Evaluating bottoming-out of bariatric sized wheelchair cushions.

In the United States, wheelchair cushions are classified using HCPCS codes. Cushions classified as Skin Protection cushions are provided for wheelchair users who are at risk of tissue damage. Cushions designed for bariatric users fall into a category of cushions with width of 22 inches or greater. Current coding procedures require tests that are designed for 41-43-cm-wide cushion so cannot evaluate wider cushions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of heavy-duty or bariatric wheelchair cushions using an anthropometrically appropriate buttock model and loading profile. A rigid buttock model, designed to reflect the anthropometry of persons using cushions over 55 cm in width was loaded onto six bariatric-sized wheelchair cushions. Two applied loads, 75 and 88 kg, represented the 50th and 80th percentile of persons who would be expected to use a 55-cm-wide cushion. None of the cushions indicated a bottomed-out state at the 88 kg load, suggesting that they could adequately support users weighing 135 kg. However, when evaluating cushions at their maximum rated loads, two of the six cushions were approaching or had bottomed-out. This study indicates that a more valid approach to classify Skin Protection bariatric cushions is needed.

Measure It: Proper Wheelchair Fit Is Key to Ensuring Function while Protecting Skin Integrity.

GENERAL PURPOSE: To review the biomechanics of posture, appropriate means to configure a wheelchair to permit proper postural support, and common problems arising from improper wheelchair fit. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Synthesize the concepts influencing proper wheelchair fit.2. Identify the biomechanics of posture as they apply to wheelchair fit.3. Summarize the appropriate assessment guidelines for determining and preparing to adjust wheelchair fit.

A variety of problems can arise from sitting persons in poorly fitted wheelchairs, including contractures, pain, and pressure injuries. These complications can result in functional consequences for the patient, such as reduced independence and activity. This article focuses specifically on proper wheelchair fit, describing the impact of proper wheelchair fit on the posture and function of wheelchair users. The author aims to help clinicians better recognize the basic biomechanics of posture, describe the appropriate means to configure a wheelchair to permit proper postural support, and identify common problems arising from improper wheelchair fit.

The design of a family of parametric anatomically-based compliant buttock models to evaluate wheelchair cushion performance.

The evaluation of wheelchair cushion performance is of interest to a variety of stakeholders, including standards organizations, cushion manufacturers, clinicians, users and payers. The objective of this project was to develop a family of compliant buttock models that are based upon the anatomical parameters of persons with varying body sizes. The models are parametrically designed so can be scaled to evaluate different sized cushions. This paper will detail the designs, describe the anatomical basis for the design and provide the rationale for the design decisions. The manuscript also serves a secondary purpose to illustrate how anthropometric data can be applied to the design of anatomical phantoms that reflect both soft tissue and skeletal anthropometry. Supplemental material includes greater detail and the full CAD files and model fabrication instructions are available in an open access repository for persons who wish to fabricate the models.

Effects of wheels and tires on high-strength lightweight wheelchair propulsion cost using a robotic wheelchair tester.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the effect of wheel and tire selections on the propulsion characteristics of a high-strength lightweight manual wheelchair using robotic wheelchair propulsion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four configurations were compared with differing combinations of drive wheel tires and casters, with the baseline reflecting the manufacturer configuration of a solid mag drive wheel and 8"×1" caster. The robotic wheelchair tester propelled the chair using pre-generated straight and curvilinear manoeuvres using repeatable and reliable cyclic torque profiles. Additionally, energy loss of the components was measured using coast-down deceleration tests to approximate the system-level rolling resistance of each configuration. RESULTS: Results indicate a significant decrease in propulsion cost, increased distance travelled and increased manoeuvrability across all configurations, with upgraded casters and tires. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that with better casters and drive wheel tires, the performance of high strength lightweight wheelchairs can be improved and better meet the mobility needs of users.Implications for rehabilitationWheel and tire selection can have a demonstrable impact on the propulsion efficiency of manual wheelchairsCoast-down test protocols can be used as a simple and cost-effective means of assessing representative energy losses across various surfacesWheelchair configurations can be optimized with proper knowledge of the main energetic loss contributions and the environments and contexts of use.

Effects of Incremental Changes to Frame Mass on Manual Wheelchair Propulsion Cost.

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of small, incremental additions to wheelchair frame mass (0 kg, +2 kg, and +4 kg) on the mechanical propulsion characteristics in both straight and curvilinear maneuvers. A robotic propulsion system was used to propel a manual wheelchair over a smooth tiled surface following rectilinear ("Straight") and curvilinear ("Slalom") trajectories. Three unique loading conditions were tested. Propulsion costs and system rolling resistance estimations were empirically collected using the robotic wheelchair tester. Propulsion cost values were equivalent across all loading conditions over the Slalom trajectory. In the Straight trajectory, adding 2 kg on the axle had equivalent propulsion cost to the unloaded configuration. Adding 4 kg on axle was comparable, but not equivalent, to the unloaded configuration with small (≤4.1%) increases in propulsion cost. This study demonstrates that small (0-4 kg) changes to the frame mass have no meaningful impacts on the propulsion characteristics of the manual wheelchair system. Differences in propulsion cost and rolling resistance were detectable but contextually insignificant.

Procedure to categorize wheelchair cushion performance using compliant buttock models.

Purpose: Wheelchair cushion prescription often seeks to address tissue integrity in addition to other clinical indicators. Because hundreds of wheelchair cushion models are available, a benefit would result if cushions were classified in a more valid manner to help guide selection by clinicians and users. The objective of this research was to develop an approach to evaluate and classify wheelchair cushion performance with respect to pressure redistribution. Materials and methods: Two anatomically-based buttock models were designed consisting of an elastomeric shell that models overall buttock form and a rigid substructure that abstracts load-bearing aspects of the skeleton. Model shapes were based upon elliptical and trigonometric equations, respectively. Two performance parameters were defined, pressure magnitude and pressure redistribution. The pressure magnitude parameter compared internal pressure values of the test cushion to a flat foam reference material, resulting in three classifications, superior, comparable, and inferior. Surface sensors were used to distinguish cushions with high, moderate or low pressure redistribution performance. Ten wheelchair cushions were evaluated by both models using two loads that represent a range of body weights expected for 41-43 cm wide cushions. Results and Conclusion: A classification matrix is proposed using both models and performance parameters. Two cushions met criteria for the highest level of performance, and one cushion was deemed to have inadequate performance for therapeutic value. The proposed method has a sensitivity to discern differences, compatibility with different sized cushions, and a versatility in classification. As such, it stands as an improvement over existing classification approaches.

Does Sacrococcygeal Skeletal Morphology and Morphometry Influence Pressure Injury Formation in Adults?

GENERAL PURPOSE: To present a study that investigated sacrococcygeal skeletal structure as a possible nonmodifiable intrinsic risk factor for pressure injury and identify possible issues caused by its morphology. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Recognize the background information the authors considered when planning and conducting their study of sacrococcygeal skeletal structure as a possible pressure injury risk factor.2. Identify the characteristics of the two groups of study participants.3. Choose the results of the study clinicians may consider when implementing evidence-based practice.

To determine if sacrococcygeal skeletal morphology and morphometry characteristics were possible pressure injury (PI) intrinsic risk factors; determine the exact location of these PIs; and generate hypotheses and determine methodological considerations required for future larger studies. This case-control pilot study compared 30 patients who had an MRI scan­15 patients had a PI and 15 patients did not. Key sacrococcygeal morphology and morphometry parameters were assessed. On average, patients with PIs had less of a lumbosacral and sacrococcygeal angle and a greater sacral curvature and intercoccygeal angle than did patients without a PI. Patients with PIs had more variable coccyx types. Tissue and bone destruction precluded several measurements in some patients. The most common area of destruction was located distally. Sacrococcygeal measurements differed in patients with PIs, and PIs were predominately located distally. Authors recommend replicating this study on a larger scale because certain key attributes warrant further investigation to determine their influence on sacrococcygeal PIs. Sacrococcygeal morphology and morphometry parameters have not been previously studied as possible intrinsic risk factors for PIs; yet, this is the most common location for their occurrence. Knowledge regarding possible injury mechanisms due to the forces from overlying skeletal structures with respective tissue loading over the sacrococcygeal area has the potential to inform practice; preventive strategies; and equipment, products, and technology developed.

