Incidence and factors for pseudoaccommodation after monofocal lens implantation: the Monofocal Extended Range of Vision study.

PURPOSE: To screen patients with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) for incidence of unaided 20/40 and 0.3 LogMAR for distance and near (pseudoaccommodation) and to find factors for pseudoaccommodation. SETTINGS: University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: This was a single-eye study ( ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04011696). At 3 to 9 months, refraction, uncorrected and corrected distance and uncorrected near visual acuity (logMAR), spherical equivalent (SEQ), mesopic pupil size (PS), total eye spherical (Z 40 ), vertical coma (Z 3-1 ) aberrations, reading speed and smallest print size were assessed. Refractive astigmatism (RA) was classified as against-the-rule, with-the-rule, oblique and no astigmatism. Data on preoperative axial length (AL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were collected. RESULTS: 29 patients (9.6%, 95% CI, 6.5-13.5) had pseudoaccommodation. In cases vs controls, median SEQ, PS, total Z 40 , Z 3-1 , reading speed, smallest print size, preoperative ACD, preoperative AL were: -0.39 vs 0.0 diopters; 3.62 vs 4.10 mm; 0.01 vs 0.02 µm; 0.018 vs 0.022 µm; 106 vs 133 words per minute; 0.30 vs 0.50 logMAR; 2.94 vs 3.13 mm, 23.4 vs 23.7 mm, respectively. RA was not different between the groups. Univariate analysis revealed preoperative ACD (odds ratio [OR], 0.38, 95% CI, 0.16-0.94, P = .04), SEQ (OR, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.42-0.88, P = .01), total Z 40 (OR, 0.0003, 95% CI, 0.00-0.39, P = .03) and PS (OR, 0.39, 95% CI, 0.22-0.69, P < .041) to be significant. Whereas multivariable logistic regression identified: preoperative AL (OR, 0.62, 95% CI, 0.42-0.91, P = .02), SEQ (OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.78, P = .01), Z 40 (OR, 0.00, 95% CI, 0.0-0.01, P = .01) and PS (OR, 0.41, 95% CI, 0.23-0.75, P = .01) to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of low myopic SEQ, lower Z 40 , shorter preoperative AL, and smaller PS increases the chances of pseudoaccommodation.

Comparison of Anterior Corneal Aberrometry, Keratometry and Pupil Size with Scheimpflug Tomography and Ray Tracing Aberrometer.

This study aimed to assess the anterior corneal wavefront aberrations, keratometry, astigmatism vectors and pupil size between Pentacam HR® (Oculus Optikgeraete GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and iTrace® (Tracey Technologies Corp., Houston, TX, USA). In this observational study, 100 eyes (50 healthy volunteers) were scanned in mesopic light condition with a Pentacam HR® and iTrace®. Anterior corneal aberrations (spherical aberration (Z40), vertical coma (Z3 − 1), horizontal coma (Z3 + 1)), keratometry in the flattest (K1) and steepest meridian (K2), mean astigmatism, astigmatic vectors (J0 and J45), and pupil size were measured. We found a significant difference in Z40 (Pentacam®: +0.30 ± 0.11 µm and iTrace®: −0.03 µm ± 0.05 µm; p < 0.01) with no correlation between the devices (r = −0.12, p = 0.22). The devices were in complete agreement for Z3 − 1 (p = 0.78) and Z3 + 1 (p = 0.39), with significant correlation between the machines (r = −0.38, p < 0.01 and r = −0.6, p < 0.01). There was no difference in K1, K2 and mean astigmatism. J0 was negative with both devices (against-the-rule astigmatism), but there was no correlation. J45 was negative with the Pentacam HR® (more myopic oblique astigmatism) but significantly correlated between the devices. Pupil size was smaller with Pentacam HR® (p < 0.01). In summary, these devices cannot be used interchangeably. Corneal Z40 was significantly different with more negative Z40 with iTrace® compared to Pentacam HR®. iTrace® operates with lower illumination, giving larger pupil size than Pentacam HR®, which uses intense blue light during measurement. No correlation was found for J0. Pentacam HR® had a trend to record more negative J45 (myopic oblique astigmatism).

