Effect of subsequent vertebral body fractures on the outcome after posterior stabilization of unstable geriatric fractures of the thoracolumbar spine.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was analyzing the effect of subsequent vertebral body fractures on the clinical outcome in geriatric patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated operatively. METHODS: Retrospectively, all patients aged ≥ 60 with a fracture of the thoracolumbar spine included. Further inclusion parameters were acute and unstable fractures that were treated by posterior stabilization with a low to moderate loss of reduction of less than 10°. The minimal follow-up period was 18 months. Demographic data including the trauma mechanism, ASA score, and the treatment strategy were recorded. The following outcome parameters were analyzed: the ODI score, pain level, satisfaction level, SF 36 score as well as the radiologic outcome parameters. RESULTS: Altogether, 73 patients were included (mean age: 72 years; 45 women). The majority of fractures consisted of incomplete or complete burst fractures (OF 3 + 4). The mean follow-up period was 46.6 months. Fourteen patients suffered from subsequent vertebral body fractures (19.2%). No trauma was recordable in 5 out of 6 patients; 42.8% of patients experienced a low-energy trauma (significant association: p < 0.01). There was a significant correlation between subsequent vertebral body fracture and female gender (p = 0.01) as well as the amount of loss of reduction (p = 0.02). Thereby, patients with subsequent vertebral fractures had significant worse clinical outcomes (ODI: 49.8 vs 16.6, p < 0.01; VAS pain: 5.0 vs 2.6, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patient with subsequent vertebral body fractures had significantly inferior clinical midterm outcome. The trauma mechanism correlated significantly with both the rate of subsequent vertebral body fractures and the outcome. Another risk factor is female gender.

Midterm outcome after posterior stabilization of unstable Midthoracic spine fractures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The evidence for the treatment of midthoracic fractures in elderly patients is weak. The aim of this study was to evaluate midterm results after posterior stabilization of unstable midthoracic fractures in the elderly. METHODS: Retrospectively, all patients aged ≥65 suffering from an acute unstable midthoracic fracture treated with posterior stabilization were included. Trauma mechanism, ASA score, concomitant injuries, ODI score and radiographic loss of reduction were evaluated. Posterior stabilization strategy was divided into short-segmental stabilization and long-segmental stabilization. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (76.9 ± 6.3 years; 51% female) were included. The fracture was caused by a low-energy trauma mechanism in 22 patients (35.6%). Twenty-one patients died during the follow-up period (35.6%). Remaining patients (n = 38) were followed up after a mean of 60 months. Patients who died were significantly older (p = 0.01) and had significantly higher ASA scores (p = 0.02). Adjacent thoracic cage fractures had no effect on mortality or outcome scores. A total of 12 sequential vertebral fractures occurred (35.3%). The mean ODI at the latest follow up was 31.3 ± 24.7, the mean regional sagittal loss of reduction was 5.1° (± 4.0). Patients treated with long segmental stabilization had a significantly lower rate of sequential vertebral fractures during follow-up (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Unstable fractures of the midthoracic spine are associated with high rates of thoracic cage injuries. The mortality rate was rather high. The majority of the survivors had minimal to moderate disabilities. Thereby, patients treated with long segmental stabilization had a significantly lower rate of sequential vertebral body fractures during follow-up.

[Thoracolumbar spinal fractures in the elderly : Classification and treatment]. / Thorakolumbale Wirbelsäulenfrakturen beim alten Menschen : Klassifikation und Therapie.

Thoracolumbar fractures in the elderly are frequently associated with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis can cause fractures or be a significant comorbidity in traumatic fractures. The OF classification is based on conventional X­ray, computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is easy to use and provides a clinically relevant classification of the fractures. Therapeutic decisions are made based on the clinical and radiological situation by using the OF score. The score takes the current clinical situation including patient-specific comorbidities into consideration. The treatment recommendations are based on an expert consensus opinion and include conservative and operative options. If surgery is indicated, vertebral body augmentation, percutaneous stabilization and even open surgery can be used.

Incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a review of literature.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review was to analyze the biomechanical basis of incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine, summarize the available treatment options with evidence from the literature, and to propose a method to differentiate fracture severity. METHODS: The injury pattern, classification, and treatment strategies of incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbal spine have been described following a review of the literature. All level I-III studies, studies with long-term results and comparative studies were included and summarized. RESULTS: Details of five randomized control trials were included. Additionally, three comparative studies and two studies with long-term outcomes were detailed in this review. The fracture severity reported in the included studies varied tremendously. Most classification used did not adequately describe the complexity of fracture configuration. A wide variety of treatment strategies were outlined, ranging from non-operative therapy to aggressive surgical intervention with combined anterior-posterior approaches. Thus, the treatment of incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine is quite diverse and remains controversial. CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete burst fractures can differ tremendously regarding the degree of instability they confer to the thoracolumbar spine. Based on a detailed review of the literature, it is clear that good results can be obtained with both non-operative and operative strategies to treat these injuries. In the authors' opinion, the intervertebral disc plays a key role in determining the long-term clinical and radiological outcome. Thus, an incorporation of the intervertebral disc pathology into the existing classification systems would be a valuable prognostic factor.

Summary of Meta-Analyses Dealing with Single-Row versus Double-Row Repair Techniques for Rotator Cuff Tears.

BACKGROUND: Several meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials have been performed to analyze whether double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) provides superior clinical outcomes and structural healing compared to single-row (SR) repair. The purpose of this study was to sum up the results of meta-analysis comparing SR and DR repair with respect on clinical outcomes and re-tear rates. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken to identify all meta-analyses dealing with randomized controlled trials comparing clinical und structural outcomes after SR versus DR RCR. RESULTS: Eight meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria: two including Level I studies only, five including both Level I and Level II studies, and one including additional Level III studies. Four meta-analyses found no differences between SR and DR RCR for patient outcomes, whereas four favored DR RCR for tears greater than 3 cm. Two meta-analyses found no structural healing differences between SR and DR RCR, whereas six found DR repair to be superior for tears greater than 3 cm tears. CONCLUSION: No clinical differences are seen between single-row and double-row repair for small and medium rotator cuff tears after a short-term follow-up period with a higher re-tear rate following single-row repairs. There seems to be a trend to superior results with double-row repair in large to massive tear sizes.

[Complex Pathologies of the Spine: Trauma meets Degeneration]. / Komplexpathologien an der Wirbelsäule: Trauma trifft Degeneration ­ eine Bestandsaufnahme.

Treating vertebral body fractures is challenging when there is relevant pre-existing spinal degeneration. Both vertebral body fractures and spinal degeneration are related to the physiological aging process. The increases in both are linked to increases in life expectancy. Several factors promote spinal degeneration and increase fracture risk, such as disc degeneration, spinal imbalance and osteoporosis. The main diagnostic and therapeutic challenge is to identify the sources of pain and to start appropriate therapy. A structured and advanced algorithm is then essential. Unstable fractures must always be stabilised. However, surgical strategy may be greatly influenced if there are also degenerative diseases, such as segmental decompression, multisegmental instrumentation or fusion, or complex reconstructive spondylodesis, including osteotomies. Notwithstanding this, the individual therapy concept has to be adapted to the demands and pathology of the individual patient.

[Release of moveable segments after dorsal stabilization : Impact on affected discs]. / Freigabe von Bewegungssegmenten nach dorsaler Stabilisierung : Auswirkung auf die betroffenen Bandscheiben.

BACKGROUND: Bisegmental dorsal stabilization is a common treatment option for instable compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine; however, it remains unknown to what extent bridging compromises intervertebral discs. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the disc height and functional features in comparison to healthy intervertebral discs after removal of the dorsal fixator and particularly under consideration of the time span between dorsal stabilization and implant removal (IR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The IR was performed in 19 patients after an average of 13 months (range 8-24 months) after dorsal stabilization of instable vertebral compression fractures of the thoracolumbar junction and lumbar spine. An additional ventral monosegmental spondylodesis was performed in 10 patients with incomplete burst fractures. Thus, a total of 28 intervertebral discs were temporarily bridged (bridged discs), with an adjacent endplate fracture in 10 (injured discs) and no adjacent bony lesion in 18 discs (healthy discs). The intervertebral discs superior and inferior to the instrumentation were selected as controls (control discs). Standardized conventional lateral radiographs were taken prior to and after IR as well as after 6 months. Additionally, standardized lateral radiographs in flexion and extension were taken. The intervertebral disc height (disc height) was determined by two independent board approved orthopedic observers by measuring the anterior, central and dorsal intervertebral disc spaces on all lateral radiographs as well as the intervertebral disc angles (disc angle) defined by the intervertebral upper and lower endplates in the flexion and extension views. Intradisc function (disc function) was defined as the difference between the disc angle in extension and flexion. The measurements were repeated after 12 months. Univariate analysis was performed using ANOVA and significance was set at p < 0.05. Interobserver and intraobserver comparisons of the disc heights and the disc angles were determined with intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen in disc function and disc height between the controls and the bridged discs at all times of measurement; however, injured discs showed a significantly reduced disc height and disc angle in extension compared to healthy discs (p = 0.028 and p = 0.027, respectively). Additionally, patients with IR during the first 12 months had significantly reduced disc heights compared to those patients with delayed IR within the second postoperative year (p = 0.018). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for disc function was 0.80 (95 % confidence interval CI: 0.68-0.88) and 0.85 (95 % CI 0.76-0.90), respectively. The interobserver and intraobserver correlations for disc height were 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.76-0.90) and 0.93 (95 % CI 0.88-0.95), respectively. CONCLUSION: Bridging of an intervertebral disc with IR within 24 months does not cause immediate loss of disc function or reduction of disc height; however, temporary bridging in combination with an adjacent endplate fracture causes significant reduction of disc height and loss of extension. Additionally, no beneficial effects could be seen by reducing the time span between stabilization and IR to below 12 months.

