Determination and Management of Risks for Practices and Procedures in the Elderly (DRIPP): the impact of a comprehensive geriatric evaluation in elderly with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment in older patients is challenging. The Determination and Management of Risks for Practices and Procedures in the Elderly (DRIPP) is a multidimensional evaluation program that involves patients undergoing oncological treatments. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients evaluated and those not evaluated by the DRIPP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study, patients > 65 years with DLBCL were included. They were divided into 3 groups: patients with a diagnosis prior to the DRIPP implementation (pre-DRIPP), patients with the DRIPP (DRIPP) and patients with a diagnosis after the DRIPP implementation, but who did not undergo the evaluation (non-DRIPP). RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were analyzed. Fourteen (11%) patients in the pre-DRIPP group, 74 (59%) in the DRIPP group, and 37 (30%) in the non-DRIPP group. In 43 (58%) patients of the DRIPP group, some drug dose adjustments were made vs. 19 (15%) in the non-DRIPP (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in terms of discontinuation of treatment or hematological toxicity between groups. The OS and PFS in one year was 64% (95%CI 34-83) and 50% (95%CI 23-72) for the pre-DRIPP group, 82% (95%CI 71-89) and 72% (95%CI 60-81) for the DRIPP group, 58% (95% CI 41-72) and 56% (95% CI 38-70) for the non-DRIPP group, (p = 0.08). The analysis was adjusted for probable confounders and no differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the DRIPP as a decision-making tool in patients with lymphoma and showed a trend towards improvement in the OS in evaluated patients.

¿Qué se debería evaluar frente al paciente adulto mayor con cáncer? / What should we evaluate in an older adult with cancer?

En la medida en que el crecimiento poblacional continúe en aumento, la cantidad de adultos mayores que sufran patología oncológica será cada vez mayor. Esta población, por su heterogeneidad y su comorbilidad diferente de la del adulto joven, requiere un manejo más específico e individualizado. La realización de una valoración geriátrica integral y el trabajo multidisciplinario, colaborarán en la toma de decisiones con el fin de priorizar la calidad de vida de cada paciente en particular y optimizar el manejo de los pacientes vulnerables. (AU)

As the population grows, there will be more cancer diagnoses in the elderly population. This group, due to its heterogeneity and comorbidities different from those of young adults, requires a specific and individualized assessment. The geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary work, together, would help in decision-making in order to prioritize the quality of life of each patient and optimize management of the vulnerable patients.Key words: elderly, geriatric assessment, frailty, cancer, sarcopenia, abilities of daily living. (AU)

Predictors of adherence and persistence to disease-modifying therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In multiple sclerosis (MS), non-adherence/non-persistence is related to suboptimal response to treatment, including disease relapses and the need for more expensive healthcare. The aim of this study was to identify predictors related to adherence to disease modifying therapies (DMTs) in a cohort of Argentinian MS patients. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at the National Medical Care Program from Argentina. MS patients with at least one claim for a DMT from 1 January 2017 to 1 October 2017 were identified. A telephone survey was performed to assess clinical and demographic factors. The medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to estimate adherence; MPR <80% defined non-adherence. Associations were studied using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Our database included 648 MS patients. A total of 360 patients (60% females, mean age 55.3 years) accepted to participate. Of these, 308 (85.5%) patients were receiving DMT at the time of the survey. Some 198 (63.7%) were receiving injectable therapies. Optimal adherence was 47.7%. Adherence was associated with oral medication [odds ratio (OR) 1.83 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-3.00, p = 0.014]. A factor related to oral drugs was higher educational level (OR 2.86 95%CI 1.41-5.81, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This real-world study showed better adherence and persistence on treatment with oral therapies in MS patients in Argentina.

[Adherence to treatment of multiple sclerosis in a health care program]. / Adherencia al tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple en un programa de atención médica.

Adherence to prescribed treatment in chronic diseases, as occurs in multiple sclerosis (MS), is a critical factor for a successful therapeutic response. The objective of this study was to evalua te the association between demographic variables and adherence to treatment of the population of MS patients in Argentina. A retrospective cohort study of MS patients who received treatment with disease-modifying drugs, included in the drug dispensing database of the National Care Medical Program: PAMI (Programa Asistencia Médica Integral), was conducted. Optimal adherence was defined as an acquisition of the drug greater than 80% during a 9-month follow-up. A total of 648 patients were included, mean age 55 years (IQR 46-64), 59.4% women. The mean adherence to treatment was 67% (IQR 44-89) and optimal adherence was documented only in 35.5% of cases. Adherence to injectable medications was 10% lower than that of oral drugs (p = 0.0001) and the use of original brands was associated with 7.4% greater adherence than with generic drugs (p = 0.001). In conclusion, adherence to treatment has been suboptimal. In the Patagonian region, the use of injectables and generic drugs was associated with lower adherence to therapy. These data are very important in order to planning socio-sanitary programs that aim to increase therapeutic adherence.

La adherencia al tratamiento prescrito en enfermedades crónicas, como ocurre en la esclerosis múltiple (EM), es un factor crítico para una respuesta terapéutica exitosa. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la asociación entre las variables demográficas y la adherencia al tratamiento en una población de pacientes con EM en Argentina. Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de pacientes con EM que recibieron tratamiento con medicamentos modificadores de la enfermedad, incluidos en la base de datos de dispensación de medicamentos del Programa Nacional de Atención Médica: PAMI (Programa Asistencia Médica Integral). La adherencia óptima se definió como una adquisición del fármaco superior al 80% durante un seguimiento de 9 meses. Se incluyó un total de 648 pacientes, edad media 55 años (RIC 46-64), 59.4% mujeres. La adherencia media al tratamiento fue del 67% (RIC 44-89) y la adherencia óptima se documentó solo en el 35.5% de los casos. La adherencia a los medicamentos inyectables fue 10% menor que la de los medicamentos orales (p = 0.0001) y el uso de marcas originales se asoció con una adherencia 7.4% mayor que los medicamentos genéricos (p = 0.001). En conclusión, la adherencia al tratamiento ha sido subóptima. En la región patagónica, el uso de inyectables y de medicamentos genéricos se asoció con una menor adherencia terapéutica. Estos datos son muy importantes para planificar programas socio-sanitarios que tengan como objetivo aumentar la adherencia terapéutica.

Adherencia al tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple en un programa de atención médica / Adherence to treatment of multiple sclerosis in a health care program

Resumen La adherencia al tratamiento prescrito en enfermedades crónicas, como ocurre en la esclerosis múltiple (EM), es un factor crítico para una respuesta terapéutica exitosa. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la asociación entre las variables demográficas y la adherencia al tratamiento en una población de pacientes con EM en Argentina. Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de pacientes con EM que recibieron tratamiento con medicamentos modificadores de la enfermedad, incluidos en la base de datos de dispensación de medicamentos del Programa Nacional de Atención Médica: PAMI (Programa Asistencia Médica Integral). La adherencia óptima se definió como una adquisición del fármaco superior al 80% durante un seguimiento de 9 meses. Se incluyó un total de 648 pacientes, edad media 55 años (RIC 46-64), 59.4% mujeres. La adherencia media al tratamiento fue del 67% (RIC 44-89) y la adherencia óptima se documentó solo en el 35.5% de los casos. La adherencia a los medicamentos inyectables fue 10% menor que la de los medicamentos orales (p = 0.0001) y el uso de marcas originales se asoció con una adherencia 7.4% mayor que los medicamentos genéricos (p = 0.001). En conclusión, la adherencia al tratamiento ha sido subóptima. En la región patagónica, el uso de inyectables y de medicamentos genéricos se asoció con una menor adherencia terapéutica. Estos datos son muy importantes para planificar programas socio-sanitarios que tengan como objetivo aumentar la adherencia terapéutica.

Abstract Adherence to prescribed treatment in chronic diseases, as occurs in multiple sclerosis (MS), is a critical factor for a successful therapeutic response. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between demographic variables and adherence to treatment of the population of MS patients in Argentina. A retrospective cohort study of MS patients who received treatment with disease-modifying drugs, included in the drug dispensing database of the National Care Medical Program: PAMI (Programa Asistencia Médica Integral), was conducted. Optimal adherence was defined as an acquisition of the drug greater than 80% during a 9-month follow-up. A total of 648 patients were included, mean age 55 years (IQR 46-64), 59.4% women. The mean adherence to treatment was 67% (IQR 44-89) and optimal adherence was documented only in 35.5% of cases. Adherence to injectable medications was 10% lower than that of oral drugs (p = 0.0001) and the use of original brands was associated with 7.4% greater adherence than with generic drugs (p = 0.001). In conclusion, adherence to treatment has been suboptimal. In the Patagonian region, the use of injectables and generic drugs was associated with lower adherence to therapy. These data are very important in order to planning socio-sanitary programs that aim to increase therapeutic adherence.

Sarcopenia index as a predictor of clinical outcomes in older patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is a prevalent condition in elderly patients and has been associated with adverse outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The present study aimed to determine the predictive value of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio, that is, "Sarcopenia Index" (SI) as a surrogate marker of sarcopenia, and investigate its association with clinical outcomes after TAVR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing TAVR between January, 2016 and December, 2018 at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Patients were excluded if <65-years old, presented previous surgical aortic valve replacement, severe chronic kidney disease, or hemodialysis requirement. The SI was obtained at baseline before TAVR. All-cause mortality and/or readmissions for congestive heart failure (CHF) were defined as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: In total 100 patients met inclusion criteria for the purpose of the study. Sarcopenia Index was significantly correlated with Timed Up and Go (r = -0.272, p = .010) and Gait Speed (r = -0.278, p = .005). During follow-up, 5/100 patients died within 30 days and a total of 10/100 patients died at 1-year follow-up. Moreover, survival curves were significantly worse (Log-rank test = p = .02) and CHF readmissions were more prevalent in the lowest SI tertile (Log-rank test = p = .01). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, we identified low SI (cutoff ≤66) as an independent predictor of long-term adverse outcomes (HR = 4.01, 95% CI = 1.31-12.27, p = .015) at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia Index, surrogate for the degree of skeletal muscle mass (SMM), could be used as a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR.

