Ki-67 Proliferation Index Is Associated With Tumor Grade and Survival in Pleural Epithelioid Mesotheliomas.

Pleural epithelioid mesothelioma (PEM) is divided into low and high grades based on nuclear atypia, mitoses, and necrosis in the tumor. Assessing mitoses and nuclear atypia tend to be labor-intensive with limited reproducibility. Ki-67 proliferation index was shown to be a prognostic factor in PEM, but its performance has not been directly correlated with tumor grade or mitotic score. This study evaluated the potential of Ki-67 index as a surrogate of tumor grade. We also compared the predictability of mitoses and Ki-67 index for overall survival (OS). Ninety-six PEM samples from 85 patients were identified from the surgical pathology file during 2000-2021 at our institution, and all glass slides were reviewed by 2 pulmonary pathologists to confirm the diagnosis and assign the tumor grade. Digital image analysis (DIA) was done for Ki-67 index. The agreement on tumor grading between 2 reviewers was moderate (kappa value = 0.47). The correlation between mitotic count (average count by 2 reviewers) and Ki-67 index was 0.65. The areas under the curve for predicting tumor grade by mitotic score and Ki-67 index were 0.84 and 0.74 (reviewer 1) and 0.85 and 0.81 (reviewer 2), respectively. High Ki-67 index and mitoses were significantly associated with poor OS ( P =0.03 and 0.0005, using 30% and 10/2 mm 2 as cutoffs, respectively). In conclusion, Ki-67 index by DIA was associated with tumor grade as well as mitotic count, and its predictability for OS was comparable to that of mitotic score, thus being a potential surrogate for tumor grade.

Examining crossover and postprotocol therapies in first-line immunotherapy trials in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has led to significant improvement in outcomes for patients with nononcogene-driven advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The rate of crossover and receipt of postprotocol ICI in frontline trials for advanced NSCLC has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was used to identify phase 3 studies evaluating the use of immunotherapy or combination chemoimmunotherapy against chemotherapy alone in the frontline management of advanced NSCLC. Data on outcomes, rate of crossover and/or subsequent post-protocol receipt of immunotherapy, and the start dates of these clinical trials were then extracted. RESULTS: Twenty-three frontline trials in nononcogene-driven advanced NSCLC were identified. Six trials with ICI monotherapy/dual ICI therapy and 17 trials evaluating chemotherapy/ICI in first-line advanced NSCLC were included in the analysis. The crossover rate ranged 0% to 54% in ICI monotherapy/dual ICI trials and 0% to 52% in chemotherapy/ICI trials. Nineteen of 23 trials provided information on subsequent postprotocol therapies. Among the trials not allowing crossover, postprotocol ICI was administered to 17% to 45.8% of patients. Information regarding the eventual receipt of ICI therapy was available for 22 of 23 trials. Of 6631 patients, 2507 (37.8%) randomized to the control arm eventually received ICI therapy. CONCLUSION: The rate of crossover and postprotocol ICI use was low in frontline trials for first-line NSCLC incorporating ICI. Given the proven survival overall survival of ICI in a broad population, there is a need to ensure availability of this life-prolonging therapy in future trials, either by crossover treatment or postprotocol administration.

Real-World Outcomes With Lurbinectedin in Second-Line Setting and Beyond for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lurbinectedin has emerged as a potential treatment option for relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). While clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, real-world data are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lurbinectedin in a real-world setting, focusing on its use as a second-line agent and beyond in SCLC patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 90 patients who received lurbinectedin between June 2020 and June 2022 within the Mayo Clinic Health System. Of these, 50 patients received lurbinectedin as a second-line agent, and 14 patients received it as a third-line or later agent. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Lurbinectedin was generally well tolerated in this real-world cohort, with a median OS of 5.1 months in the second-line cohort and 5.6 months in the third-line or later cohort. Median PFS was 2.1 months in the second-line cohort and 3.4 months in the third-line or later cohort. Adverse events were manageable, with the most common being neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths or grade 5 toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: This real-world study provides valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of lurbinectedin in relapsed SCLC. Lurbinectedin demonstrated modest efficacy and a comparable safety profile to that observed in clinical trials. However, outcomes for relapsed SCLC remain suboptimal, particularly for patients with a shorter chemotherapy-free interval and central nervous system metastases.

Surgical Reduction of Spondylolisthesis During Lumbar Fusion: Are Complications Associated With Slip Correction?

