Obstetric Outcomes Among Women With a History of Intimate Partner Violence in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) and delivery method in a U.S. obstetric cohort. METHODS: The study population included U.S. women with a history of recent live birth, drawn from the 2009-2018 PRAMS (Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System) cohort. The primary exposure was self-reported IPV. The primary outcome of interest was method of delivery (vaginal or cesarean). Secondary outcomes included preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Bivariate associations between the primary exposure (ie, self-report of IPV vs no self-report of IPV) and each covariate of interest were assessed with weighted quasibinomial logistic regression. Weighted multivariable logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the association between IPV and delivery method controlling for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 130,000 women were included in this secondary analysis of a cross-sectional sample, representing 7,500,000 women nationwide based on PRAMS sampling design. Of these, 0.8% reported abuse in the 12 months before their current pregnancy and 1.3% reported abuse during pregnancy; 1.6% of the study population reported abuse both before and during pregnancy. After adjusting for maternal sociodemographic characteristics, IPV exposure at any time was not significantly associated with cesarean delivery, compared with no IPV exposure (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.11). Of secondary outcomes, 9.4% of women experienced preterm birth and 15.1% had neonates admitted to the NICU. Exposure to IPV was associated with a 21.0% increased risk of preterm birth, compared with women without exposure (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.40), and a 33.3% increased risk of NICU admission (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52) after controlling for confounders. There was no difference in the risk of delivering a neonate who was SGA. CONCLUSION: Intimate partner violence was not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Intimate partner violence before or during pregnancy was associated with increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes, such as preterm birth and NICU admission, corroborating previous research findings.

Healthcare Quality for Acute Illness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multisite Qualitative Analysis.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic incited substantial changes to acute care delivery, including the rapid scale-up of telehealth and numerous changes to in-person care. This study explored health system changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and their influences on pediatric acute care delivery and quality of care. METHODS: We conducted 38 semistructured interviews May-November 2020 with families and clinicians from 3 US regions, eliciting their perspectives and experiences regarding changes to acute care delivery during the pandemic. Interviews were analyzed using a general inductive approach to identify relationships between clinical care infrastructure, care processes, and healthcare quality. RESULTS: Emerging knowledge of COVID-19 epidemiology and associated restrictions influenced care-seeking behaviors and clinical infrastructure and processes. Infrastructure changes included the closure of some clinics, limited "sick visit" hours and locations, and increased resources for telehealth. Modified care processes included the assignment of clinicians to specific roles, limitations on sibling attendance, increased referrals to other clinics, and iterative development of procedures and protocols. Although intended to increase safety, these changes appear to have decreased access, timeliness, and equity of care. High-quality care was supported by telephone triage processes, in-person visits following initial assessments by telehealth, and identification of diagnoses and populations best-suited to telehealth versus in-person care. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in acute care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic may have negatively impacted healthcare quality in some domains. Implementation of pediatric-specific guidelines and decision aids describing diagnoses, populations, and procedures best-suited to telehealth may improve the quality of acute care delivery.

Accessing Healthcare Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Plight of Sexual Assault Survivors.

INTRODUCTION: Despite a global focus on intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been little exploration into how the pandemic and its associated restrictions have impacted sexual assault survivors and their ability to access specialized care and resources. The purpose of this research brief is to use longitudinal data to compare the number of medical forensic examinations done seasonally prepandemic and during the COVID-19 pandemic shelter-in-place order. METHODS: This analysis uses retrospective data on medical forensic examinations from January 2010 through November 2020 from one large academic Midwestern hospital. RESULTS: Results show that monthly medical forensic examinations have increased over time, from a mean of 4.5 cases per month (range: 1-9) in 2010 to a mean of 9 cases per month (range: 7-11) in 2019. In April 2020, when COVID-19-related shutdowns were at their first peak, cases dropped to a historic low of 0 examinations (the lowest number of cases in the past 10 years). CONCLUSIONS: The data show an initial drop in the number of survivors seeking postassault care after the COVID shutdown; however, cases rebounded through the second full month of shutdown orders. Programs that provide medical forensic examinations need to be prepared for subsequent waves of survivors, who may be COVID-19 positive. We must be better prepared for many of the adverse consequences impacting individuals around the country related to COVID-19 responses.

