Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Quintessence Int ; 0(0): 0, 2024 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38726763

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: An altered sensation during endodontic treatment can occur due to the extrusion of endodontic materials. This study aims to discuss intentional replantation to address paresthesia resulting from an endodontic file penetrating the inferior alveolar nerve canal (IANC) and provide a protocol for managing nerve injuries in such incidents. CASE PRESENTATION: A 12-year-old girl developed paresthesia when an endodontic file separated and was inadvertently pushed through the apical foramen into IANC during root canal treatment of the mandibular left first molar. A CBCT scan revealed the file penetrating the canal towards the inferior border of the mandible. After considering the treatment options, intentional replantation was deemed suitable. The tooth was a-traumatically extracted and preserved in sterile saline. The surgeon then carefully cleaned and irrigated the socket. The radiographic assessment confirmed successful file removal from the socket. The Root ends were resected, and retrograde preparation and obturation were conducted using ultrasonic tips and MTA. The tooth was then replanted into the socket. Successful replantation was confirmed by tooth stability and an audible click. The patient was prescribed antibiotics and steroids. Subsequently, after completing the endodontic treatment. a stainless-steel crown was cemented. The successful intentional replantation procedure resulted in rapid improvement in the patient's condition. The normal sensation had been restored, indicating nerve recovery. At the 15-month follow-up, Periapical bone healing and the eruption of the adjacent second molar were observed, affirming the treatment protocol's overall success. CONCLUSION: Prompt intervention and immediate intentional replantation facilitated direct inspection of the separated file within the socket. Collaboration between an oral maxillofacial surgeon and an endodontist ensures expedited and targeted treatment, leading to favorable outcomes.

2.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(5)2024 Feb 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38472976

RESUMO

Bone augmentation prior to dental implant placement is a common scenario in the dental implantology field. Among the important intraoral harvesting sites to obtain bone blocks is the ramus/retromolar region that has a high success rate and long-lasting alveolar ridge augmentation. Preserving the bone volume and quality at the donor site is crucial for preventing further complications or to serve as a site for re-harvesting. Healing of the intraoral donor sites has been described in the maxillofacial field. This study aimed to evaluate the spontaneous healing of the mandibular retromolar donor site utilizing computer-assisted quantification 6 and 12 months after bone harvesting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on patients who underwent an alveolar ridge augmentation using an intraoral retromolar bone graft. Three CBCT scans were performed-intraoperative, and at six months and one year after the surgical procedure. By using the Materialise Mimics Innovation Suite software 26.0 features segmentation by thresholding, Hounsfield unit averaging, and superimposition of the tomographies, we could precisely quantify the healing process utilizing spatial and characteristic measures. RESULTS: In all cases, the computer-aided quantification showed that six months following surgery, the donor site had recovered up to 64.5% ± 4.24 of its initial volume, and this recovery increased to 89.2% ± 2.6 after one year. Moreover, the Hounsfield unit averaging confirmed dynamic bone quality healing, starting at 690.3 ± 81 HU for the bone block, decreasing to 102 ± 27.8 HU at six months postoperatively, and improving to 453.9 ± 91.4 HU at the donor site after a year. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there is no need for additional replanting at the donor site following retromolar bone block harvesting, whether autogenous or allograft, since spontaneous healing occurs 12 months following the surgery.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA