Comparative Analysis of Laboratory-Scale Immunoglobulin G Purification Methods from Human Serum.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) purification is a critical process for evaluating its role in autoimmune diseases, which are defined by the occurrence of autoantibodies. Affinity chromatography with protein G is widely considered to be the optimal technique for laboratory-scale purification. However, this technique has some limitations, including the exposure of IgG to low pH, which can compromise the quality of the purified IgG. Here, we show that alternative methods for IgG purification are possible while maintaining the quality of IgG. Different techniques for IgG purification from serum were evaluated and compared with protein G-based approaches: Melon Gel, caprylic acid-ammonium sulfate (CAAS) precipitation, anion-exchange chromatography with diethylamino ethyl (DEAE) following ammonium sulfate (AS) precipitation, and AS precipitation alone. The results demonstrated that the purification yield of these techniques surpassed that of protein G. However, differences in the purity of IgG were observed using GeLC-MS/MS. The avidity of purified IgG against selected targets (SARS-CoV-2 and topoisomerase-I) was similar between purified IgG obtained using all techniques and unpurified sera. Our work provides valuable insights for future studies of IgG function by recommending alternative purification methods that offer advantages in terms of yield, time efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and milder pH conditions than protein G.

Perception of aesthetic impairment in patients with systemic sclerosis determined using a semi-quantitative scale and its association with disease characteristics.

Background: Systemic sclerosis is a fibrotic disease. Body image assessments could be key in optimizing care; however, data are scarce. The main objective was to assess the perception of aesthetic impairment using a visual aesthetic evaluation scale in patients with systemic sclerosis compared with healthy subjects. The secondary objectives were to assess associations between the perception of aesthetic impairment and scores on standardized questionnaires for aesthetic impairment as well as clinical, psychological/quality of life, and functional parameters of patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods: This study evaluated and compared the perception of aesthetic impairment in two populations: patients with systemic sclerosis from a referral center at Lille Hospital, France, and healthy controls. Results: This study included 88 patients (69 (78.4%) women) with a median age of 52 years and 88 controls (49 (55.7%) women) with a median age of 45 years. The perception of aesthetic impairment assessed using the aesthetic evaluation scale was poorer in systemic sclerosis patients than in controls (3.7 ± 0.3 vs 2.8 ± 0.3, p = 0.028) and was statistically correlated with assessments using the adapted satisfaction with appearance, a specific aesthetic impact assessment questionnaire for patients with systemic sclerosis. Patients with anxiety or depressive symptoms had significantly higher aesthetic evaluation scale scores. Systemic sclerosis patients with facial involvement and pitting scars had a worse perception of aesthetic impairment. Compared with healthy controls, systemic sclerosis patients had a worse perception of aesthetic impairment, especially systemic sclerosis patients with anxiety or depression and those with facial and hand involvement. Conclusion: The aesthetic evaluation scale appears to be an easy-to-use tool to evaluate body image. Correlations of the aesthetic evaluation scale score with psychological and quality of life parameters reflect the importance of these parameters for body image evaluation and its complex assessment. Trial registration: Clinical Trial NCT03271320 (Registered 9 January 2017, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03271320?term=NCT03271320&cntry=FR&draw=2&rank=1).

Osteoporosis is associated with anti-topoisomerase I positivity and glucocorticoids use in patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are at increased risk for osteoporosis (OP) and associated fragility fractures. This study aimed to identify underlying risk factors for these conditions in patients with SSc. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was based on a large prospective cohort of patients with SSc using retrospectively collected bone health data. OP was defined as the presence of a T-score below -2.5 at the femoral neck or lumbar spine, a previous major osteoporotic fracture, or the prescription of anti-osteoporotic therapy. RESULTS: A total of 485 patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 diagnostic criteria for SSc, followed in the Lille University Hospital, were included in the study. The prevalence of OP was 23%; fragility fractures occurred in 18% of patients. OP was associated with higher age, diffuse cutaneous subset, interstitial lung disease (ILD), anti-topoisomerase I positivity, treatment with glucocorticoids (GC) and DMARDs in univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis indicated that higher age (OR 1.06 [95%CI 1.04-1.08]), anti-topoisomerase I antibody positivity (OR 2.22 [1.18-4.16]) and treatment with GC (OR 4.48 [2.42-8.26]) were significantly and independently associated with OP. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that OP risk in patients with SSc is determined by age, disease-related factors such as diffuse cutaneous subset, ILD and anti-topoisomerase I antibody positivity, but also treatment with GC independently of other factors.

