Elevated Lipoprotein A Levels and Development of Moderate or Severe Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Patients with Heart Transplants.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a high-incident complication of heart transplant (HT) and is the leading cause of death beyond the first post-HT year. Traditional risk factors have been related to CAV development. Elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) is an independent, genetic, and causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease; nonetheless, its association with the development or worsening of CAV in HT has not been firmly established. METHODS: An observational nested case-control study including HT recipients under follow-up in a tertiary center. Lipoprotein (a) levels were determined at the time of inclusion. We considered elevated Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL. We evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and the presence and severity of CAV (The International Society For Heart And Lung Transplantation [ISHLT] Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Grading Scheme), dividing the sample between No or Mild CAV (0-1) and Moderate-Severe CAV (2-3). Routine coronary angiographies were performed the first year after the transplant and were subsequently symptom-driven. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients with HTs were included, with a mean follow-up of 110 ± 77 months. Patients with CAV 2 to 3 presented higher median Lp(a) levels (17 vs 86 mg/dL, P = 0.001). Elevated Lp(a) level was an independent risk factor for developing CAV 2 to 3 (odds ratio 8.57 [95% CI 2.82-26.04]; P < .001). Patients with Lp(a) ≥30 mg also showed an earlier onset compared with those with Lp(a) <30 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that Lp(a) may play a role in the development of CAV. Lipoprotein (a) ≥30 mg/dL defines a subgroup of high-risk patients with HTs as portends to earlier onset and more severe CAV. Lipoprotein (a) determination should be a standard-of-care test in patients with HTs.

Heart Transplantation in a Patient With a Heterotopic Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Prosthesis: A Case Report.

The bicaval transcatheter prosthesis (TricValve) allows the treatment of cava reflux in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and high surgical risk. It consists of the implantation of 2 self-expanding valves in both vena cava without directly approaching the native tricuspid valve. Heart transplantation in this setting may require some modifications compared with the conventional bicaval technique. We describe the clinical case of a 69-year-old woman with a background of rheumatic mitral valve disease who required a mitral valve replacement a few decades before. Ongoing clinical deterioration with biventricular dysfunction and severe tricuspid regurgitation was treated with a percutaneous bicaval heterotopic self-expanding valve system, with no clinical benefit. The patient underwent an elective heart transplantation. For the surgical approach, venous cannulation was performed percutaneously for both the right internal jugular and right femoral vein. Due to the impossibility of extracting percutaneous caval valves, the biatrial technique was selected for heart implantation. The postoperative course was difficult, but the patient was successfully discharged home 2 months postoperatively. She remains in good clinical condition with normal heart function 1 year after the transplant. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing a heart transplant in a patient with a bicaval transcatheter prosthesis.

Heart Transplantation and Thromboembolic Risk In Patients With Percutaneous Aortic Valve Prosthesis and Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Case Report.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacements have become a good option for patients with aortic valve disease and high surgical risk. Thromboembolism is reported as a relatively common complication of Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This risk may be increased in patients who have left ventricular assist devices, as valve motion is drastically reduced. We present the case of a 65-year-old man with a history of alcoholism and valvular cardiomyopathy (severe chronic aortic insufficiency) with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Improvement in ventricular function followed the cessation of alcohol consumption, but still in poor clinical condition. Due to his high surgical risk, it was decided to implant a percutaneous aortic valve to treat the valve deficiency. Two months later, he suffered from a first episode of embolic stroke, which he successfully recovered. Despite the treatment, his clinical status did not improve (INTERMACS 3-4), and he was referred for heart transplantation. A left ventricular assist device was implanted as a bridge to the transplant. While on the waiting list, he suffered from other 3 episodes of stroke, 2 of them requiring mechanical thrombectomy. Finally, his transplant was performed with a favorable postoperative clinical course. Heart transplantation may be feasible in patients with multiple intracardiac devices in left chambers, although we must be aware of the increased thromboembolic risk, especially when used in combination.