Commercial Slit Lamp Anterior Segment Photography versus Digital Compact Camera Mounted on a Standard Slit Lamp with an Adapter.

PURPOSE: To compare slit lamp mounted anterior segment cameras (SLCs) versus digital compact camera (DCC) with slit-lamp adaptor when used by an inexperienced technician. METHODS: In this cross sectional study, where posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was used as a comparator, patients were consented for one photograph with SLC and two with DCC (DCC1 and DCC2), with a slit lamp adaptor. An inexperienced clinic technician, who took all the photographs and masked the images, recruited one eye of each patient. Images were graded for PCO using EPCO 2000 software by two independent masked graders. Repeatability between DCC1 and DCC2, and limits-of-agreement between SLC and DCC1 mounted on slit-lamp with an adaptor were assessed. Coefficient-of-repeatability and Bland-Altmann plots were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (eyes) were recruited in the study. First 9 patients (eyes) were excluded due to unsatisfactory image quality from both the systems. Mean evaluation of posterior capsule opacification (EPCO) score for SLC was 2.28 (95% CI: 2.09-2.45), for DCC1 was 2.28 (95% CI: 2.11-2.45), and for the DCC2 was 2.11 (95% CI: 2.11-2.45). There was no significant difference in EPCO scores between SLC vs. DCC1 (p = 0.98) and between DCC1 and DCC2 (p = 0.97). Coefficient of repeatability between DCC images was 0.42, and the coefficient of repeatability between DCC and SLC was 0.58. CONCLUSIONS: DCC on slit lamp with an adaptor is comparable to a SLC. There is an initial learning curve, which is similar for both for an inexperienced person. This opens up the possibility for low cost anterior segment imaging in the clinical, research, and teaching settings.

Growth factor restriction impedes progression of wound healing following cataract surgery: identification of VEGF as a putative therapeutic target.

Secondary visual loss occurs in millions of patients due to a wound-healing response, known as posterior capsule opacification (PCO), following cataract surgery. An intraocular lens (IOL) is implanted into residual lens tissue, known as the capsular bag, following cataract removal. Standard IOLs allow the anterior and posterior capsules to become physically connected. This places pressure on the IOL and improves contact with the underlying posterior capsule. New open bag IOL designs separate the anterior capsule and posterior capsules and further reduce PCO incidence. It is hypothesised that this results from reduced cytokine availability due to greater irrigation of the bag. We therefore explored the role of growth factor restriction on PCO using human lens cell and tissue culture models. We demonstrate that cytokine dilution, by increasing medium volume, significantly reduced cell coverage in both closed and open capsular bag models. This coincided with reduced cell density and myofibroblast formation. A screen of 27 cytokines identified nine candidates whose expression profile correlated with growth. In particular, VEGF was found to regulate cell survival, growth and myofibroblast formation. VEGF provides a therapeutic target to further manage PCO development and will yield best results when used in conjunction with open bag IOL designs.

An in vitro evaluation of the Anew Zephyr open-bag IOL in the prevention of posterior capsule opacification using a human capsular bag model.

