RESUMO
AIM: Children often fall sick, which causes concern among parents. Online health information can be confusing and difficult to understand. We aimed to produce simple, informative video tutorials on the symptoms ill children present. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi method to produce video tutorials on the symptoms of fever, vomiting and diarrhoea, abdominal pain, breathing difficulties, sore throat, red eyes, earache and rash. We identified the most common symptoms in acutely ill children. During the first consensus round, experts rated statements on out-of-hospital management from existing health information. Video tutorials were produced from statements rated to be included. The second consensus round involved video showings and editing. Two videos were evaluated in focus groups by parents. RESULTS: During the first round, experts rated a median of 79 (40-154) statements for each symptom. Panels consisted of a median of seven (6-11) experts, primarily. Panels reached a consensus on inclusion, neutrality or exclusion in 83% of statements. The second round led to adjustments to the videos and final approval by experts. Most parents evaluated the videos as 'informative, easy to understand and calming'. CONCLUSION: We produced video tutorials on the common symptoms ill children present using a modified Delphi method. Feedback from parents in focus groups was positive.
Assuntos
Pais , Humanos , Criança , Técnica Delphi , Doença Aguda , Consenso , Grupos FocaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Attention has recently been drawn to the potential dangers of firearm use among patients with dementia. However, little is known about the actual prevalence of firearms in households with demented family members. This study seeks to determine the prevalence and loaded status of firearms in households with a demented family member in a sample of outpatients at a University memory disorders clinic. DESIGN: Utilizing a cross-sectional design, subjects underwent a structured NINCDS-ADRDA criteria comprehensive evaluation to assess dementia and were also administered a questionnaire to assess level of mood disturbance. Family members were administered a behavioral checklist and surveyed about the number and loaded status of firearms in the patient's household. SETTING: The study took place in an outpatient Medical University memory disorders clinic in the Southern United States. PATIENTS: Subjects were 106 consecutive outpatients referred for symptoms suggestive of dementia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Firearm presence was coded as "present," "not present," and "unsure." In cases where firearms were present, the number and loaded status were collected. Other outcome measures included the Clinical Dementia Rating of each patient, the Yesavage Mood Inventory, and the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist. RESULTS: A high prevalence of firearm prevalence in households with demented family members was revealed (60.4%). Gun ownership was equally prevalent in households regardless of the severity of the dementia (chi-square, P = .426), severity of behavioral disturbance (ANOVA P = .88), or depressive symptoms (ANOVA P = .37). In households with firearms, 44.6% of the families reported that the guns were kept loaded; 38% reported that they did not know whether the guns were loaded. Only 16.9% of the families reported that guns were maintained in an unloaded state. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that many family members living in households in which there are demented patients do not take appropriate action to remove or unload firearms in their households, regardless of the severity of dementia, behavioral disturbance, or depression. These findings suggest that clinicians need to ask families specifically about the presence of firearms and advocate for their removal.
Assuntos
Demência/psicologia , Armas de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Zeladoria/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Entrevista Psiquiátrica Padronizada , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The objective of this study was to determine whether unawareness of cognitive deficit is disease-specific. One hundred thirty-two patients were studied, grouped according to diagnosis of definite or probable Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, geropsychiatric control, or geriatric control. Diagnosis was the independent variable, and unawareness of cognitive deficit was the dependent variable. The Mini-Mental State Examination score was used as a dementia severity covariate. Analysis of covariance was significant (F = 8.0, p < 0.0001). Follow-up mean comparisons showed the Alzheimer disease group to have significantly greater unawareness of cognitive deficit than all other groups. The vascular dementia group had significantly greater unawareness of cognitive deficit than the two control groups. These results support the premise that, independent of dementia severity, unawareness of cognitive deficit is disease specific.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Atenção , Conscientização , Demência Vascular/psicologia , Idoso , Agnosia/diagnóstico , Agnosia/psicologia , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/psicologia , Demência Vascular/diagnóstico , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Entrevista Psiquiátrica Padronizada , Papel do DoenteRESUMO
This study assessed the validity of a measure of visual recall and recognition memory using a modified administration of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Constructional Praxis task to extend the capacity of the CERAD neuropsychological battery's ability to assess nonverbal free and recognition recall. The sample consisted of consecutive university hospital memory disorders clinic patients (n = 77). To test the measures' ability to discriminate dementia severity based on an independently derived clinical dementia rating, scores on Free Visual Recall showed expected group differences as a function of dementia severity (ANOVA, F = 12.7, p = .0001), but exhibited a floor effect in the moderately severe dementia range. Recognition Visual Recall was also able to discriminate dementia severity based on an independently derived clinical dementia rating (ANOVA, F = 10.6, p = .0001). Both Free Visual Recall and Recognition Visual Recall measures were found to have strong concurrent validity based on intercorrelations with the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R; Wechsler, 1987) Visual Reproduction I and II. In addition, moderate to strong discriminant validity for Free Visual Recall was demonstrated based on correlations with a family member self-report of memory problems in everyday life.