A Functional Assay for the Determination of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia via Flow Cytometry.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication of heparin therapy (both unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin). In our study, we examined a group of 122 patients with suspected HIT. The samples of all patients were analyzed in the first step using an immunoassay (ID-PaGIA Heparin/PF4, Hemos1L-Acustar HIT IgG, ZYMUTEST HIA Monostrip IgG) to detect the presence of antibodies against heparin-PF4 complexes (platelet factor 4). When the immunoassay was positive, the sample was subsequently analyzed for HIT with a functional flow cytometry assay, the HITAlert kit, the purpose of which was to demonstrate the ability of the antibodies present to activate platelets. A diagnosis of HIT can be made only after a positive functional test result. In this article, we present an overview of our practical experience with the use of the new functional method of analysis, HIT, with flow cytometry. In this work, we compared the mutual sensitivity of two functional tests, SRA and the flow cytometry HITAlert kit, in patients perceived as being at risk for HIT. This work aims to delineate the principle, procedure, advantages, pitfalls, and possibilities of the application of the functional test HITAlert using flow cytometry.

How to Treat Today? Oral and Facial Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

The exact incidence of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) in patients with oral and facial cancer (OFC) is not exactly known, and this risk is empirically considered to be low. However, this suggestion may result in disease underdiagnosis, prolong the initiation of adequate therapy, and consecutively increase CA-VTE-related morbidity and mortality. In addition, there might be specific clinical problems in the treatment of CA-VTE in patients with oral and facial cancer, such as swallowing difficulties, that might limit the possibilities of oral anticoagulation. Finally, there are limited data regarding the optimal treatment of CA-VTE in patients with oral and facial cancer, and this includes data on novel therapeutic strategies, including the use of direct oral anticoagulants. This article reviews current data on the optimal treatment strategy for CA-VTE in patients with OFC.

COVID-19 and the Response to Antiplatelet Therapy.

The coronavirus SARS-CoV2 disease (COVID-19) is connected with significant morbidity and mortality (3.4%), disorders in hemostasis, including coagulopathy, activation of platelets, vascular injury, and changes in fibrinolysis, which may be responsible for an increased risk of thromboembolism. Many studies demonstrated relatively high rates of venous and arterial thrombosis related to COVID-19. The incidence of arterial thrombosis in severe/critically ill intensive care unit-admitted COVID-19 patients appears to be around 1%. There are several ways for the activation of platelets and coagulation that may lead to the formation of thrombi, so it is challenging to make a decision about optimal antithrombotic strategy in patients with COVID-19. This article reviews the current knowledge about the role of antiplatelet therapy in patients with COVID-19.

Resistance on the Latest Oral and Intravenous P2Y12 ADP Receptor Blockers in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Fact or Myth?

Novel P2Y12 ADP receptor blockers (ADPRB) should be preferred in dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Nevertheless, there are still patients who do not respond optimally to novel ADP receptor blocker therapy, and this nonoptimal response (so-called "high on-treatment platelet reactivity" or "resistance") could be connected with increased risk of adverse ischemic events, such as myocardial re-infarction, target lesion failure and stent thrombosis. In addition, several risk factors have been proposed as factors associated with the phenomenon of inadequate response on novel ADPRB. These include obesity, multivessel coronary artery disease, high pre-treatment platelet reactivity and impaired metabolic status for prasugrel, as well as elderly, concomitant therapy with beta-blockers, morphine and platelet count for ticagrelor. There is no literature report describing nonoptimal therapeutic response on cangrelor, and cangrelor therapy seems to be a possible approach for overcoming HTPR on prasugrel and ticagrelor. However, the optimal therapeutic management of "resistance" on novel ADPRB is not clear and this issue requires further research. This narrative review article discusses the phenomenon of high on-treatment platelet reactivity on novel ADPRB, its importance in clinical practice and approaches for its therapeutic overcoming.

Tailored Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: The Future of Oral Anticoagulation?

