Comparison of the antifibrotic effects of the pan-histone deacetylase-inhibitor panobinostat versus the IPF-drug pirfenidone in fibroblasts from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating lung disease with a poor prognosis. Pirfenidone is the first antifibrotic agent to be approved for IPF-treatment as it is able to slow down disease progression. However, there is no curative treatment other than lung transplantation. Because epigenetic alterations are associated with IPF, histone deacetylase (HDAC)-inhibitors have recently been proven to attenuate fibrotic remodeling in vitro and in vivo. This study compared the effects of pirfenidone with the pan-HDAC-inhibitor panobinostat/LBH589, a FDA-approved drug for the treatment of multiple myeloma, head-to-head on survival, fibrotic activity and proliferation of primary IPF-fibroblasts in vitro. METHODS: Primary fibroblasts from six IPF-patients were incubated for 24h with vehicle (0.25% DMSO), panobinostat (LBH589, 85 nM) or pirfenidone (2.7 mM), followed by assessment of proliferation and expression analyses for profibrotic and anti-apoptosis genes, as well as for ER stress and apoptosis-markers. In addition, the expression status of all HDAC enzymes was examined. RESULTS: Treatment of IPF-fibroblasts with panobinostat or pirfenidone resulted in a downregulated expression of various extracellular matrix (ECM)-associated genes, as compared to vehicle-treated cells. In agreement, both drugs decreased protein level of phosphorylated (p)-STAT3, a transcription factor mediating profibrotic responses, in treated IPF-fibroblasts. Further, an increase in histone acetylation was observed in response to both treatments, but was much more pronounced and excessive in panobinostat-treated IPF-fibroblasts. Panobinostat, but not pirfenidone, led to a significant suppression of proliferation in IPF-fibroblasts, as indicated by WST1- and BrdU assay and markedly diminished levels of cyclin-D1 and p-histone H3. Furthermore, panobinostat-treatment enhanced α-tubulin-acetylation, decreased the expression of survival-related genes Bcl-XL and BIRC5/survivin, and was associated with induction of ER stress and apoptosis in IPF-fibroblasts. In contrast, pirfenidone-treatment maintained Bcl-XL expression, and was neither associated with ER stress-induction nor any apoptotic signaling. Pirfenidone also led to increased expression of HDAC6 and sirtuin-2, and enhanced α-tubulin-deacetylation. But in line with its ability to increase histone acetylation, pirfenidone reduced the expression of HDAC enzymes HDAC1, -2 and -9. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, beside other antifibrotic mechanisms, pirfenidone reduces profibrotic signaling also through STAT3 inactivation and weak epigenetic alterations in IPF-fibroblasts, and permits survival of (altered) fibroblasts. The pan-HDAC-inhibitor panobinostat reduces profibrotic phenotypes while inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in IPF-fibroblasts, thus indicating more efficiency than pirfenidone in inactivating IPF-fibroblasts. We therefore believe that HDAC-inhibitors such as panobinostat can present a novel therapeutic strategy for IPF.

Aberrant expression and activity of histone deacetylases in sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Activation and differentiation of fibroblasts into contractile protein-expressing myofibroblasts and their acquired apoptosis-resistant phenotype are critical factors towards the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a fatal disease characterised by distorted pulmonary structure and excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. The molecular mechanisms underlying these processes in IPF remain incompletely understood. We investigated the possible implication of aberrant overexpression and activity of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in IPF. METHODS: We analysed lung tissues from patients with sporadic IPF (n=26) and non-diseased control lungs (n=16) for expression of class I and II HDACs. Primary IPF fibroblasts were treated with HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) LBH589 or valproic acid (VPA). RESULTS: Compared to control lungs, protein levels of class I (HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC8) and class II HDACs (HDAC4, HDAC 5, HDAC 7, HDAC 9) were significantly elevated in IPF lungs. Using immunohistochemistry, strong induction of nearly all HDAC enzymes was observed in myofibroblasts of fibroblast foci and in abnormal bronchiolar basal cells at sites of aberrant re-epithelialisation in IPF lungs, but not in controls. Treatment of primary IPF fibroblasts with the pan-HDACi LBH589 resulted in significantly reduced expression of genes associated with ECM synthesis, proliferation and cell survival, as well as in suppression of HDAC7, and was paralleled by induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis. The profibrotic and apoptosis-resistant phenotype of IPF fibroblasts was also partly attenuated by the class I HDACi VPA. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant overexpression of HDACs in basal cells of IPF lungs may contribute to the bronchiolisation process in this disease. Similarly, generation and apoptosis resistance of IPF fibroblasts are mediated by enhanced activity of HDAC enzymes. Therefore, pan-HDAC inhibition by LBH589 may present a novel therapeutic option for patients with IPF.