Comparisons of successful and failed Phase III trials of drugs and biologicals tested for mitigation of oral mucositis in patients being treated with radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy for cancers of the head and neck.

Oral mucositis (OM) remains a significant toxicity among patients being treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone or with concomitant chemotherapy (CRT) for cancers of the head and neck (HNC). Given its clinical significance as an unmet need and its potential commercial viability, the pharmaceutical industry has been actively pursuing an effective intervention. Despite this interest and activity, only a few agents have been studied in Phase III trials (n = 6). The objective of this study was to identify common features that differentiate successful and failed Phase III OM trials. We used the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Public Search database to search patents with "oral mucositis" in the claims. We then searched ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to determine if Phase III or Phase II trial data for identified biologics/drugs had been published. We assessed each Phase III and Phase II trial for characteristics that may be associated with trial success or failure. We considered a study as a "success" if the primary endpoint reached statistical significance, and we considered a study as "failure" if the primary endpoint did not reach statistical significance. Of the three successful Phase III trials, one investigated avasopasem manganese (Galera Therapeutics) and two examined palifermin (Amgen). The three failed trials included those evaluating dusquetide (Soligenix), iseganan hydrochloride (IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals), and clonidine (Monopar Therapeutics). We found that differences in the level of sponsor funding, patient inclusion criteria including radiation source and concomitant chemotherapy regimen, and concordance of primary efficacy outcomes between Phase II and Phase III trials influenced outcomes. To properly design clinical trials for OM in HNC patients, it is important that researchers and sponsors take note of specific study characteristics associated with success or failure, particularly with Phase III trials where the risks and costs are the highest.

Comparisons of Non-Oral Immune-Related Adverse Events Among Patients With Cancer With Different Oral Toxicity Profiles.

OBJECTIVES: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common. Oral irAEs tend to cluster in patients who experience concurrent toxicities. We aimed to characterize the frequency and trajectory of non-oral irAEs in patients who developed oral irAEs, assess their relationship with non-oral irAEs, and compare those characteristics with patients without oral irAEs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who started ICIT between December 11, 2011, and September 15, 2019 (n = 4683) in the Mass General Brigham Registered Patient Data Registry. Demographic information, cancer diagnosis, ICIT regimen, treatment duration, and time and number of infusions to irAE onset were recorded. Non-oral irAEs were categorized into 13 groups. Patients with melanoma, pulmonary cancer, or head and neck cancer who had oral irAEs were then matched with those without oral irAEs to compare the prevalence of concomitant non-oral irAEs. RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen patients with oral irAEs with a mean age of 65.9 ±â€…12.6 years (43.3% females) were included. Patients with multiple oral irAEs were more likely to have non-oral irAEs (OR: 2.7, 95% CI, 1.3-3.5), including cutaneous (OR: 1.7, 95% CI, 1.1-3.0), rheumatological (OR: 2.2, 95% CI, 1.1-4.2), thyroid (OR: 2.4, 95% CI, 1.2-4.9), and neurological irAEs (OR: 2.5, 95% CI, 1.0-6.3). Compared to matched patients with non-oral irAEs, patients with oral irAEs were more likely to have cutaneous (OR: 1.7, 95% CI, 1.0-2.8) and thyroid (OR: 2.86, 95% CI, 1.1-7.5) irAEs. The development of oral and non-oral irAEs is often coincidental. CONCLUSION: Patients who have non-oral irAEs should be monitored for development of oral irAEs for prompt management.

Monte Carlo based dosimetry of extraoral photobiomodulation for prevention of oral mucositis.

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) is recommended for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis, a painful condition that occurs in cancer patients. Intraoral PBMT is limited to treating distal oral mucosa and oropharynx. Extraoral PBMT may provide a more efficient intervention. The goal of this study was to develop a clinically viable protocol for extraoral PBMT. Monte Carlo modeling was used to predict the distribution of 850 nm light for four treatment sites, using anatomical data obtained from MRI and optical properties from the literature. Simulated incident light power density was limited to 399 mW/cm2 to ensure treatment safety and to prevent tissue temperature increase. The results reveal that total tissue thickness determines fluence rate at the oral mucosa, whereas the thickness of individual tissue layers and melanin content are of minor importance. Due to anatomical differences, the fluence rate varied greatly among patients. Despite these variations, a universal protocol was established using a median treatment time methodology. The determined median treatment times required to deliver efficacious dose between 1 and 6 J/cm2 were within 15 min. The developed PBMT protocol can be further refined using the combination of pretreatment imaging and the Monte Carlo simulation approach implemented in this study.

Evolution of predictive risk factor analysis for chemotherapy-related toxicity.

The causes of variation in toxicity to the same treatment regimen among seemingly similar patients remain largely unknown. There was tremendous optimism that the patient's germline genome would be strongly predictive of treatment-related toxicity and could be used to personalize treatment and improve therapeutic outcomes. However, there has been limited success in discovering robust pharmacogenetic predictors of treatment-related toxicity and even less progress in translating the few validated predictors into clinical practice. It is apparent that identification of toxicity predictors that can be used to predict and prevent treatment-related toxicity will require thinking beyond germline genomics. To that end, we propose an integrated biomarker discovery approach that recognizes that a patient's toxicity risk is determined by the cumulative effects of a broad range of "omic" and non-omic factors. This commentary describes the limited success in discovering and translating clinical and pharmacogenetic toxicity predictors into clinical practice. We illustrate the evolution of cancer toxicity biomarker discovery and translation through studies of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy, which is one of the most common and debilitating side effects of cancer treatment. We then discuss the opportunities for discovering non-genomic (e.g., metabolomic, lipidomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, microbiomic, medical, behavioral, environmental) and integrated biomarkers that may be more strongly predictive of toxicity risk and the potential challenges with translating integrated biomarkers into clinical practice. This integrated biomarker discovery approach may circumvent some of the major limitations in toxicity biomarker science and move precision oncology treatment forward so that patients receive maximum treatment benefit with minimal toxicity.

Avasopasem for the treatment of radiotherapy-induced severe oral mucositis.

INTRODUCTION: Oral mucositis (OM) remains a significant, highly symptomatic, disruptive side effect of radiation and concomitant chemoradiation therapy used for the treatment of squamous cell cancers of the head and neck. Despite its clinical and economic burden, implementation of an effective intervention has been elusive. AREAS COVERED: Increased understanding of the complexity of the biological basis for its pathogenesis has yielded potential druggable targets such as the mitigation of superoxide formation and oxidative stress. Avasopasem manganese is a selective superoxide dismutase mimetic being developed by Galera Therapeutics, which recently submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) to the FDA for a severe OM indication. This review describes the preclinical and clinical studies which led to, and supported the NDA, and assesses the potential utility of avasopasem clinically. EXPERT OPINION: Avasopasem manganese appears to effectively mitigate severe OM associated with concomitant chemoradiation used in the treatment of head and neck cancers, as well as cisplatin-associated renal toxicity in the absence of impairing tumor response.

Application of big data analyses to compare the impact of oral and gastrointestinal mucositis on risks and outcomes of febrile neutropenia and septicemia among patients hospitalized for the treatment of leukemia or multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: Oral ulcerative mucositis (UM) and gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM) have been associated with increased likelihood of systemic infection (bacteremia and sepsis) in patients being treated for hematological malignancies. To better define and contrast differences between UM and GIM, we utilized the United States 2017 National Inpatient Sample and analyzed patients hospitalized for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) or leukemia. METHODS: We utilized generalized linear models to assess the association between adverse events-UM and GIM-among hospitalized MM or leukemia patients and the outcome of febrile neutropenia (FN), septicemia, burden of illness, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 71,780 hospitalized leukemia patients, 1255 had UM and 100 GIM. Of 113,915 MM patients, 1065 manifested UM and 230 had GIM. In an adjusted analysis, UM was significantly associated with increased risk of FN in both the leukemia (aOR = 2.87, 95% CI = 2.09-3.92) and MM cohorts (aOR = 4.96, 95% CI = 3.22-7.66). Contrastingly, UM had no effect on the risk of septicemia in either group. Likewise, GIM significantly increased the odds of FN in both leukemia (aOR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.35-5.88) and MM (aOR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.51-9.31) patients. Similar findings were noted when we restricted our analysis to recipients of high-dose condition regimens in preparation for hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. UM and GIM were consistently associated with higher burden of illness in all the cohorts. CONCLUSION: This first use of big data provided an effective platform to assess the risks, outcomes, and cost of care of cancer treatment-related toxicities in patients hospitalized for the management of hematologic malignancies.

