Structure and establishment of the German Cochlear Implant Registry (DCIR).

Hearing rehabilitation of patients with severe hearing loss or deafness using cochlear implants (CI) is a very successful but also complex and lifelong process that requires high quality standards for structure, process, and results. Medical registries represent an ideal tool for conducting quality control relevant to care while at the same time collecting scientific data. Therefore, at the initiative of the Executive Committee of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), a Germany-wide CI registry (the German Cochlear Implant Register, DCIR) was to be established. The following goals were to be achieved: 1) legal and contractual basis for the register; 2) definition of the register contents; 3) development of evaluation standards (hospital-specific and national annual reports); 4) development of a logo; 5) practical operation of the registry. After defining a catalog of services that defines the content, structure, and operation of the DCIR, a registry operator with audiological expertise was sought. After considering various offers, the registry was technically implemented in cooperation with the provider INNOFORCE (Ruggell, Liechtenstein) as registry operator. This also included the realization of an interface for data transfer from previously existing databases and development of a data protection concept for productive operation of the DCIR under the scientific leadership of the DGHNO-KHC Executive Committee. Since January 2022, it has been possible for participating hospitals to enter pseudonymized data into the DCIR. To date, 75 hospitals in Germany have contractually agreed to participate in the registry. During the first 15 months, data from over 2500 implants in over 2000 patients were registered in the DCIR. The work presented here describes the structuring, development, and successful establishment of the DCIR. Introduction of the DCIR represents an important milestone of future scientifically based quality control in CI care. The registry presented here can therefore be considered as an example for other areas of medical care and thus also sets an international standard.

Conception and implementation of a certification system for quality control of cochlear implant treatment in Germany.

A standardized and structured process is indispensable for optimal hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI). The Executive Committee of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), initiated the conception of a certification program and a Whitepaper based on the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) clinical practice guideline (CPG) describing the current medical standards of CI care in Germany. The goal was to independently confirm implementation of this CPG and make this information publicly available. With the support of an independent certification organization, successful implementation of the CI-CPG by a hospital would then be verified and confirmed by awarding the "Cochlear implant-provision institution" (Cochlea-Implantat-versorgende Einrichtung, CIVE) quality certificate. A structure for implementation of a certification system was developed based on the CI-CPG. The following steps were required: 1) conception of a quality control system for certification of hospitals working in accordance with the CI-CPG; 2) development of required structures for an independent review of quality-relevant structure, process, and result parameters; 3) development of a standard procedure for independent certification of hospitals; 4) development of a certificate and a logo to demonstrate successful certification; 5) practical implementation of the certification. Following design of the certification program and the required organizational structure, the certification system was successfully launched in 2021. Applications for the quality certificate could be formally submitted from September 2021. A total of 51 off-site evaluations were performed by December 2022. In the first 16 months from introduction, 47 hospitals were successfully certified as CIVE. In this period, 20 experts were trained as auditors, who have since then carried out 18 on-site audits in hospitals. In summary, the conceptual design, structure, and practical implementation of a certification program for quality control in CI care was successfully implemented in Germany.

[Structure and establishment of the German Cochlear Implant Registry]. / Struktur und Einrichtung des Deutschen Cochlea-Implantat-Registers (DCIR).

Hearing rehabilitation of patients with severe hearing loss or deafness using cochlear implants (CI) is a very successful but also complex and lifelong process that requires high quality standards for structure, process, and results. Medical registries represent an ideal tool for conducting quality control relevant to care while at the same time collecting scientific data. Therefore, at the initiative of the Executive Committee of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), a Germany-wide CI registry (the German Cochlear Implant Register, DCIR) was to be established. The following goals were to be achieved: 1) legal and contractual basis for the register; 2) definition of the register contents; 3) development of evaluation standards (hospital-specific and national annual reports); 4) development of a logo; 5) practical operation of the registry. After defining a catalog of services that defines the content, structure, and operation of the DCIR, a registry operator with audiological expertise was sought. After considering various offers, the registry was technically implemented in cooperation with the provider INNOFORCE (Ruggell, Liechtenstein) as registry operator. This also included the realization of an interface for data transfer from previously existing databases and development of a data protection concept for productive operation of the DCIR under the scientific leadership of the DGHNO-KHC Executive Committee. Since January 2022, it has been possible for participating hospitals to enter pseudonymized data into the DCIR. To date, 75 hospitals in Germany have contractually agreed to participate in the registry. During the first 15 months, data from over 2500 implants in over 2000 patients were registered in the DCIR. The work presented here describes the structuring, development, and successful establishment of the DCIR. Introduction of the DCIR represents an important milestone of future scientifically based quality control in CI care. The registry presented here can therefore be considered as an example for other areas of medical care and thus also sets an international standard.

[Conception and implementation of a certification system for quality control of cochlear implant treatment in Germany. German version]. / Konzeption und Implementierung eines Zertifizierungssystems zur Qualitätssicherung der Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung in Deutschland.

A standardized and structured process is indispensable for optimal hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI). The Executive Committee of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), initiated the conception of a certification system and a Whitepaper based on the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) clinical practice guideline (CPG) describing the current medical standards of CI care in Germany. The goal was to independently confirm implementation of this CPG and make this information publicly available. With the support of an independent certification organization, successful implementation of the CI-CPG by a hospital would then be verified and confirmed by awarding the "Cochlear implant-provision institution" (Cochlea-Implantat-versorgende Einrichtung, CIVE) quality certificate. A structure for implementation of a certification system was developed based on the CI-CPG. The following steps were required: 1) conception of a quality control system for certification of hospitals working in accordance with the CI-CPG; 2) development of required structures for an independent review of quality-relevant structure, process, and result parameters; 3) development of a standard procedure for independent certification of hospitals; 4) development of a certificate and a logo to demonstrate successful certification; 5) practical implementation of the certification. Following design of the certification system and the required organizational structure, the certification system was successfully launched in 2021. Applications for the quality certificate could be formally submitted from September 2021. A total of 51 off-site evaluations were performed by December 2022. In the first 16 months from introduction, 47 hospitals were successfully certified as CIVE. In this period, 20 experts were trained as auditors, who have since then carried out 18 on-site audits in hospitals. In summary, the conceptual design, structure, and practical implementation of a certification system for quality control in CI care was successfully implemented in Germany.

Empfehlungen zur Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit und Verlaufsdokumentation von Mepolizumab bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) im deutschen Gesundheitssystem ­ Empfehlungen des Ärzteverbandes Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA) und der AGs Klinische Immunologie, Allergologie und Umweltmedizin und Rhinologie und Rhinochirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie (DGHNOKHC).

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease of the mucous membranes of the nose and sinuses. Eosinophilic inflammation is described as a common endotype. The anti-IL5 antibody mepolizumab was approved in November 2021 as an add-on therapy to intranasal glucocorticosteroids for the treatment of adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps when systemic glucocorticosteroids or surgery do not provide adequate disease control. While national and international recommendations exist for the use of mepolizumab in CRSwNP, it has not yet been adequately specified how this therapy is to be monitored, what follow-up documentation is necessary, and when it should be terminated if necessary. METHODS: A literature search was performed to analyze previous data on the treatment of CRSwNP with mepolizumab and to determine the available evidence by searching Medline, Pubmed, the national and international trial and guideline registries and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published in the period up to and including 10/2022 were considered. RESULTS: Based on the international literature and previous experience by an expert panel, recommendations for follow-up, adherence to therapy intervals and possible therapy breaks, as well as termination of therapy when using mepolizumab for the indication CRSwNP in the German health care system are given on the basis of a documentation sheet. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the immunological basis of CRSwNP opens up new non-surgical therapeutic approaches with biologics for patients with severe, uncontrolled courses. Here, we provide recommendations for follow-up, adherence to therapy intervals, possible therapy pauses, or discontinuation of therapy when mepolizumab is used as add-on therapy with intranasal glucocorticosteroids to treat adult patients with severe CRSwNP that cannot be adequately controlled with systemic glucocorticosteroids and/or surgical intervention.

Empfehlungen zur Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit und Verlaufsdokumentation von Dupilumab bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) im deutschen Gesundheitssystem.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease of the nasal and paranasal mucosa. A Type-2 inflammation is described as the most common endotype. Since October 2019 the anti-IL-4/-IL-13 antibody dupilumab has been approved in Germany as an add-on therapy to intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, when systemic corticosteroids alone or surgery do not provide adequate disease control. While recommendations for the use of dupilumab in CRSwNP exist at both national and international levels, until now it has not been adequately established, how therapy should be monitored and when it should be discontinued in the German Health Care System. METHODS: A literature search was performed analyzing previous data on the treatment of CRSwNP with dupilumab and to determine the available evidence by searching Medline, Pubmed, the national and international trial and guideline registries and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published in the period up to 05/2022 were included. RESULTS: Based on international literature and previous experience, recommendations are given by an expert panel for follow-up and possible therapy breaks, therapy intervals or termination of therapy when using dupilumab for the indication CRSwNP in the German health care system based on a documentation form. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the immunological basis of CRSwNP opens new non-surgical therapy approaches with biologics for patients with severe courses. The authors give recommendations for follow-up, possible therapy breaks, therapy intervals and a termination for dupilumab treatment as add-on therapy with intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of adult patients with severe CRSwNP that cannot be adequately controlled with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgical intervention.

