RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To prioritize trainee well-being, promote professionalism, and allow individuals to raise concerns without fear of retribution, one surgical department created an innovative process by which individuals can raise concerns and obtain subsequent support. DESIGN AND SETTING: The University of Michigan Department of Surgery implemented the Michigan Action Progress System (MAPS) in February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: General Surgery residents, faculty, and staff voluntarily participate in MAPS. RESULTS: Since implementation, there have been 26 entries into MAPS. Petitioners included students (10, 38%), residents and fellows (7, 27%), staff (1, 4%), faculty (1, 4%), and anonymous petitioners (7, 27%). Concerns regarding racism (1, 4%), bullying (11, 52%), gender discrimination (1, 4%), and other incidents (8, 38%) were addressed though MAPS. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully implemented an innovative system that focuses on the needs of the user, consolidates handling of concerns, and emphasizes transparency, documentation, education, and improvement to promote a culture of professionalism and accountability.
Assuntos
Profissionalismo , Estudantes , Humanos , Michigan , Responsabilidade SocialRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess frailty, a measure of physiologic declines in multiple organ systems, in children with chronic liver disease using a novel pediatric frailty tool. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective cross-sectional multicenter study at 17 liver transplantation (LT) centers. 71 children (5-17 years of age), 36 with compensated chronic liver disease (CCLD) and 35 with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and listed for LT, were assessed for frailty using validated pediatric tools to assess the 5 classic Fried Frailty Criteria-slowness, weakness, exhaustion, diminished physical activity, and shrinkage. Test scores were translated to age- and sex-dependent z scores, generating a maximum frailty score of 10. RESULTS: The median frailty score of the cohort was 4 (IQR 3, 5). Subjects with ESLD had significantly higher frailty scores (median 5; IQR 4, 7) than subjects with CCLD (median 3; IQR 2, 4); (P < .0001). Area under the curve receiver operating characteristic for frailty scores to discriminate between ESLD and CCLD was 0.83 (95% CI 0.73, 0.93). Forty-six percent of children with ESLD were frail and there was no correlation between pediatric frailty scores and physician's global assessments (r = -0.24, 95% CI -0.53, 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: A novel frailty tool assessed additional dimensions of health, not captured by standard laboratory measures and identified the sickest individuals among a cohort of children with chronic liver disease. This tool may have applicability to other children with chronic disease.