Radiotherapy-induced severe oral mucositis: pharmacotherapies in recent and current clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Oral mucositis (OM) is among the most common, damaging side effects of head and neck radiation therapy and may interfere with patients' ability to comply with optimal treatment. AREAS COVERED: The increasing unmet clinical need, recent clinical trial successes, and the commercial potential have catalyzed interest in the development of effective intervention for OM. A range of small molecules are under development - some still in the preclinical stage, but others close to NDA submission. This review will focus on those drugs which have recently been assessed in a clinical trial and those which are still under clinical study as a prevention or treatment for radiation-associated OM. EXPERT OPINION: In response to the unmet clinical need, both the biotechnology and pharmacological industries have been actively pursuing an agent to prevent/treat radiation-associated OM. This effort has been catalyzed by the identification of multiple drug targets which contribute to OM's pathogenesis. The lessons learned from the many trials which have previously stumbled have led to standardization of clinical trial design, endpoint efficacy definitions, rater assessment, and data interpretation over the past decade. Consequently, results of recently completed clinical trials provide optimism that effective treatment options should be available in the not-too-distant future.

Psoriasis and oral health in adult United States population: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To detect the association between psoriasis as an exposure and oral health conditions as outcomes represented by periodontal and dentition status. This was addressed by analysis of a large number of adults in the United States. METHODS: By using The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey datasets from 2009 to 2014, we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 11,726 participants included in our study population. For participants aged ≥ 30 years, the psoriasis status was assessed from the medical questionnaire. We used data from periodontal and oral examinations to assess the oral conditions of our participants. We examined the association between psoriasis as exposure and moderate/severe periodontitis and non-functional dentition as outcomes. RESULTS: The weighted prevalence of psoriasis was 3%, 44% for moderate/severe periodontitis, and 20.5% for non-functional dentition. The fully adjusted model showed no significant association between psoriasis and moderate/severe periodontitis (Prevalence Ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.9-1.2, p = 0.8). There was no statistically significant association between psoriasis and non-functional dentition except in the fully adjusted model it became statistically significant (Prevalence Ratio 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our results showed no association between psoriasis and periodontal or dentition status except in a fully adjusted model for non-functional dentition.

