Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hypertens ; 42(11): 1994-2002, 2024 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39248134

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the US. Improved diagnosis and treatment of HDP may be achieved through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). However, there are challenges to effective HBPM during pregnancy. This qualitative study was conducted to explore patients' perspectives and experiences with HBPM. METHODS: Pregnant or recently postpartum women with HDP (≥18 years) were recruited from an academic medical center to virtual focus groups from March to September 2023. The discussions centered on experiences with HDP and barriers and facilitators to HBPM. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Among 20 participants, the mean age was 33.8 (SD 5.9) years, with 35% Hispanic and 35% Black/African-American. Facilitators to HBPM included understanding the parameters/purpose of HBPM, prior experience with healthcare/duration of hypertension, free access to HBPM equipment and decision support, creating a routine, external support/counseling (e.g., partner/healthcare/family), and technology support. Barriers to HBPM included uncertainty/lack of training about the HBPM process, accessing/using HBPM equipment, the belief that clinic monitoring was sufficient/achieving good control, and activation barriers to making HBPM a priority (e.g., fear of affirming the diagnosis, higher priorities/life stressors). CONCLUSION: Many of the barriers to HBPM in pregnancy can be overcome through patient education/counseling, technology support, clinician/family reinforcement, and better access to validated blood pressure monitors. Given the importance of HBPM in improving outcomes for HDP, it is important for healthcare providers and policy makers to work to reduce barriers and amplify facilitators to HBPM for better adoption.


Assuntos
Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Adulto , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/fisiopatologia , Grupos Focais
2.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 21(1): 92, 2021 04 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33941089

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials in home hospice settings are important to build the evidence base for practice, but balancing the burden and benefit of clinical trial conduct for clinicians, patients, and family caregivers is challenging. A stakeholder-engaged process can help inform and refine key aspects of home hospice clinical trials. The aim of this study was to describe a stakeholder-engaged process to refine, design, and implement aspects of an educational intervention trial in home hospice, including recommendations for refining intervention content and delivery, recruitment and enrollment strategies, and content and frequency of outcome measurement. METHODS: A panel of interprofessional (1 hospice administrator, 3 nurses, 2 physicians, 2 pharmacists) and 2 former family caregiver stakeholders was systematically selected and invited to participate based on expertise, representing 2 geographically distinct hospices who were participating in the clinical trial. Teleconferences followed a predetermined procedural sequence: 1. pre-meeting materials distribution and review; 2. pre-meeting email solicitation of concerns in response to materials; 3. teleconference with structured and guided discussion; and 4. documentation and distribution of minutes for accuracy review and future meeting guidance. Discussion topics were distinct for each panel meeting. Written reflections on the stakeholder engagement process were collected from panel members to further refine our process. RESULTS: Five initial biweekly teleconferences resulted in recommendations for recruitment strategy, enrollment process, measurement frequency, patient inclusion, and primary care physician notification of the patient's trial involvement. The panel continues to participate in quarterly teleconferences to review progress and unexpected questions and concerns. Panelist reflections reveal personal and professional benefit from participation. CONCLUSIONS: An interprofessional stakeholder process is feasible and invaluable for developing home hospice intervention studies, contributing to better science, successful trial implementation, and relevant, valid outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03972163 , Registered June 3, 2019.


Assuntos
Hospitais para Doentes Terminais , Cuidadores , Humanos , Participação dos Interessados
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA