Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Wound Care ; 29(8): 444-451, 2020 Aug 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32804032

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a temporary topical external haemostat (OMNI-STAT Granules, Omni-stat Medical Inc., US) versus the use of electrocautery for bleeding control in patients who have undergone surgical wound debridement. Time saved in the operating room (OR) was evaluated. METHOD: A prospective evaluation of use of a topical haemostat in an OR setting was compared with retrospective data collected using electrocautery to understand the time-saving benefits of using a topical haemostat versus electrocautery. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were treated with the topical haemostat, and 89 patients with electrocautery. The topical haemostat was shown to be as effective in achieving haemostasis post-surgical debridement as electrocautery, with the added benefits of significant time savings in the OR (reducing the mean total OR time by 19.1%). Additionally, preprocedure and surgical procedure times in patients treated with the topical haemostat were significantly reduced. The results showed that wounds treated with the topical haemostat demonstrated a more advanced stage of healing, which may be a result of the lack of tissue damage demonstrated with the topical haemostat compared with electrocautery. CONCLUSION: This study found that the temporary topical haemostat was equally as effective as cauterisation in achieving haemostasis. In addition, significant saving in OR time was demonstrated relative to electrocautery. The improved OR times may translate into increased cost-effectiveness, relative to electrocautery, by increasing the number of surgical cases per day and/or using resources more effectively to treat more patients. It may also enable bleeding control in the outpatient clinic or at the bedside, freeing up costly OR time and enabling more effective management of healthcare resources.


Assuntos
Desbridamento/efeitos adversos , Eletrocoagulação , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 7(6): e2251, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31624671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biofilm can impair wound healing by maintaining an elevated, but ineffective, inflammatory state. This article describes interim results from the prospective RESPOND postmarketing registry evaluating the use of a native type 1, porcine collagen matrix with the embedded antimicrobial polyhexamethylene biguanide (PCMP) in the management of chronic wounds. METHODS: Adults ≥18 years of age with ≥1 appropriate wound were eligible for inclusion. Data that were final on January 26, 2018 were included in this analysis. At week 0, wounds were cleaned, debrided, and prepared as necessary and PCMP was applied, with a dressing to fix it in place. Patients received standard wound care plus PCMP weekly, up to 24 weeks, at the investigator's discretion. At each visit, wounds were assessed for area and quality of granulation tissue. RESULTS: Most common wound types (N = 63) were venous ulcers (28.6%), trauma and lacerations (22.2%), postsurgical open wounds (15.9%), pressure injuries (12.7%), and diabetic ulcers (9.5%). Median baseline wound area was 6.5 cm2; mean wound duration at baseline was 4 months. Of the 63 wounds, 43 (68.3%) achieved complete wound closure, 41 of 43 (95.3%) closed after PCMP treatment, and 2 of 43 (4.7%) after bridging to other modalities and surgical closure. Twelve out of 63 wounds were bridged to other modalities after PCMP treatment. Mean time to closure for PCMP wounds was 5.0 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: PCMP appears to be a useful adjunct for treating various wound types. PCMP use should be considered when managing chronic or acute wounds.

3.
Wounds ; 31(2 Suppl): S1-S17, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30741645

RESUMO

Use of ultra-portable, mechanically powered disposable negative pressure wound therapy (dNPWT) has grown as an adjunctive modality to manage wounds in outpatient care and to expedite transition of inpatients to an outpatient setting. This technology has demonstrated similar efficacy and usability for mobile outpatients when compared with electrically powered negative pressure wound therapy devices. It was designed for patients with smaller, low to moderately exudating wounds and does not require batteries or a power source. However, very few studies address best practices for using dNPWT in a variety of wound types. There is a need for comprehensive clinical recommendations to better direct clinicians and patients in using this therapy. In addition, it is critical that providers are knowledgeable about processes for obtaining reimbursement for placement of dNPWT since codes and procedures differ drastically from standard NPWT. A panel meeting of experts with a high level of experience with dNPWT in varied wound types was convened to develop clinical recommendations and summarize current US reimbursement coding guidelines for the use of dNPWT. This publication summarizes the recommendations from panel members, in addition to supporting evidence, to help guide appropriate use of dNPWT. Panel recommendations regarding optimal patient and wound selection, wound preparation, proper patient training, and use of dNPWT in various wound types are included as well as clinical techniques for dressing application, bridging under offloading devices and compression, maintaining a seal, and protecting intact skin. Processes and codes for obtaining reimbursement for dNPWT are reviewed by care setting. Clinical recommendations and reimbursement guidelines summarized in this publication are meant to provide direction to clinicians in using dNPWT that potentially could translate into improved clinical and economic value.


Assuntos
Equipamentos Descartáveis , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Exsudatos e Transudatos , Humanos , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/economia , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/instrumentação , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Seleção de Pacientes , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Cicatrização , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/patologia
4.
Wounds ; 28(3): 78-88, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26978861

RESUMO

Hyaluronic acid (HA), the main component of extracellular matrix, is considered one of the key players in the tissue regeneration process. It has been proven to modulate via specific HA receptors, inflammation, cellular migration, and angiogenesis, which are the main phases of wound healing. Studies have revealed that most HA properties depend on its molecular size. High molecular weight HA displays anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties, whereas low molecular weight HA is a potent proinflammatory molecule. In this review, the authors summarize the role of HA polymers of different molecular weight in tissue regeneration and provide a short overview of main cellular receptors involved in HA signaling. In addition, the role of HA in 2 major steps of wound healing is examined: inflammation and the angiogenesis process. Finally, the antioxidative properties of HA are discussed and its possible clinical implication presented.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Inflamação/patologia , Regeneração/efeitos dos fármacos , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/patologia , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Receptores de Hialuronatos/efeitos dos fármacos , Ácido Hialurônico/metabolismo , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Inflamação/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico
5.
Wounds ; 28(2): 40-7, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26891136

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare and rapidly progressing bacterial infection of soft tissues. Bacterial toxins cause local tissue damage and necrosis, as well as blunt immune system responses. A self-propagating cycle of bacterial invasion, toxin release and tissue destruction can continue until substantial amounts of tissue become necrotic. Neutralization of bacterial toxins should improve the results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pure hypochlorous acid (HOCl) (0.01% w/v) with no sodium hypochlorite impurity in saline pH 4-5, which was recently shown to both eradicate bacteria and neutralize bacterial toxins in vitro, was administered via flowthrough instillation to 6 patients with NF 4-6 times daily as needed. Utilizing a vacuum-assisted closure, 5-10 mL of pure 0.01% HOCl with no sodium hypochlorite impurity was instilled and removed frequently to irrigate the wounds. RESULTS: Of the 6 patients, no deaths or limb amputations occurred. All infected areas healed completely without major complications. CONCLUSION: The toxicity and immune dysfunction caused by bacterial toxins and toxins released from damaged cells may be mitigated by flow-through instillation with saline containing pure 0.01% HOCl with no sodium hypochlorite impurity. Randomized controlled clinical trial research of this relatively simple and inexpensive instillation protocol is suggested for identified cases of NF.


Assuntos
Fasciite Necrosante/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Hipocloroso/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Instilação de Medicamentos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA