RESUMO
Introduction: Self-management programs for spinal cord injury (SCI) are a growing adjunct to traditional healthcare services aiding individuals with SCI in learning and managing symptoms and medical care. A benefit of self-management programs is that they can be facilitated by peers, offering a unique lived experience of adjusting to and managing SCI. While a growing body of literature highlights the effectiveness of peer led programs, there is limited understanding of how individuals engage with peer programs or critical components of peer support. The current study seeks to understand how individuals engaged with peers in the context of a self-management program. Methods: Secondary qualitative analysis of online forum posts resultant from a peer led self-management course for SCI. Results: Content analysis revealed several themes of how participants engaged with members of the group, including skill building, resource sharing, and problem solving. A process level theme of emotional connection to others living with similar SCI-related challenges was defined as "bearing witness." Participants commented frequently that groups were the first time they engaged with a community with lived experience, and shared experience was frequently highlighted in the responses from individuals as one of the most unique and important aspects of the intervention. Discussion: Themes identified suggest that bearing witness was a critical component of peer led intervention. While self-management content provided structure for engagement and discussion, participants report that connectedness and shared experience made content more impactful and relevant. Future research should examine if alignment of peer and participant experience increases the impact of interventions and explore if this theme is important for other chronic medical populations.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the interaction of opiate misuse and marijuana use frequency is associated with behavioral health outcomes. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand seven hundred fifty participants enrolled in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems who completed the Pain Survey and had complete opioid use and marijuana use information. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, secondary analysis from a multisite observational cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinically significant behavioral health symptoms for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and sleep quality. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred thirty-five (94.3%) participants did not misuse opiates, 215 (5.7%) did misuse opiates (taking more opioid pain medication than prescribed and/or using nonprescription opioid pain medication); 2683 (70.5%) participants did not use marijuana, 353 (9.3%) occasionally used marijuana (less than once a week), and 714 (18.8%) regularly used marijuana (once a week or more frequently). There was a statistically significant relationship (P < .05) between the interaction of opiate misuse and marijuana use frequency and all behavioral health outcomes and several covariates (age, sex, cause of injury, severity of injury, and pain group category). Pairwise comparisons confirm that statistically significant associations on behavioral health outcomes are driven by endorsing opiate misuse and/or regular marijuana use, but occasional marijuana use was not associated. CONCLUSIONS: Higher odds of clinically significant PTSD, depression, anxiety, and poor sleep quality are present in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who misuse opiates and/or who use marijuana regularly. In the absence of opiate misuse, regular marijuana use had higher odds of worse behavioral health outcomes than occasional and no use. The interaction of opiate misuse and regular marijuana use yielded the highest odds. Individuals with TBI should be informed of the relationship of substance use and behavioral health outcomes and that current chronic pain may mediate the association.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Dor Crônica , Uso da Maconha , Alcaloides Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Uso da Maconha/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Alcaloides Opiáceos/uso terapêutico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: (1) Adapt evidence-based hypnosis-enhanced cognitive therapy (HYP-CT) for inpatient rehabilitation setting; and (2) determine feasibility of a clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of HYP-CT intervention for pain after spinal cord injury (SCI). STUDY DESIGN: Pilot non-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: English-speaking patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation after SCI reporting current pain of at least 3 on a 0-10 scale. Persons with severe psychiatric illness, recent suicide attempt or elevated risk, or significant cognitive impairment were excluded. Consecutive sample of 53 patients with SCI-related pain enrolled, representing 82% of eligible patients. INTERVENTION: Up to 4 sessions of HYP-CT Intervention, each 30-60 minutes long. METHODS: Participants were assessed at baseline and given the choice to receive HYP-CT or Usual Care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant enrollment and participation and acceptability of intervention. Exploratory analyses examined the effect of intervention on pain and cognitive appraisals of pain. RESULTS: In the HYP-CT group, 71% completed at least 3 treatment sessions and reported treatment benefit and satisfaction with the treatment; no adverse events were reported. Exploratory analyses of effectiveness found pre-post treatment pain reductions after HYP-CT with large effect (P<.001; ß=-1.64). While the study was not powered to detect significant between-group differences at discharge, effect sizes revealed decreases in average pain (Cohen's d=-0.13), pain interference (d=-0.10), and pain catastrophizing (d=-0.20) in the HYP-CT group relative to control and increases in self-efficacy (d=0.27) and pain acceptance (d=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to provide HYP-CT to inpatients with SCI, and HYP-CT results in substantial reductions in SCI pain. The study is the first to show a psychological-based nonpharmacologic intervention that may reduce SCI pain during inpatient rehabilitation. A definitive efficacy trial is warranted.
Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Dor , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitaçãoRESUMO
Early, acute pain following spinal cord injury (SCI) is common, can negatively impact SCI rehabilitation, and is frequently not responsive to biomedical treatment. Nonpharmacological interventions show promise in reducing pain for individuals with SCI. However, most psychological interventions rely heavily on verbal interaction between the individual being treated and the clinician, making them inaccessible for individuals with impaired verbal output due to mechanical ventilation. This case study aims to describe the adaptation and implementation of hypnotic cognitive therapy (HYP-CT) intervention for early SCI pain in the context of mechanical ventilation dependence and weaning. The participant was a 54-year-old male with C2 AIS A SCI requiring mechanical ventilation. Four sessions of HYP-CT were provided during inpatient rehabilitation with assessment prior to intervention, after the intervention sessions, and prior to discharge. The participant reported immediate reductions in pain intensity following each intervention session. Overall, he reported increases in self-efficacy and pain acceptance. He did not report any negative treatment effects and thought the intervention provided support during mechanical ventilation weaning. During treatment, he discontinued opioid pain medications and reported actively using intervention strategies. Our results support the potential for early, hypnotic cognitive therapy for individuals with SCI experiencing pain or distress while dependent on mechanical ventilation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: People of color (POC), especially those who also hold social identities associated with disadvantage (non-English-speaking, female, older, lower socioeconomic level), continue to be underserved in the health system, which can result in poorer care and worsened health outcomes. Most disparity research in traumatic brain injury (TBI) focuses on the impact of single factors, which misses the compounding effect of belonging to multiple historically marginalized groups. OBJECTIVE: To examine the intersectional impact of multiple social identities vulnerable to systemic disadvantage following TBI on mortality, opioid usage during acute hospitalization, and discharge location. METHODS: Retrospective observational design utilizing electronic health records merged with local trauma registry data. Patient groups were defined by race and ethnicity (POC or non-Hispanic White), age, sex, type of insurance, and primary language (English-speaking vs non-English-speaking). Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify clusters of systemic disadvantage. Outcome measures were then assessed across latent classes and tested for differences. RESULTS: Over an 8-year period, 10 809 admissions with TBI occurred (37% POC). LCA identified a 4-class model. Groups with more systemic disadvantage had higher rates of mortality. Classes with older populations had lower rates of opioid administration and were less likely to discharge to inpatient rehabilitation following acute care. Sensitivity analyses examining additional indicators of TBI severity demonstrated that the younger group with more systemic disadvantage had more severe TBI. Controlling for more indicators of TBI severity changed statistical significance in mortality for younger groups. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate significant health inequities in the mortality and access to inpatient rehabilitation following TBI along with higher rates of severe injury in younger patients with more social disadvantages. While many inequities may be related to systemic racism, our findings suggested an additive, deleterious effect for patients who belonged to multiple historically disadvantaged groups. Further research is needed to understand the role of systemic disadvantage for individuals with TBI within the healthcare system.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Enquadramento Interseccional , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/terapia , Hospitalização , EtnicidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a peer-led online self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Randomized waitlist control trial. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: 184 adults with SCI. INTERVENTIONS: SCI Thrive is a peer-led self-management program with self-paced online content and video-sessions for live discussion. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceived quality of life, self-efficacy for health, participation. RESULTS: A total of 97 individuals (86 randomized plus 9 assigned to the final group) were assigned to treatment and 86 randomized to the waitlist. Participants were 51 years old on average (SD = 14.9), with 58% male, mean of 15.5 (SD = 14.0) years injured, with 59% cervical injuries and 64% incomplete injuries. The treatment group had significantly higher scores on CHART occupational subscale (P = .022), but no other differences were found at the end of 6 weeks. Analysis of all participants who completed SCI Thrive showed significant increase in self-efficacy between baseline (6.32) and 6 weeks (6.81; P < .001) which was maintained at 3 months post treatment (6.83; P = .001). Those who were more engaged in SCI Thrive reported higher quality of life (P = .001), self-efficacy (P = .007), and increased mobility on the CHART (P = .026). CONCLUSION: SCI Thrive is a highly accessible program for individuals with SCI and shows promise for improving self-efficacy. Strategies to increase engagement should be added to maximize benefits. Measurement tools may have been impacted by COVID-19 pandemic. Further research on the efficacy of SCI Thrive is needed given feedback on benefit of a group focus area, such as on physical activity.
