Live-cell imaging reveals the trade-off between target search flexibility and efficiency for Cas9 and Cas12a.

CRISPR-Cas systems have widely been adopted as genome editing tools, with two frequently employed Cas nucleases being SpyCas9 and LbCas12a. Although both nucleases use RNA guides to find and cleave target DNA sites, the two enzymes differ in terms of protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) requirements, guide architecture and cleavage mechanism. In the last years, rational engineering led to the creation of PAM-relaxed variants SpRYCas9 and impLbCas12a to broaden the targetable DNA space. By employing their catalytically inactive variants (dCas9/dCas12a), we quantified how the protein-specific characteristics impact the target search process. To allow quantification, we fused these nucleases to the photoactivatable fluorescent protein PAmCherry2.1 and performed single-particle tracking in cells of Escherichia coli. From our tracking analysis, we derived kinetic parameters for each nuclease with a non-targeting RNA guide, strongly suggesting that interrogation of DNA by LbdCas12a variants proceeds faster than that of SpydCas9. In the presence of a targeting RNA guide, both simulations and imaging of cells confirmed that LbdCas12a variants are faster and more efficient in finding a specific target site. Our work demonstrates the trade-off of relaxing PAM requirements in SpydCas9 and LbdCas12a using a powerful framework, which can be applied to other nucleases to quantify their DNA target search.

Type III-B CRISPR-Cas cascade of proteolytic cleavages.

The generation of cyclic oligoadenylates and subsequent allosteric activation of proteins that carry sensory domains is a distinctive feature of type III CRISPR-Cas systems. In this work, we characterize a set of associated genes of a type III-B system from Haliangium ochraceum that contains two caspase-like proteases, SAVED-CHAT and PCaspase (prokaryotic caspase), co-opted from a cyclic oligonucleotide-based antiphage signaling system (CBASS). Cyclic tri-adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-induced oligomerization of SAVED-CHAT activates proteolytic activity of the CHAT domains, which specifically cleave and activate PCaspase. Subsequently, activated PCaspase cleaves a multitude of proteins, which results in a strong interference phenotype in vivo in Escherichia coli. Taken together, our findings reveal how a CRISPR-Cas-based detection of a target RNA triggers a cascade of caspase-associated proteolytic activities.

Characterization of the AcrIIC1 anti‒CRISPR protein for Cas9‒based genome engineering in E. coli.

Anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) block the activity of CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins, either by inhibiting DNA interference or by preventing crRNA loading and complex formation. Although the main use of Acrs in genome engineering applications is to lower the cleavage activity of Cas proteins, they can also be instrumental for various other CRISPR-based applications. Here, we explore the genome editing potential of the thermoactive type II-C Cas9 variants from Geobacillus thermodenitrificans T12 (ThermoCas9) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (GeoCas9) in Escherichia coli. We then demonstrate that the AcrIIC1 protein from Neisseria meningitidis robustly inhibits their DNA cleavage activity, but not their DNA binding capacity. Finally, we exploit these AcrIIC1:Cas9 complexes for gene silencing and base-editing, developing Acr base-editing tools. With these tools we pave the way for future engineering applications in mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria combining the activities of Acr and CRISPR-Cas proteins.

Efficient Genome and Base Editing in Human Cells Using ThermoCas9.

Most genetic engineering applications reported thus far rely on the type II-A CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpyCas9), limiting the genome-targeting scope. In this study, we demonstrate that a small, naturally accurate, and thermostable type II-C Cas9 ortholog from Geobacillus thermodenitrificans (ThermoCas9) with alternative target site preference is active in human cells, and it can be used as an efficient genome editing tool, especially for gene disruption. In addition, we develop a ThermoCas9-mediated base editor, called ThermoBE4, for programmable nicking and subsequent C-to-T conversions in human genomes. ThermoBE4 exhibits a three times larger window of activity compared with the corresponding SpyCas9 base editor (BE4), which may be an advantage for gene mutagenesis applications. Hence, ThermoCas9 provides an alternative platform that expands the targeting scope of both genome and base editing in human cells.

Compact but mighty: Biology and applications of type III-E CRISPR-Cas systems.

In this issue, Liu et al. present an in-depth study aiming to unravel the structural, biochemical, and physiological aspects of how type III-E CRISPR-Cas systems trigger abortive infection by activating a protease upon target RNA recognition.1.

The diverse arsenal of type III CRISPR-Cas-associated CARF and SAVED effectors.

