"I am just trying to live a life!" -a qualitative study of the lived experience of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injuries.

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are frequently reported in people with spinal cord injuries (SCI). Wound management in people with SCI involves relieving pressure on the affected area by means of immobilisation and bed rest. The healing time of a PU can vary, but often takes several months or even years, causing people to stay in bed for prolonged periods of time. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the perspectives and lived experiences of people with SCI who are affected by PUs. DESIGN: and method: This study is a qualitative explorative study that employs individual semi-structured in-depth interviews to obtain the narratives of people with SCI and a pressure ulcer. We used a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach that was inspired by Ricoeur's theory of interpretation. The analysis was performed in three levels: Naïve reading, structural analysis and critical interpretation and discussion. PARTICIPANTS: and setting: Ten people with SCI who were being treated in the Danish healthcare system for their PU participated in this study: six participants had experienced a complete traumatic SCI, three had an incomplete traumatic SCI, and one had a non-traumatic complete SCI. The study included nine men and one woman, aged 49-81 years (mean 64). Nine had a PU in the seating area, while one had the ulcer on the leg. RESULTS: The analysis revealed three themes: 1. Struggling to balance prevention with an active, meaningful life, 2. Challenges and consequences of pressure relief protocols and bed rest, 3. Experiencing prolonged and incoherent treatment with varying levels of staff engagement and competencies. CONCLUSIONS: People with SCI and a PU have difficulty balancing their active, redefined lives when subjected to a strict pressure relief protocol. The consequences of immobility caused by pressure relief include reduced social and community participation and decreased quality of life. PU treatment is experienced as incoherent and unnecessarily lengthy, leading to a deterioration in the wounds. Improving PU treatment for people with SCI is of utmost importance and has the potential to benefit not only the people with SCI but also the healthcare system and the economy.

Interventions, stakeholders, and organisation related to pressure ulcer prevention for individuals with spinal cord injuries in transition from hospital to home - A scoping review.

STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review. AIM OF THE STUDY: To obtain an overview of initiatives, organisational components, and stakeholders' perspectives on PU prevention in transitional care. METHODS: Scoping review searching the databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE), CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS in May 2022. Inclusion of English-written research on pressure ulcer prevention in adult people with spinal cord injury in transition from hospital or rehabilitation centre to the home care environment. RESULTS: Fifteen studies of different types are included in this study: six qualitative studies, four randomized controlled trials, three cohort studies, one cross-sectional study and an interventional study. The included studies are relatively low-level evidence but of acceptable quality. CONCLUSION: Continuous tailored education and information about PU prevention and follow-up services are essential components in preventing PUs and rehabilitating people with SCI. The complexity of SCI requires adaptations, equipment and access to specialist care and treatment after discharge. However, there is a discrepancy between the international recommendations, the perceived needs, and the delivered healthcare services. The consequences are a lower quality of life and a higher risk of PUs for people with SCI.

Static overlays for pressure ulcer prevention: a hospital-based health technology assessment.

INTRODUCTION: At Odense University Hospital (OUH) alternating-air mattresses (AAM) are used in the prevention of pressure ulcers (PU); however, static overlays might be more effective and have lower costs. To investigate the properties and consequences of using static overlays for prevention of PU at OUH, a hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA) was conducted. METHODS: Two types of static overlays were tested in an observational study and compared with AAM for patients with a medium-high risk of PU in geriatric and orthopaedic wards at OUH. Incidence of PU was investigated 7 months before (n=720) and 6 months after implementation (n=837). Staff attitudes were examined in a questionnaire survey (n=55) and focus group interviews (n=13). Patients who had tried one of the overlays and the AAM were interviewed (n=12). RESULTS: No statistical difference in PU incidence was found before and after the implementation of overlays (2.5% before, 2.7% after, P=0.874, n=1557) and no patients lying on overlays developed PU (n=123). Staff had mixed attitudes, but the majority preferred having overlays as an option for their patients. Interviewed patients preferred overlays due to less noise and improved mobility. CONCLUSION: Both types of overlay are effective in PU prevention. However, overlays introduce challenges for staff and clear guidelines for the selection of support surfaces are needed. Overall, it is recommended that static overlays are considered as an alternative to AAM for PU prevention.

Pressure ulcer prevention in hospitals: a successful nurse-led clinical quality improvement intervention.

A pressure ulcer prevalence of 17.3% at Odense University Hospital in Denmark in 2010 prompted action and a quality improvement project was planned. This had two aims: to reduce pressure ulcers at the hospital by 50% and to have no pressure ulcers at or above category 3. An project was established with a steering committee, a pressure ulcer specialist nurse, local dedicated nurses and nurse assistants to implement a pressure ulcer bundle in clinical practice at all departments at the hospital. Six years later the pressure ulcer prevalence was down to approximately 2% and in 2018 only one stage 3 pressure ulcer occurred in the hospital. Pressure ulcer prevention is now incorporated into clinical practice in all departments at the hospital.