Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine (C2-T1): systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,165 patients and 16,669 screws.

Lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation are among the most popular techniques for posterior fusion of the cervical spine. Early research prioritized the LMS approach as the trajectory resulted in fewer neurovascular complications; however, with the incorporation of navigation assistance, the CPS approach should be re-evaluated. Our objective was to report the findings of a meta-analysis focused on comparing the LMS and CPS techniques in terms of rate of various complications with inclusion of all levels from C2 to T1. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases with final inclusion criteria focused on identifying studies that reported outcomes and complications for either the CPS or LMS technique. These studies were then pooled, and statistical analyses were performed from the cumulative data. A total of 60 studies comprising 4165 participants and 16,669 screws placed within the C2-T1 levels were identified. Within these studies, the LMS group had a significantly increased odds for lateral mass fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 43.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62-711.42), additional cervical surgeries (OR = 5.56, 95%CI = 2.95-10.48), and surgical site infections (SSI) (OR = 5.47, 95%CI = 1.65-18.16). No other significant differences between groups in terms of complications were identified. Within the subgroup analysis of navigation versus non-navigation-guided CPS placement, no significant differences were identified for individual complications, although collectively significantly fewer complications occurred with navigation (OR = 5.29, 95%CI = 2.03-13.78). The CPS group had significantly fewer lateral mass fractures, cervical revision surgeries, and SSIs. Furthermore, navigation-assisted CPS placement was associated with a significant reduction in complications overall.

Prone Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: Case Series With an Operative Video Using Fluoroscopy-Based Instrument Tracking Guidance.

BACKGROUND: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion has inherent limitations, such as the necessity to reposition the patient. To overcome this limitation, the prone transpsoas (PTP) approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion has been developed. OBJECTIVE: To report clinical and radiographic outcome measures of a series of patients who underwent PTP at our hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent PTP for degenerative lumbar spine disease between September 2019 and August 2021. A thorough analysis of clinical and radiographic outcome measures for these patients was conducted. RESULTS: Our search resulted in the identification of 15 consecutive patients. Four patients were operated using the assistance of fluoroscopy-based instrument tracking. Overall, the mean follow-up duration was 11.9 ± 7.9 months. Radiographically, the PTP approach resulted in significant postoperative improvement of lumbar lordosis ( P = .03) and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis ( P < .005). No significant difference was found postoperatively in other regional sagittal alignment parameters, including pelvic tilt, sacral slope, or pelvic incidence. Clinically, the patients' Oswestry Disability Indices ( P = .002) and Short Form Survey-12 Physical Scores improved significantly ( P = .01). The estimated mean blood loss for patients who underwent the PTP procedure was 137.7 ± 96.4 mL, the mean operative time was 212.5 ± 77.1 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.4 days. One patient each had superficial wound infection, transient paralytic ileus, transient pulmonary embolism, transient urinary retention, or required revision lumbar surgery. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the PTP approach is associated with significant improvement in radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Extensive Symptomatic Thoracolumbar Epidural Lipomatosis Treated With Minimally Invasive Hemilaminectomies: Technical Case Report.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Spinal epidural lipomatosis is a rare condition commonly associated with chronic corticosteroid use and obesity that involves deposition of adipose tissue in the epidural space of the spinal canal. This accumulation of adipose tissue may cause compression of the spinal cord and/or nerve roots and result in compressive symptoms such as myelopathy or radiculopathy. Spinal involvement is usually confined to either the thoracic or lumbar spine but can infrequently affect both regions. Depending on pre-existing conditions, treatment options include weight loss and discontinuation of exogenous steroid use, both of which have been shown to be effective therapeutic methods. Surgical decompression may be useful for appropriately selected patients in whom conservative therapy has failed or who experience acute neurological deterioration, although this is rarely indicated. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: In this study, we describe a patient receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy who presented with symptomatic epidural lipomatosis that involved the thoracic and lumbar spine. She was treated with decompression by continuous T3-L5 hemilaminectomies performed through 5 small incisions of alternating laterality. After surgery, the patient experienced clinical improvement and was able to return to her baseline. CONCLUSION: We illustrate a successful spinal decompression of extensive epidural lipomatosis through a less-invasive surgical approach using several small incisions to accomplish uninterrupted hemilaminectomies. This alternative approach to a standard continuous incision can be considered in cases of extensive spinal epidural lipomatosis in patients with multiple medical comorbidities in whom wound healing is believed to be an issue and for whom minimizing blood loss is crucial.

