About time: neurocognitive correlates of stimulus-bound and other time setting errors in the Clock Drawing Test.

OBJECTIVE: Previous findings suggest that time setting errors (TSEs) in the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) may be related mainly to impairments in semantic and executive function. Recent attempts to dissociate the classic stimulus-bound error (setting the time to "10 to 11" instead of "10 past 11") from other TSEs, did not support hypotheses regarding this error being primarily executive in nature or different from other time setting errors in terms of neurocognitive correlates. This study aimed to further investigate the cognitive correlates of stimulus-bound errors and other TSEs, in order to trace possible underlying cognitive deficits. METHODS: We examined cognitive test performance of participants with preliminary diagnoses associated with mild cognitive impairment. Among 490 participants, we identified clocks with stimulus-bound errors (n = 78), other TSEs (n = 41), other errors not related to time settings (n = 176), or errorless clocks (n = 195). RESULTS: No differences were found on any dependent measure between the stimulus-bound and the other TSErs groups. Group comparisons suggested TSEs in general, to be associated with lower performance on various cognitive measures, especially on semantic and working memory measures. Regression analysis further highlighted semantic and verbal working memory difficulties as being the most prominent deficits associated with these errors. CONCLUSION: TSEs in the CDT may indicate underlying deficits in semantic function and working memory. In addition, results support previous findings related to the diagnostic value of TSEs in detecting cognitive impairment.

Association of functional connectivity of the executive control network or default mode network with cognitive impairment in older adults with remitted major depressive disorder or mild cognitive impairment.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with an increased risk of developing dementia. The present study aimed to better understand this risk by comparing resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) in the executive control network (ECN) and the default mode network (DMN) in older adults with MDD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Additionally, we examined the association between rsFC in the ECN or DMN and cognitive impairment transdiagnostically. We assessed rsFC alterations in ECN and DMN in 383 participants from five groups at-risk for dementia-remitted MDD with normal cognition (MDD-NC), non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment (naMCI), remitted MDD + naMCI, amnestic MCI (aMCI), and remitted MDD + aMCI-and from healthy controls (HC) or individuals with Alzheimer's dementia (AD). Subject-specific whole-brain functional connectivity maps were generated for each network and group differences in rsFC were calculated. We hypothesized that alteration of rsFC in the ECN and DMN would be progressively larger among our seven groups, ranked from low to high according to their risk for dementia as HC, MDD-NC, naMCI, MDD + naMCI, aMCI, MDD + aMCI, and AD. We also regressed scores of six cognitive domains (executive functioning, processing speed, language, visuospatial memory, verbal memory, and working memory) on the ECN and DMN connectivity maps. We found a significant alteration in the rsFC of the ECN, with post hoc testing showing differences between the AD group and the HC, MDD-NC, or naMCI groups, but no significant alterations in rsFC of the DMN. Alterations in rsFC of the ECN and DMN were significantly associated with several cognitive domain scores transdiagnostically. Our findings suggest that a diagnosis of remitted MDD may not confer functional brain risk for dementia. However, given the association of rs-FC with cognitive performance (i.e., transdiagnostically), rs-FC may help in stratifying this risk among people with MDD and varying degrees of cognitive impairment.

Time setting errors in the Clock Drawing Test are associated with both semantic and executive deficits.

The common requirement to set the time to "10 past 11" on the Clock Drawing Test is intended to elicit a stimulus bound response (SBR), in which the responder is "pulled" to the salient stimulus "10," resulting in hands set at "10 before 11." SBRs are considered markers of executive dysfunction, although this assumption has not yet been validated. We compared SBR and other time-setting errors on inhibitory control tests, hypothesizing that they represent related constructs. The role of semantic dysfunction in the formation of those errors was also investigated. We examined baseline test performance of participants with Mild Cognitive Impairment or a history of depression, and control participants, enrolled in a dementia prevention study. Among 258 participants, we identified clocks with SBRs (n = 16), other time errors (n = 22), or no errors at all (n = 42). Performance between the groups with SBRs and other time-setting errors did not differ on any of the executive tests, and both error groups performed significantly worse than the No Error group on the semantic tests. Control for covariates further supported semantic and executive components in time-setting errors. Both semantic and inhibitory control deficits may underlie time representation errors in general.