RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria has been demonstrated in phase iii clinical trials, but limited information is available regarding real-life effectiveness using the weekly Urticarial Activity Score (UAS7). The aim of the study was to assess clinical response (UAS7≤6) and complete response (UAS7=0) rates at weeks 12 and 24 in a real-life cohort and to identify possible predictors of response to omalizumab. METHODS: Clinical records of consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (UAS≥16) treated with omalizumab at a university-affiliated reference dermatology department in Barcelona, Spain, from February 2014 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. UAS7 values and patients' evolution were assessed according to a predefined protocol. Statistical analysis of data was done using SPSS 18 statistical package (SPSS 18 Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in the study. All of them completed at least 24-weeks of treatment and follow-up. At week 12, clinical response rates (UAS7<6) were 70.8% and complete response rates (UAS7=0) were 47.9%. At week 24, clinical response rates were 64.6% and complete response rates were 52.1%. PATIENTS: with long-term urticaria (≥18 months' duration) were less likely to achieve a clinical response at week 12 (odds ratio: 0.25; 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.96). Previous immunosuppressive treatment tended to be associated with a lower probability of complete response at week 12 (odds ratio: 0.27 95% confidence interval: 0.07-1.02). H1-antihistamine treatment was associated with lower probability of response at week 24 (odds ratio: 0.1 95% 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.88) CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in real life are similar to efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Duration of disease, previous immunosuppressive therapy and requirement for concomitant H1-antihistamine treatment may be helpful in predicting response to omalizumab treatment.
Assuntos
Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Pragmáticos como Assunto , Sistema de Registros , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pivotal trials with omalizumab for treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are generally run over 12 to 24weeks. However, in clinical practice, many patients need longer treatment. In this article, we present an algorithm for treatment with omalizumab. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The consensus document we present is the result of a series of meetings by the CSU working group of "Xarxa d'Urticària Catalana i Balear" (XUrCB) at which data from the recent literature were presented, discussed, compared, and agreed upon. RESULTS: Treatment with omalizumab should be initiated at the authorized dose, and is adjusted at 3-monthly intervals according to the Urticaria Activity Score Over 7days, the Urticaria Control Test, or both. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm proposed is designed to provide guidance on how to adjust omalizumab doses, how and when to discontinue the drug, and how to reintroduce it in cases of relapse.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico , Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Omalizumab/administração & dosagemAssuntos
Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Doença Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Omalizumab/administração & dosagem , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Urticária/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Infiximab has been shown to be highly effective in phase III clinical trials, but limited information is available regarding drug survival and maintenance of efficacy beyond 1 year in real-life clinical setting. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the efficacy and safety of infliximab in a large number of patients with a long follow-up and to identify clinical factors associated with long-term drug survival. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with infliximab from March 2004 to August 2012 at a tertiary dermatology centre was carried out. RESULTS: In total, 63 treatment courses with infliximab were administered to 56 patients. The mean duration of treatment was 31.6 months. The only significant positive predictor of drug survival was combination treatment [hazard ratio (HR) vs. monotherapy 2.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.425.92]. Significant negative predictors of drug survival were obesity (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.190.87) and infusion reactions (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.190.87). Infusion reactions occurred in 13 (23%) of our patients and were a reason for discontinuation of treatment in 5. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review of a cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with infliximab in daily practice shows that the PASI75 response rates at 24 and 52 weeks of treatment are similar to those of the pivotal studies, but 37 courses of treatment (59%) had to be discontinued after a median of 12 months. The major cause for discontinuation was loss of response, in 18 cases. Combination treatment, obesity and infusion reactions were found to be predictors of drug survival.