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are currently the drug of choice for drug prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, repeated ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and bleeding while on DOAC is still a challenging clinical phenomenon in the management of future long-term anticoagulation. It is not known whether tailoring the DOAC therapy to achieve optimal therapeutic drug levels could improve the clinical course of DOAC therapy. To be able to tailor the therapy, it is necessary to have a valid laboratory method for DOAC level assessment, to be aware of factors influencing DOAC levels and to have clinical options to tailor the treatment. Furthermore, the data regarding clinical efficacy/safety of tailored DOAC regimes are still lacking. This article reviews the current data on tailored direct oral anticoagulation in patients with AF.

DNA Polymorphisms in Pregnant Women with Sticky Platelet Syndrome.

Sticky platelet syndrome (SPS) is a thrombophilia caused by the increased aggregability of platelets in response to the addition of low concentrations of epinephrine (EPI) and/or adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Some of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), alleles and haplotypes of platelet glycoprotein receptors were proved to have a role in the etiology of thrombotic episodes When comparing SPS and the control group, in VEGFA rs3025039, the p value for both CC vs. TT and CT vs. TT analyses was <0.001. Interestingly, no minor TT genotype was present in the SPS group, suggesting the thrombotic pathogenesis of recurrent spontaneous abortions (RSA) in these patients. Moreover, we found a significant difference in the presence of AT containing a risky A allele and TT genotype of ALPP rs13026692 (p = 0.034) in SPS patients when compared with the controls. Additionally, we detected a decreased frequency of the GG (CC) genotype of FOXP3 rs3761548 in patients with SPS and RSA when compared with the control group (p value for the CC (GG) vs. AA (TT) 0.021). This might indicate an evolutionary protective mechanism of the A (T) allele in the SPS group against thrombotic complications in pregnancy. These results can be used for antithrombotic management in such pregnant patients.

How can Secondary Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Pregnant Patients be Improved?

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is suggested for thromboprophylaxis in pregnant women with previous venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anyway, there is only limited amount of studies evaluating the effect of LMWH on hemostatic parameters during pregnancy of patients with previous VTE and the need of secondary thromboprophylaxis. We therefore provide results of prospective and longitudinal assessment of changes in hemostasis in high-risk pregnant women at four times during pregnancy (T1-T4) and one time after the postpartum period (T5) used for individualized modification of thromboprophylaxis. In this study, the results of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and protein S (PS) activity, ProC Global ratio and anti-Xa activity were evaluated. Despite the thromboprophylaxis, an increased predisposition to thromboembolic complications was detected (significant increase in FVIII activity and decrease in PS function, ProC Global ratio not normalized even after the postpartum period - p < .0001 between controls and T5 for PS and ProC Global). These results indicate that hemostasis may not be restored even 6 to 8 weeks after delivery and pose the question when is it safe to withdraw the anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients with prior VTE.

Plasma levels of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients at the time of embolic stroke: a pilot prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) with low anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels may be at higher risk of recurrent stroke. However, no prospective post-marketing study has investigated these DOAC plasma levels at the time of embolic stroke. The aim of this study was to assess the anti-Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban) and anti-IIa (dabigatran) plasma levels in DOAC-treated AF patients at the time of acute embolic stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively identified 43 patients with AF on long-term DOAC who experienced embolic strokes. We compared the DOAC plasma levels of these patients with a control sample of 57 patients who tolerated long-term therapeutic dose DOAC therapy without any adverse event. DOAC levels were assessed with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban, apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran). RESULTS: Dabigatran-treated patients with stroke had significantly lower anti-IIa levels when compared with the trough (40.7 ± 36.9 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, p < 0.05) and peak samples of the controls (40.7 ± 36.9 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Similarly, there were significantly lower anti-Xa levels in apixaban-treated patients with stroke compared to the trough control samples (72.4 ± 46.7 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, p < 0.05), and in rivaroxaban- and apixaban-treated patients when compared to peak control samples (rivaroxaban: 42.7 ± 31.9 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, p < 0.001; apixaban: 72.4 ± 46.7 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This observational study showed significantly lower anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in AF patients with embolic stroke compared to those who tolerated long-term therapeutic dose DOAC therapy.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Plasma Levels in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at the Time of Bleeding: A Pilot Prospective Study.