[Current concepts for treatment of massive rotator cuff tears]. / Aktuelle Behandlungskonzepte für Massenrupturen der Rotatorenmanschette.

The ideal treatment for massive rotator cuff tears is influenced by the morphology and chronicity of the tear, tissue quality, the degree of concomitant osteoarthritis, and patient-specific factors. Traditionally, massive rotator cuff tears have wrongly been equated with irreparable tears. A variety of improvements in surgical technique and materials now permit successful arthroscopic management of many massive rotator cuff tears when non-operative management has failed. This study provides an overview of the current treatment options for large and massive rotator cuff tears, including their expected outcomes. Finally, a possible treatment algorithm is suggested.

[Delayed indications for additive ventral treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures : What correction loss is to be expected]. / Zeitverzögerte Indikationsstellung zur additiv ventralen Versorgung thorakolumbaler Berstungsfrakturen : Welcher Korrekturverlust ist zu erwarten.

INTRODUCTION: There is a general consensus that unstable vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar junction with a B type fracture or a high load shear index need to be surgically stabilized, primarily by a dorsal approach. The authors believe that there are indications for an additional ventral spondylodesis in cases of reduction loss or a relevant intervertebral disc lesion in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 6 weeks after dorsal stabilization. However, in cases of unstable vertebral fractures it remains unclear if a delayed anterior spondylodesis will lead to unacceptable loss of initial reduction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 59 patients were included in this study during 2013 and 2014. All patients suffered from a traumatic vertebral fracture of the thoracolumbar junction and were initially treated with a dorsal short segment stabilization. All vertebral body fractures had a load shear index of at least 5 or were B type fractures. An x-ray control was carried out after 2 and 6 weeks and MRI was additionally performed after 6 weeks. An additional ventral spondylodesis was recommended in patients showing a reduction loss of at least 5° and in patients with relevant intervertebral disc lesions. The extent of the reduction loss was analyzed. Other parameters of interest were the fracture level, fracture classification, patient age and surgical technique (e.g. implant, index screw, laminectomy and cement augmentation). RESULTS: The patient collective consisted of 23 women and 36 men (average age 51 years ± 17 years). The mean reduction loss was 5.1° (± 5.2°) after a mean follow-up of 60 days (± 56 days). The reduction loss was significantly higher when polyaxial implants were used compared to monoaxial dorsal fixators (10.8° versus 4.0°, p < 0.001). There was a significantly higher reduction loss in those patients who received a laminectomy (11.3° versus 4.3°, p = 0.01) but there were no significant differences if an index screw was used (4.5° versus 5.3°). Additionally, there was a significantly lower reduction in the subgroup of patients 60 years or older who were stabilized using cement-augmented screws (3.9° versus 11.3°, p = 0.02). The mean reduction loss was 2.8° (± 2.5°) in patients treated with a monoaxial implant, cement-augmented if 60 years or older and without laminectomy (n = 39). There was no significant correlation between reduction loss and the other parameters of interest, such as fracture morphology with classification according to the working group on questions of osteosynthesis (AO) and McCormack or fracture level. CONCLUSION: Delayed indications for an additional ventral spondylodesis in patients with unstable thoracolumbar vertebral fractures and initial dorsal stabilization will cause no relevant reduction loss if monoaxial implants are used and laminectomy can be avoided. Additionally, cement augmentation of the pedicle screws seems to be beneficial in patients 60 years of age or older.

