Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Intern Med ; 184(3): 281-290, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285565

RESUMO

Importance: Use of low-value care is common among older adults. It is unclear how to best engage clinicians and older patients to decrease use of low-value services. Objective: To test whether the Committing to Choose Wisely behavioral economic intervention could engage primary care clinicians and older patients to reduce low-value care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial conducted at 8 primary care clinics of an academic health system and a private group practice between December 12, 2017, and September 4, 2019. Participants were primary care clinicians and older adult patients who had diabetes, insomnia, or anxiety or were eligible for prostate cancer screening. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to November 2023. Intervention: Clinicians were invited to commit in writing to Choosing Wisely recommendations for older patients to avoid use of hypoglycemic medications to achieve tight glycemic control, sedative-hypnotic medications for insomnia or anxiety, and prostate-specific antigen tests to screen for prostate cancer. Committed clinicians had their photographs displayed on clinic posters and received weekly emails with alternatives to these low-value services. Educational handouts were mailed to applicable patients before scheduled visits and available at the point of care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-months with a low-value service across conditions (primary outcome) and separately for each condition (secondary outcomes). For patients with diabetes, or insomnia or anxiety, secondary outcomes were patient-months in which targeted medications were decreased or stopped (ie, deintensified). Results: The study included 81 primary care clinicians and 8030 older adult patients (mean [SD] age, 75.1 [7.2] years; 4076 men [50.8%] and 3954 women [49.2%]). Across conditions, a low-value service was used in 7627 of the 37 116 control patient-months (20.5%) and 7416 of the 46 381 intervention patient-months (16.0%) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97). For each individual condition, there were no significant differences between the control and intervention periods in the odds of patient-months with a low-value service. The intervention increased the odds of deintensification of hypoglycemic medications for diabetes (adjusted odds ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.06-3.24) but not sedative-hypnotic medications for insomnia or anxiety. Conclusions and Relevance: In this stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial, the Committing to Choose Wisely behavioral economic intervention reduced low-value care across 3 common clinical situations and increased deintensification of hypoglycemic medications for diabetes. Use of scalable interventions that nudge patients and clinicians to achieve greater value while preserving autonomy in decision-making should be explored more broadly. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03411525.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Neoplasias da Próstata , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Economia Comportamental , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Cuidados de Baixo Valor , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico
2.
Kidney Med ; 5(2): 100580, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36712314

RESUMO

Rationale & Objective: Compared to the original nursing home status (any nursing home stay in the previous calendar year), new nursing home status variables were developed to improve the risk adjustment of Standardized Mortality/Hospitalization Ratio (SMR/SHR) models used in public reporting of dialysis quality of care, such as the Annual Dialysis Facility Report. Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting & Participants: 625,040 US maintenance dialysis patients with >90 kidney failure days in 2019. Predictors: Nursing home status variables; patient characteristics; comorbid conditions. Outcomes: Mortality/hospitalization. Analytical Approach: We assigned patients and patient times (SMR/SHR model) to one of 3 mutually exclusive categories: long-term care (≥90 days), short-term care (1-89 days), or non-nursing home, based on nursing home stay during the previous 365 days from the first day of the time period at risk. Nursing home status was derived from the Nursing Home Minimum Data Set. Comparisons of hazard ratios from adjusted models, facility SMR/SHR performance, and model C-statistics between the original/new models were performed. Results: SMR's hazard ratio of original nursing home status (2.09) was lower than both ratios of short-term care (2.38) and long-term care (2.43), whereas SHR's hazard ratio of original nursing home status (1.10) was between the ratios of long-term care (1.01) and short-term care (1.20). There was a difference in hazard ratios between short-term care and long-term care for both measures. Small percentages of facilities changed performance categories: 0.7% for SMR and 0.4% for SHR. The SMR C-statistic improved whereas the SHR C-statistic was relatively unchanged. Limitations: Limited capture of subacute rehabilitation stays in the nursing home by using a 90-day cutoff for short-term care and long-term care; unable to draw causal inference about nursing home care. Conclusions: Use of a nursing home metric that effectively separates short-term from long-term nursing home utilization results in more meaningful risk adjustment that generally comports with Medicare payment policy, potentially resulting in more interpretable results for dialysis stakeholders.

3.
Kidney360 ; 3(6): 1047-1056, 2022 06 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35845326

RESUMO

Background: Recent investigations have shown that, on average, patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a poorer postdischarge prognosis than those hospitalized without COVID-19, but this effect remains unclear among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who are on dialysis. Methods: Leveraging a national ESKD patient claims database administered by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, we conducted a retrospective cohort study that characterized the effects of in-hospital COVID-19 on all-cause unplanned readmission and death within 30 days of discharge for patients on dialysis. Included in this study were 436,745 live acute-care hospital discharges of 222,154 Medicare beneficiaries on dialysis from 7871 Medicare-certified dialysis facilities between January 1 and October 31, 2020. Adjusting for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and prevalent comorbidities, we fit facility-stratified Cox cause-specific hazard models with two interval-specific (1-7 and 8-30 days after hospital discharge) effects of in-hospital COVID-19 and effects of prehospitalization COVID-19. Results: The hazard ratios due to in-hospital COVID-19 over the first 7 days after discharge were 95% CI, 1.53 to 1.65 for readmission and 95% CI, 1.38 to 1.70 for death, both with P<0.001. For the remaining 23 days, the hazard ratios were 95% CI, 0.89 to 0.96 and 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.07, with P<0.001 and P=0.50, respectively. Effects of prehospitalization COVID-19 were mostly nonsignificant. Conclusions: In-hospital COVID-19 had an adverse effect on both postdischarge readmission and death over the first week. With the surviving patients having COVID-19 substantially selected from those hospitalized, in-hospital COVID-19 was associated with lower rates of readmission and death starting from the second week.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Falência Renal Crônica , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Medicare , Alta do Paciente , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 35(7): 1036.e1-1036.e2, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28189379

RESUMO

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare cutaneous eruption characterized by the appearance of diffuse, sterile pustules on an erythematous and edematous base. Most cases are attributed to drug reactions, with antibiotics being the most common offending agents. Only a handful of case reports have described AGEP in the setting of antiepileptic use. Here, we report a case of AGEP secondary to dual antiepileptic therapy with levetiracetam and valproic acid in a 73-year-old female. The patient presented to the emergency department with the characteristic AGEP rash, fever, and leukocytosis. Upon discontinuation of the two medications and conservative management, the patient's symptoms quickly abated, and she was discharged from the hospital several days later.


Assuntos
Pustulose Exantematosa Aguda Generalizada/diagnóstico , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Ácido Valproico/efeitos adversos , Pustulose Exantematosa Aguda Generalizada/patologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Levetiracetam , Piracetam/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA