How to deal with vessel diameter mismatch in left main bifurcation stenting.

Left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention is particularly complex when stenting across the distal bifurcation is required in the presence of a diameter mismatch between the proximal main and distal branches. A suboptimal procedural result increases the risk of thrombosis and restenosis. Considering the paucity of data published on this topic, our objective was to provide technical solutions to deal with this complex anatomy. We described four cases showing the use of devices and techniques which allowed us to overcome a diameter discrepancy between adjacent coronary segments: (1) self-expanding nitinol stent; (2) stent platform with noteworthy expansion capacity; (3) the 'extended skirt' technique; (4) the 'trouser-leg' technique. In conclusion, the use of specific strategies and devices allows a safe and effective approach to be used to perform treatment that respects the coronary anatomy, and to optimize percutaneous coronary intervention results in complex scenarios.

Immediate coronary angiography and systematic targeted temperature management are associated with improved outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.

Rapid and systematic access to coronary angiography (CAG) and target temperature management (TTM) might improve outcome in comatose patients who survive cardiac arrest (CA). However, there is controversy around indicating immediate CAG in the absence of transmural ischemia on the electrocardiogram after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We evaluated the short- and long-term outcome of patients undergoing systematic CAG and TTM, based on whether culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed. All consecutive comatose CA survivors without obvious extra-cardiac causes undergoing TTM were included. Analysis involved the entire population and subgroups, namely patients with initial unshockable rhythm, no ST elevation on electrocardiogram, and good neurological recovery. We enrolled 107 patients with a median age of 64.9 (57.7-73.6) years. The initial rhythm was shockable in 83 (77.6%). Sixty-six (61.7%) patients underwent PCI. In-hospital survival was 71%. It was 78.8% and 58.5% in those undergoing or not PCI (p = 0.022), respectively. Age, time from CA to ROSC and culprit lesion PCI were independent predictors of in-hospital survival. Long-term survival was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCI (respectively 61.5% vs 34.1%; Log-rank: p = 0.002). Revascularization was associated with better outcomes regardless of initial rhythm (shockable vs non-shockable) and ST deviation (elevation vs no-elevation), and improved the long-term survival of patients discharged with good neurological recovery. Systematic CAG and revascularization, when indicated, were associated with higher survival in comatose patients undergoing TTM, regardless of initial rhythm and ST deviation in the post-ROSC electrocardiogram. The benefit was sustained at long-term particularly in those with neurological recovery.

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty: current status and future prospects.

INTRODUCTION: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) improves hemodynamic and clinical status of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) for a limited period of 6-12 months. However, there is a high number of procedures performed worldwide and an upward trend over the last decades. AREAS COVERED: Epidemiology of AS and the advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) contribute to the extensive referral of patients. The expansion of recommendations for TAVI has occasionally led to financial reimbursement-related problems that do not exist for BAV. BAV is indicated as a bridge to valve replacement, to decision in complex cases, and to extracardiac surgery. BAV may play a role in preparing for TAVI and optimizing procedural results. The minimalist approach and reduced complication rate make it applicable in fragile patients. EXPERT OPINION: In the near future, BAV will continue to be a useful asset in managing patients with AS given the multiple indications, broad applicability, safety profile, low cost, and repeatability. Specific studies are necessary to explore technical solutions, stronger indications, the finest technique, and to standardize the procedural result. Pending the development of potential competitive devices, the role that BAV plays will remain closely intertwined with the one played by TAVI.

[The shockwave: an ace in the hole?] / Lo shockwave: un asso nella manica?

In patients with severe calcified coronary lesions, angioplasty procedures are associated with significant technical problems and a higher rate of complications. Nowadays, intravascular lithotripsy represents a safe and effective system for the treatment of calcified coronary stenosis before stent deployment. In this article, we report three complex clinical or angiographic cases in which the use of coronary lithotripsy is not yet codified. Specifically, we discuss a case of stent underexpansion after primary angioplasty, a case of acute myocardial infarction due to left main subocclusive stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock and a case of severely calcified plaque in a venous bypass graft. In these three cases, the use of shockwave was essential to ensure an optimal procedural result, in the absence of significant adverse clinical events.

Early and long-term outcomes after combined percutaneous revascularization in patients with carotid and coronary artery stenoses.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the 30-day and long-term clinical outcomes of patients with carotid obstructive disease (COD) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing a combined percutaneous revascularization, in 4 high-volume centers skilled for the treatment of multilevel vascular disease. BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with COD and concomitant CAD remains controversial. A variety of therapeutic strategies, including coronary artery bypass grafting, alone or in combination with carotid artery revascularization, have been reported. METHODS: Between January 2006 and April 2010, 239 consecutive patients with COD (symptomatic carotid stenosis in 20.5%) and concomitant CAD were treated with staged or simultaneous carotid artery stenting and percutaneous coronary intervention, and enrolled in this prospective registry. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including any death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurring between the first revascularization procedure and 30 days after treatment of the second vascular territory affected. RESULTS: The incidence of the primary endpoint at 30 days was 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.02 to 7.56). The rate of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at long-term follow-up (median 520 days) was 4.2%, 2.1%, and 3.8%, respectively. At long-term follow-up, patients with previous cardiovascular disease had significantly higher rates of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events than did patients with a first clinical episode (17% vs. 6%, hazard ratio: 3.34; 95% CI: 1.46 to 7.63; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COD and concomitant CAD, a combined percutaneous treatment compares favorably with previous surgical or hybrid experiences. Such strategy may be particularly suited to complex patients at high surgical risk.

Clinical outcome after endovascular, surgical or hybrid revascularisation in patients with combined carotid and coronary artery disease: the Finalised Research In ENDovascular Strategies Study Group (FRIENDS).

AIMS: To assess the 30-day clinical outcome of endovascular and surgical revascularisation procedures in patients with carotid obstructive disease (COD) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2006 and December 2009, 659 patients with COD and concomitant CAD were treated. The incidence of the primary endpoint (composite of death, MI and stroke) was 4.25% (0.9%, 1.1% and 2.3%, respectively). Acute renal insufficiency occurred in 2.4% and major bleedings in 4.4% of patients. According to the treatment forms patients were divided into three groups: surgical, 185 patients (28.1%), endovascular, 378 (57.4%), and hybrid, 89 (13.5%). Seven patients (1%) were managed medically only. The primary endpoint of the study occurred in 4.8%, 2.4% and 8.6%, respectively, p=0.01. The secondary endpoint, that included the occurrence of renal or respiratory insufficiency and major bleedings occurred in 10.1%, 6.5% and 23.8%, respectively, p<0.001. At multivariate logistic regression analysis renal insufficiency (OR=2.517; 95%CI=1.077-5.883, p=0.03) and treatment group (endovascular: OR=0.369; 95%CI=0.168-0.813, p=0.01 or hybrid: OR=3.098; 95%CI=1.359-7.060, p=0.007) predicted the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical and endovascular treatments yield very good immediate results; the later being less invasive, may be particularly suited to these fragile and complex patients. Long-term follow-up is under assessment.