Bridging healthcare access: strategies beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency.

Issued in January 2020, the federal Public Health Emergency (PHE)'s termination was ultimately inevitable and has prompted reflection over how the pandemic elicited relatively progressive reforms to healthcare. Although we are concerned that the PHE's termination poses a significant threat to public health and equity, we believe that physicians, along with systemic changes, can provide critical support for patients as they navigate a shifting health policy landscape. In response to this evolving landscape, the article emphasizes the pivotal role of physicians and healthcare institutions in safeguarding patient access to care. It proposes strategies such as community-based workshops, patient navigators, and streamlined technology-driven redetermination processes to support vulnerable populations during this transition. Physicians are encouraged to engage in advocacy efforts, from voicing concerns at health meetings to collaborating with non-profit organizations and the media, to influence data-driven policy changes that prioritize patient safety and equitable access. Marginalized patients should not be slipping through the cracks.

Barriers to Care for Pediatric Patients with Obesity.

This review article emphasizes the challenges pediatric patients face during obesity treatment. Prior research has been compartmentalized, acknowledging that stigma, the ability to implement lifestyle changes, social health determinants, and healthcare accessibility are considerable impediments for obese children. These issues emerge at various levels, including the individual or family, the community and school, and even national policy. This suggests the need for a more comprehensive, team-based approach to tackle pediatric obesity. Understanding these barriers is the first step toward creating effective strategies and solutions to overcome these challenges.

Financial crossroads of care: physicians' struggle and patient outcomes.

In 2024, physicians face significant financial challenges due to declining Medicare reimbursement rates and high student loan interest rates, which will impact health care delivery and access.

Reimagining Urban Spaces: Green Spaces, Obesity, and Health Resilience in an Era of Extreme Heat.

Record-breaking heat waves intensified by climate change pose both environmental and health threats, necessitating a balance between urban sustainability and well-being. Extreme heat and limited green space access are drivers of obesity prevalence, with decreased proximity to green spaces correlating with higher rates of obesity in nearby communities. In contrast, access to such green spaces fosters physical activity, well-being, and community cohesion, especially crucial in marginalized communities facing health disparities due to historical policies like redlining and underinvestment in social gathering spaces. Despite challenges, green space investment offers healthcare savings and environmental gains, necessitating a shift in perception towards viewing green spaces as essential for urban living. As heat waves persist, integrating health and sustainability in urban planning is paramount. Health and medical communities must play an active role in advocating for equitable access to urban green spaces, as they possess influential positions to address climate-related health disparities through localized advocacy.

Policy Interventions to Enhance Medical Care for People With Obesity in the United States-Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions.

Policy Points Health policymakers have insufficiently addressed care for people with obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) in the United States. Current federal policies targeting obesity medications reflect this unfortunate reality. We argue for a novel policy framework to increase access to effective obesity therapeutics and care, recognizing that, though prevention is critical, the epidemic proportions of obesity in the United States warrant immediate interventions to augment care. Reducing barriers to and improving the quality of existing anti-obesity medications, intensive behavioral therapy, weight management nutrition and dietary counseling, and bariatric surgery are critical. Moreover, to ensure continuity of care and patient-clinician trust, combating physician and broader weight stigma must represent a central component of any viable obesity care agenda.

Body Composition in Anti-Obesity Medication Trials-Beyond Scales.

This Viewpoint contends that focusing only on weight loss as the primary weight medication end point is an inaccurate measure of medication efficacy for both patients and clinicians.

Pharmacotherapy causing weight gain and metabolic alteration in those with obesity and obesity-related conditions: A review.

This review aims to summarize pharmacological interventions that may affect adiposity and metabolic equilibrium in individuals with obesity. Pharmacological therapy is frequently used to treat medical conditions that are both directly related to obesity (such as hypertension and type 2 diabetes) and indirectly related to obesity (such as asthma, insomnia, and type 1 diabetes). This pharmacological therapy may result in weight gain and alterations in the metabolic profile. Many medication classes are implicated in the pharmacologic causes of weight gain, including antipsychotics, glucocorticoids, beta-adrenergic blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, antihistamines, insulin, neuropathic agents, sleep agents, and steroids. This article describes the mechanisms of action and pathways of pharmacological interventions causing obesity.

The Role of Racism in Childhood Obesity.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Obesity rates continue to rise among children and have shown persistent racial disparities. Racism plays a potentially essential and actionable role in these disparities. This report reviews some mechanisms through which racism may shape childhood obesity. RECENT FINDINGS: From the youngest ages, disparities in childhood obesity prevalence are already present. Racism may shape intergenerational and prenatal factors that affect obesity and various stressors and environments where children grow up. The relationships between clinicians and patients may also be shaped by everyday racism and legacies of past racism, which may affect obesity prevalence and treatment efficacy. Comprehensive data on the extent to which racism shapes childhood obesity is limited. However, compelling evidence suggests many ways through which racism ultimately does affect childhood obesity. Interventions to address racism at multiple points where it shapes childhood obesity, including intergenerational and prenatal mechanisms, may help to close disparities.

Changing the global obesity narrative to recognize and reduce weight stigma: A position statement from the World Obesity Federation.

Weight stigma, defined as pervasive misconceptions and stereotypes associated with higher body weight, is both a social determinant of health and a human rights issue. It is imperative to consider how weight stigma may be impeding health promotion efforts on a global scale. The World Obesity Federation (WOF) convened a global working group of practitioners, researchers, policymakers, youth advocates, and individuals with lived experience of obesity to consider the ways that global obesity narratives may contribute to weight stigma. Specifically, the working group focused on how overall obesity narratives, food and physical activity narratives, and scientific and public-facing language may contribute to weight stigma. The impact of weight stigma across the lifespan was also considered. Taking a global perspective, nine recommendations resulted from this work for global health research and health promotion efforts that can help to reduce harmful obesity narratives, both inside and outside health contexts.

Current status of weight bias and stigma in pediatrics and the need for greater focus on populations at risk.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Obesity is one of the most common pediatric chronic conditions in the United States, affecting approximately 20% of American youth and is more common amongst Black, Latino, and Indigenous and low socioeconomic populations. The condition places children and adolescents at increased risk of physical and mental health conditions partly mediated by the weight bias and stigmatization experienced during the potentially vulnerable periods of childhood and adolescence. RECENT FINDINGS: Weight bias and the resulting stigma are pervasive in society. Children have been shown to internalize this bias and its devaluation, which have been shown to contribute to worsening metabolic and mental health outcomes independently. Studies suggest weight stigmatization more adversely affects Black, Latino, and Indigenous children, suggesting the potential for adverse synergistic effects of these historical biases on such youth. SUMMARY: Addressing childhood obesity successfully across all racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic lines requires addressing weight bias and stigma. Steps toward this end include collaborative efforts to promote cross-cultural competence and upstander bias education and training for those who care for children, person-centered communication, and a culture of inclusivity across governmental, healthcare, educational, entertainment, and advertising sectors.