The relationship between in-seat movement and pressure ulcers in wheelchair users with SCI/D.

OBJECTIVE: To identify parameters that are associated with time at pressure, are most related to pressure ulcer outcomes, and that may be used to influence pressure ulcer (PrU) outcomes in future intervention studies. DESIGN: Analysis used datasets from cross-sectional and longitudinal observational studies. Wheelchair-usage and in-seat metrics thresholds were optimized to differentiate individuals in PrU or No PrU groups. Logistic regression identified the demographics and in-seat activity metrics that impacted PrU outcomes. SETTING: General Community. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty individuals with spinal cord injuries and/or disorders (SCI/D) who use a wheelchair as their primary mobility device. 22 subjects were within the first year following injury and 28 had been using a wheelchair for over 2 years. Twenty-one participants reported PrU outcomes. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: Time in chair, pressure relief frequency, weight shift frequency, percentage of seated time that the subject is active (CoP Percent Active), frequency of in-seat movement, unloading event frequency, maximum time between events, and number of transfers. RESULTS: Optimal cutoff thresholds for the most significant in-seat movement metrics included: unloading event frequency of 3.1 times per hour (OR 0.353, 95% CI [0.110, 1.137]), maximum time between events of 155.4 min (OR 2.888, 95% CI [0.886, 9.413]), and CoP Percent Active of 2.6% (OR 0.221, 95% CI [0.063, 0.767]). When individuals were more active than these cutoffs, significantly more individuals were in the no pressure ulcer group. In predictive modeling, CoP Percent Active was the in-seat movement metric that significantly predicted PrU outcomes. The model was improved by adding age, occupation, and injury completeness. CONCLUSION: Of the 4 significant predictors in the model, only CoP Percent Active was modifiable. Therefore, an opportunity exists to design approaches to modify behavior. However, the results illustrate that the key to preventative movement may be through functional movement as opposed to scheduled, routine pressure reliefs.

Effect of Wheels, Casters and Forks on Vibration Attenuation and Propulsion Cost of Manual Wheelchairs.

Manual wheelchair users are exposed to whole-body vibrations as a direct result of using their wheelchair. Wheels, tires, and caster forks have been developed to reduce or attenuate the vibration that transmits through the frame and reaches the user. Five of these components with energy-absorbing characteristics were compared to standard pneumatic drive wheels and casters. This study used a robotic wheelchair propulsion system to repeatedly drive an ultra-lightweight wheelchair over four common indoor and outdoor surfaces: linoleum tile, decorative brick, poured concrete sidewalk, and expanded aluminum grates. Data from the propulsion system and a seat-mounted accelerometer were used to evaluate the energetic efficiency and vibration exposure of each configuration. Equivalence test results identified meaningful differences in both propulsion cost and seat vibration. LoopWheels and SoftWheels both increased propulsion costs by 12-16% over the default configuration without reducing vibration at the seat. Frog Legs suspension caster forks increased vibration exposure by 16-97% across all four surfaces. Softroll casters reduced vibration by 11% over metal grates. Wide pneumatic 'mountain' tires showed no difference from the default configuration. All vibration measurements were within acceptable ranges compared to health guidance standards. Out of the component options, softroll casters show the most promising results for ease of efficiency and effectiveness at reducing vibrations through the wheelchair frame and seat cushion. These results suggest some components with built-in suspension systems are ineffective at reducing vibration exposure beyond standard components, and often introduce mechanical inefficiencies that the user would have to overcome with every propulsion stroke.