Type III CRISPR-Cas systems make use of a multi-subunit effector complex to target foreign (m)RNA transcripts complementary to the guide/CRISPR RNA (crRNA). Base-pairing of the target RNA with specialized regions in the crRNA not only triggers target RNA cleavage, but also activates the characteristic Cas10 subunit and sets in motion a variety of catalytic activities that starts with the production of cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) second messenger molecules. These messenger molecules can activate an extensive arsenal of ancillary effector proteins carrying the appropriate sensory domain. Notably, the CARF and SAVED effector proteins have been responsible for renewed interest in type III CRISPR-Cas due to the extraordinary diversity of defenses against invading genetic elements. Whereas only a handful of CARF and SAVED proteins have been studied so far, many of them seem to provoke abortive infection, aimed to kill the host and provide population-wide immunity. A defining feature of these effector proteins is the variety of in silico-predicted catalytic domains they are fused to. In this mini-review, we discuss all currently characterized type III-associated CARF and SAVED effector proteins, highlight a few examples of predicted CARF and SAVED proteins with interesting predicted catalytic activities, and speculate how they could contribute to type III immunity.

Modulating CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing Using Guide-Complementary DNA Oligonucleotides.

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) has revolutionized genome editing and has great potential for many applications, such as correcting human genetic disorders. To increase the safety of genome editing applications, CRISPR-Cas may benefit from strict control over Cas enzyme activity. Previously, anti-CRISPR proteins and designed oligonucleotides have been proposed to modulate CRISPR-Cas activity. In this study, we report on the potential of guide-complementary DNA oligonucleotides as controlled inhibitors of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. First, we show that DNA oligonucleotides inhibit Cas9 activity in human cells, reducing both on- and off-target cleavage. We then used in vitro assays to better understand how inhibition is achieved and under which conditions. Two factors were found to be important for robust inhibition: the length of the complementary region and the presence of a protospacer adjacent motif-loop on the inhibitor. We conclude that DNA oligonucleotides can be used to effectively inhibit Cas9 activity both ex vivo and in vitro.

Adaptation by Type V-A and V-B CRISPR-Cas Systems Demonstrates Conserved Protospacer Selection Mechanisms Between Diverse CRISPR-Cas Types.

Adaptation of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) arrays is a crucial process responsible for the unique, adaptive nature of CRISPR-Cas immune systems. The acquisition of new CRISPR spacers from mobile genetic elements has previously been studied for several types of CRISPR-Cas systems. In this study, we used a high-throughput sequencing approach to characterize CRISPR adaptation of the type V-A system from Francisella novicida and the type V-B system from Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris. In contrast to other class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, we found that for the type V-A and V-B systems, the Cas12 nucleases are dispensable for spacer acquisition, with only Cas1 and Cas2 (type V-A) or Cas4/1 and Cas2 (type V-B) being necessary and sufficient. Whereas the catalytic activity of Cas4 is not essential for adaptation, Cas4 activity is required for correct protospacer adjacent motif selection in both systems and for prespacer trimming in type V-A. In addition, we provide evidence for acquisition of RecBCD-produced DNA fragments by both systems, but with spacers derived from foreign DNA being incorporated preferentially over those derived from the host chromosome. Our work shows that several spacer acquisition mechanisms are conserved between diverse CRISPR-Cas systems, but also highlights unexpected nuances between similar systems that generally contribute to a bias of gaining immunity against invading genetic elements.

Alternative functions of CRISPR-Cas systems in the evolutionary arms race.

CRISPR-Cas systems of bacteria and archaea comprise chromosomal loci with typical repetitive clusters and associated genes encoding a range of Cas proteins. Adaptation of CRISPR arrays occurs when virus-derived and plasmid-derived sequences are integrated as new CRISPR spacers. Cas proteins use CRISPR-derived RNA guides to specifically recognize and cleave nucleic acids of invading mobile genetic elements. Apart from this role as an adaptive immune system, some CRISPR-associated nucleases are hijacked by mobile genetic elements: viruses use them to attack their prokaryotic hosts, and transposons have adopted CRISPR systems for guided transposition. In addition, some CRISPR-Cas systems control the expression of genes involved in bacterial physiology and virulence. Moreover, pathogenic bacteria may use their Cas nuclease activity indirectly to evade the human immune system or directly to invade the nucleus and damage the chromosomal DNA of infected human cells. Thus, the evolutionary arms race has led to the expansion of exciting variations in CRISPR mechanisms and functionalities. In this Review, we explore the latest insights into the diverse functions of CRISPR-Cas systems beyond adaptive immunity and discuss the implications for the development of CRISPR-based applications.

Streamlined CRISPR genome engineering in wild-type bacteria using SIBR-Cas.

