Trends in Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Publications.

Background: Scientific publication and original articles remain the primary method of sharing scientific findings and advancing the knowledge base of that subject. Despite the value of these publications, little research has surveyed what topics are being published. This study aims to identify and characterize the most common topics in current foot and ankle literature. Methods: We reviewed all 1514 published articles in a 5.5-year period (January 2014-June 2019) in 2 foot and ankle-specific journals: Foot & Ankle International (FAI) and Foot and Ankle Surgery (FAS). The articles were sorted into different topic domains to identify the 3 most common categories of publication. The top 3 domains were further characterized by level of evidence (LOE) as well as citations. Results: The 3 most published topics in foot and ankle literature were hallux valgus (8.3%), total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) (8.3%), and ankle fracture (6.6%). These 3 subjects accounted for 351 articles (23.2%). Other common topics were patient-reported outcomes (5.0%), osteochondritis dissecans (3.9%), syndesmotic injury (3.8%), ankle instability (3.7%), hallux rigidus (3.0%), and anatomy (2.8%). The average LOE for articles on hallux valgus, TAA, and ankle fracture was 3.27 from FAI, and the average number of annual citations for a given article in both journals was 3.05. Based on our study, there is no correlation between LOE and number of overall citations, but there is a significant, negative linear correlation in ankle fracture data. We also found that articles on TAA had the highest impact factor and that articles from FAI were cited more often than articles from FAS. Conclusion: The 3 most published topics in foot and ankle literature comprise only 23.2% of all articles. This finding is indicative of the wide variety of cases performed by orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons. High-quality data are still needed in all topics. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

A Single Sugar-Tong Splint Can Maintain Pediatric Forearm Fractures.

Displaced pediatric forearm fractures often are treated with closed reduction and immobilization. Recent literature demonstrates no difference in maintaining alignment or needing repeat intervention in patients immobilized with either a single sugar-tong splint or a long-arm cast, but most series include patients with distal fractures. This study included patients 3 to 15 years old who underwent closed reduction and immobilization for displaced midshaft or proximal forearm fractures. Radiographs from the time of injury, after reduction, and at 4-week follow-up were reviewed for coronal and sagittal plane angular alignment. Secondary interventions also were recorded. A total of 121 patients (70 long-arm cast, 51 simple sugar-tong splint) met inclusion criteria. Groups were matched in terms of age (P=.95), sex (P=.41), body mass index (P=.12), and angular deformity prior to reduction in the sagittal (P=.78) and coronal (P=.83) planes. Following closed reduction, sagittal (P=.003) and coronal (P=.002) alignment improved significantly in all patients. At 4-week follow-up, there were no significant differences in sagittal (P=.15) or coronal (P=.68) alignment between the 2 groups. Nine patients underwent a secondary intervention after the index reduction (long-arm cast, n=7; simple sugar-tong splint, n=2), with no statistically significant difference between groups (P=.30). There were no statistically significant differences between patients managed with long-arm cast or simple sugar-tong splint regarding residual sagittal or coronal plane deformity at 4-week follow-up or incidence of secondary intervention. These findings indicate simple sugar-tong splint and long-arm cast appear to be acceptable and equivalent methods of immobilization for these injuries. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e178-e182.].

Clinical and radiographic comparison of single-sugar-tong splint to long-arm cast immobilization for pediatric forearm fractures.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single-sugar-tong splint (SSTS) to a long-arm cast (LAC) in maintaining reduction of pediatric forearm fractures, while avoiding secondary intervention. One hundred patients age 3-15 with a forearm fracture requiring a reduction and immobilization were evaluated (50 LAC and 50 SSTS). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed at injury, postreduction, and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postinjury. Sagittal and coronal angular deformities were recorded. Any secondary intervention due to loss of reduction was documented. The groups were matched by age (P = 0.19), sex (P = 0.26), mechanism of injury (P = 0.66), average injury sagittal deformity (LAC 27.4°, SSTS 25.4°; P = 0.50), and average injury coronal deformity (LAC 15.5°, SSTS 16°; P = 0.80) At 4 weeks postinjury follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between use of an SSTS or LAC when comparing postimmobilization sagittal alignment (LAC 10.3 ± 7.2, SSTS 8.4 ± 5.1°; P = 0.46), coronal alignment (LAC 6.9 ± 4.6, SSTS 7.6 ± 9.3°; P = 0.46), or need for repeat manipulation or surgery (LAC 4/50, SSTS 3/50; P = 0.70).

A Biomechanical and Clinical Comparison of Midshaft Clavicle Plate Fixation: Are 2 Screws as Good as 3 on Each Side of the Fracture?

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for plating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures has been 6 cortices of purchase on each side of the fracture. The use of locking plates and screws may afford equivalent biomechanical strength with fewer cortices of purchase on each side of the fracture. PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical and clinical performance of 3- versus 2-screw constructs for plating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study/cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Lateral fragments of simulated midshaft fractures in 10 pairs of cadaveric clavicles were randomly assigned to plate fixation with either 3 nonlocking screws or 2 locking screws. Cyclic tensile loads were applied along the long axis of the clavicle. The constructs were then loaded to failure with pullout forces applied parallel to the long axis of the screws. Additionally, clinical outcomes of patients who had midshaft clavicle fractures that were surgically repaired were retrospectively identified and compared; 21 patients were treated with 3-screw constructs and 20 with 2-screw constructs. RESULTS: Biomechanically, there were no significant differences for cyclic displacement, stiffness, yield load, or ultimate load between groups. Forces required for screw pullout were considerably higher than physiologic forces experienced by a healing clavicle in vivo. Clinically, there were no significant differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores; complications; or mean time to union. Additionally, we found that the plates used in the 2-screw group were consistently shorter. CONCLUSION: Plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with 4 cortices of purchase with 2 locking screws demonstrated no significant differences biomechanically when compared with fixation with 6 cortices of purchase and 3 nonlocking screws. Clinically, there were no significant differences in outcomes or complications seen in patients receiving 2- or 3-screw constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical benefits of using the 3-screw construct for plate fixation include decreased surgical exposure, morbidity, and cost, and the use of shorter and noncontoured straight plates eliminates the extra time and technical difficulty associated with matching longer contoured plates to the complex morphology of the clavicle.