Estimating whole-body vibration limits of manual wheelchair mobility over common surfaces.

Whole-body vibration (WBV) experienced during manual wheelchair use was quantified across several types of terrain (tile, sidewalk, decorative bricks, expanded metal grates). Over-ground travel was controlled using a robotic propulsion system. Vibrations along the vertical axis were measured with a triaxial accelerometer mounted to the seat of the wheelchair. Root-mean-square acceleration values were compared to the health guidance exposure limits established by the European Council using the WBV calculator tool published by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Vibrations along the vertical axis were well below the exposure values associated with health risks. Even the most aggressive tactile surface (grates) tested in this study would require more than 14 h of daily travel to reach the "exposure action value," and more than 24 h would be required to reach the "exposure limit value". Considering the average cumulative duration of active self-propulsion among manual wheelchair users is around an hour or less, none of the tested conditions were deemed unsafe or damaging.

Assessment of wheeled mobility devices provided to a commercially insured population in 2017.

In the United States, wheeled mobility devices (WMD) are classified as durable medical equipment (DME). Consistent with the definition of DME, wheeled mobility devices are typically covered by health insurance when deemed medically necessary. Despite the number of persons using wheelchairs, little knowledge is available about the types of wheelchairs provided, user's specific diagnoses and the costs associated with WMD provision. The objective of this analysis was to define the number and types of wheelchairs and associated seating and mobility (S&M) accessories provided in the calendar year 2017. The analysis focused on user demographics, categories of WMDs and associated S&M equipment as well as cost accounting according to the type of insurance and contributions by beneficiaries. Analysis of over 81,000 wheelchair acquisitions found that manual wheelchairs accounted for nearly 90% with standard manual wheelchairs accounting for 86% of all wheelchairs provided. Wheelchair recipients tended to be older with the majority being female. Based upon ICD-10 diagnostic categories over 50% of captured ICD-10 codes came from three classifications, musculoskeletal (M), circulatory (I) and a general category of not otherwise classified disorders (R). Costs associated with seating and mobility equipment were fairly large, exceeding $79 million over a single calendar year.

Does the setting matter? Observing wheelchair transfers across different environmental conditions.

The setting in which wheelchair transfers are performed can affect the difficulty and the risks associated with completion. This article presents results from an observational study involving 13 wheelchair users performing independent transfers across four settings. The aim is to understand how the environment affects how different types of independent transfers are performed. Descriptive analysis was performed alongside an objective assessment using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI). The perceived difficulty reported after each transfer was also collected. Two participants exhibited radically different transferring techniques in different scenarios. Additionally, the transferring scenario was found to significantly affect the perceived difficulty of sitting transfers (toilet 2.17 ±.88; bed 1.47 ±.65, p =.001; car 1.63 ±.82, p =.012) and standing transfers (car 3.5 ±.71; bed 1 ± 0, p =.03; toilet 1 ± 0, p =.03), and the TAI score attributed to sitting pivot with use of a transfer board (couch 4.3 ±.88; bed 6.93 ± 1.29, p =.022; car 7.13 ± 1.32, p =.018). Overall, environmental constraints can lead to major technique changes and, more often, to different positioning of hands and feet which could impact the transfer's biomechanics.

Measurement of rolling resistance and scrub torque of manual wheelchair drive wheels and casters.

The effort needed to maneuver a manual wheelchair is a function of the occupied wheelchair's inertia and energy loss. The primary source of energy loss is due to the resistance of the drive wheels and casters on the ground. Specifically, manual wheelchairs have two major sources of frictional energy loss: rolling resistance and scrub torque. The objective of this study was to develop and validate component-level test methods to evaluate the energy loss properties of drive wheels and casters on different surfaces and with different applied loads. Rolling resistance is measured using a weighted coast-down cart and scrub torque is calculated by measuring the force required to rotate a plate that is loaded onto the tire's surface. Each test method was iterated and then applied to a cohort of drive wheels and casters. Both test methods demonstrated acceptable repeatability and the ability to distinguish energy loss parameters between common wheelchair components. The results show that caster and drive wheel energy losses can vary significantly across surfaces and with increased load on the casters. However, the findings also illuminate complex relationships between rolling resistance and scrub torque performance that embody a tradeoff in performance as applied to mobility during everyday life.

