Predictors and outcome of conversion to cardiac surgery during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: Due to increasing clinical experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures, sophisticated imaging and advanced device technology, TAVI complication rates are low; however, patients requiring conversion to surgery are confronted with an increased mortality risk. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the predictors for conversion and the outcomes of these patients. METHODS: We analysed the records of all patients undergoing TAVI in our centre from 2011 to 2016 and focused on cases that required conversion to sternotomy. We investigated reasons and risk factors for conversion as well as 30-day and 1-year outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 32 (2.1%) of 1775 patients undergoing TAVI required immediate conversion to sternotomy. Annular rupture (5 of 32; 16%), device embolization (9 of 32; 28%) and pericardial tamponade (15 of 32; 47%) were the most common reasons for conversion. Usage of a self-expandable valve showed to be the only predictor for conversion (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.90; P = 0.03). Survival at 30 days and 1 year was 56% and 41%, respectively. Patients who survived 30 days after conversion showed higher preoperative ejection fraction, shorter duration of surgery and shorter perfusion time. CONCLUSIONS: In this high-volume, single-centre experience, conversion to sternotomy during TAVI occurred in about 2%, with annular rupture, device embolization and pericardial tamponade being the most common causes. Complications requiring conversion showed to be unpredictable. However, in view of these life-threatening complications, the 30-day survival rate exceeding 50% emphasizes the importance of an experienced and well-attuned heart team providing immediate access to surgical bailout procedures.

One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.

OBJECTIVES: A new class of rapid-deployment aortic valves has emerged with the potential to simplify minimally invasive aortic surgery and reduce crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. We report the 1-year clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, Calif) in the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial. METHODS: Seventeen surgeons from 6 European centers treated 152 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis requiring valve replacement in a prospective, single-arm trial. A stented trileaflet bovine pericardial bioprosthesis with a balloon-expandable, cloth-covered stent frame at the inflow aspect was implanted in 146 patients (mean age, 75.5 ± 6.7 years; 52.7% were female). Five valve sizes were evaluated (19-27 mm); 58.9% of cases had isolated aortic valve replacement, and 41.1% of cases involved concomitant procedures. Minimally invasive surgical approaches occurred in 48.8% of the isolated aortic valve replacements. Patients were followed at discharge, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Implantation success was 96.1% (146/152), early valve-related mortality was 1.4% (2/146), and cumulative survival was 92.5% at a mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 5.1 months. Crossclamp time for isolated aortic valve replacement was 41.1 ± 10.6 minutes. Independent core laboratory-adjudicated mean effective orifice area and aortic valve pressure gradient were 1.7 ± 0.2 cm(2) and 8.8 ± 3.0 mm Hg at 3 months, and 1.7 ± 0.2 cm(2) and 8.4 ± 3.4 mm Hg at 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System is feasible, safe, and efficacious for aortic valve replacement. Aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were reduced compared with those for conventional aortic valve replacement. Early hemodynamic performance was excellent and remained so up to 1 year.