Prevalence of anti-Ro52-kDa/SSA (TRIM21) antibodies and associated clinical phenotype in systemic sclerosis: Data from a French cohort, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Estimate the global prevalence of anti-Ro52-kDa/SSA (TRIM21) autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis (SSc), and describe the associated clinical phenotype, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports and new data from our French cohort. METHODS: Anti-TRIM21 seropositivity and associated SSc characteristics were assessed in a cross-sectional study including 300 patients of Lille University Hospital. A systematic review of the literature was performed in Pubmed and Embase, followed by a meta-analysis, using data on prevalence, clinical/demographical/biological characteristics of SSc patients and the type of assay used for anti-TRIM21 antibodies detection (PROSPERO n° CRD42021223719). FINDINGS: In the cross-sectional study, anti-TRIM21 antibodies prevalence was 26% [95%CI: 21; 31]. Anti-centromere antibodies were the most frequent SSc specific autoantibodies coexisting with anti-TRIM21. Patients with anti-TRIM21 antibodies were more frequently women (91% vs 77%, p = 0.006), more likely to present an associated Sjögren's syndrome (19% vs 7%, p < 0.001), had a higher rate of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (15% vs 6%, p = 0.017) and a greater frequency of digestive complications such as dysphagia (12% vs 5%, p = 0.038) or nausea/vomiting (10% vs 3%, p = 0.009) than anti-TRIM21 negative patients. Thirty-five articles corresponding to a total of 11,751 SSc patients were included in the meta-analysis. In this population, the overall seroprevalence of anti-TRIM21 antibodies was 23% [95%CI: 21; 27] with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2: 93% Phet: <0.0001), partly explained by the methods of detection. Anti-TRIM21 seropositivity was positively associated with female sex (OR: 1.60 [95%CI: 1.25, 2.06]), limited cutaneous subset (OR: 1.29 [1.04, 1.61]), joint manifestations (OR: 1.33 [1.05, 1.68]), pulmonary hypertension (PH) (OR: 1.82 [1.42, 2.33]), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (OR: 1.31 [1.07, 1.60]). INTERPRETATION: Anti-TRIM21 antibodies frequently co-exist with usual SSc antibodies, but are independently associated to a higher risk of cardio-pulmonary complications. The presence of these autoantibodies should therefore be considered when assessing the risk of developing PH and ILD, and deserves further studies on appropriate screening and follow-up of patients.

Pregnancy outcomes in women with primary Sjögren's syndrome: an analysis of data from the multicentre, prospective, GR2 study.

BACKGROUND: Adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with primary Sjögren's syndrome have only been evaluated retrospectively using heterogeneous methods and with contradictory results. We aimed to describe adverse pregnancy, delivery, and birth outcome risks in pregnant women with primary Sjögren's syndrome compared with those of a matched general population in France, and to identify factors predictive of disease flares or adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, prospective, cohort study in France using the GR2 (Groupe de Recherche sur la Grossesse et les Maladies Rares) registry. Women from the GR2 study were eligible if they had conceived before March, 2021, had primary Sjögren's syndrome according to the American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2016 classification criteria, and had an ongoing pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation. In women who entered in the registry with pregnancies before 18 weeks of gestation, we sought to identify factors associated with primary Sjögren's syndrome flare (≥3-point increase in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index [ESSDAI] score) or adverse pregnancy outcomes (fetal or neonatal death, placental insufficiency leading to a preterm delivery [<37 weeks of gestation], or small-for-gestational-age birthweight). A matched controlled study compared adverse pregnancy, delivery, and birth outcome rates between pregnant women with primary Sjögren's syndrome from the GR2 registry and matched controls from the general population included in the last French perinatal survey (Enquête Nationale Périnatale 2016). FINDINGS: 1944 pregnancies were identified in the GR2 cohort, of which 106 pregnancies in 96 women with primary Sjögren's syndrome were included in this analysis. The median age at pregnancy onset was 33 years (IQR 31-36). 87 (83%) of 105 pregnancies (with ethnicity data) were in White women, 18 (17%) were in Black women; 92 (90%) of 102 had previous systemic activity (ESSDAI score of ≥1; data missing in four pregnancies), and 48 (45%) of 106 had systemic activity at inclusion. Of 93 pregnancies included at week 18 of gestation or earlier, primary Sjögren's syndrome flares occurred in 12 (13%). No baseline parameters were associated with primary Sjögren's syndrome flare. Four twin pregnancies and one medical termination were excluded from the adverse pregnancy outcome analysis; of the remaining 88, adverse pregnancy outcomes occurred in six (7%). Among pregnancies in women with data for antiphospholipid antibodies (n=55), antiphospholipid antibody positivity was more frequent among pregnancies with adverse outcomes (two [50%] of four pregnancies) compared with those without adverse outcomes (two [4%] of 51 pregnancies; p=0·023). Anti-RNP antibody positivity was also more frequent among pregnancies with adverse outcomes than those without, although this was not statistically significant. In the matched controlled study, adverse pregnancy outcomes occurred in nine (9%) of 105 pregnancies in women with primary Sjögren's syndrome and 28 (7%) of the 420 matched control pregnancies; adverse pregnancy outcomes were not significantly associated with primary Sjögren's syndrome (odds ratio 1·31, 95% CI 0·53-2·98; p=0·52). INTERPRETATION: Pregnancies in women with primary Sjögren's syndrome had very good prognoses for mothers and fetuses, with no overall increase in adverse pregnancy outcome risk compared with the general population. Women with antiphospholipid antibodies or anti-RNP antibodies require close monitoring, because these factors might be associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. FUNDING: Lupus France, Association des Sclérodermiques de France, Association Gougerot Sjögren, Association Francophone Contre la Polychondrite Chronique Atrophiante, AFM-Telethon, Société Nationale Française de Médecine Interne, Société Française de Rhumatologie, Cochin Hospital, French Health Ministry, Fondation for Research in Rheumatology, Association Prix Véronique Roualet, Union Chimique Belge.

The nosology of systemic sclerosis: how lessons from the past offer new challenges in reframing an idiopathic rheumatological disorder.

Systemic sclerosis is a rare connective tissue disease characterised by a wide range of clinical manifestations. Compared with previous sets of criteria, the 2013 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification of systemic sclerosis encompasses a broader and more relevant spectrum of the condition. Nonetheless, clinical and prognostic heterogeneity persists among patients fulfilling these criteria. The next task in the classification of systemic sclerosis is the development of new subset criteria that can successfully identify subgroups of patients with distinct prognostic or pathophysiological features. In this Viewpoint we describe the history of systemic sclerosis over the past century with the objective of highlighting the effect of previous nosological debates on efforts to understand and manage this disorder. Rather than seeking to present a systematic review of possible subgrouping for systemic sclerosis in relation to prognosis, we aim to clarify how nosological considerations have influenced our understanding of the cause and prognosis of this so-called idiopathic rheumatological disorder and how aetiological, prognostic, and pathophysiological hypotheses have helped to describe clusters within the disease. By reflecting on past nosological debates and endeavours, we identify challenges for the current initiative to develop a new subgrouping of systemic sclerosis.