and 2019. Consecutive 385 patients with unprotected LM and at least 1-year follow-up were included in the study. The study population comprosed 272 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) with dominant RCA, without any significant lesions (Group 1), and 113 ULMCAD patients and without RCA support (Group 2). RESULTS: In Group 2, 32.7% patients had a significant RCA stenosis, 48.7% had chronic total occlusion (CTO) of RCA, and 18.6% had recessive RCA. Patients in Group 2 were older and had higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). SYNTAX Score (median [IQR] 26.0 [20.0-33.0] vs 19.0 [13.0-25.5]; P <0.001) was higher and left ventricular ejection fraction was lower (median [IQR] 50.0 [40.0-60.0]% vs 55.0 [45.0-60.0]%; P = 0.01) in this group. All periprocedural complications did not differ among the groups. Long-term all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 1149 days did not differ significantly (23% vs 20%; P = 0.37). The long-term mortality in CTO-RCA group was also not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ULMCAD who have undergone LM PCI in the absence of RCA support, compared with those with ULMCAD and RCA support, differed neither in the prevalence of periprocedural complications nor in long-term all-cause mortality.

Optimal Timing of P2Y12 Inhibitor Loading in Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The timing of P2Y12 inhibitor loading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a matter of debate. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral P2Y12 inhibitors: clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel administered at two different time points in relation to PCI: early (> 2 hours pre-PCI) versus late (< 2 hours pre-PCI or post-PCI). METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies were included. Outcomes evaluated were combined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization, death and bleeding complications. Summary estimates of the relative risks with therapy were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies met the selection criteria and included 60,907 patients. Early P2Y12 inhibitor loading was associated with a 22% relative risk reduction (RRR) of MACE (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68-0.89; p < 0.001). Early clopidogrel loading was associated with a 25% RRR of MACE (95% CI = 0.65-0.85; p < 0.001), a 30% RRR of MI (95% CI = 0.6-0.82; p < 0.0001) and 25% RRR of death (95% CI = 0.64-0.87; p = 0.0002), without an impact on major bleedings. In ST-elevation myocardial infarction as well as non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), early clopidogrel loading resulted in 35 and 22% RRR in 30 days MACE (p < 0.001), respectively, with no impact in elective PCI. Whereas early loading with prasugrel and ticagrelor did not improve ischaemic outcomes, prasugrel administered early increased bleeding risks in NSTE-ACS. CONCLUSION: Early clopidogrel loading is associated with a better efficacy and similar safety, whereas timing of ticagrelor or prasugrel loading had no effects on ischaemic events.

Impact of the presence of chronically occluded coronary artery on long-term prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Multivessel disease (MVD) is a significant risk factor in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whether the presence of chronic total occlusion (CTO) poses an additional hazard is still unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CTO on survival in STEMI patients. METHODS: The study group consisted of 836 STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coro-nary intervention (PCI). MVD was diagnosed in 52.3%, and CTO in 17.5% of patients. RESULTS: In MVD patients, 30-day mortality was 4.8% (6.8% in the CTO and 3.8% in the non-CTO group, p = 0.167). After 6 years, of the 437 patients with MVD, 56 (38.6%) died in the CTO group, and 74 (25.4%) in the non-CTO group (p = 0.0055). CTO was an independent predictor of long-term mortality (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.30-3.28, p = 0.002), whereas triple vessel disease was not (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.78-1.97, p = 0.358). The other independent predictors of mortality were: age, anterior myocardial infarction, and PCI failure. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CTO is an independent predictor of the long-term mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 2: 117-124).

Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion of the coronary artery with the implantation of bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds. Poznan CTO-Absorb Pilot Registry.

AIMS: Data concerning the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early and midterm clinical outcomes of CTO stenting with BVS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty consecutive patients (male 78%, mean age 59.9±8.3 years, diabetics 30%) with CTO treated with BVS were enrolled. Patients with a reference vessel diameter >4 mm, metallic stents, excessive calcium and tortuosity were excluded. Mean J-CTO score was 1.6. A total of 63 BVS were implanted with an average number of 1.6 per patient, and an average scaffold length of 42.4±21.5 mm. Procedural success was achieved in all patients with no device-related complications. At follow-up (median time 556 days), there were no deaths, one patient experienced subacute and late scaffold thrombosis (ST), and another one developed symptomatic in-scaffold focal restenosis treated with repeat PCI. At control angiography, performed at a median time of 329 days in 27 patients (68%), no more restenosis or vessel reocclusion was found. CONCLUSIONS: CTO stenting with BVS is feasible with good acute performance, and good early and midterm clinical outcomes.

Primary percutaneous angioplasty, thrombolysis and conservative treatment in low-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: effects on short- and long-term mortality.

BACKGROUND: Although primary coronary intervention (PCI) is currently regarded as the preferred reperfusion strategy in ST- -elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), its superiority over thrombolysis has been documented mainly in high-risk patients. In low-risk patients, the difference seems to be not so significant. AIM: To evaluate the early and late mortality in low-risk STEMI patients treated with thrombolysis, PCI, or conservatively. METHODS: From a total of 3,780 consecutive STEMI patients presenting within 24 h from symptom onset, 990 low-risk patients (age < 70 years old, Killip-Kimball class 1 at admission, non-anterior STEMI) were selected. The median follow-up duration was 18.3 (14.2-25.0) months. The patients were subdivided into three groups: group A (n = 465) - treated with PCI; group B (n = 289) - treated with thrombolysis; and group C (n = 236) - treated conservatively. RESULTS: In the whole study group 12 (1.21%) patients died; 30-day mortality in group A was 0.65%. In group B five out of 289 (1.73%) patients died, and in group C four out of 236 (1.69%) patients died. No significant differences in 30-day mortality between these three groups were found (p = 0.3). During the long-term follow-up, 37 (3.7%) of 990 patients died. In group A 18 (3.9%) patients died, in group B ten (3.4%) patients died, and in group C nine (3.8%) patients died (p = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in 30-day or long-term mortality rates between conservative therapy, PCI or thrombolysis groups in low-risk STEMI patients were observed.

[ST segment elevation typical for Brugada syndrome after intracoronary acetylocholine injection with retrosternal pain in history]. / Zmiany ST−T o typie zespolu Brugadów po podaniu dowiencowym acetylocholiny u mlodego mezczyzny z bólami w klatce piersiowej.

Chest pain is mainly linked with acute coronary syndrome, but sometimes it can be the only manifestation of ventricular tachycardia. We present a case of a young man who was diagnosed with Brugada syndrome after intracoronary acetylocholine injection, with negative test with flecanaide. First manifestation of a disease was a chest pain.