Validating a wheelchair in-seat activity tracker.

Wheelchair users often experience prolonged periods of stationary sitting. Such periods are accompanied with increased loading of the ischial tuberosities. This can lead to the development of pressure ulcers which can cause complications such as sepsis. Periodic pressure offloading is recommended to reduce the onset of pressure ulcers. Experts recommend the periodic execution of different movements to provide the needed pressure offloading. Wheelchair users, however, might not remember to perform these recommended movements in terms of both quality and quantity. A system that can detect such movements could provide valuable feedback to both wheelchair users as well as clinicians. The objective of this study was to present and validate the WiSAT - a system for characterizing in-seat activity for wheelchair users. WiSAT is designed to detect two kinds of movements - weight shifts and in-seat movements. Weight shifts are movements that offload pressure on ischial tuberosities by 30% as compared to upright sitting and are maintained for 15 seconds. In-seat movements are shorter transient movements that involve either a change in the center of pressure on the sitting buttocks or a transient reduction in total load by 30%. This study validates the use of WiSAT in manual wheelchairs. WiSAT has a sensor mat which was inserted beneath a wheelchair cushion. Readings from these sensors were used by WiSAT algorithms to predict weight shifts and in-seat movements. These weight shifts and in-seat movements were validated against a high-resolution interface pressure mat in a dataset that resembles real-world usage. The proposed system achieved weight shift precision and recall scores of 81% and 80%, respectively, while in-seat movement scores were predicted with a mean absolute error of 22%. Results showed that WiSAT provides sufficient accuracy in characterizing in-seat activity in terms of weight shifts and in-seat movement.

Propulsion Cost Changes of Ultra-Lightweight Manual Wheelchairs After One Year of Simulated Use.

Manual wheelchairs are available with folding or rigid frames to meet the preferences and needs of individual users. Folding styles are commonly regarded as more portable and storable, whereas rigid frames are commonly regarded as more efficient for frequently daily use. To date, there are no studies directly comparing the performances of the frame types. Furthermore, while differences have been reported in the longevity of the frame types, no efforts have been made to relate this durability back to the real-world performance of the frames. This study investigated the propulsion efficiencies of four folding and two rigid ultra-lightweight frames equipped with identical drive tires and casters. A robotic wheelchair tester was used to measure the propulsion costs of each chair over two surfaces: concrete and carpet. A motorized carousel was used to drive the chairs 511 km around a circular track to simulate one year of use for each wheelchair. After simulated use, five of the six wheelchairs showed no decrease in propulsion effort, indicating that the frames were able to withstand the stresses of simulated use without a detrimental impact on performance. In the unused "new" condition, rigid chairs were found to have superior (>5%) performance over folding frames on concrete and carpet, and in the "worn" condition rigid chairs had superior performance over folding chairs on concrete but were comparable on the carpeted surface.

An Exploratory Analysis of the Role of Adipose Characteristics in Fulltime Wheelchair Users' Pressure Injury History.

