GEC-ESTRO survey of 106Ru eye applicator practice for ocular melanoma - Physicist survey.

AIM: 106Ru eye plaque brachytherapy (BT, interventional radiotherapy) is an eye-preserving treatment for uveal melanoma performed in about 100 clinics worldwide. Despite this relatively low number, there is a considerable variation in clinical practice. In 2022, the BRAPHYQS and Head & Neck and Skin GEC-ESTRO working groups conducted a survey to map the current clinical practice. The survey consisted of a physicist and a physician part. This paper describes the physicist results. However, three physician questions with overlapping interest are included here as well. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey questions pertained to commissioning and quality control (QC) of the plaques, treatment planning, radiobiological correction, as well as more general questions on practice improvement. The questions overlapping with the physician survey were related to dose prescription and margins. RESULTS: Sixty-five physicist responses were included. A majority of the centres do not perform an independent measurement of the absorbed dose at reference depth, percentage depth dose (PDD) and off-axis data. A lack of calibration services and suitable equipment are the main reasons. About one third of the centres indicated that they do image based treatment planning. The use of margins and dose prescription showed a large variability, despite the availability of guidelines [1]. Many respondents expressed a strong wish for improvement in a wide range of aspects of clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The physics survey showed a wide variability regarding quality control of the 106Ru sources and treatment planning practice.

Assessment of the novel online delineation workshop dummy run approach using FALCON within a European multicentre trial in cervical cancer (RAIDs).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Online delineation workshops (ODW) permit training of geographically dispersed participants. The purpose is to evaluate the methodology of an ODW using FALCON to harmonize delineation within a European multicentre trial on locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two ODW included 46 clinicians (14 centres). Clinicians completed baseline (C1), guideline (C2) and final contours (C3) for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) for LACC. Interobserver and intraobserver variability was evaluated quantitatively (using the DICE index) and qualitatively compared to expert contours. RESULTS: Nine clinicians submitted for EBRT and BT for C1-C3. Thirty-two sent any contour. Interobserver quantitative comparisons for EBRT showed significant improvement for C2 vs. C1 for bowel, CTV node, CTV-p and GTV node with significant detriment for GTV node (C3 vs. C1; C2), CTV-p (C3 vs. C2) and bowel (C3 vs. C2), showing in general an improvement in C2 vs. C1, with a detriment in C3 vs. C2 for two target volumes and an organ at risk. For BT there was significant improvement for C2 vs. C1 for bladder, GTV, HR-CTV and IR-CTV, with significant detriment for bladder (C3 vs. C2), thus overall improvement in C2 vs. C1, with only a detriment in C3 vs. C2 for bladder. Centres using MRI imaging for BT contouring did significantly better in the BT case for HR-CTV than those which used other techniques (C2 vs. C1: p<0.005; C3 vs. C1: p=0.02). Intraobserver quantitative comparisons showed significant improvement contouring a region of interest between C2 vs. C1, C3 vs. C1 and C3 vs. C2 for EBRT and between C2 and C1 for BT. CONCLUSIONS: ODW offer training, initial contouring harmonization and allow assessment of centres.

Pulsed-dose rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in cervical cancer: Dose-volume effect relationships for the rectum and bladder.

PURPOSE: To establish dose-volume effect correlations for late bladder and rectum side effects in patients treated for locally advanced cervical cancer with concomitant chemoradiation followed by pulsed-dose rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dosimetric data, converted in 2 Gy equivalent, from 217 patients were confronted to late morbidity defined as any event lasting or occurring 90 days after treatment initiation. Toxicity was assessed using the CTC-AE 3.0. Probit analyses and Log rank tests were performed to assess relationships. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one urinary and 58 rectal events were reported, affecting 98 (45.1%) and 51 (23.5%) patients, respectively. Cumulative incidences for grade 2-4 bladder and rectal morbidity were 24.3% and 9.6% at 3 years, respectively. Significant relationships were observed between grade 2-4 and 3-4 events and D0.1cm(3) and D2 cm(3) for the bladder and between grade 1-4 and 2-4 event probability and rectal D2 cm(3). The effective doses for 10% grade 2-4 morbidity were 65.3 Gy (59.8-81.3), and 55.4 Gy (15.7-63.6), respectively, for the rectum and bladder. Without considering urinary and rectal incontinence, for which the pertinence of correlating them with D2 cm(3) is questionable, ED10 were 68.5 Gy (62.9-110.6) and 65.5 Gy (51.4-71.6 Gy). When sorting patients according to D2 cm(3) levels, patients with high D2 cm(3) had significantly lower morbidity free survival rates for grade 1-4 and 2-4 urinary and rectal morbidity. CONCLUSION: Significant dose-volume effect relationships were demonstrated between the modern dosimetric parameters and the occurrence of late rectal and urinary morbidity in patients treated with pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy. Further studies are required to refine these relationships according to clinical cofactors, such as comorbidities.

[Impact of radiotherapy on female fertility]. / Impact de la radiothérapie sur la fertilité féminine.

Radiation therapy may have deleterious effects on female fertility. It can cause ovarian dysfunction, uterine damages or disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. These effects occur at varying dose levels usually relatively low compared to the prescribed doses. Other co-factors influence the effects of radiation therapy on fertility, such as age or therapy with alkylating agents. This review aims to make an update on the current state of knowledge about the impact of radiotherapy on female fertility.