Mechanical circulatory support in severe primary graft dysfunction: Peripheral cannulation but not earlier implantation improves survival in heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) still affects 2% to 28% of heart transplants (HT). Severe PGD requires mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and is the main cause of death early after HT. Earlier initiation has been suggested to improve prognosis but the best cannulation strategy is unknown. METHODS: Analysis of all HT in Spain between 2010 and 2020. Early (<3 hours after HT) vs late initiation (≥3 hours after HT) of MCS was compared. Special focus was placed on peripheral vs central cannulation strategy. RESULTS: A total of 2376 HT were analyzed. 242 (10.2%) suffered severe PGD, 171 (70.7%) received early MCS and 71 (29.3%) late MCS. Baseline characteristics were similar. Patients with late MCS had higher inotropic scores and worse renal function at the moment of cannulation. Early MCS had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times and late MCS was associated with more peripheral vascular damage. No significant differences in survival were observed between early and late implant at 3 months (43.82% vs 48.26%; log-rank p = 0.59) or at 1 year (39.29% vs 45.24%, log-rank p = 0.49). Multivariate analysis did not show significant differences favoring early implant. Survival was higher in peripheral compared to central cannulation at 3 months (52.74% vs 32.42%, log-rank p = 0.001) and 1 year (48.56% vs 28.19%, log-rank p = 0.0007). In the multivariate analysis, peripheral cannulation remained a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Earlier MCS initiation for PGD was not superior, compared to a more conservative approach with deferred initiation. Peripheral compared to central cannulation showed superior 3-month and 1-year survival rates.

Results of heart retransplantation: subanalysis of the Spanish Heart Transplant Registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Heart retransplantation (ReHT) is controversial in the current era. The aim of this study was to describe and analyze the results of ReHT in Spain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis from the Spanish Heart Transplant Registry from 1984 to 2018. Data were collected on donors, recipients, surgical procedure characteristics, immunosuppression, and survival. The main outcome was posttransplant all-cause mortality or need for ReHT. We studied differences in survival according to indication for ReHT, the time interval between transplants and era of ReHT. RESULTS: A total of 7592 heart transplants (HT) and 173 (2.3%) ReHT were studied (median age, 52.0 and 55.0 years, respectively). Cardiac allograft vasculopathy was the most frequent indication for ReHT (42.2%) and 59 patients (80.8%) received ReHT >5 years after the initial transplant. Acute rejection and primary graft failure decreased as indications over the study period. Renal dysfunction, hypertension, need for mechanical ventilation or intra-aortic balloon pump and longer cold ischemia time were more frequent in ReHT. Median follow-up for ReHT was 5.8 years. ReHT had worse survival than HT (weighted HR, 1.43; 95%CI, 1.17-1.44; P<.001). The indication of acute rejection (HR, 2.49; 95%CI, 1.45-4.27; P<.001) was related to the worst outcome. ReHT beyond 5 years after initial HT portended similar results as primary HT (weighted HR, 1.14; 95%CI, 0.86-1.50; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: ReHT was associated with higher mortality than HT, especially when indicated for acute rejection. ReHT beyond 5 years had a similar prognosis to primary HT.

Malignancy following heart transplantation: differences in incidence and prognosis between sexes - a multicenter cohort study.

Male patients are at increased risk for developing malignancy postheart transplantation (HT); however, real incidence and prognosis in both genders remain unknown. The aim of this study was to assess differences in incidence and mortality related to malignancy between genders in a large cohort of HT patients. Incidence and mortality rates were calculated for all tumors, skin cancers (SCs), lymphoma, and nonskin solid cancers (NSSCs) as well as survival since first diagnosis of neoplasia. 5865 patients (81.6% male) were included. Total incidence rates for all tumors, SCs, and NSSCs were lower in females [all tumors: 25.7 vs. 44.8 per 1000 person-years; rate ratio (RR) 0.68, (0.60-0.78), P < 0.001]. Mortality rates were also lower in females for all tumors [94.0 (77.3-114.3) vs. 129.6 (120.9-138.9) per 1000 person-years; RR 0.76, (0.62-0.94), P = 0.01] and for NSSCs [125.0 (95.2-164.0) vs 234.7 (214.0-257.5) per 1000 person-years; RR 0.60 (0.44-0.80), P = 0.001], albeit not for SCs or lymphoma. Female sex was associated with a better survival after diagnosis of malignancy [log-rank p test = 0.0037; HR 0.74 (0.60-0.91), P = 0.004]. In conclusion, incidence of malignancies post-HT is higher in males than in females, especially for SCs and NSSCs. Prognosis after cancer diagnosis is also worse in males.