Minimally Invasive Resection of Intraventricular Pilocytic Astrocytoma Using the Aurora Surgiscope in an Adult Patient: Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Pilocytic astrocytomas account for approximately 5%-6% of all gliomas and are most commonly diagnosed between the ages of 8 and 13 years. Although they may occur throughout the neuraxis, approximately two thirds arise from the cerebellum and optic pathway. Other locations of origin include midline structures such as thalamus, hypothalamus, and periventricular regions. Surgical approaches to lateral or third ventricular tumors include anterior transcallosal, subfrontal translamina terminalis, and anterior transcortical approaches. The Aurora Surgiscope is a single-use, disposable minimally invasive neurological endoscope designed for intraparenchymal hemorrhage evacuation. We present the successful use of this system to aid resection of a large intraventricular pilocytic astrocytoma. METHODS: A 29-year-old man presented with signs of developing hydrocephalus and was found to have a large intraventricular tumor, which was later identified to be a rare intraventricular pilocytic astrocytoma. A ventriculostomy was performed as a temporizing measure, and he was transferred to our tertiary care facility for surgical management. Sulcal dissection was performed, and the endoscope was inserted to create a minimally invasive corridor to the lateral ventricle. Using the endoscope, bimanual surgery using multiple instruments simultaneously was possible and enabled gross total resection of the tumor. RESULTS: The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged at his neurological baseline level. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive sulcal dissection preceding placement of the endoscope allowed access to the intraventricular space with minimal passage of parenchymal tissue. High-definition visualization was provided and allowed the operating surgeon to freely use both hands during surgery.

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine: systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 1768 patients and 8636 screws.

Lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation for the treatment of subaxial cervical spine instability or deformity has been traditionally associated with few neurovascular complications. However, cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation has recently increased in popularity, especially with navigation assistance, because of the higher pullout strength of the pedicle screws. To their knowledge, the authors conducted the first meta-analysis comparing the complication rates during and/or after CPS and LMS placement for different pathologies causing cervical spine instability. A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase from inception to January 12, 2021 was performed to identify studies reporting CPS and/or LMS-related complications. Complications were categorized into intraoperative and early postoperative (within 30 days of surgery) and late postoperative (after 30 days from surgery) complications. All studies that met the prespecified inclusion criteria were pooled and cumulatively analyzed. A total of 24 studies were conducted during the time frame of the search and comprising 1768 participants and 8636 subaxially placed screws met the inclusion criteria. The CPS group experienced significantly more postoperative C5 palsy (odds ratio [OR] = 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-9.53, p < 0.05). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between the LMS and CPS groups. There were no significant differences between the CPS and LMS groups in terms of neurovascular procedure-related complications other than significantly more C5 palsy in the CPS group.