ABSTRACT: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be at higher risk of bleeding because of higher anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels. However, there is no postmarketing study investigating these DOAC plasma levels at the time of bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate DOAC levels at the time of a bleeding emergency. We analyzed 5440 patients examined at our Emergency Department in from April 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019. During this period, we prospective identified 105 consecutive patients with bleeding while on long-term antithrombotic therapy; 49 patients had AF on DOACs. We compared DOAC levels in patients who bled against a control sample of 55 patients who tolerated long-term high dose DOAC therapy without any emergency. Samples of these patients were tested with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran). Dabigatran-treated patients who bled had significantly higher anti-IIa levels when compared with trough (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, P < 0.001) and peak samples of controls (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Similarly, there were significantly higher anti-Xa levels in rivaroxaban-treated and apixaban-treated patients with bleeding compared with trough control samples (rivaroxaban: 245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 52.5 ± 36.4 ng/mL, P <0.001 and apixaban: 311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001), as well as in apixaban-treated patients when compared with peak control samples (311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Finally, rivaroxaban anti-Xa levels in patients who bled tended to be higher compared with peak control samples (245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, P = 0.13). This observational study showed a significant difference in anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in patients with AF with bleeding complications compared with those who tolerated long-term high-dose DOAC therapy without bleeding complications.

How Can Rotational Thromboelastometry as a Point-of-Care Method Be Useful for the Management of Secondary Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Pregnant Patients?

Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is suggested. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) represents an innovative point-of-care method enabling the complex and quick evaluation of hemostasis. However, there are only episodic cases of its use for hemostasis assessment and guidance of LMWH in pregnancy. Therefore, we provide the results of unique prospective and longitudinal monitoring of hemostasis in high-risk pregnant women, which we used for the individualized optimalization of secondary thromboprophylaxis. According to the shortening of clot formation time (CFT) in EXTEM (p = 0.0007 from the 26th gestational week vs. controls) and INTEM (p = 0.002 from the 35th gestational week), increase in alpha angle (AA) in EXTEM, INTEM, and HEPTEM, and the persistence of increase in maximum clot firmness (MCF) in EXTEM, INTEM, and HEPTEM (p < 0.001 from the 26th and 35th gestational week vs. controls for EXTEM and INTEM, p = 0.0012 from the 26th gestational week in HEPTEM), LMWH dose was modified. Even after the postpartum period, AA in EXTEM was steeper than in controls (p = 0.0007), indicating that hemostasis is not fully normalized after 6-8 weeks following delivery. Therefore, ROTEM may be a useful tool for the individual evaluation of the termination of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.

Does atorvastatin therapy change the anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with atrial fibrillation?

Atorvastatin and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (xabans) are frequently co-administrated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, no studies investigating the possibility of the pharmacologic interaction between these agents have been conducted. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the impact of atorvastatin therapy on anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF. We enrolled 115 AF patients on long-term rivaroxaban (52 patients) and long-term apixaban (63 patients) therapy. Long-term atorvastatin (40 mg once daily) was administrated to 28 rivaroxaban-treated patients and to 28 apixaban-treated patients. Trough and peak samples were tested for anti-Xa activity with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis. For rivaroxaban, there were no significant differences in trough activity (45.5 ± 39.5 ng/ml vs. 46.2 ± 30.1 ng/ml; p = .34) and peak anti-Xa activity (179.2 ± 108.8 ng/ml vs. 208.1 ± 104.1 ng/ml; p = .94) between atorvastatin-treated patients and those without atorvastatin. Similarly, atorvastatin did not impact the trough activity (127.7 ± 71.1 ng/ml vs. 100.8 ± 61.1 ng/ml; p = .12) or peak anti-Xa activity (213.8 ± 103.6 ng/ml vs. 179.3 ± 72.9 ng/ml; p = .14) among apixaban-treated patients with AF. This observational study did not show a significant impact of atorvastatin on trough and peak anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF.

Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays and Platelet Function Testing in Patients with Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases.

Platelets play crucial role in acute vascular atherosclerotic diseases, including myocardial infarction and stroke. Additionally, platelet aggregation is a key target of antiplatelet agents, forming the keystone of pharmacotherapy of various atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Thromboelastography and thromboelastometry, representing currently available viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHA), are designed as whole blood, real-time analyzers of clot formation and clot resolution. These assays could, in theory, overcome some limitations of currently available platelet function testing assays. This article reviews the current experience with the use of VHA for platelet function testing and for monitoring of the response to antiplatelet therapy.

Apixaban: An Optimal Agent for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism?

BACKGROUND: Apixaban, a direct inhibitor of activated coagulation factor X (FXaI), is being frequently selected for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Several reports about possible use of oral FXaI in patients with cancer-associated VTE (CA-VTE) have been published recently. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: The efficacy/safety profile of oral FXaI anticoagulation in patients with CA-VTE seems promising; however, several problems remain unanswered. The pharmacologic profile of apixaban could prefer this agent for the treatment of CA-VTE. DATA SOURCES: Currently available medical literature was searched and reviewed to summarize data regarding the use of apixaban for the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated VTE. RESULTS: Apixaban therapy in patients with cancer and VTE is expected to increase as clinicians gain more experience and reassurance with data from real-world studies that are generally promising. Several studies demonstrated that apixaban exhibits noninferiority to warfarin and low molecular weight heparin in preventing recurrent thrombosis in cancer-associated VTE. Nevertheless, there are still concerns regarding the bleeding associated with apixaban therapy, and regarding the optimal management of these bleeding emergencies. THERAPEUTIC OPINION: Although currently available evidence confirms the noninferiority of apixaban for reduction of the risk of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer; there are still concerns regarding the safety, especially in selected subpopulations of these patients.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Novel Approach for the Treatment of Thrombosis in Pediatric Patients?

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a rare, but life-threatening disease in those who have not reached their adulthood. This condition is usually treated with heparin or low molecular weight heparins which require parenteral administration and, in case of unfractionated heparin, also frequent laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)-direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban-are currently frequently used for the prevention and treatment of VTE in adult population. In fact, these agents offer several advantages compared to traditional agents, such as oral route of administration, short on-set and off-set of action, predictable pharmacologic profile with low risk of food and drug interactions, and no need for routine laboratory assessment of anticoagulant activity. However, clinical experience with these directly acting oral anticoagulants in pediatric population is very limited as these drugs had been tested and are used mostly in adult individuals. This article reviews the current data from pre- and post-marketing studies reporting the use of DOACs for the treatment of VTE in pediatric patients.

Does proton pump inhibition change the on-treatment anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with atrial fibrillation? A pilot study.

Proton pump inhibition (PPI) reduces gastrointestinal bleeding on direct oral anticoagulants. However, PPI may affect dabigatran on-treatment levels; and there is no information regarding the effect of PPI on xabans on-treatment activity. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the impact of PPI on therapeutic anti-Xa activity in rivaroxaban- and apixaban-treated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This single-centre pilot prospective study enrolled 77 consecutive xabans-treated patients (42 rivaroxaban-treated and 35 apixaban-treated patients) with AF. PPI was administrated in 44 patients. Trough and peak anti-Xa activity was assessed with factor Xa-calibrated anti-Xa chromogenic analysis. There were no significant differences in trough anti-Xa activity comparing PPI-treated patients and patients without PPI (80.5 ± 66.5 ng/mL in PPI group vs. 71.6 ± 64.1 ng/mL in non-PPI group, p = 0.57, Table 2). Similarly, there were no significant differences in peak anti-Xa activity between compared groups (175.2 ± 102.5 ng/mL in PPI group vs. 202.9 ± 84.1 ng/mL in non-PPI group, p = 0.21). This pilot study did not reveal significant changes in xabans on-treatment anti-Xa activity according the PPI status.