Impact of donor-recipient age on cardiac transplant survival. Subanalysis of the Spanish Heart Transplant Registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The age of heart transplant recipients and donors is progressively increasing. It is likely that not all donor-recipient age combinations have the same impact on mortality. The objective of this work was to compare survival in transplant recipients according to donor-recipient age combinations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of transplants performed between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2017 in the Spanish Heart Transplant Registry. Pediatric transplants, retransplants and combined transplants were excluded (6505 transplants included). Four groups were considered: a) donor <50 years for recipient <65 years; b) donor <50 years for recipient ≥ 65 years; c) donor ≥ 50 years for recipient ≥ 65 years, and d) donor ≥ 50 years for recipient <65 years. RESULTS: The most frequent group was young donor for young recipient (73%). There were differences in the median survival between the groups (P <.001): a) younger-younger: 12.1 years, 95%CI, 11.5-12.6; b) younger-older: 9.1 years, 95%CI, 8.0-10.5; c) older-older: 7.5 years, 95%CI, 2.8-11.0; d) older-younger: 10.5 years, 95%CI, 9.6-12.1. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of mortality were the age of the donor and the recipient (0.008 and 0.001, respectively). The worst combinations were older-older vs younger-younger (HR, 1.57; 95%CI, 1.22-2.01; P <.001) and younger-older vs younger-younger (HR, 1.33; 95%CI, 1.12-1.58; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Age (of the donor and recipient) is a relevant prognostic factor in heart transplant. The donor-recipient age combination has prognostic implications that should be identified when accepting an organ for transplant.

Spanish Heart Transplant Registry. 31th Official Report of the Heart Failure Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The present report describes the clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart transplants in Spain and updates the data to 2019. METHODS: We describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart transplants performed in Spain in 2019, as well as trends in this procedure from 2010 to 2018. RESULTS: In 2019, 300 transplants were performed (8794 since 1984; 2745 between 2010 and 2019). Compared with previous years, the most notable findings were the decreasing rate of urgent transplants (38%), and the consolidation of the type of circulatory support prior to transplant, with an almost complete disappearance of counterpulsation balloon (0.7%), stabilization in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (9.6%), and an increase in the use of ventricular assist devices (29.0%). Survival from 2016 to 2018 was similar to that from 2013 to 2015 (P=.34). Survival in both these periods was better than that from 2010 to 2012 (P=.002 and P=.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplant activity has remained stable during the last few years, as have outcomes (in terms of survival). There has been a trend to a lower rate of urgent transplants and to a higher use of ventricular assist devices prior to transplant.

Cold ischemia >4 hours increases heart transplantation mortality. An analysis of the Spanish heart transplantation registry.

BACKGROUND: Cold ischemia time (CIT) has been associated to heart transplantation (HT) prognosis. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the CIT cutoff value that might have relevant clinical implications. METHODS: We analyzed all adults that received a first HT during the period 2008-2018. CIT was defined as the time between the cross-clamp of the donor aorta and the reperfusion of the heart. Primary outcome was 1-month mortality. RESULTS: We included 2629 patients, mean age was 53.3 ± 12.1 years and 655 (24.9%) were female. Mean CIT was 202 ± 67 min (minimum 20 min, maximum 600 min). One-month mortality per CIT quartile was 9, 12, 13, and 19%. One-year mortality per CIT quartile was 16, 19, 21, and 28%. CIT was an independent predictor of 1-month mortality, but only in the last quartile of CIT >246 min (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.49-3.08, p < .001). We found no relevant differences in CIT during the study period. However, the impact of CIT in 1-month and 1-year mortality decreased with time (p value for the distribution of ischemic time by year 0.01), particularly during the last 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although the impact of CIT in HT prognosis seems to be decreasing in the last years, CIT in the last quartile (>246 min) is associated with 1-month and 1-year mortality. Our findings suggest the need to limit HT with CIT > 246 min or to use different myocardial preservation systems if the expected CIT is >4 h.

Impact of Preoperative Pulmonary Hypertension on Survival in Patients Undergoing Elective Heart Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) represents a marker of bad prognosis in left heart disease. Nonetheless, the effect on survival after heart transplant remains controversial. The objective was to study the impact of preoperative PAH on survival in patients undergoing elective heart transplant. METHODS: A retrospective study of 173 transplant recipients was conducted at a single hospital from January 2009 to December 2018. Congenital etiology and emergent heart transplant were exclusion criteria as well as those patients without enough data in the hemodynamic study. Two groups were considered: A (without PAH) and B (with HTP). PAH was classified as mild (mean pulmonary arterial pressure [mPAP] 25-34 mm Hg, pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] 2.5-3.4 Wood units and/or transpulmonary gradient [TPG] 13-16 mm Hg), moderate (mPAP 35-44 mm Hg, PVR 3.5-4.9 Wood units and/or TPG 17-19 mm Hg), and severe (mPAP > 44 mm Hg, PVR > 4.9 Wood units and/or TPG > 19 mm Hg). RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were enrolled; 71.6% were male and average age was 52.3 (SD, 10.02) years. The main etiology was ischemic cardiomyopathy; 13.7% underwent previous heart operations. A total of 61 patients (59.8%) had PAH prior to heart transplant: 25 mild, 34 moderate, and 2 severe. Mean overall survival after transplant was 79.9 (SD, 5.68) months, without differences between the 2 groups (P = .82). One-month survival was 89% (the main cause of mortality was primary graft dysfunction), and 1-year survival was 78%. Four patients required mechanical circulatory support during early post-transplant period. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PAH does not have a significant impact on survival in elective heart transplant.

