Alternative Methods for Pulmonary-Administered Drugs Metabolism: A Breath of Change.

Prediction of pulmonary metabolites following inhalation of a locally acting pulmonary drug is essential to the successful development of novel inhaled medicines. The lungs present metabolic enzymes, therefore they influence drug disposal and toxicity. The present review provides an overview of alternative methods to evaluate the pulmonary metabolism for the safety and efficacy of pulmonary delivery systems. In vitro approaches for investigating pulmonary drug metabolism were described, including subcellular fractions, cell culture models and lung slices as the main available in vitro methods. In addition, in silico studies are promising alternatives that use specific software to predict pulmonary drug metabolism, determine whether a molecule will react with a metabolic enzyme, the site of metabolism (SoM) and the result of this interaction. They can be used in an integrated approach to delineate the major cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms to rationalize the use of in vivo methods. A case study about a combination of experimental and computational approaches was done using fluticasone propionate as an example. The results of three tested software, RSWebPredictor, SMARTCyp and XenoSite, demonstrated greater probability of the fluticasone propionate being metabolized by CYPs 3A4 at the S1 atom of 5-S-fluoromethyl carbothioate group. As the in vitro studies were not able to directly detect pulmonary metabolites, those alternatives in silico methods may reduce animal testing efforts, following the principle of 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement), and contribute to the evaluation of pharmacological efficacy and safety profiles of new drugs in development.

An attempt to chemically state the cross-talk between monomers of COX homodimers by double/hybrid inhibitors mofezolac-spacer-mofezolac and mofezolac-spacer-arachidonic acid.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) account for over 17 million death globally each year, including arterial thrombosis. Platelets are key components in the pathogenesis of this disease and modulating their activity is an effective strategy to treat such thrombotic events. Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) isoenzyme is involved in platelet activation and is the main target of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and new selective inhibitor research. Inhibitors of general formula mofezolac-spacer-mofezolac (mof-spacer-mof) and mofezolac-spacer-arachidonic acid (mof-spacer-AA) were projected to investigate the possible cross-talk between the two monomers (Eallo and Ecat) forming the COX-1 homodimer. Mofezolac was chosen as either one or two moieties of these molecules being the known most potent and selective COX-1 inhibitor and administrated to humans as Disopain™, then arachidonic acid (AA) was used to develop molecules bearing, in the same compound, in addition to the inhibitor moiety (mofezolac) also the natural COX substrate. Depending on the nature of the spacer, COX-1 and COX-2 activity was differently inhibited by mof-spacer-mof set with a preferential COX-1 inhibition. The highest COX-1 selectivity was exhibited by the compound in which the spacer was the benzidine [N,N'-(biphenyl-4,4'-di-yl)bis (2-[3,4-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)isoxazol-5-yl]acetamide) (15): COX-1 IC50 = 0.08 µM, COX-2 IC50 > 50 µM, Selectivity Index (SI) > 625]. In the case of mof-spacer-AA set, the COX inhibitory potency and also the isoform preference changed. (5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z)-N-(4-{2-[3,4-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)isoxazol-5-yl]acetamido}butyl)icosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenamide (19) and (5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z)-N-(4'-{2-[3,4-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)isoxazol-5-yl]acetamido}-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)icosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenamide (21), in which the spacer is the 1,2-diaminobutane or benzidine, respectively, selectively inhibited the COX-2, whereas when the spacer is the 1,4-phenylendiamine [(5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z)-N-(4-{2-[3,4-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)isoxazol-5-yl]acetamido}phenyl)icosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenamide) (20) the COX preference is COX-1 (COX-1 IC50 = 0.05 µM, COX-2 IC50 > 50 µM, with a COX-1 selectivity > 1000). Molecular modelling by using FLAP algorithm shows fundamental interactions of the novel compounds at the entry channel of COX and inside its catalytic cavity. The effect of these mof-spacer-mof and mof-spacer-AA in inhibiting in vitro free arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was also determined. A positive profile of hemocompatibility in relation to their influence on the blood coagulation cascade and erythrocyte toxicity was observed. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity safety were also found for these two novel sets of compounds.

Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.

A set of novel diarylisoxazoles has been projected using mofezolac (1) as a lead compound to investigate structure-inhibitory activity relationships of new compounds and the cyclooxygenases (COXs) catalytic activity. Mofezolac was chosen because is the most potent and selective reversible COX-1 inhibitor [COX-1 IC50 = 0.0079 µM and COX-2 IC50 > 50 µM, with a selectivity index (SI) in favor of COX-1 higher than 6300]. Seventeen new compounds were synthesized in fair to good yields and evaluated for their COXs inhibitory activity and selectivity. SIs ranged between 1 and higher than 1190.3,4-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-vinylisoxazole (22) has the highest SI with COX-1 IC50 = 0.042 µM and COX-2 IC50 > 50 µM. 1 and 22 were superior to aspirin in inhibiting platelet aggregation (IC50 = 0.45, 0.63 and 1.11 µM, respectively) in human platelet rich plasma (hPRP) assay. They did not induce blood coagulation and hemolysis, and are neither genotoxic nor mutagen. 1 and 22 slightly increase bortezomib cytotoxic effect on multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines (NCI-H929 and RPMI-8226) and affects MM cell cycle and apoptosis when co-administered with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, a drug clinically used to treat plasma cell neoplasms including MM. In addition, structure-based binding mode of 1 and 22, through Fingerprints for Ligands and Proteins (FLAG) calculation, allowed to explain the one order of magnitude difference between COX-1 IC50 values of the two compounds. Specifically, the higher inhibitory potency seems due to the formation of a H-bond between COX-1 S530 and the carboxyl, present in 1 and absent in 22.