Comparison of FLT-PET/CT and CECT in gastric cancer diagnosis.

AIM: To date, no data are available on the use of 18-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FLT-PET/CT) for preoperative gastric cancer staging. Herein, we attempt to assess the value of FLT-PET/CT for preoperative gastric cancer staging in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a group of 96 gastric cancer patients, 96 FLT-PET/CT, 56 abdominal cavity CECT, and 51 resective operations were done. All three (FLT-PET/CT, CECT, and resective operation) were done in 29 patients. The results of FLT-PET/CT, CECT, and histopathological examinations were used to assess the ability of FLT-PET/CT and CECT to identify primary tumors, regional nodal metastases, and distant abdominal metastases. Assessment of regional lymph nodes was based on SUVmax in FLT-PET/CT and SAD (short-axis diameter) in CECT. RESULTS: In the group of 56 patients examined with FLT-PET/CT and CECT, identification of the primary tumor was possible in 56 cases (100%) and in 53 cases (94.6%), respectively, (p = 0.013). Using ROC curve, the sensitivity and specificity of FLT-PET/CT in metastatic regional lymph node assessment were higher than those of CECT (p = 0.0033). FLT-PE/CT enabled identification of a greater number of extraregional abdominal metastases than CECT (n = 56; 19 vs. 15, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: The ability of FLT-PET/CT to identify primary tumors is greater than that of CECT, and thus FLT-PET/CT was better in evaluating regional nodal metastases. FLT-PET/CT enabled identification of a greater number of abdominal metastases than CECT, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Evaluation of FLT-PET/CT usefulness in diagnosis and qualification for surgical treatment of gastric cancer.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Evaluation of FLT/PET/ CT usefulness in diagnosis and qualification for surgical treatment of gastric cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The FLT/PET/CT test was carried out in a group of 50 gastric cancer patients. Based on the test result, a decision followed about the therapeutic procedure to be applied. A comparison was made with regards to the consistency of the cancer growth advancement degree evaluation in the initial preoperative FLT/PET/CT test against the evaluation of postoperative degree of cancer advancement in histopathology. RESULTS: In the group of 50 diagnosed patients a surgical treatment was used for 37 patients. 21 resections were performed out of which 19 operations were radical In the group of 16 non-resective operations 2 post-laparotomic patients were selected for inductive treatment. In the group of 13 patients who did not undergo any surgery, 10 were directed to palliative care and 3 for inductive treatment. In the group of 50 patients, the applied FLT-PET/CT test confirmed presence of primary tumor in 49 patients. The presence of increased uptake of FLT in the local lymph nodes during the preoperative FLT-PET/CT test was confirmed in 22 cases. In 14 patients with FLT-PET/Ct N(+) with the M(-) feature resection surgery was performed. The increased uptake of FLT in localizing metastases (nodal and non-nodal) FLT-PET/CT (M+) was detected in 22 patients. The presence of nodal metastases in the postoperative histopathology examination (hpN+) was detected in 14 cases. In these cases preoperative FLT-PET/CT test proved the N(+) feature in 11 patients. The result FLT-PET/CT N(-) was truly negative in 2 patients, and false negative in 1 patient. In the group of 7 operated hpN(-) patients, in 3 patients a preoperative result FLT-PET/ CT N(+) (false positive result) was obtained. The consistency (positive) of nodal metastases identification in FLT-PET/CT as compared to post-surgical histopathology examination scored 11/15, which equals 73.3%. In the group of patients in whom resection surgery was performed, 4 false negative results were obtained [hp(N+), FLT-PET/CT (N-)] and 3 false positive results [hp(N-), FLT-PET/CT N(+)]. CONCLUSIONS: The initial test results indicate that FLT-PET/CT is an effective method in evaluating the primary tumor and the regional lymph nodes and is useful and beneficial in the diagnosis and further treatment evaluation of gastric cancer. FLT-PET/CT examination facilitates making proper therapeutic decisions - it allows the number of unnecessary laparotomies to be lowered.

(18)F-FLT PET/CT in Patients with Gastric Carcinoma.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of 18F-FLT PET/CT in the detection and differentiation of gastric cancers (GC). 104 consecutive patients (57 cases of adenocarcinoma tubulare (G2 and G3), 17 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma, 6 cases of undifferentiated carcinoma, 14 cases of adenocarcinoma partim mucocellulare, and 10 cases of end stage gastric cancer) with newly diagnosed advanced gastric cancer were examined with FLT PET/CT. For quantitative and comparative analyses, the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated for both the tumors and noninvaded gastric wall. Results. There were found, in the group of adenocarcinoma tubulare, SUVmax 1.5-23.1 (7.46 ± 4.57), in mucinous adenocarcinoma, SUVmax 2.3-10.3 (5.5 ± 2.4), in undifferentiated carcinoma, SUVmax 3.1-13.6 (7.28 ± 3.25), in adenocarcinoma partim mucocellulare, SUVmax 2-25.3 (7.7 ± 6.99), and, in normal gastric wall, SUVmax 1.01-2.55 (1.84 ± 0.35). For the level of 2.6 cut-off value between the normal wall and neoplasm FLT uptake from ROC analysis, all but five gastric cancers showed higher accumulation of FLT than noninfiltrated mucosa. Conclusion. Gastric cancer presents higher accumulation of 18F-FLT than normal, distended gastric mucosa. Significantly higher accumulation was shown in cancers better differentiated and with higher cellular density.

Torsed intraabdominal testicular tumor diagnosed during surgery performed due to suspicion of acute appendicitis.

Intra-abdominal neoplasmatic testicular torsion is a very rare clinical condition, which is normally not considered during differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The above-mentioned is most often observed in patients after puberty, without any previous specific symptoms apart from the absence of the testis in the scrotum and inguinal canal or periodic pain in the right lower abdomen. The study presented a case of a 22-year old male patient who was admitted and operated with suspicion of acute appendicitis. During surgery we observed intra-abdominal testicular torsion, both the testis and appendix were excised. Postoperative histopathological results were as follows: seminoma of the testis and normal appendix. The study presented available data concerning the above-mentioned rare clinical condition, as well as principles of diagnosis and treatment.