Positionspapier: Empfehlungen zur Anwendung von Mepolizumab bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi (CRSwNP) im deutschen Gesundheitssystem ­ Empfehlungen des Ärzteverbandes Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA) und der AGs Klinische Immunologie, Allergologie und Umweltmedizin und Rhinologie und Rhinochirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie (DGHNO-KHC).

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinus mucosa with eosinophilic inflammation as the most common endotype. The anti-IL5 antibody mepolizumab was approved for the treatment of severe CRSwNP in the EU in November 2021. METHODS: A literature search was performed to analyze the immunology of CRSwNP and determine the available evidence by searching Medline, Pubmed, and the German national and international trial and guideline registries and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published in the period up to and including 12/2021 that investigated the effect of mepolizumab in CRSwNP were considered. RESULTS: Based on the international literature and previous experience, recommendations for the use of mepolizumab in CRSwNP in the German health care system are given by an expert panel on the basis of a documentation form. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding about the immunological basis of CRSwNP opens new non-surgical therapeutic approaches with biologics for patients with severe courses. Mepolizumab is approved since November 2021 for add-on therapy with intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of adult patients with severe CRSwNP who cannot be adequately controlled with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgical intervention.

Quality control in cochlear implant therapy: clinical practice guidelines and registries in European countries.

PURPOSE: The treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) is the gold standard in therapy of patients with profound hearing loss or deafness. Successful hearing rehabilitation with a CI is a complex, multi-stage process. In medicine, "Clinical Practice Guidelines" (CPG) are widely accepted for the standardization of such processes. These are supplemented by medical registries in which data regarding the treatment can be collected and evaluated. The aim of this paper is to identify currently existing CI-related CPGs and registries in Europe. METHODS: Between 01/2021 and 06/2021, 42 countries on the European continent, including the United Kingdom, Russia and Turkey, were screened using an internet search (search engine: Google) and a key word search in the Pubmed database. Search terms were the respective country name combined with the following terms: "Cochlear Implant", "CI", "Cochlear implant clinical practice guideline", "CI Guideline", "Cochlear Implant Registry", "CI Registry", "Ear nose throat society". The internet search was conducted in English as well as in the corresponding national language. The objective was to identify a CI-related CPG or registry. RESULTS: A CPG was found in 16 of 42 (38%) countries. In terms of population, this accounts for 645 million out of 838 million people (77%). A registry existed in 4 of the 42 (10%) countries assessed. This corresponds to 102 million out of 838 million (12%) people. In total, 4 out of 42 countries (10%) had both a CPG and a registry. CONCLUSION: Our work shows numerous efforts in Europe to standardize CI care at the national level. While most people in Europe already live in countries with a CPG, this is not the case for CI registries. European-wide consensus on CPGs or registries does not yet exist. The present study thus provides a first assessment of the distribution of CI-related CPGs and registries.

[First time online 92nd annual meeting of the DGHNO-KHC 2021 - a critical assessment based on the participant's evaluation]. / 92. Jahresversammlung der DGHNO-KHC 2021 erstmals im Online-Format ­ eine kritische Bewertung auf Basis der Teilnehmerevaluation.

First time ever, the 92nd annual meeting of the DGHNO-KHC was carried out completely in an online format in May 2021 due to the new framework conditions caused by the corona pandemic. The participants from the ranks of members, guests and industrial partners were asked to complete an evaluation questionnaire from the responsible State Medical Association of North Rhine, which was supplemented with questions about the new virtual format. The publication summarizes the evaluation of the 187 (10 % of the total number of participants) medical/scientific and 25 industrial exhibitors (60 % of the participating industrial partners) responses and provides an initial conclusion. Roughly speaking, the congress was rated positively by the medical/scientific participants despite the total lack of social interaction and scientific open debates. On the industrial side, the picture was different. The medical participants were asked about the future format of the next annual ENT congresses. 16 % were in favor of a purely online congress, 67 % in favor of a face-to-face congress with online elements, and only 17 % in favor of a purely face-to-face congress. The question, which type of exhibition would be preferred in the future for industrial partners, 68 % were in favor of a purely face-to-face exhibition as part of a face-to-face congress. 32 % accepted a combination of presence with online elements. A future complete online industrial exhibition was voted out with 0 % approval.

