Identifiable historic and observable factors may predict progression to exfoliation glaucoma in newly-diagnosed exfoliation patients.

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical factors associated with conversion to exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) in exfoliation syndrome (XFS) patients most at risk of progression to XFG within 3 years for increased surveillance and early preventive interventions. DESIGN: A retrospective patient cohort study design was employed. SUBJECTS: A source population of XFS patients 50 years and older was identified from electronic medical records in the Utah Population Database. From this, 487 study patients with one or more dilated eye exams prior to chart-confirmed XFS onset in 2011 or later, and three or more years of subsequent eye exams, were selected for study. METHODS: We implemented a binomial linear mixed models with L1-penalized estimation to select variables associated with conversion. Models included a random intercept to account for within-patient correlation for eye-level data. Candidate demographic, lifestyle, systemic and ocular comorbidities data were obtained and diagnoses categorized as binary (history or no history). These potential factors between conversion and non-conversion patients were used in model selection of variables jointly predictive of conversion. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated using the link logit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To determine the main outcome of conversion to XFG following an index diagnosis of XFS compared with nonconversion within 3 years, clinical records of each subject's left and right eyes were assessed to confirm XFS and date of onset and date of XFG onset, if conversion occurred. Clinical measurements, e.g. intraocular pressure (IOP), cup to disc ratio, provider notes and IOP-lowering procedures and medications were used to corroborate conversion status. RESULTS: Eighteen variables jointly predicted XFG conversion within 3 years correctly in 71% of patient eyes. Odds of conversion was highest for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 2.3-fold (P=0.004). Other predictive variables included nonexudative AMD (P=0.05), primary open angle glaucoma (P<0.001), obstructive sleep apnea (P=0.03), and ocular hypertension (P=0.003) diagnosed prior to XFS onset. CONCLUSIONS: We determined a set of clinically relevant factors that predicted which newly-diagnosed XFS patients progressed to XFG within 3 years. A planned validation will independently confirm if these prognostic indicators hold promise in other settings.

Gap Analysis of Glaucoma Examination Concept Representations within Standard Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms.

OBJECTIVE/PURPOSE: Standardization of eye care data is important for clinical interoperability and research. We aimed to address gaps in the representations of glaucoma examination concepts within Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT), the preferred terminology of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. DESIGN: Study of data elements. METHODS: Structured eye examination data fields from 2 electronic health records (EHR) systems (Epic Systems and Medisoft) were compared against existing SNOMED-CT codes for concepts representing glaucoma examination findings. Glaucoma specialists from multiple institutions were surveyed to identify high-priority gaps in representation, which were discussed among the SNOMED International Eye Care Clinical Reference Group. Proposals for new codes to address the gaps were formulated and submitted for inclusion in SNOMED-CT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gaps in SNOMED-CT glaucoma examination concept representations. RESULTS: We identified several gaps in SNOMED-CT regarding glaucoma examination concepts. A survey of glaucoma specialists identified high-priority data elements within the categories of tonometry and gonioscopy. For tonometry, there was consensus that we need to define new codes related to maximum intraocular pressure (IOP) and target IOP and delineate all methods of measuring IOP. These new codes were proposed and successfully added to SNOMED-CT for future use. Regarding gonioscopy, the current terminology did not include the ability to denote the gonioscopic grading system used (e.g., Shaffer or Spaeth), degree of angle pigmentation, iris configuration (except for plateau iris), and iris approach. There was also no ability to specify eye laterality or angle quadrant for gonioscopic findings. We proposed a framework for representing gonioscopic findings as observable entities in SNOMED-CT. CONCLUSION: There are existing gaps in the standardized representation of findings related to tonometry and gonioscopy within SNOMED-CT. These are important areas for evaluating clinical outcomes and enabling secondary use of EHR data for glaucoma research. This international multi-institutional collaborative process enabled identification of gaps, prioritization, and development of data standards to address these gaps. Addressing these gaps and augmenting SNOMED-CT coverage of glaucoma examination findings could enhance clinical documentation and future research efforts related to glaucoma. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphema Syndrome from Subtle Malposition of a Hydrus Microstent.

Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome is a rare condition characterized by intraocular inflammation, elevated intraocular pressure, and recurrent hyphema. Although UGH syndrome is typically caused by chafing between an intraocular lens and the iris or ciliary body, microinvasive glaucoma devices are becoming increasingly recognized as potential causes of recurrent intraocular inflammation. Herein, we discuss a case of UGH syndrome due to subtle malposition of a Hydrus microstent that ultimately required surgical removal to manage. This represents the first case of Hydrus-related UGH syndrome to include high-quality anterior segment imaging, which led us to suspect Hydrus-iris contact and supported the decision to proceed with microstent explantation.

Vision Loss in Children from Immigrant and Nonimmigrant Households: Evidence from the National Survey of Children's Health 2018-2020.

The aim of this study was to determine whether immigrant generation is associated with caregiver-reported vision loss in children adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Nationally representative data from the National Survey of Children's Health (2018-2020) was used. The primary exposure was immigrant generation defined as: first (child and all reported parents were born outside the United States); second (child was born in the United States and at least one parent was born outside the United States); third or higher (all parents in the household were born in the United States). The main outcome was caregiver-reported vision loss in child. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals were computed based on immigration generation. The study sample included 84,860 US children aged 3-17 years. First generation children had higher adjusted odds of caregiver-reported vision loss (aOR 2.30; 95% CI 1.21, 4.35) than third or higher generation children after adjusting for demographic characteristics and social determinants of health. For Hispanic families, first generation (aOR 2.99; 95% CI 1.34, 6.66), and second-generation children (aOR 1.70; 95% CI 1.06, 2.74) had a higher adjusted odds of vision loss compared with third or higher generation children. Even when adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, first generation children had greater odds of vision loss, especially in Hispanic households, than third generation children. Immigration generation should be treated as an independent risk factor for vision loss for children and is a social determinant of eye health.

Association between vision impairment and increased prevalence of falls in older US adults.

BACKGROUND: Vision impairment (VI) is associated with falls in older adults. However, past studies have relied on geographically constrained samples with limited generalizability or self-reports of visual difficulty. To date, there have not been nationally representative studies on the association of objective measures of visual function and falls outcomes. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from Round 11 of National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative panel study of age-eligible Medicare beneficiaries (N = 2951). We performed Poisson regression to calculate the prevalence and prevalence ratio (PR) of >1 fall in the past year, any fall in the past month, fear of falling (FoF), and activity limitation due to FoF as a function of distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. Models were adjusted for demographic and health covariates and were weighted to make nationally representative parameter estimates. RESULTS: The weighted proportion of participants with VI was 27.6% (95% CI, 25.4%-29.9%). Individuals with any VI had a higher prevalence of falls compared with those without VI (18.5% vs. 14.1%, PR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53). Specifically, contrast sensitivity impairment was associated with a higher prevalence of recurrent falls (20.8% vs. 14.7%; PR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.67) and recent falls (17.1% vs. 9.9%; PR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.01-1.94). This relationship existed even independent of near and distance visual acuity. Distance and near visual acuity were not significantly associated with falls. Having any VI was also associated with a higher prevalence of FoF (38.4% vs. 30.5%, PR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.34). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of falls is associated with poor contrast sensitivity but not with near or distance visual acuity. Findings suggest greater collaboration between geriatricians and eye care providers may be warranted to assess and address fall risk in older adults with VI.

Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Different Lens Pathology in Electronic Health Records.

PURPOSE: Nearly all published ophthalmology-related Big Data studies rely exclusively on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) billing codes to identify patients with particular ocular conditions. However, inaccurate or nonspecific codes may be used. We assessed whether natural language processing (NLP), as an alternative approach, could more accurately identify lens pathology. DESIGN: Database study comparing the accuracy of NLP versus ICD billing codes to properly identify lens pathology. METHODS: We developed an NLP algorithm capable of searching free-text lens exam data in the electronic health record (EHR) to identify the type(s) of cataract present, cataract density, presence of intraocular lenses, and other lens pathology. We applied our algorithm to 17.5 million lens exam records in the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) repository. We selected 4314 unique lens-exam entries and asked 11 clinicians to assess whether all pathology present in the entries had been correctly identified in the NLP algorithm output. The algorithm's sensitivity at accurately identifying lens pathology was compared with that of the ICD codes. RESULTS: The NLP algorithm correctly identified all lens pathology present in 4104 of the 4314 lens-exam entries (95.1%). For less common lens pathology, algorithm findings were corroborated by reviewing clinicians for 100% of mentions of pseudoexfoliation material and 99.7% for phimosis, subluxation, and synechia. Sensitivity at identifying lens pathology was better for NLP (0.98 [0.96-0.99] than for billing codes (0.49 [0.46-0.53]). CONCLUSIONS: Our NLP algorithm identifies and classifies lens abnormalities routinely documented by eye-care professionals with high accuracy. Such algorithms will help researchers to properly identify and classify ocular pathology, broadening the scope of feasible research using real-world data.

Incident glaucoma and ocular hypertension after periocular and intravitreal steroid injections: a claims-based analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aims to determine the incidence and risk of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OHT) following ocular steroid injections using healthcare claims data. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed deidentified insurance claims data from the IBM MarketScan Database to identify 19 156 adult patients with no prior history of glaucoma who received ocular steroid injections between 2011 and 2020. Patient demographics and steroid treatment characteristics were collected. Postinjection glaucoma/OHT development was defined as a new diagnosis of glaucoma/OHT, initiation of glaucoma drops, and/or surgical or laser glaucoma treatment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the risk of glaucoma/OHT development within 5 years after first steroid injection. RESULTS: Overall, 3932 (20.5%) patients were diagnosed with new glaucoma/OHT, 3345 (17.5%) started glaucoma drops and 435 (2.27%) required a laser or surgical glaucoma procedure within 5 years of first steroid injection. Triamcinolone subconjunctival injections were associated with a lower risk of glaucoma/OHT development than retrobulbar or intravitreal steroid injections (p<0.001, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.79), whereas the 0.59 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant had the highest risk of glaucoma/OHT development (p=0.001, HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.02). The risk of glaucoma/OHT development was also higher for patients receiving multiple steroid injections (p<0.001), with the largest increase in risk occurring after three total steroid injections. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving ocular steroid injections are at risk of developing glaucoma/OHT, even with no prior glaucoma/OHT diagnosis or treatment. Patients should be closely monitored for the development of glaucoma following ocular steroid injections, particularly in the setting of intravitreal and/or repeated steroid administration.

Association Between Health Insurance and Primary Care Vision Testing Among Children and Adolescents.

This survey study assesses rates of vision testing by pediatrician or other primary care practitioners among insured and uninsured persons aged 3 to 17 years.

A scoping review of patients' barriers to eye care for glaucoma and keratitis.

In this scoping review, we examine underlying causes of loss to follow-up for chronic (glaucoma) and acute (corneal ulcers) eye conditions using the Penchansky and Thomas access to care framework. We explore barriers by World Health Organization income levels and by studying geographical location. We identified 6,363 abstracts, with 75 articles retrieved and 16 meeting inclusion criteria. One article discussed barriers to follow-up care for people with corneal ulcers, and the other 15 were for people with glaucoma. The most frequent barriers to care were affordability, awareness, and accessibility. The international studies had a greater percentage of studies report acceptability as a barrier to loss to follow-up. Countries with universal healthcare included affordability as a loss to follow-up barrier, emphasizing that cost goes beyond the ability to pay for direct treatment costs. Understanding and addressing barriers to follow-up care can aid the goal of continued care and decrease the risk of poor outcomes and vision loss.

Systematic User-centered Design of a Prototype Clinical Decision Support System for Glaucoma.

Purpose: To rigorously develop a prototype clinical decision support (CDS) system to help clinicians determine the appropriate timing for follow-up visual field testing for patients with glaucoma and to identify themes regarding the context of use for glaucoma CDS systems, design requirements, and design solutions to meet these requirements. Design: Semistructured qualitative interviews and iterative design cycles. Participants: Clinicians who care for patients with glaucoma, purposefully sampled to ensure a representation of a range of clinical specialties (glaucoma specialist, general ophthalmologist, optometrist) and years in clinical practice. Methods: Using the established User-Centered Design Process framework, we conducted semistructured interviews with 5 clinicians that addressed the context of use and design requirements for a glaucoma CDS system. We analyzed the interviews using inductive thematic analysis and grounded theory to generate themes regarding the context of use and design requirements. We created design solutions to address these requirements and used iterative design cycles with the clinicians to refine the CDS prototype. Main Outcome Measures: Themes regarding decision support for determining the timing of visual field testing for patients with glaucoma, CDS design requirements, and CDS design features. Results: We identified 9 themes that addressed the context of use for the CDS system, 9 design requirements for the prototype CDS system, and 9 design features intended to address these design requirements. Key design requirements included the preservation of clinician autonomy, incorporation of currently used heuristics, compilation of data, and increasing and communicating the level of certainty regarding the decision. After completing 3 iterative design cycles using this preliminary CDS system design solution, the design was satisfactory to the clinicians and was accepted as our prototype glaucoma CDS system. Conclusions: We used a systematic design process based on the established User-Centered Design Process to rigorously develop a prototype glaucoma CDS system, which will be used as a starting point for a future, large-scale iterative refinement and implementation process. Clinicians who care for patients with glaucoma need CDS systems that preserve clinician autonomy, compile and present data, incorporate currently used heuristics, and increase and communicate the level of certainty regarding the decision. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Seeing Red: Associations between Historical Redlining and Present-Day Visual Impairment and Blindness.

PURPOSE: Redlining was a discriminatory housing policy in the United States that began in 1933 and denoted neighborhoods with high proportions of Black individuals as "undesirable" and a high risk for lending, which therefore excluded people from obtaining traditional insured mortgages to purchase a home. Simultaneously, realtors discouraged Black individuals from purchasing homes in predominantly non-Black neighborhoods. This resulted in decreased home ownership and wealth accumulation among Black individuals and neighborhoods with high proportions of Black individuals. This study investigated rates of visual impairment and blindness (VIB) in neighborhoods that at one time were graded for redlining. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of American Community Survey data and historical grades for redlining. PARTICIPANTS: United States census tracts (CTs) from 2010 with historical grades for redlining. METHODS: One-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-square test, and logistic regression modeling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was CT percentage of residents reporting VIB and the association with historical grades for redlining. Grades were converted to numeric values (1 to 4, with higher values indicating worse grade) and aggregated over a CT based on the distribution of grades within to obtain a redlining score. Logistic regression was used to model the effect of redlining on the probability of having VIB. RESULTS: Eleven thousand six hundred sixty-eight CTs were analyzed. Logistic regression found that a 1-unit increase in average redlining score was associated with a 13.4% increased odds of VIB after controlling for CT measures of age, sex, people of color (any non-White race), state, and population size (odds ratio [OR], 1.134; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.131-1.138; P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for an additional model that adjusted for the estimated percentage of Black residents within a CT (OR, 1.180; 95% CI, 1.177-1.183; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Historical government-sanctioned residential segregation through redlining was found to be associated with higher proportions of people living with VIB in these neighborhoods today. Understanding how neighborhood segregation impacts eye health is important for planning improved mechanisms of eye care delivery to mitigate health disparities. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