PURPOSE: During cataract surgery an IOL is placed within the capsular bag. Clinical studies show that IOLs with a square edge profile and complete contact between the IOL and the anterior capsule (AC) are currently the best way to prevent posterior capsule opacification (PCO). This has been challenged by recent clinical and experimental observations, which suggest that if the capsular bag is kept open with separation of contact between the AC and posterior capsule (PC) by an "open-bag device" PCO is dramatically reduced. Therefore, the current study set out to evaluate the putative merits of an open-bag IOL (Anew Zephyr) in a human capsular bag model. METHODS: An in vitro organ culture model using the bag-zonular-ciliary body complex isolated from fellow human donor eyes was prepared. A capsulorhexis and lens extraction were performed, and an Alcon Acrysof IOL or Anew Zephyr IOL implanted. Preparations were secured by pinning the ciliary body to a silicone ring and maintained in 6 mL Eagle's minimum essential medium (EMEM) or EMEM supplemented with 2% vol/vol human serum (HS) and 10 ng/mL TGF-ß2 for 28 days. Cell growth and capsular modifications were monitored with phase-contrast and modified dark-field microscopy. RESULTS: In serum-free EMEM culture conditions, cells were observed growing onto the PC of preparations implanted with an Anew Zephyr IOL, but this was retarded relative to observations in match-paired capsular bags implanted with an Alcon Acrysof IOL. In the case of cultures maintained in 2% HS-EMEM plus TGF-ß2, the movement on to the PC was again delayed with the presence of an Anew Zephyr IOL. Differences in the degree of growth on the PC and matrix modifications were apparent with the different donors, but in each case the match-paired Alcon Acrysof implanted bag exhibited significantly greater coverage and modification of the capsule. CONCLUSIONS: The Anew Zephyr open-bag IOL performs consistently better than the Alcon Acrysof IOL in the human capsular bag model. We propose that the benefits observed with the Anew Zephyr result from a reduction in growth factor levels available within the capsular bag and a barrier function imposed by the ring haptic.

Effect of total lens epithelial cell destruction on intraocular lens fixation in the human capsular bag.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of complete destruction of lens epithelial cells (LECs) in the capsular bag on intraocular lens (IOL) stability. SETTING: School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Comparative evaluation. METHODS: An in vitro organ culture model using the bag-zonule-ciliary body complex isolated from fellow human donor eyes was prepared. A capsulorhexis and fiber extraction were performed, and an Acrysof IOL was implanted. Preparations were secured by pinning the ciliary body to a silicone ring and maintaining it in 6 mL Eagle minimum essential medium supplemented with 5% v/v fetal calf serum and 10 ng/mL transforming growth factor-ß2 for 3 weeks or more. One bag of each pair was treated with 1 µM thapsigargin to destroy all LECs. Observations of LEC growth were captured by phase-contrast microscopy, IOL stability by video microscopy, and endpoint analysis through scanning electron microscopy and immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: The LECs in control capsular bags migrated centrally, closing the bag and fixating the IOL between the anterior and posterior capsules, as seen clinically. These events were not observed in the thapsigargin-treated group. After a period of controlled orbital movement, the IOL in the control group stabilized quicker than in the treated bags. There was no IOL rotation in the bag; however, the IOLs in the treated group rocked with axial movement. CONCLUSIONS: The LECs appeared to aid stabilization of current IOL designs in the capsular bag. The results have clinical implications for IOL design and for strategies to prevent posterior capsule opacification. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification between 2 aspheric microincision intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between 2 microincision hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and with a conventional spherical hydrophobic IOL. SETTING: St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective randomized comparative study. METHODS: A microincision Acri.Smart 36A (negatively aspheric) or Akreos MI-60 (aspherically neutral) IOL was randomized to the first eye of patients with the alternative IOL implanted in the fellow eye within 3 weeks. Postoperatively, 100% and 9% logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were assessed. Retroillumination photographs were analyzed using the posterior capsule opacity software system. The data on PCO scores were compared with those of a conventional spherical hydrophobic IOL (Acrysof SN60AT). RESULTS: One hundred percent CDVA was significantly better at 12 months and 9% CDVA was better at 6, 12, and 24 months (P<.05) with the negatively aspheric IOL. One eye in each group with microincision IOLs developed capsule phimosis at 1 month. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomies were required by 2 years in 2 eyes with a negatively aspheric IOL and 8 eyes with an aspherically neutral IOL. At 24 months, the mean PCO score remained less than 10% with the conventional spherical IOL, whereas it increased with time in the negatively aspheric IOL (up to 16%) and the aspherically neutral IOL (up to 23%). CONCLUSIONS: The negatively aspheric IOL had a better PCO profile than the aspherically neutral IOL. This may be attributed to the difference in the edge design between the IOLs. The microincision IOLs had more PCO than the conventional 1-piece hydrophobic IOL.

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography demonstrates interconnected orbital cyst and chorioretinal coloboma in an adult.