Aim: The goals of this study were 1) to identify the relationship between adipose (subcutaneous and intramuscular) characteristics and pressure injury (PrI) history in wheelchair users and 2) to identify subject characteristics, including biomechanical risk, that are related to adipose characteristics. Materials and Methods: The buttocks of 43 full-time wheelchair users with and without a history of pelvic PrIs were scanned in a seated posture in a FONAR UPRIGHT® MRI. Intramuscular adipose (the relative difference in intensity between adipose and gluteus maximus) and the subcutaneous adipose characteristics (the relative difference in intensity between subcutaneous adipose under and surrounding the ischium) were compared to PrI history and subject characteristics. Results: Participants with a history of PrIs had different subcutaneous fat (subQF) characteristics than participants without a history of PrIs. Specifically, they had significantly darker adipose under the ischium than surrounding the ischium (subQF effect size = 0.21) than participants without a history of PrIs (subQF effect size = 0.58). On the other hand, only when individuals with complete fat infiltration (n = 7) were excluded did individuals with PrI history have more fat infiltration than those without a PrI history. The presence of spasms (µ intramuscular adipose, 95% CI with spasms 0.642 [0.430, 0.855], without spasms 0.168 [-0.116, 0.452], p = 0.01) and fewer years using a wheelchair were associated with leaner muscle (Pearson Corr = -0.442, p = 0.003). Conclusion: The results of the study suggest the hypothesis that changes in adipose tissue under the ischial tuberosity (presenting as darker SubQF) are associated with increased biomechanical risk for pressure injury. Further investigation of this hypothesis, and the role of intramuscular fat infiltration in PrI development, may help our understanding of PrI etiology. It may also lead to clinically useful diagnostic techniques that can identify changes in adipose and biomechanical risk to inform early preventative interventions.

Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically-relevant conditions.

Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and linen is hypothesized as being a key performance factor. The objective of this project was to quantify the static and kinetic coefficients of friction (COF) of various brands of prophylactic dressings under the stresses experienced in situ, while the dressings are in contact with bed linen materials. The COF of six commercial dressings were calculated using tribometer measurements. The ranges of static COF were 0.333-0.542 and kinetic COF were 0.333-0.513. Four dressings exhibited COF that were consistent with skin-linen values reported in the literature and all dressing COF appear to be lower than the COF of moist skin against linen.

Everyday use of power adjustable seat height (PASH) systems.

The objective of this study was to measure how, why, and where the power adjustable seat height (PASH) system of Quantum's iLevel® wheelchairs were used. We instrumented iLevel® power wheelchairs for 24 adults to measure wheelchair occupancy, seat height, in-seat activity level, and bouts of mobility. Participants elevated their wheelchair 3.9 (4.4) (mean (SD)) times per day, including 1.0 (1.6) times per day past 9". Twenty-nine percent of elevation events were transient, lasting < 1 min, while 42% of elevate events lasted >5 minutes. Sixty-seven percent of participants transferred while elevated at least once, typically from heights <5" or >9", and 14 people changed their seat height between the transfer to and from the wheelchair. Twenty-three of 24 participants wheeled while elevated. Finally, in-seat activity level was greater while elevated. For many participants, the PASH system provided a functional benefit on a daily basis. Individuals elevated 4 times per day for activities including transfers, reach, gaze, or mobility. However, 14 participants did not elevate on at least 1 day. Further study is needed to identify the characteristics of people who will benefit most from a PASH system as well as to document the value associated with PASH system use.

Modeling manual wheelchair propulsion cost during straight and curvilinear trajectories.

Minimizing the effort to propel a manual wheelchair is important to all users in order to optimize the efficiency of maneuvering throughout the day. Assessing the propulsion cost of wheelchairs as a mechanical system is a key aspect of understanding the influences of wheelchair design and configuration. The objective of this study was to model the relationships between inertial and energy-loss parameters to the mechanical propulsion cost across different wheelchair configurations during straight and curvilinear trajectories. Inertial parameters of an occupied wheelchair and energy loss parameters of drive wheels and casters were entered into regression models representing three different maneuvers. A wheelchair-propelling robot was used to measure propulsion cost. General linear models showed strong relationships (R2 > 0.84) between the system-level costs of propulsion and the selected predictor variables representing sources of energy loss and inertial influences. System energy loss parameters were significant predictors in all three maneuvers. Yaw inertia was also a significant predictor during zero-radius turns. The results indicate that simple energy loss measurements can predict system-level performance, and inertial influences are mostly overshadowed by the increased resistive losses caused by added mass, though weight distribution can mitigate some of this added cost.