Additive prognostic value of carbohydrate antigen-125 over frailty in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the additive prognostic value of myocardial, inflammatory, and renal biomarkers according to frailty status in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: A total of 111 subjects who underwent TAVR at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina between January 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Plasma levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), C-reactive protein (CRP), cystatin-c (Cys-C) and carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA-125) were assessed prior to TAVR. Frailty status was assessed according to the fried physical frailty phenotype (FPFP). The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause death and/or readmission for worsening congestive heart failure (CHF) within the first year after TAVR. RESULTS: Of the 111 patients included, 48/111 (43%) were considered to be "frail" according to the FPFP. Among biomarkers, we found CA-125 to be strongly associated with the primary endpoint (p = .006). CA-125 ≥ 18.2 U/ml was present in 41% and was associated with a higher rate of the primary endpoint (31% vs. 9%; p = .003). After multivariable adjustment, CA-125 ≥ 18.2 U/ml (hazard ratio [HR] 3.17; p = .024) was the only independent predictor of the primary endpoint. Finally, the inclusion of CA-125 to frailty significantly improved C-index (0.68-0.74; p < .05), and provided a Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) of 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.49, p = .031), largely through reductions in risk estimates among pre-frail and frail patients. CONCLUSIONS: CA-125, a tumor biomarker, outperformed frailty for predicting the primary endpoint within the first year after TAVR.

Utilidad de una Evaluación geriátrica integral dirigida a la determinación de riesgos para prácticas y procedimiento (DRIPP) en el adulto mayor / Performance of a comprehensive geriatric assessment aimed at the determination of risks for practices and procedures (DRIPP) in the elderly

La edad está asociada con un aumento de la prevalencia de múltiples enfermedades y también con un deterioro de la reserva funcional y fisiológica. Los pacientes adultos mayores tienen un riesgo aumentado para el desarrollo de complicaciones frente a cirugías y diversas prácticas oncológicas. Los procesos de toma de decisiones en muchos casos son complejos, y la detección de toda esta comorbilidad geriátrica no está contemplada en muchos de los modelos clásicos para predicción de riesgo. En este artículo se describe una herramienta de evaluación geriátrica integral dirigida a la detección de riesgos para prácticas y procedimientos (DRIPP) en el adulto mayor, que fue desarrollada y se utiliza en el ámbito del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. El objetivo de DRIPP es la detección de factores de riesgo clínicos y geriátricos asociados con malos resultados, a partir del cual se generan recomendaciones específicas de manejo, que aportan mayor información para el buen desarrollo del proceso de consentimiento informado y la toma de decisiones. Su integración transversal y longitudinal con las diferentes disciplinas e instancias para el seguimiento del paciente es una característica esencial que se traduce en ventajas asistenciales y académicas. (AU)

Aging is associated with an increased prevalence of multiple diseases, and also with decline in functional and physiologic reserve. Elderly patients have an increased risk to develop complications after surgeries and various oncological interventions. Decision-making processes are complex in several cases, and detection of all this geriatric comorbidity is not covered by many of the classic models for risk prediction. This article describes a comprehensive geriatric assessment tool for detection of risks for practices and procedures (DRIPP) in the elderly, which was developed and is used in the setting of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. The aim of DRIPP is the systematic detection of clinical and geriatric risk factors associated with poor outcomes, and from which specific management recommendations are generated, as well as provides more information for the proper development of the informed consent and decision making processes. The transverse and longitudinal integration with different disciplines and instances for patient's follow up, are an essential feature, resulting in healthcare and academic advantages. (AU)

[A multidisciplinary program for the treatment and follow up of depression in ambulatory elderly]. / Ensayo pragmático para evaluar la efectividad de un programa de manejo de depresión para pacientes mayores de 65 años en un Plan de Salud.

Depression is a common disorder in the elderly population; with significant elevated rates in terms of morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless it continues to be a subdiagnosticated disease with poor outcomes due to lack in the effectiveness of follow up. We developed collaborative intervention programs for elderly people in primary care at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires designing a randomized controlled trial in the ambulatory setting. Patients were recruited for an initial comprehensive geriatric evaluation, and then randomly assigned to the program intervention (n=18) or usual care (n=19). At 6 months, 55.5% of intervention patients had a 50% or greater reduction in depressive symptoms from baseline compared with 31.5% of those on usual care. Although the reduction of the outcomes of depressive symptoms is not statistically significative, these are preliminary data. We believe there is a trend toward better results with regard to improvements in depressive symptoms in patients in the intervention group, and that this will achieve statistical significance as the number of subjects recruited is increased in the course of the trial.