Leveraging GWAS data derived from a large cooperative group trial to assess the risk of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) in patients being treated for breast cancer: Part 2-functional implications of a SNP cluster associated with TIPN risk in patients being treated for breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Using GWAS data derived from a large collaborative trial (ECOG-5103), we identified a cluster of 267 SNPs which predicted CIPN in treatment-naive patients as reported in Part 1 of this study. To assess the functional and pathological implications of this set, we identified collective gene signatures were and evaluated the informational value of those signatures in defining CIPN's pathogenesis. METHODS: In Part 1, we analyzed GWAS data derived from ECOG-5103, first identifying those SNPs that were most strongly associated with CIPN using Fisher's ratio. After identifying those SNPs which differentiated CIPN-positive from CIPN-negative phenotypes, we ranked them in order of their discriminatory power to produce a cluster of SNPs which provided the highest predictive accuracy using leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV). An uncertainty analysis was included. Using the best predictive SNP cluster, we performed gene attribution for each SNP using NCBI Phenotype Genotype Integrator and then assessed functionality by applying GeneAnalytics, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, and PCViz. RESULTS: Using aggregate data derived from the GWAS, we identified a 267 SNP cluster which was associated with a CIPN+ phenotype with an accuracy of 96.1%. We could attribute 173 genes to the 267 SNP cluster. Six long intergenic non-protein coding genes were excluded. Ultimately, the functional analysis was based on 138 genes. Of the 17 pathways identified by Gene Analytics (GA) software, the irinotecan pharmacokinetic pathway had the highest score. Highly matching gene ontology attributions included flavone metabolic process, flavonoid glucuronidation, xenobiotic glucuronidation, nervous system development, UDP glycosyltransferase activity, retinoic acid binding, protein kinase C binding, and glucoronosyl transferase activity. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) GO terms identified neuron-associated genes as most significant (p = 5.45e-10). Consistent with the GA's output, flavone, and flavonoid associated terms, glucuronidation were noted as were GO terms associated with neurogenesis. CONCLUSION: The application of functional analyses to phenotype-associated SNP clusters provides an independent validation step in assessing the clinical meaningfulness of GWAS-derived data. Functional analyses following gene attribution of a CIPN-predictive SNP cluster identified pathways, gene ontology terms, and a network which were consistent with a neuropathic phenotype.

PREVLAR: Phase 2a Randomized Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of RRx-001 in the Attenuation of Oral Mucositis in Patients Receiving Head and Neck Chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: No Food and Drug Administration-approved intervention exists for oral mucositis (OM) from chemoradiotherapy (CRT) used to treat head and neck cancers. RRx-001 is a hypoxia-activated, cysteine-directed molecule that affects key pathways involved in OM pathogenesis. This phase 2a, multi-institutional trial was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of 3 schedules of a fixed concentration of RRx-001; a standard-of-care arm was included to identify potential signals of efficacy for further study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study enrolled patients with oral cavity and oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive or postoperative cisplatin-based CRT. Patients were randomized into 4 cohorts. In arms 1 to 3, RRx-001 was coinfused with patients' blood at differing intervals. Arm 4 was a control cohort of patients treated with CRT alone. Trained evaluators assessed OM using a standardized data collection instrument twice weekly during treatment and then until resolution. OM severity was scored centrally using World Health Organization criteria. Safety outcomes were assessed using National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteriav4 benchmarks. Long-term tumor response was defined by Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors v1.1 criteria. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled, with 46 and 45 individuals contributing safety and efficacy data, respectively. There were no severe adverse events attributed to the study drug. Across all 3 active arms, the study drug was infused fully per protocol in 86% of patients. All 3 RRx-001 treatment cohorts appeared to demonstrate a similar or lower OM duration relative to control; arm 1 had the lowest median duration of severe oral mucositis (SOM), 8.5 days versus 24 days in controls among patients who developed at least 1 day of SOM. There were no locoregional failures in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the safety and feasibility of RRx-001 as an intervention to mitigate SOM. Additional studies are planned to confirm its efficacy.

Identification of a SNP cluster associated with taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy risk in patients being treated for breast cancer using GWAS data derived from a large cooperative group trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common toxicity of taxanes for which there is no effective intervention. Genomic CIPN risk determination has yielded promising, but inconsistent results. The present study assessed the utility of a collective SNP cluster identified using novel analytics to describe taxane-associated CIPN risk. METHODS: We analyzed GWAS data derived from ECOG-5103, first identifying SNPs that were most strongly associated with CIPN using Fisher's ratio (FR). We then ranked ordered those SNPs which discriminated CIPN-positive (CIPN +) from CIPN-negative phenotypes based on their discriminatory power and developed the cluster of SNPs which provided the highest predictive accuracy using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). RESULTS: Using aggregated genotype data obtained from the previously reported ECOG-5103 clinical trial (in which two different arrays were used, HumanOmniExpress (727,227 SNPs) and HumanOmni1-Quad1 (1,131,857 SNPs)), we identified a 267 SNP cluster which was associated with a CIPN + phenotype with an accuracy of 96.1%. CONCLUSIONS: A cluster of SNPs was identified which prospectively discriminated patients most likely to develop symptomatic CIPN following taxane exposure as part of a breast cancer chemotherapy regimen. Validation using an independent patient cohort should be performed.