[Development of the publication activity at the German university hospitals for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery during the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic in 2020]. / Entwicklung der Publikationsleistung der Universitätskliniken für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie während der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie im Jahr 2020 in Deutschland.

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to profound limitations in patient care and student teaching at the University Hospitals of Otorhinolaryngology (ORL). In contrast, the impact on research has been variable. To classify the pandemic-related effect on research, the development of the number of scientific publications of the German ORL university hospitals before and during the pandemic was analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The publication performance between 2015 and 2020 of the 39 current chairmen was surveyed using a literature search (Pubmed). All entries relating to the chairmen of the university hospital as first, last or co-author were included. The absolute and relative development of each author's publication performance was determined and evaluated using nonparametric statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 2420 publications could be documented. From 2015 to 2019, an average of 368 publications were published per year. In 2020, this number increased by 57.9 % to 581 publications. While the number of monthly publications remained constant between 2015 and 2019, a significant increase was seen from May 2020 up to a maximum of 74 publications in September 2020. In 2020, 34 articles (5.9 %) had a thematic relation to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with 7 of these papers (20.6 %) resulting from cross-site publications. CONCLUSION: In 2020, the number of scientific publications was raised to more than 1.5 times the usual annual publications. This increase was clearly related in time to the reduction of elective patient care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic starting in mid-March 2020. Probably, free time capacities enabled this increased publication output. Our results confirm the great scientific potential of the ORL university hospitals, which has been successfully implemented despite the pandemic.

[Effects of the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic on the otolaryngology university hospitals in the field of research, student teaching and specialist training]. / Auswirkungen der SARS-CoV­2-Pandemie auf die universitäre Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde im Bereich der Forschung, Lehre und Weiterbildung.

BACKGROUND: From spring 2020, SARS-CoV­2 began to spread worldwide, with what is now known as the first wave of the pandemic, starting in March 2020. This resulted in restructuring and shift of resources at many hospitals. The aim of our work was to detect the effects of the pandemic on the german Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (ORL) university hospitals in terms of research, student teaching and further specialist training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The chairmen of the 39 ORL university hospitals in Germany were asked about the effects of the pandemic on research, student teaching and ORL specialist training (residency) in the period from March to April 2020 using a structured online survey. RESULTS: All 39 chairmen took part in the survey. Of these, 74.4% (29/39) stated that their research activities had deteriorated as a result of the pandemic. In 61.5% (24/39) pandemic-related research issues were addressed. All hospitals reported a restriction for in-house teaching and 97.5% (38/39) introduced new digital teaching methods. During the observation period, 74.4% of the chairmen did not see ORL specialist training (residency)at risk. CONCLUSION: Our results provide an insight into the heterogeneous effects of the pandemic. The fast processing of pandemic-related research topics and the introduction of innovative digital concepts for student teaching impressively demonstrates the great innovative potential and the ability of the ORL university hospitals to react quickly in order to maintain their tasks in research, student teaching and ORL specialist training in the best possible way even during the pandemic.

Audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction with the ADHEAR hearing system in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: The ADHEAR system (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) is a new adhesive bone conduction hearing aid. This study evaluates the audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction as well as the manageability in everyday life in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss. METHODS: Ten children with unilateral hearing loss of different origin were included in the study. The audiological assessment included sound field audiometry and speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise, which was tested unaided and after 4 weeks of wearing the hearing system. Subjective benefit and satisfaction with the system was assessed using the SSQ for parents. With a second system-specific questionnaire, suitability for everyday use and quality of life were queried. RESULTS: With ADHEAR, speech perception in quiet improved by 44%. The word recognition score in noise improved from 11.7% in the unaided situation to 46.7% with the ADHEAR system. The SSQ for parents demonstrates a subjective benefit and satisfaction with the system. CONCLUSION: ADHEAR is an effective treatment option for children with unilateral conductive hearing loss. Especially children who are not eligible for semi-implantable hearing systems or do not accept hearing devices on a softband can benefit from this device.

[Regional distribution of the cochlear implant (CI) centers in Germany]. / Regionale Verteilung der Cochlea-Implantat (CI)-versorgenden Einrichtungen in Deutschland.

The treatment of patients with severe hearing loss or deafness with a cochlear implant (CI) represents a standard in Germany today. However, there is hardly any data on the current number of clinical CI centers (CI clinics) and their geographical distribution. The patient self-help organization, German Cochlear Implant Society (DCIG), and the German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC) have therefore initiated a survey to determine the regional distribution, the range of services, the consideration of existing quality standards and cooperation with patient self-help organizations of the individual clinical CI centers.For this purpose, a total number of 170 ENT departments or their directors (37 professors and 133 chief physicians), respectively, were contacted by e-mail and provided with a questionnaire. The survey took place from October 2019 to February 2020.Of the 170 departments contacted, 71 (41.8 %) took part in the survey. Of these, 70 departments (98.6 %) confirmed to perform CI surgeries. Thus, 41.8 % of all clinics contacted reported to perform CI surgeries (70 of 170 clinics), while this information was not available from 99 clinics. All 70 clinical CI centers (100 %) reported to conduct CI surgeries on adults, 60 centers (85.7 %) also on children (< 18 years). 36 departments (51.4 %) reported that the total number of CI surgeries at their facility in 2018 was more than 50. In 64 departments (91.4 %), the recommendations of the DGHNO-KHC on CI care (according to the White Paper CI care 2018) were followed. A collaboration between the department and patient self-help organization was confirmed by 67 institutions (95.7 %). The geographical distribution of the clinical CI centers showed a heterogeneous distribution pattern between the individual federal states and also within the respective federal state.The work presented here is a first assessment of the situation with regard to the regional distribution of clinical CI centers in Germany. A clustering of CI centers was noticeable in metropolitan areas, sometimes with several facilities in one city. The predominant attention to quality-related aspects, such as the consideration of the DGHNO-KHC white paper and the cooperation with patient self-help, is gratifying. The limitations of the study result from limited participation in the survey (41.8 % of the contacted clinics).

[Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the otorhinolaryngology university hospitals in the field of medical care]. / Auswirkungen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie auf die universitäre Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde im Bereich der Krankenversorgung.

INTRODUCTION: Since December 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been rapidly spreading worldwide. In Germany, an exponential increase in the number of infections was registered at the beginning of March 2020 and led to a call of the Ministry of Health to create more capacity for intensive medical treatment in hospitals. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (ORL) university hospitals regarding patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was sent out to all chairmen of the 39 ORL university hospitals in Germany. The answers to the questions referred to the defined period from March 15th to April 15th 2020 and were carried out using the online survey tool "SurveyMonkey". 87 questions focused on general information, health care, and structural effects in the respective institution. RESULTS: All chairmen of the 39 university hospitals in Germany participated in the survey. The collected data prove the considerable impact on organizational, structural and medical aspects of patient care. For example, the surveyed clinics reported a decrease in outpatient cases by 73.8 % to 26.2 ±â€Š14.2 % and in surgical treatments by 65.9 % to 34.1 ±â€Š13.9 %. In contrast, emergency treatment remained unchanged or even increased in 80 % of the facilities and surgical treatment of emergency patients remained unchanged or even increased in more than 90 %. Emergency outpatient and surgical treatment of patients was provided throughout the pandemic in all facilities. In total, about 35 000 outpatients and about 12 000 surgical cases were postponed. As a result of the acute structural changes, the potential danger of falling below current treatment standards was seen in individual areas of patient care. DISCUSSION: The assessment of the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is heterogeneous. The majority of the chairmen are critically aware of the risk of falling below current medical treatment standards or guidelines. In the phase of an exponential increase in the number of infections, significant changes in treatment processes had to be accepted for understandable reasons. However, with the currently significantly reduced number of infections, falling below treatment standards and guidelines should not be allowed to remain constant and tolerated. SUMMARY: This study shows a differentiated picture with regard to the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on outpatient, inpatient and operative patient care at the ORL university hospitals in Germany and illustrates the importance of these institutions for ensuring patient care during this critical phase.

[Strategies for a regenerative therapy of hearing loss. German version]. / Strategien für eine regenerative Therapie der Schwerhörigkeit.

Despite impressive technical progress in the field of conventional hearing aids and implantable hearing systems, the hopes for the treatment of inner ear diseases such as hearing loss and tinnitus have become increasingly directed toward regenerative therapeutic approaches. This review discusses the currently most promising strategies for hair cell regeneration in the inner ear to treat hearing loss, including stem cell-based, gene transfer-based, and pharmacological interventions. Furthermore, previous milestones and ground-breaking work in this scientific field are identified. After many years of basic research, the first clinical trials with a regenerative therapeutic approach for hearing-impaired patients were recently initiated. Although there is still a long and bumpy road ahead until a true breakthrough is achieved, it seems more realistic than ever that regenerative therapies for the inner ear will find their way into clinical practice.