A common tumour in a rare location: a single centre case series of cerebellar glioblastoma.

Although glioblastoma is the commonest primary brain tumour in adults, its location in the cerebellum is extremely rare. We present thirteen cases (3 female, 10 male; median age at presentation 56 [age range 21-77]) of surgically managed, histologically confirmed, primary cerebellar glioblastoma (cGB) over a 17 year period (2005-2022). Pre-operative radiological diagnosis was challenging given cGB rarity, although MRI demonstrated ring enhancement in all cases. Surgical management included posterior fossa craniectomy and debulking in 11 cases and burr hole biopsy in two. CSF diversion was necessary in four cases. No evidence of IDH or ATRX gene mutations was found when tested. Survival ranged from 1 to 22 months after diagnosis (mean 10.9 months). We also seek to understand why glioblastoma is rare in this location and discuss potential reasons for this. We hypothesise that increasing anatomical distance from germinal regions and decreased local endogenous neural stem cell activity (which has been associated with glioblastoma) may explain why glioblastoma is rare in the cerebellum. We hereby seek to add to the limited literature on cGB as this is the largest UK cGB series to date.

Craniectomy with soft tissue reconstruction for locally advanced non-melanoma skin cancer of scalp with calvarial invasion: The Nottingham experience.

INTRODUCTION: Locally advanced non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) involving the periosteum or calvarium poses a clinical challenge for patients who are unfit for immunotherapy due to medical comorbidities and/or frailty. This case series aims to investigate outcomes for patients undergoing craniectomy and soft tissue reconstruction. METHOD: Patients who underwent craniectomy and soft tissue reconstruction for invasive NMSC with calvarium or periosteal invasion between 2016 and 2022 were included. Data, including demographics, operative details, and clinical outcomes, were gathered from Nottingham University Hospitals' digital health record and the histopathology electronic database. RESULT: Eight patients (average age: 78.4 years, 3 females 5 males) with significant comorbidities and varying degrees of periosteal or bone invasion fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Diagnoses included four squamous cell carcinomas, two basal cell carcinomas, and two pleomorphic dermal sarcomas. Five patients had a history of prior incomplete deep margin excision. The median sizes for soft tissue defect, tumor and bone defect size were 51.83 cm2, 34.63 cm2 and 42.25 cm2, respectively. Intraoperative complications included one dural tear. Four patients underwent local flap reconstruction and with split-thickness skin grafting, four patients underwent free flap reconstruction. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to three patients. Complications comprised partial graft loss in two and complete graft loss in one. There was partial flap loss in one case. One patient required subsequent parotidectomy due to regional progression before achieving disease control. All patients achieved lasting locoregional disease control (average follow-up 29.7 months). CONCLUSION: Craniectomy with soft tissue reconstruction proves to be a safe and effective treatment option in advanced NMSC of the scalp in patients unsuitable for immunotherapy due to frailty or medical co-morbidity.

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil is associated with reduction in operative time in surgery for glioblastoma when compared with inhalational anaesthesia with sevoflurane.

BACKGROUND: Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is emerging as a preferred neuroanaesthetic agent compared with inhalational anaesthetic (IA) agents. We asked if TIVA with propofol and remifentanil was associated with shorter operative times compared to IA using sevoflurane in brain tumour surgery under GA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing surgery for glioblastoma (GBM). We assessed choice of GA agent (TIVA or IA) with total time patient was under GA (anaesthetic time), operative time and time taken to recover fully from GA (recovery time). RESULTS: Over a two year period 263 patients underwent surgery under GA for their GBM including 188 craniotomy operations, 63 burr hole biopsy procedures and 12 open biopsy procedures. Of these, 79 operations took place under TIVA and 184 operations under IA. TIVA was associated with significantly reduced mean operative time including time taken to wake up in theatre (104 min with TIVA, 129 min with IA; p = 0.02). TIVA was also associated with trends toward shorter mean recovery time (118 min, versus 135 min with IA; p = 0.08) and shorter mean anaesthetic time (163 min, versus 181 min with IA; p = 0.07). There was no difference between TIVA and IA groups as regards duration of inpatient stay, readmission rates, complications or survival. CONCLUSIONS: TIVA with propofol and remifentanil may reduce anaesthetic, operative and recovery times in patients undergoing surgery for their GBM. These findings may be attributable to favourable effects on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion, as well as rapid recovery from GA. In addition to clinical advantages, there may be financial and logistical benefits.