PURPOSE: To report an orbital cyst underlying a chorioretinal coloboma in an otherwise normal eye, detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of a chorioretinal colobomatous cyst in the normal eye to be reported. METHODS: A descriptive case report of a patient with a chorioretinal coloboma with an underlying orbital cyst. RESULTS: A 59-year-old woman presented with a floater affecting her left visual field. Fundoscopy revealed a pale lesion inferotemporal to fixation at the left macula. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography revealed a retinochoroidal coloboma with an associated scleral hole. Enhanced depth imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography revealed an underlying orbital colobomatous cyst. CONCLUSION: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of a healthy adult with a retinochoroidal colobomatous cyst without microphthalmos. The authors encourage optical coherence tomography of any suspected colobomas to exclude similar pathology.

Comparison of near vision, intraocular lens movement, and depth of focus with accommodating and monofocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity, intraocular lens (IOL) movement, and depth of focus with the Crystalens HD single-optic accommodating IOL and the Tecnis ZCB00 aspheric monofocal IOL. SETTING: St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Patients with bilateral symptomatic cataract had bilateral sequential cataract surgery within 6 weeks with randomized implantation of the accommodating or monofocal IOL in both eyes. Exclusion criteria included other ocular conditions and corneal astigmatism greater than 2.00 diopters. The primary outcome was uniocular distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA). Secondary measures were IOL movement, depth of focus, intermediate and distance vision, objective refraction, and pupil size at distance and near fixation. Results from 3 months postoperatively are presented. RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, 64 patients (32 in each group) were available for study. The distance vision was not statistically significantly different between the accommodating IOL and monofocal IOL (mean 0.05 logMAR versus 0.06 logMAR). The mean DCNVA (0.48 logMAR ± 0.15 [SD] versus 0.61 ± 0.13 logMAR) and intermediate visual acuity (0.08 ± 0.1 logMAR versus 0.20 ± 0.09 logMAR) were significantly better with the accommodating IOL (P<.001). Neither IOL had clinically significant movement, and near vision did not directly correlate with movement of the accommodating IOL. The accommodating IOL provided greater depth of focus. CONCLUSIONS: Near and intermediate acuities were better with the accommodating IOL. This effect was not directly linked to IOL movement but was at least partly due to depth of focus.

Fellow-eye comparison of 2 aspheric microincision intraocular lenses and effect of asphericity on visual performance.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual performance and aberrations with aspheric and spherically neutral microincision intraocular lenses (IOLs) and assess the influence of asphericity on visual performance, wavefront aberration, and depth of focus. SETTING: St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Clinical trial and cohort study. METHODS: In the first study, patients with bilateral cataract were randomized to receive an aspheric Acri.Smart 36A IOL or a spherically neutral Akreos MI60 IOL in the first eye. The other IOL was implanted in the second eye within 3 weeks. Assessments at 3 months were 100% and 9% corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA). Aberrations and depth of focus were computed using iTrace software. In the second study, data from the other published study was combined to assess the visual performance, aberration, and depth of focus in groups of spherical, spherically neutral, and negatively aspheric (asphericity -0.17 µm) IOLs. RESULTS: In part 1, there was no difference in 100% or 9% CDVA, DCNVA, or depth of focus between the 2 microincision IOLs. Total spherical aberration was lower with the aspheric IOL. In part 2, the CDVA and DCNVA were not different between the spherical (n = 44), spherically neutral (n = 32), or aspheric (n = 76) IOLs. Total spherical (P<.01) and vertical coma aberrations decreased with increasing IOL asphericity (P<.01). Depth of focus (4.0 mm pupil) also decreased with increasing asphericity and was significant between the spherical IOL and aspheric IOLs. The DCNVA did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Asphericity of IOLs did not affect distance visual acuity. The difference in depth of focus was significant only between negatively aspheric and spherical IOLs. Asphericity differences up to 20 µm did not influence depth of focus.

Calcification in hydrophilic intraocular lenses associated with injection of intraocular gas.