Differential associations of rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis or tooth loss: A cross-sectional study.

AIM: To study the association between periodontitis, tooth loss, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by using a large national dataset. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was performed using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles (2009-2014). RA status was detected using a questionnaire. Periodontal status was assigned on the basis of the clinical attachment level and periodontal pocket depth. Dentition status was assessed by the number of permanent teeth observed. We examined the association between RA as exposure and moderate/severe periodontitis and non-functional dentition as outcomes. We progressively adjusted our models for different sets of potential confounders. RESULTS: Moderate/severe periodontitis was more prevalent in participants reporting RA (53% vs. 41.5%, p = .0003). Non-functional dentition was more prevalent in participants with RA (41% vs. 15.5%, p = .0001). The fully adjusted model showed that participants with RA had higher odds of having non-functional dentition (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.3, p = .0001) but no association with moderate/severe periodontitis (prevalence ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.9-1.1, p = .9). CONCLUSION: RA was associated with a higher likelihood of having non-functional dentition but did not show any association with periodontitis after adjusting for the risk factors to control their confounding effect.

A New Hypothesis Describing the Pathogenesis of Oral Mucosal Injury Associated with the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitors.

It has been 24 years since rapamycin (sirolimus) was approved to mitigate solid organ transplant rejection and 16 years since mTOR (mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin) inhibitors reached patients as a cancer therapy. While the clinical benefits of mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) are robust, so too are their toxicities. Among the most common issues is the development of ulcers of the oral mucosa (mTOR-inhibitor associated stomatitis; mIAS). These lesions are distinct from those of other anti-cancer agents, occur with regularity, and impact patient outcomes. mIAS' pathogenesis has been the subject of speculation, and its similar presentation to recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) has led to the hypothesis that it might serve as a surrogate to better understand RAS. Based on a review of the literature, the current manuscript provides a hypothesis regarding the mechanisms by which mTORis uniquely initiate mucosal injury and an explanation for the observation that steroids (also an immunosuppressive) are effective in its treatment through a non-immunologic mechanism. Unexplained unique features of mIAS are discussed in this review in the context of future investigation.

Photobiomodulation therapy in management of cancer therapy-induced side effects: WALT position paper 2022.

Disclaimer: This article is based on recommendations from the 12th WALT Congress, Nice, October 3-6, 2018, and a follow-up review of the existing data and the clinical observations of an international multidisciplinary panel of clinicians and researchers with expertise in the area of supportive care in cancer and/or PBM clinical application and dosimetry. This article is informational in nature. As with all clinical materials, this paper should be used with a clear understanding that continued research and practice could result in new insights and recommendations. The review reflects the collective opinion and, as such, does not necessarily represent the opinion of any individual author. In no event shall the authors be liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the proposed protocols. Objective: This position paper reviews the potential prophylactic and therapeutic effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) on side effects of cancer therapy, including chemotherapy (CT), radiation therapy (RT), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Background: There is a considerable body of evidence supporting the efficacy of PBM for preventing oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing RT for head and neck cancer (HNC), CT, or HSCT. This could enhance patients' quality of life, adherence to the prescribed cancer therapy, and treatment outcomes while reducing the cost of cancer care. Methods: A literature review on PBM effectiveness and dosimetry considerations for managing certain complications of cancer therapy were conducted. A systematic review was conducted when numerous randomized controlled trials were available. Results were presented and discussed at an international consensus meeting at the World Association of photobiomoduLation Therapy (WALT) meeting in 2018 that included world expert oncologists, radiation oncologists, oral oncologists, and oral medicine professionals, physicists, engineers, and oncology researchers. The potential mechanism of action of PBM and evidence of PBM efficacy through reported outcomes for individual indications were assessed. Results: There is a large body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of PBM for preventing OM in certain cancer patient populations, as recently outlined by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). Building on these, the WALT group outlines evidence and prescribed PBM treatment parameters for prophylactic and therapeutic use in supportive care for radiodermatitis, dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia, trismus, mucosal and bone necrosis, lymphedema, hand-foot syndrome, alopecia, oral and dermatologic chronic graft-versus-host disease, voice/speech alterations, peripheral neuropathy, and late fibrosis amongst cancer survivors. Conclusions: There is robust evidence for using PBM to prevent and treat a broad range of complications in cancer care. Specific clinical practice guidelines or evidence-based expert consensus recommendations are provided. These recommendations are aimed at improving the clinical utilization of PBM therapy in supportive cancer care and promoting research in this field. It is anticipated these guidelines will be revised periodically.