A retrospective study on the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of LoveYourBrain Yoga for people with traumatic brain injury and caregivers.

PURPOSE: To conduct a mixed methods, pre-post, retrospective study on the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the LoveYourBrain Yoga program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: People were eligible if they were a traumatic brain injury survivor or caregiver, age 15-70, ambulatory, and capable of gentle exercise and group discussion. We analyzed attendance, satisfaction, and mean differences in scores on Quality of Life After Brain Injury Overall scale (QOLIBRI-OS) and four TBI-QOL/Neuro-QOL scales. Content analysis explored perceptions of benefits and areas of improvement. RESULTS: 1563 people (82.0%) participated ≥1 class in 156 programs across 18 states and 3 Canadian provinces. Mean satisfaction was 9.3 out of 10 (SD 1.0). Mixed effects linear regression found significant improvements in QOLIBRI-OS (B 9.70, 95% CI: 8.51, 10.90), Resilience (B 1.30, 95% CI: 0.60, 2.06), Positive Affect and Well-being (B 1.49, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.84), and Cognition (B 1.48, 95% CI: 0.78, 2.18) among traumatic brain injury survivors (n = 705). No improvement was found in Emotional and Behavioral Dysregulation, however, content analysis revealed better ability to regulate anxiety, anger, stress, and impulsivity. Caregivers perceived improvements in physical and psychological health. CONCLUSIONS: LoveYourBrain Yoga is feasible and acceptable and may be an effective mode of community-based rehabilitation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPeople with traumatic brain injury and their caregivers often experience poor quality of life and difficulty accessing community-based rehabilitation services.Yoga is a holistic, mind-body therapy with many benefits to quality of life, yet is largely inaccessible to people affected by traumatic brain injury in community settings.Participants in LoveYourBrain Yoga, a six-session, community-based yoga with psychoeducation program in 18 states and 3 Canadian provinces, experienced significant improvements in quality of life, resilience, cognition, and positive affect.LoveYourBrain Yoga is feasible and acceptable when implemented on a large scale and may be an effective mode of, or adjunct to, community-based rehabilitation.

Influence of Gender on Surgical Residency Applicants' Recommendation Letters.

BACKGROUND: Implicit bias has been documented in candidate selection within academic medicine. Gender bias is exposed when writers systematically use different language to describe attributes of male and female applicants. This study examined the presence of gender bias in recommendation letters for surgical residency candidates. STUDY DESIGN: Recommendation letters for 2016 to 2017 surgery resident applicants selected for interview at an academic institution were analyzed using qualitative text analysis, quantitative text mining, and topic modeling. Dedoose, QDA Miner, and RStudio analytic software were used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 332 letters of recommendation for 89 applicants (51% male) analyzed. Of 265 letter writers, 86% were male, 21% chairs, and 50% professors. Average word count was 404. Letter writers for male compared with female applicants had a significantly higher average word count (male = 421, SD 144; female = 388, SD 140, p = 0.035). Standout adjectives (eg exceptional), reference to awards, achievement, ability, hardship, leadership, scholarship, and use of applicant's name were most often applied to male applicants. Comments on positive general terms (eg delightful), grindstone words (eg hard-working), physical description, doubt raisers, and work ethic were most often applied to female applicants. Topic modeling and term frequencies revealed achievement words (performance, career, leadership, and knowledge) used more often with male applicants, while caring words (care, time, patients, and support) were used more often with female applicants. CONCLUSIONS: Gendered differences examined through language and text exist in surgical residents' recommendation letters. Implementing tools to help faculty write recommendation letters with meaningful content and editing letters for reflections of stereotypes may improve the resident selection process by reducing bias.