Effectiveness and Safety of Continuous Infusion Regional Anesthesia Pumps for Pain After Thoracopelvic Fusion Surgery for Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain after complex revision spine surgery, especially for the treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS), is frequently severe and can be debilitating, requiring the use of intravenous and oral opioids. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a continuous infusion regional anesthesia pump placed after thoracopelvic fusion for the treatment of PSPS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparative study of consecutive patients who had undergone thoracopelvic fusion for PSPS. The patients included in the present study had either had a continuous infusion regional anesthesia pump placed during surgery or had not (control). Demographics, use of preoperative and postoperative opioids, postoperative adverse events, length of hospital stay, and 90-day readmission were recorded. RESULTS: The patients in the pump group (n = 14) had used fewer opioids during their hospital stay compared with the control group (n = 12; P = 0.6). This difference was greater for postoperative days 1 and 2 (P = 0.3 and P = 0.2, respectively). No significant difference was found in opioid usage during the first 14 days after surgery (P = 0.8) or at the 3-month postoperative follow-up evaluation (P = 0.8). Furthermore, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative complications. The pump group had a 1.4-day shorter hospital stay (P = 0.7). The control group had more 90-day readmissions than did the pump group (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Despite showing a trend toward less usage of opioids during the first 2 days after surgery and a shorter hospital stay with no increased complications in the pump group, the study data failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Use of the Scan-and-Plan Workflow in Next-Generation Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion: Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience using the scan-and-plan workflow and review current literature on surgical efficiency, safety, and accuracy of next-generation robot-assisted (RA) spine surgery. METHODS: The records of patients who underwent RA pedicle screw fixation were reviewed. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was determined based on the Ravi classification system. To evaluate workflow efficiency, 3 demographically matched cohorts were created to analyze differences in time per screw placement (defined as operating room [OR] time divided by number of screws placed). Group A had <4 screws placed, Group B had 4 screws placed, and Group C had >4 screws placed. Intraoperative errors and postoperative complications were collected to elucidate safety. RESULTS: Eighty-four RA cases (306 pedicle screws) were included for analysis. The mean number of screws placed was 2.1 ± 0.3 in Group A and 6.4 ± 1.2 in Group C; 4 screws were placed in Group B patients. The accuracy rate (Ravi grade I) was 98.4%. Screw placement time was significantly longer in Group A (101 ± 37.7 minutes) than Group B (50.5 ± 25.4 minutes) or C (43.6 ± 14.7 minutes). There were no intraoperative complications, robot failures, or in-hospital complications requiring a return to the OR. CONCLUSIONS: The scan-and-plan workflow allowed for a high degree of accuracy. It was a safe method that provided a smooth and efficient OR workflow without registration errors or robotic failures. After the placement of 4 pedicle screws, the per-screw time remained constant. Further studies regarding efficiency and utility in multilevel procedures are necessary.

Mortality and Functional Outcome in Surgically Evacuated Acute Subdural Hematoma in Elderly Patients.

BACKGROUND: Significant morbidity and mortality is associated with surgical evacuation of acute subdural hematomas (ASDHs) in the elderly population. The literature remains mixed on risk factors associated with poor outcomes, specifically preoperative antithrombotic usage and postoperative seizures. METHODS: Between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, we retrospectively identified 62 patients ≥65 years of age who underwent a craniotomy for evacuation of an ASDH, with the primary outcome being Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at discharge and 3- and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of the patients, 52% were women, with a median age of 78 years (range, 65-93 years). The mechanism of injury was because of a fall in 40 patients. Twenty-eight patients (44%) had a poor outcome (GOS score 1-2) at discharge, increasing to 31 patients (50%) at 3-month follow-up. Eight patients (13%) had a good outcome (GOS score 4-5) at discharge, increasing to 17 patients (27%) at 3-month follow-up. Perioperative mortality rate was 39%, increasing to 44% at 3-month follow-up. The strongest associations with mortality in descending order were 24-hour postoperative Glasgow Come Scale (GCS) score, midline shift, preoperative GCS score, and pupillary abnormalities. Although age was not a statistically significant factor for mortality, patients with a favorable outcome (GOS score 4-5) had a median age of 71 years versus 78 years for GOS score 1-3. Preoperative antithrombotic usage and postoperative seizures were not significant predictors of outcome or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of morbidity and mortality remains in the management of ASDHs in the elderly population; however, a significant percentage (27%) can still go on to have a favorable outcome.