[Posttraumatic arthritis of the glenohumeral joint. Joint-preserving therapy options]. / Posttraumatische Arthrosen des Glenohumeralgelenks. Gelenkerhaltende Therapieoptionen.

BACKGROUND: The management of glenohumeral osteoarthritis in younger patients with high activity levels remains a challenge to orthopedic surgeons. The clinical results of joint replacement surgery are commonly unsatisfactory in this particular cohort with the associated problem of limited longevity of the implant. OBJECTIVES: This paper reviews the indications, techniques and outcomes of joint-preserving arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the shoulder. METHODS: A selective literature search was performed and personal surgical experiences are reported. RESULTS: Besides significant pain reduction, improved range of motion and increased patient satisfaction, arthroscopic surgery can delay the need for total shoulder arthroplasty. A comprehensive approach that addresses all concomitant pathologies of the shoulder joint is of particular importance. Recent studies have shown that a glenohumeral joint space of less than 2 mm predicts significantly poorer results with arthroscopic therapy. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic procedures are a good option to treat young, active patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Patient selection and setting a consensus for appropriate preoperative expectations are of particular relevance.

[Bony Bankart lesions]. / Die ossäre Bankart-Läsion.

Fractures of the anteroinferior glenoid rim, termed bony Bankart lesions, have been reported to occur in up to 22% of first time anterior shoulder dislocations. The primary goal of treatment is to create a stable glenohumeral joint and a good shoulder function. Options for therapeutic intervention are largely dependent on the chronicity of the lesion, the activity level of the patient and postreduction fracture characteristics, such as the size, location and number of fracture fragments. Non-operative treatment can be successful for small, acute fractures, which are anatomically reduced after shoulder reduction. However, in patients with a high risk profile for recurrent instability initial Bankart repair is recommended. Additionally, bony fixation is recommended for acute fractures that involve more than 15-20% of the inferior glenoid diameter. On the other hand chronic fractures are generally managed on a case-by-case basis depending on the amount of fragment resorption and bony erosion of the anterior glenoid with high recurrence rates under conservative therapy. When significant bone loss of the anterior glenoid is present, anatomical (e.g. iliac crest bone graft and osteoarticular allograft) or non-anatomical (e.g. Latarjet and Bristow) reconstruction of the anterior glenoid is often indicated.

[Incomplete cranial burst fracture in the thoracolumbar junction. Results 6 years after thoracoscopic monosegmental spondylodesis]. / Kraniale inkomplette Berstungsfraktur im thorakolumbalen Übergang. 6-Jahres-Ergebnisse nach thorakoskopischer monosegmentaler Spondylodese.

INTRODUCTION: Ventral thoracoscopic spondylodesis of the thoracolumbar spine is an elegant treatment strategy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the years 2002 and 2003 a total of 16 patients with incomplete cranial burst fractures were treated by ventral thoracoscopic monosegmental spondylodesis and were included in this study prospectively. The data acquisition was done preoperatively, postoperatively and after 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. After 6 years a follow-up examination was performed in 13 of these patients (5 men and 8 women, average age 36.3 years, follow-up rate 81%) and 8 patients were treated ventrally only whereas 5 patients were treated dorsoventrally. RESULTS: The operative reduction of the kyphotic malalignment was superior in the dorsoventrally treated patients. The persistent gain of monosegmental correction after 6 years seemed to be higher in the patient group treated dorsoventrally. The average physical component summary (PSC) scores were comparable to a control group of the same age and revision surgery was performed in two patients both related to the iliac crest bone graft. CONCLUSIONS: The ventral and dorsoventral therapy strategies showed good and very good functional outcomes, respectively. The dorsoventral treatment concept secured a persistent gain of monosegmental correction which seemed to be superior compared to a ventral only therapy strategy.

[What is the effect of ventral thoracoscopic spondylodesis (VTS) on elderly patients and what is the medium-term outcome?]. / Die ventrale Spondylodese beim älteren Patienten--Overtreatment oder sinnvolle Therapieoption?

