RESUMO
Purpose: To examine the characteristics of eyes with high-risk lattice degeneration treated with laser retinopexy and determine the indications, safety, and outcomes of the treatment. Methods: This interventional single-surgeon consecutive retrospective study was conducted at Wills Eye Hospital between 2014 and 2021. The series included eyes with lattice degeneration with high-risk lesions. Documented characteristics and outcomes of these eyes and fellow eyes were documented. Results: The study comprised 167 eyes of 143 patients (53.3% women; mean age [±SD], 50 ± 17 years). Complications after laser treatment included new posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) (n = 21), epiretinal membrane (ERM) (n = 13), retinal detachment (RD) (n = 5), and additional laser required (n = 22). Eyes that developed ERMs were more likely to develop PVDs (odds ratio, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.57-18.47). Patents who developed ERMs were older (mean, 60 ± 7 years vs 49 ± 17 years; P = .016), as were those developing PVDs (mean, 59 ± 8 years vs 48 ± 17; P = .005). No eye with a new ERM required surgery (n = 13). Four eyes with a new RD required laser retinopexy alone; 1 eye was treated surgically. No eye had an RD at the most recent evaluation. Conclusions: Despite high-risk lesions in areas of lattice degeneration, few eyes developed RDs after prophylactic laser retinopexy. Older patients may have a higher risk for ERM or PVD after laser treatment. Eyes with post-laser PVD were more likely to develop an ERM.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To assess the anatomical and functional outcomes in eyes with persistent diabetic macular oedema (pDME) on chronic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy switched to intravitreal faricimab. METHODS: Patients with pDME on chronic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy that were switched to faricimab and received at least three injections at our institution between April 2022 and May 2023 were included in this study. Patients were excluded if they had complete response to previous treatment but were switched to extend treatment intervals if they had steroid or laser treatment for DME within 6 months prior to switch. Clinical and imaging data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Central foveal thickness (CFT) and Snellen visual acuity (VA) were obtained before and after three intravitreal faricimab injections. Generalised estimating equations were used to analyse the change in CFT and VA. RESULT: During the study period, 69 eyes of 53 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 68.6±9.0 years. The mean number of injections prior to switch was 18.1±16.0. Pre-switch mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution VA was 0.40±0.30 (Snellen equivalent 20/50) and 0.38±0.27 (Snellen equivalent 20/48) after three faricimab injections (p=0.397). Mean CFT improved from 380±155 microns to 323±147 microns (p<0.001). No ophthalmic or systemic adverse events occurred during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal faricimab can improve anatomic outcomes while maintaining visual acuity in eyes with pDME previously treated with anti-VEGF therapy.