RESUMO
Advancements in critical care medicine have improved survival rates for patients experiencing critical illness in intensive care units (ICUs). Although mortality has declined, more than half of ICU survivors experience functional impairments that persist beyond discharge. Of particular concern is ICU-related cognitive impairment, which can extend across the care continuum, ranging from acute and transient presentations in the ICU (eg, delirium) to long-term impairments years after discharge. ICU-related cognitive impairment has received increased attention in the literature, particularly as it relates to ICU survivors who have received and survived critical care in the context of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and are now experiencing postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The medical complexity and heterogeneity of ICU survivors, coupled with the multifactorial etiology of ICU-related cognitive impairments, lead to challenges in how to optimize care for ICU survivors at various stages of recovery. This review aims to provide an overview of cognitive outcomes associated with critical illness by integrating recent literature focused on etiology, assessment, and interventions in the context of ICU-related cognitive impairments. The narrative review employs a biopsychosocial framework to comprehensively evaluate the multifactorial nature of ICU-related cognitive outcomes. Authors also highlight that multidisciplinary teams composed of key rehabilitation providers are likely best suited for optimizing recovery trajectories of ICU survivors.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Disfunção Cognitiva , Disfunção Cognitiva/epidemiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Cuidados Críticos , Estado Terminal , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current literature to identify what research has been conducted, examine the approaches used, and determine what is presently known about prescription and nonprescription opioid receipts and use among individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DATA SOURCES: The search strategy included the following: opioid; opiate; analgesics, opioid; opiate alkaloids; or opioid-related disorders; AND brain injury; brain injuries; brain injuries, traumatic; head injury; head injuries; head injuries, closed; head injuries, penetrating; brain concussion; diffuse axonal injury; diffuse axonal injuries; brain trauma/s; head trauma/s; concussion; craniocerebral trauma/s; or TBI. Filters included English and Adults (19+ years). Study Selection: Inclusion: English language, adults with stable TBI, and prescription opioid receipt or use after TBI. Exclusion: Animal models, populations with other acquired brain injury, acute TBI management, and non-peer-reviewed articles, theses, or conference abstracts. Multiple reviewers screened abstracts and full-text articles for eligibility. In total, 771 abstracts were screened, 183 full texts were reviewed, and 21 met eligibility criteria. Data Extraction: Relevant content was independently extracted by multiple observers, including authors, design, sample identification and data source/s, TBI severity, TBI assessment, opioid assessment, study population (demographics, N), military affiliation, comparison groups, date of data collection, and summary of findings. RESULTS: Studies were published between 1987 and 2019; most data were collected prior to 2015. The majority utilized administrative and electronic medical record data from the Department of Veterans Affairs and retrospective cohort designs, and most focused on prescription opioids. There were no studies evaluating interventions to reduce use of opioids in TBI populations. Preliminary findings suggest that prescription opioid receipt is strongly related to psychological symptoms, including comorbid depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased awareness of opioid receipt and use following TBI, there is limited investigation on the examination of this issue. Future studies should include more varied patient populations as well as evaluate interventions to reduce opioid use following TBI.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe patient and clinical characteristics associated with receipt of opioid medications and identify differences in sleep quality, architecture, and sleep-related respiration between those receiving and not receiving opioid medications. SETTING: Acute inpatient rehabilitation care for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 248 consecutive admissions for inpatient rehabilitation care following moderate to severe TBI (average age of 43.6 years), who underwent level 1 polysomnography (PSG) (average time since injury: 120 days) across 6 sites. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, secondary analyses. MAIN MEASURES: The PSG sleep parameters included total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), wake after sleep onset, rapid eye movement (REM) latency, sleep staging, and arousal and awakening indices. Respiratory measures included oxygen saturation, central apnea events per hour, obstructive apnea and hypopnea events per hour, and total apnea-hypopnea index. RESULTS: After adjustment for number of prescribed medication classes, those receiving opioid medications on the day of PSG experienced increased TST relative to those not receiving opioid medications (estimated mean difference [EMD] = 31.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-61.3). Other indices of sleep did not differ significantly between groups. Among respiratory measures those receiving opioids on the day of PSG experienced increased frequency of central sleep apnea events during total (EMD = 2.92; 95% CI, 0.8-5.0) and non-REM sleep (EMD = 3.37; 95% CI, 1.0-5.7) and higher frequency of obstructive sleep apnea events during REM sleep (EMD = 6.97; 95% CI, 0.1-13.8). Compared with those who did not, receiving opioids was associated with lower oxygen saturation nadir during total sleep (EMD = -3.03; 95% CI, -5.6 to -0.4) and a greater number of oxygen desaturations across REM (EMD = 8.15; 95% CI, 0.2-16.1), non-REM (EMD = 7.30; 95% CI, 0.3-14.4), and total sleep (EMD = 8.01; 95% CI, 0.8-15.2) Greater total apnea-hypopnea index was observed during REM (EMD = 8.13; 95% CI, 0.8-15.5) and total sleep (EMD = 7.26; 95% CI, 0.08-14.4) for those receiving opioids. CONCLUSION: Opioid use following moderate to severe TBI is associated with an increase in indicators of sleep-related breathing disorders, a modifiable condition that is prevalent following TBI. As sleep-wake disorders are associated with poorer rehabilitation outcomes and opioid medications may frequently be administered following traumatic injury, additional longitudinal investigations are warranted in determining whether a causal relation between opioids and sleep-disordered breathing in those following moderate to severe TBI exists. Given current study limitations, future studies can improve upon methodology through the inclusion of indication for and dosage of opioid medications in this population when examining these associations.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Respiração , SonoRESUMO
Mental illness and obesity are highly prevalent in patients with coronary disease and are frequently comorbid. While mental illness is an established risk factor for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), prior studies suggest improved outcomes in people with obesity. It is unknown if obesity and mental illness interact to affect cardiac outcomes or if they independently influence MACCE. We identified 55 091 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2009 and 2014, using the Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) program. Cox methods were used to assess the risk of MACCE by weight status and psychiatric diagnosis, and assessed for interaction. Compared to normal weight status, higher weight was associated with reduced MACCE events after PCI (mean follow-up of 2 years) for both stable angina and acute coronary syndromes (ACSs; reduction of >13% in stable angina, >17% in ACS; P < 0.01 for both after adjustment). Having a non-substance abuse mental illness diagnosis increased risk of MACCE compared to patients without mental illness in stable angina over 17%; P < 0.05, but not in ACS. When analysed for interaction, obesity and mental illness did not significantly impact MACCE over their independent influences. These results suggest that mental illness along with weight status have significant impact on MACCE, post-PCI. Clinicians should be aware of patients' mental health status as a significant cardiovascular risk factor after PCI, independent of weight status.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Saúde Mental , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Saúde dos Veteranos , Veteranos/psicologia , Idoso , Peso Corporal , Comorbidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans AffairsRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid use and opioid related deaths continue to increase nationwide. Several states have adopted legislation allowing for recreational use of cannabis. Little is known about how recreational cannabis laws impact compliance in chronic pain patients who have been prescribed opioid therapy. The goals of this study were to (1) retrospectively assess the effect of cannabis use on compliance with opioid therapy in a high-risk patient population and (2) determine the impact of legalization of recreational cannabis on patients prescribed therapeutic opioids. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on results from a "high-risk" urine drug testing panel. Results from 1 year before and 1 year after initiation of recreational cannabis legislation were analyzed. This testing panel included qualitative assays for cannabinoids and 9 other common drugs of abuse in addition to a quantitative LC-MS/MS assay for 23 different opioids and metabolites. Opioid compliance was assigned by reviewing pathologists' interpretations. RESULTS: In the pre-legalization period, 1776 panels were performed, and in the post-legalization, 1648 panels were performed. An increase (6%) in the rate of positive cannabinoids screening results was observed after legalization of recreational cannabis; however, the overall compliance rate was consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that legalization of recreational cannabis does not affect compliance rate in patients treated with opioid therapy for chronic pain.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Uso da Maconha/epidemiologia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Legislação de Medicamentos , Masculino , Uso da Maconha/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Washington/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is highly prevalent among a wide range of populations, including civilians, military personnel, and Veterans. TBI sequelae may be further exacerbated by symptoms associated with frequently occurring comorbid psychiatric conditions, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This is particularly true among the population of military personnel from recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, with a history of mild TBI (mTBI) and PTSD. The need for efficacious treatments for TBI and comorbid PTSD is significant, and evidence-based interventions for these frequently co-occurring conditions are limited. Based on findings suggesting that inflammation may be an underlying mechanism of both conditions, anti-inflammatory/immunoregulatory agents, including probiotics, may represent a novel strategy to treat TBI and/or PTSD-related symptoms. The focus of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate existing research regarding prebiotic and probiotic interventions for the populations of individuals with a history of TBI and/or PTSD. Only 4 studies were identified (3 severe TBI, 1 PTSD, 0 co-occurring TBI and PTSD). Although findings suggested some promise, work in this area is nascent and results to date do not support some claims within the extensive coverage of probiotics in the popular press.
Assuntos
Síndrome Pós-Concussão/tratamento farmacológico , Probióticos/farmacologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Concussão Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Concussão Encefálica/microbiologia , Lesões Encefálicas/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/microbiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Militares , Prebióticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/microbiologia , VeteranosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The association between cardiovascular disease and depression is well-established. Peripheral arterial disease arises from atherosclerosis like other cardiovascular disease, but unlike other cardiovascular disease, it impairs ambulation and lower extremity function. Given peripheral arterial disease's unique characteristics and underrepresentation in mental health research, we aimed to: (a) assess the prevalence of depression or depressive symptoms among peripheral arterial disease patients compared to coronary artery disease rates, (b) assess whether an independent association between peripheral arterial disease and depression exists, and (c) identify associated factors that may be targeted for intervention. DESIGN: This study was based on a systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify studies that examined peripheral arterial disease and depression or depressive symptoms. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: We identified 28 studies. Prevalence of depression or depressive symptoms ranged from 11-48% in 12 cross-sectional studies, and from 3-36% in 16 longitudinal studies, which is comparable to reported coronary artery disease rates. Depressed peripheral arterial disease patients were more likely to be female, African American, and have more severe peripheral arterial disease symptoms and more compromised physical function compared to non-depressed patients. There is evidence to suggest that depression exerts a negative influence on walking ability and physical function independently of peripheral arterial disease. CONCLUSIONS: There is a critical need to address depression in peripheral arterial disease patients, particularly those with characteristics that place them at increased risk. Vascular care providers appear to be the primary contact for assessing depressive symptoms, and once identified, integrated mental health providers may intervene to prevent the worsening of both depression and peripheral arterial disease.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/etiologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/complicações , Doença Arterial Periférica/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Effective medical therapies are lacking for the treatment of neurofibromatosis type 1-related plexiform neurofibromas, which are characterized by elevated RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. METHODS: We conducted a phase 1 trial of selumetinib (AZD6244 or ARRY-142886), an oral selective inhibitor of MAPK kinase (MEK) 1 and 2, in children who had neurofibromatosis type 1 and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to evaluate plasma pharmacokinetics. Selumetinib was administered twice daily at a dose of 20 to 30 mg per square meter of body-surface area on a continuous dosing schedule (in 28-day cycles). We also tested selumetinib using a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1-related neurofibroma. Response to treatment (i.e., an increase or decrease from baseline in the volume of plexiform neurofibromas) was monitored by using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging analysis to measure the change in size of the plexiform neurofibroma. RESULTS: A total of 24 children (median age, 10.9 years; range, 3.0 to 18.5) with a median tumor volume of 1205 ml (range, 29 to 8744) received selumetinib. Patients were able to receive selumetinib on a long-term basis; the median number of cycles was 30 (range, 6 to 56). The maximum tolerated dose was 25 mg per square meter (approximately 60% of the recommended adult dose). The most common toxic