CRISPR-Cas is a powerful tool for genome editing in bacteria. However, its efficacy is dependent on host factors (such as DNA repair pathways) and/or exogenous expression of recombinases. In this study, we mitigated these constraints by developing a simple and widely applicable genome engineering tool for bacteria which we termed SIBR-Cas (Self-splicing Intron-Based Riboswitch-Cas). SIBR-Cas was generated from a mutant library of the theophylline-dependent self-splicing T4 td intron that allows for tight and inducible control over CRISPR-Cas counter-selection. This control delays CRISPR-Cas counter-selection, granting more time for the editing event (e.g. by homologous recombination) to occur. Without the use of exogenous recombinases, SIBR-Cas was successfully applied to knock-out several genes in three wild-type bacteria species (Escherichia coli MG1655, Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and Flavobacterium IR1) with poor homologous recombination systems. Compared to other genome engineering tools, SIBR-Cas is simple, tightly regulated and widely applicable for most (non-model) bacteria. Furthermore, we propose that SIBR can have a wider application as a simple gene expression and gene regulation control mechanism for any gene or RNA of interest in bacteria.

SCOPE enables type III CRISPR-Cas diagnostics using flexible targeting and stringent CARF ribonuclease activation.

Characteristic properties of type III CRISPR-Cas systems include recognition of target RNA and the subsequent induction of a multifaceted immune response. This involves sequence-specific cleavage of the target RNA and production of cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) molecules. Here we report that an exposed seed region at the 3' end of the crRNA is essential for target RNA binding and cleavage, whereas cOA production requires base pairing at the 5' end of the crRNA. Moreover, we uncover that the variation in the size and composition of type III complexes within a single host results in variable seed regions. This may prevent escape by invading genetic elements, while controlling cOA production tightly to prevent unnecessary damage to the host. Lastly, we use these findings to develop a new diagnostic tool, SCOPE, for the specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 from human nasal swab samples, revealing sensitivities in the atto-molar range.

Coevolution between bacterial CRISPR-Cas systems and their bacteriophages.

CRISPR-Cas systems provide bacteria and archaea with adaptive, heritable immunity against their viruses (bacteriophages and phages) and other parasitic genetic elements. CRISPR-Cas systems are highly diverse, and we are only beginning to understand their relative importance in phage defense. In this review, we will discuss when and why CRISPR-Cas immunity against phages evolves, and how this, in turn, selects for the evolution of immune evasion by phages. Finally, we will discuss our current understanding of if, and when, we observe coevolution between CRISPR-Cas systems and phages, and how this may be influenced by the mechanism of CRISPR-Cas immunity.

Structure of a type IV CRISPR-Cas ribonucleoprotein complex.

We reveal the cryo-electron microscopy structure of a type IV-B CRISPR ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex (Csf) at 3.9-Å resolution. The complex best resembles the type III-A CRISPR Csm effector complex, consisting of a Cas7-like (Csf2) filament intertwined with a small subunit (Cas11) filament, but the complex lacks subunits for RNA processing and target DNA cleavage. Surprisingly, instead of assembling around a CRISPR-derived RNA (crRNA), the complex assembles upon heterogeneous RNA of a regular length arranged in a pseudo-A-form configuration. These findings provide a high-resolution glimpse into the assembly and function of enigmatic type IV CRISPR systems, expanding our understanding of class I CRISPR-Cas system architecture, and suggesting a function for type IV-B RNPs that may be distinct from other class 1 CRISPR-associated systems.

CRISPR with a Happy Ending: Non-Templated DNA Repair for Prokaryotic Genome Engineering.

The exploration of microbial metabolism is expected to support the development of a sustainable economy and tackle several problems related to the burdens of human consumption. Microorganisms have the potential to catalyze processes that are currently unavailable, unsustainable and/or inefficient. Their metabolism can be optimized and further expanded using tools like the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and their associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) systems. These tools have revolutionized the field of biotechnology, as they greatly streamline the genetic engineering of organisms from all domains of life. CRISPR-Cas and other nucleases mediate double-strand DNA breaks, which must be repaired to prevent cell death. In prokaryotes, these breaks can be repaired through either homologous recombination, when a DNA repair template is available, or through template-independent end joining, of which two major pathways are known. These end joining pathways depend on different sets of proteins and mediate DNA repair with different outcomes. Understanding these DNA repair pathways can be advantageous to steer the results of genome engineering experiments. In this review, we discuss different strategies for the genetic engineering of prokaryotes through either non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or alternative end joining (AEJ), both of which are independent of exogenous DNA repair templates.

Good guide, bad guide: spacer sequence-dependent cleavage efficiency of Cas12a.

