Antibody response to lipopolysaccharides and recombinant proteins of Shiga toxin (STX)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in children with haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Poland.

Typical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (STEC-HUS), caused by Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), is a serious, life-threating disease that mainly affects children. Bacteriological and genetic tests are commonly used in the routine laboratory diagnosis of STEC-HUS; however, serological methods have emerged as useful and reliable diagnostic tools, especially when bacterial isolation fails. In this study, we present the results of the serological investigation of 72 paediatric patients suspected for HUS, hospitalized during 2011-2019 at the Department of Pediatrics and Nephrology of Children's Hospitals in Poland. During the routine laboratory investigation STEC strains were isolated only from nine stool samples. However, serological investigations confirmed 45 cases of STEC infections in children with HUS. In this study, 22 (48·9%) paediatric patients were infected by E. coli serotype O26, 11 (24·4%) by serotype O145, 9 (20·0%) by serotype O157, and 3 (6·7%) by E. coli serotype O111. In the majority of these patients, in addition to a high level of IgA, IgG and IgM antibodies to lipopolysaccharide of particular E. coli serotypes, antibodies to recombinant proteins Tir, Stx2b and intimin were detected. Our results confirm that serological tests are useful in the diagnosis of STEC-HUS. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study showed that serological analysis greatly complements bacterial isolation and helps in the diagnosis and confirmation of Shiga toxin (verotoxin)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections. Serological tests can be performed to qualify the patient for the typical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (STEC-HUS). In Poland, STEC-HUS in children is mostly caused by the E. coli serotype O26, which indicates that there is an increasing number of non-O157 STEC infections associated with human diseases in Europe.

Comparison of seven commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of anti-diphtheria toxin antibodies.

Determination of immune status of patients to diphtheria toxin is based mainly on the results of commercially available ELISA kits. The aim of the present study was to compare the results obtained by ELISAs from seven different manufacturers: Mikrogen, Immunolab, Sekisui Virotech, NovaTec, Virion\Serion, IBL International and Euroimmun. All assays were performed according to the manufacturers' instructions. The concentrations of the anti-diphtheria toxin antibodies in 72 serum samples were calculated on the basis of curves constructed from standards supplied by manufacturers and the new reference material-International Standard for Diphtheria Antitoxin (10/262). The repeatability and reproducibility of all the ELISA kits tested were good. Number of sera with concentrations of the anti-diphtheria toxin antibodies below the WHO-recommended level of protection (0.1 IU/ml) were dependent on the ELISA used: Mikrogen, 20/72 samples (27.7%); Immunolab, 11/72 samples (15.3%); Sekisui Virotech, 0/72 samples (0%); NovaTec 18/72 samples (25.0%); Serion 12/72 samples (16.7%); IBL International, 7/72 samples (9.7 %); and Euroimmun, 17/72 samples (23.6%). However, the results obtained in particular ELISAs, with the exception of Sekisui Virotech, were much more consistent when the concentrations of the anti-diphtheria toxin antibodies in 72 sera measured by using curves constructed from the International Standard 10/262. The data obtained clearly demonstrated that manufacturer-dependent differences between anti-diphtheria IgG ELISA kits exist. The differences in recommendations accepted by the individual manufacturers together with differences shown in our studies in sensitivity greatly affect the clinical interpretation of results.