effects associated with selumetinib included acneiform rash, gastrointestinal effects, and asymptomatic creatine kinase elevation. The results of pharmacokinetic evaluations of selumetinib among the children in this trial were similar to those published for adults. Treatment with selumetinib resulted in confirmed partial responses (tumor volume decreases from baseline of ≥20%) in 17 of the 24 children (71%) and decreases from baseline in neurofibroma volume in 12 of 18 mice (67%). Disease progression (tumor volume increase from baseline of ≥20%) has not been observed to date. Anecdotal evidence of decreases in tumor-related pain, disfigurement, and functional impairment was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our early-phase data suggested that children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas benefited from long-term dose-adjusted treatment with selumetinib without having excess toxic effects. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01362803 .).
Assuntos
Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Benzimidazóis/farmacocinética , Quinases de Proteína Quinase Ativadas por Mitógeno/antagonistas & inibidores , Neurofibroma Plexiforme/tratamento farmacológico , Neurofibromatose 1/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Animais , Benzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Camundongos , Neurofibroma Plexiforme/diagnóstico por imagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Due to the concerns about the overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer, active surveillance (AS) is now a recommended alternative to the active treatments (AT) of surgery and radiotherapy. However, AS is not widely utilized, partially due to psychological and decision-making factors associated with treatment preferences. METHODS: In a longitudinal cohort study, we conducted pretreatment telephone interviews (N = 1,140, 69.3% participation) with newly diagnosed, low-risk prostate cancer patients (PSA ≤ 10, Gleason ≤ 6) from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We assessed psychological and decision-making variables, and treatment preference [AS, AT, and No Preference (NP)]. RESULTS: Men were 61.5 (SD, 7.3) years old, 24 days (median) after diagnosis, and 81.1% white. Treatment preferences were: 39.3% AS, 30.9% AT, and 29.7% NP. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that men preferring AS (vs. AT) were older (OR, 1.64; CI, 1.07-2.51), more educated (OR, 2.05; CI, 1.12-3.74), had greater prostate cancer knowledge (OR, 1.77; CI, 1.43-2.18) and greater awareness of having low-risk cancer (OR, 3.97; CI, 1.96-8.06), but also were less certain about their treatment preference (OR, 0.57; CI, 0.41-0.8), had greater prostate cancer anxiety (OR, 1.22; CI, 1.003-1.48), and preferred a shared treatment decision (OR, 2.34; CI, 1.37-3.99). Similarly, men preferring NP (vs. AT) were less certain about treatment preference, preferred a shared decision, and had greater knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Although a substantial proportion of men preferred AS, this was associated with anxiety and uncertainty, suggesting that this may be a difficult choice. IMPACT: Increasing the appropriate use of AS for low-risk prostate cancer will require additional reassurance and information, and reaching men almost immediately after diagnosis while the decision-making is ongoing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(8); 1240-50. ©2016 AACR.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Preferência do Paciente/psicologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Conduta Expectante , Idoso , Ansiedade , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/psicologia , Risco , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
This Rehabilitation Measures Database summary provides a review of the psychometric properties of the HADS in individuals with TBI. A full review of the HADS as well as reviews of over 330 other instruments can be found at www.rehabmeasures.org.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Transtornos de Ansiedade/complicações , Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/complicações , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Humanos , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study is a randomized trial of a Web-based intervention to increase condom use among college women. PARTICIPANTS: From October 2012 to March 2013, N = 422 completed baseline questionnaires and intervention procedures. n = 216 completed 3-month follow-up. METHODS: Participants completed a decisional balance exercise examining their sex acts over the past 3 months and wrote an essay encouraging young girls to use condoms. All procedures were conducted online. RESULTS: The intervention improved intentions to use and attitudes towards condoms for 3 subscales of condom attitudes. Attitudes following the intervention significantly predicted condom use at 3-month follow-up, and this relationship was mediated by condom intentions immediately post intervention. The relationship between intentions and condom use was moderated by group. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved condom attitudes and intentions immediately post intervention, and immediately post intervention intentions had a greater impact on condom use at 3-month follow-up among those in the condom intervention compared with those in the control group.
Assuntos
Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação em Saúde/métodos , Internet , Sexo Seguro , Estudantes/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Motivação , Análise Multivariada , New York , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Assunção de Riscos , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , UniversidadesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The impact of decision aids on prostate cancer screening outcomes has been inconsistent. PURPOSE: We assessed whether pre-existing attitudes moderated the impact of decision aids on screening. METHODS: Men aged 45-70 (56.2% Caucasian, 39.9% African-American) were randomly assigned to a print decision aid (N = 630), a web decision aid (N = 631), or usual care (N = 632). Telephone interviews assessed pro/con screening attitudes and screening behaviors at baseline, 1-month and 13-months post-randomization. RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses revealed significant arm by attitude interactions: Higher baseline cons scores predicted lower screening in the print (OR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.92)) and web (OR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.91)) arms but not in usual care (OR = 1.34 (95% CI: 0.90, 2.00)). CONCLUSIONS: The decision aids amplified the impact of men's baseline attitudes about limitations of screening: Compared to the usual care arm, men in both decision aid arms were less likely to be screened when they perceived more limitations of screening.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/psicologia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição AleatóriaRESUMO
Rates of depression are high among individuals living with HIV. Accurate assessment of depressive symptoms among this population is important for ensuring proper diagnosis and treatment. The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a widely used measure for assessing depression, however its psychometric properties have not yet been investigated for use with HIV-positive populations in the United States. The current study was the first to assess the psychometric properties of the BDI-II among a large cohort of HIV-positive participants sampled at multiple sites across the United States as part of the CNS HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research (CHARTER) study. The BDI-II test scores showed good internal consistency (α = .93) and adequate test-retest reliability (internal consistency coefficient = 0.83) over a 6-mo period. Using a "gold standard" of major depressive disorder determined by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, sensitivity and specificity were maximized at a total cut-off score of 17 and a receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed that the BDI-II is an adequate diagnostic measure for the sample (area under the curve = 0.83). The sensitivity and specificity of each score are provided graphically. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the best fit for a three-factor model over one-factor and two-factor models and models with a higher-order factor included. The results suggest that the BDI-II is an adequate measure for assessing depressive symptoms among U.S. HIV-positive patients. Cut-off scores should be adjusted to enhance sensitivity or specificity as needed and the measure can be differentiated into cognitive, affective, and somatic depressive symptoms.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Sobreviventes de Longo Prazo ao HIV/psicologia , Soropositividade para HIV/psicologia , Inventário de Personalidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicometria/métodos , Psicometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Feminino , Soropositividade para HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Sexually transmitted infections continue to trouble the United States and can be attenuated through increased condom use. Attitudes about condoms are an important multidimensional factor that can affect sexual health choices and have been successfully measured using the Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale (MCAS). Such attitudes have the potential to vary between men and women, yet little work has been undertaken to identify if the MCAS accurately captures attitudes without being influenced by underlying gender biases. We examined the factor structure and gender invariance on the MCAS using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory, within-subscale differential item functioning analyses. More than 770 participants provided data via the Internet. Results of differential item functioning analyses identified three items as differentially functioning between the genders, and removal of these items is recommended. Findings confirmed the previously hypothesized multidimensional nature of condom attitudes and the five-factor structure of the MCAS even after the removal of the three problematic items. In general, comparisons across genders using the MCAS seem reasonable from a methodological standpoint. Results are discussed in terms of improving sexual health research and interventions.