The Frequency of Visual Field Testing in a US Nationwide Cohort of Individuals with Open-Angle Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: Visual field testing that is not frequent enough results in delayed identification of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) progression. Guidelines recommend at least annual testing. It is not known how frequently patients with OAG across the United States receive visual field testing and how patient characteristics and circumstances influence this frequency. If US patients with OAG do not receive visual field tests frequently enough, interventions to increase this frequency or to develop other forms of testing visual function may reduce unidentified OAG vision loss. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The TruvenHealth MarketScan Commercial Claims Database (IBM) contains demographic and claims data for > 160 million individuals across the United States from 2008 to 2017. We identified enrollees in the database with a recorded diagnosis of OAG (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 356.1x and H40.1x, respectively). We excluded those aged < 40 years at the time of their first OAG diagnosis, those without at least 1 confirmatory OAG diagnosis at a subsequent visit, and those with < 4 years of follow-up data after OAG diagnosis. METHODS: We calculated the number of visual field tests that each enrollee with OAG underwent per year and categorized the enrollees based on that number (0, > 0 to < 0.9, ≥ 0.9 to ≤ 1.1, > 1.1 to ≤ 2.1, and > 2.1). We used negative binomial regression to investigate the demographic or health variables that were associated with the frequency of visual field tests that enrollees with OAG received. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of visual field testing among enrollees with OAG. RESULTS: Of the 380 029 enrollees included in the study, 33 267 (8.8%) did not receive a visual field test during the study period, 259 349 (68.2%) underwent > 0 to < 0.9 visual field tests per year, 42 129 (11.1%) underwent ≥ 0.9 to ≤ 1.1 visual field tests per year, 42 301 (11.1%) underwent > 1.1 to ≤ 2.1 visual field tests per year, and 2983 (0.8%) underwent ≥ 2.1 visual field tests per year. The median number of visual field tests per year was 0.63 (interquartile range, 0.33-0.88; mean, 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: More than 75% of enrollees with OAG received < 1 visual field test per year and, thus, did not receive guideline-adherent glaucoma monitoring.

Exfoliation Syndrome in Baja Verapaz Guatemala: A Cross-Sectional Study and Review of the Literature.

There are little epidemiologic data on exfoliation syndrome (XFS) or exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) in Guatemala, especially in the underserved Baja Verapaz region. This observational study assessing XFS/XFG and demographic factors of this region aims to better understand unique exogenous and endogenous risk factors associated with XFS/XFG in Guatemala. During Moran Eye Center's global outreach medical eye camps from 2016-2017, 181 patients age 15 years and older presented for complete eye exams. These individuals were screened for eye disease and evaluated for possible surgical interventions that could occur during the camps to improve eyesight. During the dilated exams, XFS was noted as missing or present. Of those 181, 10 had insufficient data and 18 lacked a definitive diagnosis of XFS or XFG, resulting in 153 evaluable patients; 46 XFS and 9 XFG were identified. Age, gender, hometown, ancestry (languages spoken by parents and grandparents), past medical history, family medical history, and occupational data (only 2017 trip) were obtained for each patient. The most common occupations of these individuals were farming and housekeeping. Higher rates of XFS/XFG were noted in individuals of rural compared to urban settings and Mayan speaking people compared with Spanish speakers. Based on this subset of patients, with various ocular pathologies being evaluated during medical eye outreach camps, the prevalence of XFS/XFG appeared to be 36%, a high prevalence compared to other world populations. Location and higher altitude, along with a farming occupation, may contribute to XFS development and subsequent progression to XFG. To our knowledge, this is the largest study looking at the epidemiology of XFS/XFG in the Baja Verapaz region of Guatemala for those over the age of 15 years seeking eye exams and interventions.

Perceptions of Respect From Clinicians by Patients in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups With Eye Disease.

IMPORTANCE: The perception of being treated with respect by clinicians may be a driver of disparities in individuals in racial and ethnic minoritie groups with eye diseases. Understanding these drivers may help identify potential interventions to reduce eye health disparities to prevent vision loss and blindness. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between racial and ethnic minority status and the perception of being treated with respect by clinicians. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative cohort study using data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) included participants in the 2017 survey with complete data on outcomes, associated factors, and covariates. Data analysis took place from January 2021 to February 2021. Using a population-based survey conducted in the US in 2017 by the US census bureau on behalf of the National Center for Health Statistics, NHIS study participants (age ≥18 years) who self-reported having an eye disease (macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy [DR], glaucoma, cataracts) were included, and patients who self-reported as Black, Asian, other/multiple races, or Hispanic ethnicity were considered to be in racial and ethnic minority groups. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of minority status with self-reported "always" being treated with respect by clinicians and self-reported "always" being asked about opinions/beliefs about medical care. RESULTS: Participants in racial and ethnic minority groups had 23% lower odds of reporting being treated with respect compared with non-Hispanic White patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.97; P = .03). A minority of participants had 66% higher odds of reporting being asked about their beliefs (AOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.39-1.98; P < .001). For all patients, being asked about opinions/beliefs by their clinician was associated with a 5.8 times higher odds of reporting being treated with respect (AOR, 5.80; 95% CI, 4.35-7.74; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this nationally representative US population of patients with eye diseases, being a patient in a racial or ethnic minority group was associated with feeling less respected by health care professionals compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Asking about opinions and beliefs, regardless of race or ethnicity, is associated with patients feeling that they are treated with respect.

