His-Bundle Pacing in a Patient With Tricuspid and Mitral Prosthetic Valves Without Suitable Coronary Veins for Lead Placement.

Atrioventricular block in patients with a prosthetic tricuspid valve and a pacemaker with a dysfunctional epicardial lead is not uncommon. In such instances, coronary sinus lead placement is the preferred option, but it has a failure rate of 10%-15%. An atrial transseptal left ventricular lead placement has been proposed as an alternative, but this approach is not feasible in patients with a prosthetic mitral valve. This analysis represents the first reported case of His-bundle pacing from the atria in a patient with prosthetic tricuspid and mitral valves, with no suitable coronary veins for lead placement.

Le bloc auriculo-ventriculaire n'est pas rare chez les patients ayant reçu une valve tricuspide prothétique et porteurs d'un stimulateur cardiaque dont la sonde épicardique est dysfonctionnelle. Dans de tels cas, le positionnement de la sonde sur le sinus coronaire est l'option à privilégier, mais son taux d'échec varie entre 10 et 15 %. L'implantation de la sonde sur le ventricule gauche par la voie transsetale a été proposée à titre de solution de rechange, mais cette approche n'est pas envisageable chez les patients ayant reçu une valve mitrale prothétique. La présente analyse constitue le premier cas de stimulation du faisceau de His à partir des oreillettes chez un patient ayant reçu des valves tricuspides et mitrales prothétiques, en l'absence de veines coronaires se prêtant à l'implantation de la sonde.

The political and security dimensions of the humanitarian health response to violent conflict.

The nature of armed conflict throughout the world is intensely dynamic. Consequently, the protection of non-combatants and the provision of humanitarian services must continually adapt to this changing conflict environment. Complex political affiliations, the systematic use of explosive weapons and sexual violence, and the use of new communication technology, including social media, have created new challenges for humanitarian actors in negotiating access to affected populations and security for their own personnel. The nature of combatants has also evolved as armed, non-state actors might have varying motivations, use different forms of violence, and engage in a variety of criminal activities to generate requisite funds. New health threats, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and new capabilities, such as modern trauma care, have also created new challenges and opportunities for humanitarian health provision. In response, humanitarian policies and practices must develop negotiation and safety capabilities, informed by political and security realities on the ground, and guidance from affected communities. More fundamentally, humanitarian policies will need to confront a changing geopolitical environment, in which traditional humanitarian norms and protections might encounter wavering support in the years to come.