Spanish Heart Transplant Registry. 30th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Heart Failure (1984-2018).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The present report updates the clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart transplant in Spain to 2018. METHODS: Prospective registry of all the heart transplants performed between 1984 and 2018 in Spain. Specifically, temporal trends in clinical characteristics and outcomes are described for the period from 2009 to 2017. RESULTS: In 2018, 321 transplants were performed (8494 since 1984; 2719 between 2009 and 2018). Compared with the previous year, the number of transplants performed in 2018 rose by 52% in recipients younger than 16 years and by 42% in those older than 60 years. In the last decade, significant temporal trends were observed in recipient characteristics (better pretransplant renal function, higher rates of diabetes, more urgent transplants, and greater use of pretrasplant circulatory support, particularly ventricular assist devices), donor characteristics (higher donor age, more female donors, and higher frequencies of cerebrovascular cause of death and predonation cardiac arrest and lower ischemia time). Survival significantly improved in the last decade, mainly due to lower mortality due to primary graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: The number of heart transplants is increasing in Spain, with a progressive improvement in survival.

Spanish Heart Transplant Registry. 29th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Heart Failure.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The present report updates the characteristics and results of heart transplantation in Spain, mainly focused in the 2008-2017 period. METHODS: We describe the recipient and donor characteristics, surgical procedures, and outcomes of heart transplants performed in 2017. The 2017 data were compared with those obtained from 2008 to 2016. RESULTS: A total of 304 cardiac transplants were performed in 2017. Between 1984 and 2017, 8173 procedures were performed, 2689 of them after 2008. Significant temporal trends were observed in recipient characteristics (lower pulmonary vascular resistance, lower use of mechanical ventilation, and a higher percentage of diabetic patients and those with previous cardiac surgery), donor characteristics (older donor age and a higher percentage of female donors and those with a prior cardiac arrest) and procedures (lower ischemia time). In 2017, 27% of patients were transplanted after undergoing mechanical ventricular assistance (P <.001 for trend). In the last decade, there was a trend to better survival. CONCLUSIONS: Around 300 transplants per year were performed in Spain in the last decade. There was a significant increase in the use of pretransplant mechanical circulatory support and a trend to improved survival.

Spanish Heart Transplant Registry. 28th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Heart Failure (1984-2016).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The present article reports the characteristics and results of heart transplants in Spain since this therapeutic modality was first used in May 1984. METHODS: We summarize the main features of recipients, donors, surgical procedures, and outcomes of all cardiac transplants performed in Spain up to December 31, 2016. RESULTS: A total of 281 cardiac transplants were performed in 2016. The whole historical series consisted of 7869 procedures. The main features of transplant procedures in 2016 were similar to those observed in recent years. A high percentage of procedures were urgent, particularly those with use of pretransplant continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (19.1% of all transplants). Survival significantly improved in the last decade compared with previous periods. CONCLUSIONS: During the last few years, transplant activity in Spain has remained steady, with approximately 250-300 transplants/year. Despite a more complex clinical context, survival has improved in recent years.

Long-term prognostic role of CA-125 in noncongestive patients undergoing a cardiac transplantation.

AIM: To evaluate the possible relationship between high levels of CA-125 and long-term prognosis in chronic heart failure patients after they undergo a cardiac transplantation (CT). MATERIALS & METHODS: We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent a CT and had a previous determination of CA-125. Congestive patients and those whose survival was <1 year after CT were excluded. RESULTS: Of 55 patients, 23 had elevated CA-125 levels (>35 U/ml). After CT, survival was significantly inferior in this group (96.3 vs 81%, 84.9 vs 64%, 70.7 vs 32.9% at 2, 5 and 8 years, p = 0.014). CA-125 >35 U/ml was the only factor independently associated to long-term mortality (OR: 3.94; 95% CI: 1.2-12.82; p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Noncongestive patients with high levels of CA-125 had inferior long-term survival after CT.