Perception, magnitude, and implications of cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer survivors: Study from a developing country.

BACKGROUND: We have analyzed perceptions, magnitude, interventions adopted, and overall implications of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in breast cancer survivors (BCSs). METHODOLOGY: BCSs who attended follow-up clinic at our institute between January and June 2018 were asked to fill a questionnaire focused on assessing an individual's perception, severity, potential causes, implications on quality of life, and measures taken to deal with CRF. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included. Fifty-four (83%) had undergone surgery, 59 (91%) chemotherapy, 43 (66%) radiation therapy, and 36 (55%) hormonal/targeted therapy. Sixty-two (95%) patients experienced any grade CRF. Fifty-five (85%) patients experienced moderate to severe CRF affecting work (58%) and activities of daily living (27%). CRF was perceived as generalized weakness by 54 (83%) patients, diminished concentration/attention span by 24 (37%) patients, decreased motivation and interest in usual activities by 29 (45%) patients, and emotional labiality by 16 (25%) patients. Fifty-six patients (86%) believed that fatigue was due to the effect of cancer treatment on the body, while only 8 (12%) attributed it to underlying cancer. CRF had negative impact on mood, daily activities, interpersonal relationships, and professional work in 40 (62%), 39 (60%), 13 (20%), and 10 (15%) patients, respectively. Measures taken to overcome CRF were increased physical exercise, psychosocial interventions, mind-body interventions, and pharmacological interventions in 32 (49%), 8 (12%), 28 (43), and 17 (26%) patients, respectively. Thirty-nine (60%) patients reported persistence of CRF after completion of treatment while it took up to 6 months, 6-12 months, and more than 12 months for resolution of CRF in 13, 10, and 3 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Development and persistence of CRF remains a major health concern, and current interventions are not able to mitigate this problem. Further research in this field is warranted.

Addition of docetaxel or abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in Indian population.

BACKGROUND: The addition of docetaxel or abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) achieves superior survival outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in predominantly Western population. We sought to evaluate the treatment outcomes of adding docetaxel or abiraterone to ADT in Indian population. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of ninety patients with newly diagnosed mHSPC who received treatment between January 2015 and June 2018. Patients received ADT alone or ADT + docetaxel or ADT + abiraterone as initial treatment. Monthly clinical evaluation and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement were done. Outcome measures analyzed included PSA decline <90%, serological complete response (sCR) (PSA < 0.2 ng/ml), and progression to CRPC. Outcome variable was compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Patients received ADT alone (n = 37) or ADT + docetaxel (n = 31) or ADT + abiraterone (n = 22). The median age was 67.5 years (range, 41-87 years) and the median PSA was 88.5 ng/ml (range, 1.12-4000). PSA decline <90% was seen in 22 (73%), 24 (86%), and 17 (94%) patients in the ADT alone, ADT + docetaxel, and ADT + abiraterone groups. sCR was achieved in 5 (17%), 10 (36%), and 9 (50%) patients in the ADT alone, ADT + docetaxel, and ADT + abiraterone groups. Progression to CRPC was observed in 18 (60%), 11 (39%), and 2 (11%) patients in the ADT alone, ADT + docetaxel, and ADT + abiraterone groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of docetaxel or abiraterone to ADT achieves a deeper serological response and reduces progression to CRPC compared to ADT alone in mHSPC patients of Indian origin. Longer follow-up is required to comment on overall survival and also to determine which combination (ADT + docetaxel or ADT + abiraterone) is superior to others, if at all.