BACKGROUND: Only limited data are available concerning the effect of ventral thoracoscopic spondylodesis (VTS) on elderly patients and the medium-term outcome. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In a retrospective study, 23 patients were included from 2003 to 2008. An age over 60, a traumatic burst fracture in the thoracolumbar region and a VTS procedure were inclusion criteria. A preoperative neurological deficit, ASA scores greater than 3 and a malignant disease were exclusion criteria. The mean age was 65 (62-70) years, 17 male and 6 female patients were included. In 87 % (n = 18) of the patients a compression fracture type A was found. Bone density values were obtained in 5 patients, mean value was -1,7. 21 patients were treated with a dorsoventral, bisegmental procedure. Two patients with limited kyphosis and no relevant stenosis of the spinal canal were treated with a ventral only procedure. In two cases with measured low bone quality, pedicle screws were placed with bone cement. Patients were monitored on ICU for 24 hours after operation until the thoracic drainage was removed. At an average follow-up of 3.9 years, patients were evaluated with SF 36 (short form 36) and an Oswestry disability index score (ODI score). The postoperative radiographic control was performed with a CT scan, X-ray controls were taken 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after the operation. Cobb angle and scoliosis angle were measured. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS-Software 17.0 (SPSS®, Inc., Chicago, USA) and a Mann-Whitney U test and a level of significance of p < 0,05. RESULTS: In five patients pulmonary complications occurred, in one case a revision operation had to be performed due to pleural effusion. One patient suffered from a delayed pneumonia. The mean loss of correction in all patients was 3,3° (-20°-1°). In four patients with a distinct loss of correction at an average of 13,6° ± 4,5°, iatrogenic damage of the lower or upper cover plate of the adjacent vertebral bodies was found. The risk of loss of correction was found to be significantly higher in case of damage to the lower or upper cover plate (p < 0.001). Test results from the SF 36 score (sum scale 40.8) showed no significant difference in life quality to a similar aged comparison group. The ODI score revealed a mean vertebral column associated impairment of 10.8 %, 20 patients showed only minimal limitations. CONCLUSION: Also in older patients VTS seems to be an adequate treatment of traumatic burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Perioperative pulmonary complications were easy to handle and had no effect on the clinical outcome. Postoperative radiographs showed only little loss of correction, in four cases iatrogenic damage of the cover-plate led to a distinct loss of correction. Careful and accurate preparation of the cover plates is therefore decisive.

[Long-term results of kyphoplasty with additive dorsal instrumentation of incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine in the elderly]. / Langzeitergebnisse nach Hybridstabilisierung inkompletter Berstungsfrakturen der thorakolumbalen Wirbelsäule des älteren Patienten.

BACKGROUND: To offer a correct treatment strategy for osteoporotic vertebral body fractures remains a huge challenge in modern spine surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the years 2002 and 2003 5 patients with incomplete burst fractures (AO type A3.1) of the thoracolumbar spine were included in this study (4 men, 1 woman, average age: 62.6 years, follow-up rate: 100 %). All 5 were treated by kyphoplasty and additional dorsal bisegmental instrumentation. Unlike today, dorsal instrumentation was done without cement augmentation. Inclusion criteria were age above 60 years, an adequate trauma, and a fracture between thoracic body 11 and lumbar body 3. Data acquisition was performed prospectively before and after the operation, after 3, 6, 12, 18 months, and after 5 years, including visual analogue scale (VAS) spine score, spinal function score, X-ray examination or in cases of complaints or limited assessability a CT examination, and SF 36 score after 5 years. As comparison group, we used 4 patients, suffering the same fracture type with a similar fracture location (1 man, 3 women, average age: 67.3 years), who were treated with kyphoplasty alone during the same time period. RESULTS: No clinically relevant intra- and postoperative complications were registered in our study group. The operative bisegmental kyphotic reduction was slightly higher in our study group. Afterwards the correction loss was 9.8° in our study group, exceeding the reduction by 3.6°, whereas the comparison group suffered from a correction loss of 11.8°, exceeding the operative reduction by 8.5°, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. Similarly, no statistically significant differences were registered with respect of physical component summary (PSC), mental component summary (MSC) score and VAS spine score. Both groups had comparable PSC and MSC scores to a norm group of the same age. CONCLUSION: After 5 years the therapy concept seems to be of low risk and not being associated with major complications. The PCS and MCS scores are comparable to a norm group of the same age. The correction loss exceeded the operative reduction marginally but turned out to be slightly lower compared to that of an isolated kyphoplasty.