PURPOSE: To report a distinct type of calcification in hydrophilic intraocular lenses in complicated, traumatized eyes with a history of intraocular gas use. DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: Three cases of hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) opacification confined to the pupillary area are reported from clinical practice in London, UK. Clinical details and analysis of the explanted intraocular lenses are provided with environmental scanning electron microscopy images and x-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy results. RESULTS: All cases were associated with use of intraocular gas in complicated traumatized eyes, and had central areas of IOL opacification over the pupillary zone, confined to the anterior surface of the IOL. Analysis of the lenses showed the opacified areas to be composed of calcium and phosphate. CONCLUSION: The areas of opacification in all 3 hydrophilic IOLs were attributable to calcification. We postulate that intraocular gas use and the altered blood-aqueous barrier of these complicated traumatized eyes co-act to trigger secondary IOL calcification. Further experimental testing is needed to confirm this clinical association.

Effect of intraocular lens asphericity on posterior capsule opacification between two intraocular lenses with same acrylic material: a fellow-eye study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intra-individual differences in posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and visual performance between spherical AcrySof SN60AT and an aspheric AcrySof SN60WF intraocular lens (IOL) with a posterior aspheric surface, both of which are made of same hydrophobic acrylic material. SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK. METHODS: In this prospective randomized, fellow-eye comparison, an aspheric IOL, which is 9% thinner in comparison with the spherical IOL, was randomized to the first eye of 47 patients and fellow-eye surgery was performed within 3 weeks. Follow-up was at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Corrected logMAR visual acuity (CDVA) was measured at 100% and 9% contrast. After pupil dilation, digital retroillumination photographs were taken and the mean PCO percentage was calculated using poco software at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: At 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, 47 (94 eyes), 44 (88 eyes), 42 (84 eyes) and 41 (82 eyes) patients were followed-up respectively. Hundred per cent and 9% of LogMAR CDVA was not significantly different between the two IOLs (p = NS at all time-points). Percentage area PCO scores (mean ± SD) at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months with the spherical IOL was 5.82 ± 9.89, 7.76 ± 16.83, 7.21 ± 12.46, 9.29 ± 18.25 and 14.39 ± 25.42, respectively, and with an aspheric IOL was 8.91 ± 12.79, 5.97 ± 10.32, 5.15 ± 7.92, 7.68 ± 11.18 and 12.18 ± 20.10, respectively (p = NS at all time-points). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior capsule opacification was not significantly different between the spheric and aspheric IOLs in this fellow-eye, randomized comparison. Additional asphericity on the existing model of IOL does not influence PCO performance.

Influence of different acrylic intraocular lens materials on optical quality of vision in pseudophakic eyes.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) material on the optical quality in pseudophakic eyes with a clear posterior capsule and assess in vitro forward light scatter of these IOLs. SETTING: St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Eyes with a hydrophobic or hydrophilic acrylic IOL and a clear posterior capsule within the central 4.0 mm at least 3 months postoperatively were identified from 2 ongoing studies. Data on 100% and 9% logMAR corrected distance visual acuities (CDVA) and total eye aberrations with a 4.0 mm pupil were collected. The 10% and 50% point-spread function (PSF) values of double-pass measurements were collected. In vitro forward light scattering was analyzed for the IOL models using a standardized laboratory technique. RESULTS: Twenty-eight eyes had hydrophilic IOLs, and 43 had hydrophobic IOLs. There was no significant difference in IOL power, postoperative spherical equivalent, or 100% logMAR CDVA between hydrophilic IOLs and hydrophobic acrylic IOLs. Nine percent logMAR CDVA (P=.000), 10% PSF (P=.005), 50% PSF (P=.008), and Zernike polynomial 4 (P=.000) were significantly different between the IOL groups. Although in vitro forward-scatter levels were low in both groups, hydrophilic IOLs had more forward scatter. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrophobic acrylic IOLs gave better low contrast visual acuity. Even within the acrylic subgroup, the optical quality varied significantly. The IOL material is an important factor influencing the optical quality of vision with different acrylic IOLs.

Use of the double-pass technique to quantify ocular scatter in patients with uveitis: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: to assess whether the double-pass technique can be employed to quantify the amount of light scattering in patients with uveitis. METHODS: 56 eyes of 44 patients with intraocular inflammation were consecutively recruited from the uveitis clinic over 9 months. The degree of intraocular inflammation was recorded according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature criteria and the eyes were grouped as having anterior, intermediate, posterior or panuveitis. Objective scatter index (OSI) was assessed using a double-pass technique with the Optical Quality Analysis System II. RESULTS: twenty-four eyes had anterior uveitis, 9 eyes had intermediate uveitis, 10 eyes had posterior uveitis and 13 eyes had panuveitis. The OSI was significantly different between all 4 groups (p = 0.0005). The mean OSI was highest in eyes with anterior uveitis (2.6 ± 3.1) and lowest in posterior uveitis (1.9 ± 1.3). Anterior chamber cells significantly correlated with OSI (R(2) = 0.8726, p = 0.007), unlike posterior chamber cells (R(2) = 0.0189, p = 0.588) and flare (R(2) = 0.0048, p = 0.471). CONCLUSION: patients with anterior uveitis have more ocular scatter, and anterior chamber cells scatter more light. This pilot study opens new avenues for research in use of the double-pass technique to assess light scattering in uveitis.

A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare the accommodative performance of the Morcher BioComFold Type 89A bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens (IOL) with a conventional in-the-bag control IOL in presbyopic eyes. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. STUDY POPULATION: Fifty-two eyes of 26 patients with bilateral age-related cataracts. INTERVENTION: Phacoemulsification cataract extraction with implantation of a bag-in-the-Lens and a control IOL, the Alcon AcrySof SA60AT (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA), randomized to either eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Axial IOL shift stimulated by physiologic (near visual effort) and pharmacologic (pilocarpine and cyclopentolate) accommodative stimulation was measured objectively with partial coherence interferometry. Other outcome measures were objective and subjective accommodation, logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution distance-corrected near visual acuity, and defocus curves. RESULTS: Three months after surgery, axial IOL shift stimulated by near visual effort measured -5.9 ± 10.3 µm in bag-in-the-lens eyes versus -8.4 ± 12.8 µm in control eyes (P = .37), that stimulated by pilocarpine measured 20.2 ± 165.6 µm versus 50.4 ± 164.4 µm (P = .36), and that stimulated by cyclopentolate measured -65.8 ± 64.3 µm versus -54.0 ± 37.5 µm (P = .34), respectively (n = 25). Objective accommodation measured 0.03 ± 0.18 diopters (D) in bag-in-the-lens eyes versus 0.08 ± 0.21 D in control eyes (P = .40), whereas subjective accommodation measured 2.48 ± 0.72 D versus 2.45 ± 0.80 D (P = .75), respectively. Distance-corrected near visual acuity and defocus curves showed no difference between IOLs. CONCLUSIONS: The bag-in-the-lens IOL demonstrated negligible axial shift and objective accommodation with physiologic near visual stimulation. The IOL shift demonstrated with pilocarpine also was clinically insignificant. The bag-in-the-lens IOL showed no accommodative or near visual advantage over a conventional in-the-bag IOL, despite its unique capsular fixation method. This provides further evidence that the focus-shift principle fails to produce clinically significant IOL movement.

Complications of cataract surgery.

Modern cataract surgery is safe in more than 95 per cent of patients. In the small number of cases where a serious complication occurs, the most common is an intra-operative posterior capsular rupture. This can lead to vitreous loss or a dropped nucleus and can increase the risk of post-operative cystoid macular oedema or retinal detachment. Post-operatively, posterior capsular opacification is the most common complication and can be readily treated with a YAG capsulotomy. The most devastating complication is endophthalmitis, the rate of which is now significantly decreased through the use of intracameral antibiotics. As a clinician, the most important step is to assess the patient pre-operatively to predict higher risk individuals and to counsel them appropriately. In these patients, various pre- or intra-operative management steps can be taken in addition to routine phacoemulsification to optimise their visual outcome.