Genome editing has recently made a revolutionary development with the introduction of the CRISPR-Cas technology. The programmable CRISPR-associated Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases generate specific dsDNA breaks in the genome, after which host DNA-repair mechanisms can be manipulated to implement the desired editing. Despite this spectacular progress, the efficiency of Cas9/Cas12a-based engineering can still be improved. Here, we address the variation in guide-dependent efficiency of Cas12a, and set out to reveal the molecular basis of this phenomenon. We established a sensitive and robust in vivo targeting assay based on loss of a target plasmid encoding the red fluorescent protein (mRFP). Our results suggest that folding of both the precursor guide (pre-crRNA) and the mature guide (crRNA) have a major influence on Cas12a activity. Especially, base pairing of the direct repeat, other than with itself, was found to be detrimental to the activity of Cas12a. Furthermore, we describe different approaches to minimize base-pairing interactions between the direct repeat and the variable part of the guide. We show that design of the 3' end of the guide, which is not involved in target strand base pairing, may result in substantial improvement of the guide's targeting potential and hence of its genome editing efficiency.

Editor's cut: DNA cleavage by CRISPR RNA-guided nucleases Cas9 and Cas12a.

Discovered as an adaptive immune system of prokaryotes, CRISPR-Cas provides many promising applications. DNA-cleaving Cas enzymes like Cas9 and Cas12a, are of great interest for genome editing. The specificity of these DNA nucleases is determined by RNA guides, providing great targeting adaptability. Besides this general method of programmable DNA cleavage, these nucleases have different biochemical characteristics, that can be exploited for different applications. Although Cas nucleases are highly promising, some room for improvement remains. New developments and discoveries like base editing, prime editing, and CRISPR-associated transposons might address some of these challenges.

Type I-F CRISPR-Cas resistance against virulent phages results in abortive infection and provides population-level immunity.

Type I CRISPR-Cas systems are abundant and widespread adaptive immune systems in bacteria and can greatly enhance bacterial survival in the face of phage infection. Upon phage infection, some CRISPR-Cas immune responses result in bacterial dormancy or slowed growth, which suggests the outcomes for infected cells may vary between systems. Here we demonstrate that type I CRISPR immunity of Pectobacterium atrosepticum leads to suppression of two unrelated virulent phages, ɸTE and ɸM1. Immunity results in an abortive infection response, where infected cells do not survive, but viral propagation is severely decreased, resulting in population protection due to the reduced phage epidemic. Our findings challenge the view of CRISPR-Cas as a system that protects the individual cell and supports growing evidence of abortive infection by some types of CRISPR-Cas systems.

Keeping crispr in check: diverse mechanisms of phage-encoded anti-crisprs.

CRISPR-Cas represents the only adaptive immune system of prokaryotes known to date. These immune systems are widespread among bacteria and archaea, and provide protection against invasion of mobile genetic elements, such as bacteriophages and plasmids. As a result of the arms-race between phages and their prokaryotic hosts, phages have evolved inhibitors known as anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins to evade CRISPR immunity. In the recent years, several Acr proteins have been described in both temperate and virulent phages targeting diverse CRISPR-Cas systems. Here, we describe the strategies of Acr discovery and the multiple molecular mechanisms by which these proteins operate to inhibit CRISPR immunity. We discuss the biological relevance of Acr proteins and speculate on the implications of their activity for the development of improved CRISPR-based research and biotechnological tools.

Bioinformatic evidence of widespread priming in type I and II CRISPR-Cas systems.

CRISPR-Cas systems provide bacteria and archaea with adaptive immunity against invading genetic elements, such as plasmids, bacteriophages and archaeal viruses. They consist of cas genes and CRISPR loci, which store genetic memories of previously encountered invaders as short sequences termed spacers. Spacers determine the specificity of CRISPR-Cas defence and immunity can be gained or updated by the addition of new spacers into CRISPR loci. There are two main routes to spacer acquisition, which are known as naïve and primed CRISPR adaptation. Naïve CRISPR adaptation involves the de novo formation of immunity, independent of pre-existing spacers. In contrast, primed CRISPR adaptation (priming) uses existing spacers to enhance the acquisition of new spacers. Priming typically results in spacer acquisition from locations near the site of target recognition by the existing (priming) spacer. Primed CRISPR adaptation has been observed in several type I CRISPR-Cas systems and it is potentially widespread. However, experimental evidence is unavailable for some subtypes, and for most systems, priming has only been shown in a small number of hosts. There is also no current evidence of priming by other CRISPR-Cas types. Here, we used a bioinformatic approach to search for evidence of priming in diverse CRISPR-Cas systems. By analysing the clustering of spacers acquired from phages, prophages and archaeal viruses, including strand and directional biases between subsequently acquired spacers, we demonstrate that two patterns of primed CRISPR adaptation dominate in type I systems. In addition, we find evidence of a priming-like pathway in type II CRISPR-Cas systems.