Precision medicine for risk prediction of oral complications of cancer therapy-The example of oral mucositis in patients receiving radiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck.

Oral complications of cancer therapy are common, markedly symptomatic, negatively impact patients' quality of life, and add significantly to the cost of care. Patients' risk of treatment-related toxicities is not uniform; most patients suffer at least one side effect, while others tolerate treatment without any. Understanding those factors which impact risk provides opportunities to customize cancer treatment plans to optimize tumor kill and minimize regimen-related toxicities. Oral mucositis (OM) is an iconic example of a clinically significant and common complication of head and neck radiotherapy. Individuals' OM risk is governed by the cumulative impact of factors related to treatment, the tumor, and the patient. In addition to OM risk prediction, a second opportunity to apply precision medicine will evolve as viable treatment options become available. Patients vary widely in how well or poorly they respond to specific treatments. What works well in one individual, might fail in another. Prospective determination of the likelihood of a patient's response or non-response is based on a range of biological interactions. Coupled with risk determination, the application of precision medicine will allow caregivers, patients, and payers to integrate risk/benefit to optimize the probability that the best treatment is be given to the most appropriate patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy: Review of orofacial adverse events and role of the oral healthcare provider.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a revolutionary class of antineoplastic therapy that restore anti-tumor immunity. Consequences of this enhanced immune response include a multitude of immune related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any body system, including the mouth. Orofacial irAEs reproduce features of numerous immune-mediated conditions, including oral lichen planus, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and Sjögren syndrome, among others. The aim of this review is to summarize known orofacial irAEs and to familiarize oral healthcare providers with how to identify and manage these toxicities as part of the care team for patients treated with ICIs.

Two-Year Tumor Outcomes of a Phase 2B, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Avasopasem Manganese (GC4419) Versus Placebo to Reduce Severe Oral Mucositis Owing to Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Cisplatin for Head and Neck Cancer.

PURPOSE: Avasopasem manganese (GC4419), an investigational selective dismutase mimetic radioprotector, reduced duration, incidence, and severity of severe oral mucositis (World Health Organization grade 3-4) in a phase 2b, randomized, double-blind trial of patients receiving concurrent cisplatin (cis) and radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. We report the secondary endpoints of final 1- and 2-year tumor outcomes and exploratory data on trismus and xerostomia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with locally advanced oral cavity or oropharynx cancer to be treated with definitive or postop cis and RT were randomized to 1 of 3 arms: 30 mg avasopasem, 90 mg avasopasem, or placebo. Pairwise comparisons of Kaplan-Meier estimates (each active arm separately vs placebo) were made for overall survival, progression-free survival, locoregional control, and distant metastasis-free survival. Xerostomia and trismus data were collected at each follow-up visit and analyzed for trends by post-RT timepoint and treatment group. RESULTS: At a median follow-up for the entire cohort of 25.5 months (25th-75th percentile, 24.6-26.2 months; range, 0.2-31.9 months), Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1- and 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, locoregional control, and distant metastasis-free survival were not statistically different. No trends were apparent in xerostomia or trismus data. CONCLUSIONS: Avasopasem does not lead to statistically different tumor control outcomes when used concurrently with cis and RT for head and neck cancer. There was no detectable effect on trismus or xerostomia.