The Burden of Caring for and Treating Glaucoma: The Patient Perspective.

PURPOSE: To understand the treatment burden experienced by patients receiving care for primary open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN: Semistructured, one-on-one, qualitative interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and age ≥40 years who were scheduled for a follow-up glaucoma appointment at the Kellogg Eye Center. Researchers used purposeful sampling to ensure that there was representation of a range of ages, disease stages, total number of medical conditions, distance traveled to clinic, history of glaucoma surgery, employment, and education. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was obtained. METHODS: Participants were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide that addressed aspects of glaucoma care that give them burden, how this burden impacts their lives, and factors that influence the burden and its impact. Researchers analyzed the transcripts using inductive thematic analysis and grounded theory to generate themes that emerged from the interviews and to map these themes into a conceptual model of glaucoma treatment burden. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes related to glaucoma treatment burden generated by qualitative analysis. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients participated in the study. Study participants described 10 categories of glaucoma care activities that cause treatment burden, 8 themes for consequences of glaucoma treatment burden, and 25 themes of factors that influenced the workload created by the various glaucoma care activities and the consequences that they experienced because of these activities. CONCLUSIONS: Participants expressed that the treatment of glaucoma creates a burden for patients that is distinct from the burden of the disease process itself and that this burden negatively affects their quality of life and can potentially cause vision-threatening issues with medication and appointment adherence. We observed considerable variation in the extent to which participants experienced this burden and its consequences, much of which was explained by the influencing factors the participants described. Understanding glaucoma treatment burden and its influencing factors is important as we work to deliver patient-centered care and prevent vision loss.

The Use of eHealth Practices by United States Patients with Self-Reported Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: Patient-oriented eHealth practices (e.g., scheduling appointments on the Internet, communicating with providers online) are an integral part of modern healthcare delivery. It is not known what proportion of United States patients with glaucoma use eHealth and how this use compares with those without glaucoma. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the 2016 through 2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a cross-sectional survey regarding health topics that is administered annually to a nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized adults in the United States. METHODS: Based on the NHIS complex survey design, we calculated the proportion of participants with and without glaucoma who used 5 different eHealth practices (looking up health information on the Internet, requesting or ordering a prescription medication on the Internet, scheduling a medical appointment on the Internet, communicating with healthcare provider online, and using online groups to learn about health topics) during the 12 months before the survey. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between self-reported glaucoma diagnosis and use of the eHealth practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion using eHealth practices and odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Forty thousand four hundred sixty-five survey participants were included in the analysis; 1932 had self-reported glaucoma and 38 533 did not. For those with glaucoma, 46.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.3%-49.0%) used at least one of the eHealth practices in the 12 months before the survey compared with 52.5% (95% CI, 51.5%-53.5%) of those without glaucoma (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, participants with glaucoma were more likely to report use of at least 1 of the eHealth practices compared with those without glaucoma (adjusted OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.40; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative United States population, nearly half of people with glaucoma reported using eHealth practices. Although a lower proportion of people with glaucoma used eHealth practices compared with those without glaucoma, this relationship actually reversed after adjusting for confounders. Because many patients with glaucoma are capable of and already using e-Health, further investment in these technologies may be beneficial.

Special Commentary: Using Clinical Decision Support Systems to Bring Predictive Models to the Glaucoma Clinic.

Advances in the field of predictive modeling using artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to improve clinical care and outcomes, but only if the results of these models are presented appropriately to clinicians at the time they make decisions for individual patients. Clinical decision support (CDS) systems could be used to accomplish this. Modern CDS systems are computer-based tools designed to improve clinician decision making for individual patients. However, not all CDS systems are effective. Four principles that have been shown in other medical fields to be important for successful CDS system implementation are (1) integration into clinician workflow, (2) user-centered interface design, (3) evaluation of CDS systems and rules, and (4) standards-based development so the tools can be deployed across health systems.