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify the rates of complication following surgical treatment for symptomatic degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis and to examine the association between slip reduction and complication rates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is unclear if the degree of spondylolisthesis reduction during lumbar spine fusion in adults influences the rate of surgical complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 1-level and 2-level adult fusion patients with degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis. The degree of reduction and complications were calculated, and complication rates between those with and without reduction were compared. RESULTS: The surgical reduction was improved by 1 Meyerding grade in 56.5% of the 140 patients included in this analysis. Of those patients, 60% had a grade 1 spondylolisthesis. In addition, 62.5% of grade 2 slips had an improvement by 1 grade. Surgical reduction during lumbar fusion did not result in a higher rate of complications compared with in situ fusion. CONCLUSIONS: During 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusion for degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis, a 1-grade reduction of the slip was achieved in 56% of patients in this retrospective case series. Reduction of the spondylolisthesis was not associated with a higher rate of complication when compared with in situ fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Rare Adverse Events with Programmed Death-1 and Programmed Death-1 Ligand Inhibitors: Justification and Rationale for a Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a new class of cancer drug that spawn unusual adverse events that generate unusual and sometimes unexpected adverse events. Despite databases that track such adverse events, there remains a need to also generate systematic reviews to capture side effects from such agents. FINDINGS: We generated a systematic compendium of adverse event reports. Extensively reviewing the published literature of case reports and case series, we relied on the peer process to compile a resource for clinicians of rare adverse events associated with checkpoint inhibitors. We used this compendium as a platform to provide broad-based comments on the role of systematic reviews in gathering such adverse event data. This approach generated 265 types of rare adverse events that had been reported, the most frequent of which were autoimmune type I diabetes (n = 62), pneumonitis (n = 40), myocarditis (n = 39), and colitis (n = 36). More unusual adverse events were also catalogued. Some adverse events that initially seemed unusual turned out to be more frequently reported over time and thus lost their novelty-an important point which provides context for how adverse events should be viewed when new drugs become available. Additionally, in contrast to such resources as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), this systematic review relied on peer-reviewed data-another important point which adds strength to such systematic reviews. This report provides a compendium of rare and usual adverse events, serves as a resource to cancer clinicians, and appears to be justified based on the reported findings.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI)-based chemotherapy after irinotecan -based chemotherapy in patients with pancreas cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nanoliposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) is a preferred second-line treatment for metastatic pancreas cancer. It is unclear, however, whether patients who had received irinotecan derive benefit. METHODS: Medical records of metastatic pancreas cancer patients who had received irinotecan and then Nal-IRI were reviewed. The primary endpoint was overall survival after the initiation of Nal-IRI (an a priori threshold of >4 months defined success); adverse events and quotes from the medical record on decision-making were also recorded. RESULTS: Sixty four patients met eligibility criteria with a median age of 65 years (range: 36, 80 years). The median overall survival from initiation of Nal-IRI was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.3, 5.6 months). An exploratory comparison, based on no cancer progression with irinotecan versus progression, showed improved survival with Nal-IRI in the former group: 6.1 months (95% CI: 5.1, 9.3 months) versus 4.3 months (95% CI: 2.3, 4.8 months); p = 0.0006. Nal-IRI adverse events occurred as expected. Qualitative data illustrate several themes, including "limited treatment options," which appeared to drive the decision to prescribe Nal-IRI. CONCLUSION: Nal-IRI might be considered in pancreas cancer patients who had received irinotecan, particularly in the absence of disease progression with the latter.

Leukocytosis and Tobacco Use: An Observational Study of Asymptomatic Leukocytosis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to characterize the white blood cell differential of tobacco smoking-induced leukocytosis and describe the longitudinal impact of smoking cessation on this peripheral blood abnormality. METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing evaluation by hematologists for persistent leukocytosis were reviewed. Patients in whom leukocytosis was determined to be secondary to tobacco use after exclusion of other causes were identified. Demographic and laboratory data were collected at time of diagnosis. Patients were longitudinally followed and information regarding smoking cessation and follow-up white blood cell values were recorded. RESULTS: Forty patients were determined to have smoking-induced leukocytosis. The median age was 49.5 years (range: 28-75 years), 24 patients were female, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 31.5 kg/m2. The mean white blood cell count was 13.3 × 109/L (range: 9.8-20.9 × 109/L); 39 patients had absolute neutrophilia (98%), 21 had lymphocytosis (53%), 20 had monocytosis (50%), and 19 had basophilia (48%). During follow-up, 11 patients either quit (n = 9) or reduced (n = 2) tobacco use. Reduction in tobacco smoking led to a significant decrease in mean white blood cell count (13.2 × 109/L vs 11.1 × 109/L, P = 0.02). The median time to decrease in white blood cell count following reduction in tobacco use was 8 weeks (range: 2-49 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco-induced leukocytosis was characterized by a mild elevation in total white blood cell count and was most commonly associated with neutrophilia, lymphocytosis, monocytosis, and basophilia. Cessation of smoking led to improvement in leukocytosis. Tobacco history should be elicited from all patients presenting with leukocytosis to limit unnecessary diagnostic testing, and counseling regarding smoking cessation should be offered.

Non-Squamous, Non-Basal Cell Cancers of the Skin: Exploring Associations Between Site of Disease and Depression.

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies report a direct association between diseases of the skin-particularly those on the face-and depression. However, to our knowledge, such associations have not been examined in patients with non-squamous, non-basal call skin cancers. METHODS: The primary goal was to assess whether malignant skin disease-specifically on the face as opposed to other sites-was associated with depression. The medical records of patients with cutaneous cancer (either primary or metastatic but non-squamous, non-basal cell) were reviewed for the relevant data. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five patients were studied. Only 23 patients (14%) had metastases to the face, and 115 (70%) had a readily viewable skin cancer. Twenty-one patients (13%) developed depression after a diagnosis of cutaneous cancer (of note, the rate of missing data for depression was 37%). Only one patient with facial cutaneous cancer manifested depression, yielding an odds ratio for not developing depression (95% confidence interval (CI)) of 4.4 (0.5,35); p = 0.13. Depression appeared to occur more often in women (62% versus 43%), patients with a history of depression (52% versus 6%), and younger patients (median age with and without depression 55 years and 67 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: In contrast to other cutaneous diseases, no association was found between cutaneous cancer to the face and depression. Nonetheless, high rates of missing data underscore the need to focus on depression in patients with cutaneous cancers in the future.