Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion Strokes: Understanding the Present and Paving the Way for a Better Future.

Distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) are thought to cause as many as 25% to 40% of all acute ischemic strokes and may result in substantial disability amongst survivors. Although intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is more effective for distal than proximal vessel occlusions, the overall efficacy of IVT remains limited in DMVO with less than 50% of patients achieving reperfusion and about 1/3 to 1/4 of the patients failing to achieve functional independence. Data regarding mechanical thrombectomy (MT) among these patients remains limited. The smaller, thinner, and more tortuous vessels involved in DMVO are presumably associated with higher procedural risks whereas a lower benefit might be expected given the smaller amount of tissue territory at risk. Recent advances in technology have shown promising results in endovascular treatment of DMVOs with room for future improvement. In this review, we discuss some of the key technical and clinical considerations in DMVO treatment including the anatomical and clinical terminology, diagnostic modalities, the role of IVT and MT, existing technology, and technical challenges as well as the contemporary evidence and future treatment directions.

Vision of the future: large language models in ophthalmology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly entering the landscape of medicine in areas from patient interaction to clinical decision-making. This review discusses the evolving role of LLMs in ophthalmology, focusing on their current applications and future potential in enhancing ophthalmic care. RECENT FINDINGS: LLMs in ophthalmology have demonstrated potential in improving patient communication and aiding preliminary diagnostics because of their ability to process complex language and generate human-like domain-specific interactions. However, some studies have shown potential for harm and there have been no prospective real-world studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of LLMs in practice. SUMMARY: While current applications are largely theoretical and require rigorous safety testing before implementation, LLMs exhibit promise in augmenting patient care quality and efficiency. Challenges such as data privacy and user acceptance must be overcome before LLMs can be fully integrated into clinical practice.

A Comparative Study of Large Language Models, Human Experts, and Expert-Edited Large Language Models to Neuro-Ophthalmology Questions.

BACKGROUND: While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in medicine, their effectiveness compared with human experts remains unclear. This study evaluates the quality and empathy of Expert + AI, human experts, and LLM responses in neuro-ophthalmology. METHODS: This randomized, masked, multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from June to July 2023. We randomly assigned 21 neuro-ophthalmology questions to 13 experts. Each expert provided an answer and then edited a ChatGPT-4-generated response, timing both tasks. In addition, 5 LLMs (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Claude 2, Bing, Bard) generated responses. Anonymized and randomized responses from Expert + AI, human experts, and LLMs were evaluated by the remaining 12 experts. The main outcome was the mean score for quality and empathy, rated on a 1-5 scale. RESULTS: Significant differences existed between response types for both quality and empathy (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001). For quality, Expert + AI (4.16 ± 0.81) performed the best, followed by GPT-4 (4.04 ± 0.92), GPT-3.5 (3.99 ± 0.87), Claude (3.6 ± 1.09), Expert (3.56 ± 1.01), Bard (3.5 ± 1.15), and Bing (3.04 ± 1.12). For empathy, Expert + AI (3.63 ± 0.87) had the highest score, followed by GPT-4 (3.6 ± 0.88), Bard (3.54 ± 0.89), GPT-3.5 (3.5 ± 0.83), Bing (3.27 ± 1.03), Expert (3.26 ± 1.08), and Claude (3.11 ± 0.78). For quality (P < 0.0001) and empathy (P = 0.002), Expert + AI performed better than Expert. Time taken for expert-created and expert-edited LLM responses was similar (P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Expert-edited LLM responses had the highest expert-determined ratings of quality and empathy warranting further exploration of their potential benefits in clinical settings.

A Comparative Study of Responses to Retina Questions from Either Experts, Expert-Edited Large Language Models, or Expert-Edited Large Language Models Alone.

Objective: To assess the quality, empathy, and safety of expert edited large language model (LLM), human expert created, and LLM responses to common retina patient questions. Design: Randomized, masked multicenter study. Participants: Twenty-one common retina patient questions were randomly assigned among 13 retina specialists. Methods: Each expert created a response (Expert) and then edited a LLM (ChatGPT-4)-generated response to that question (Expert + artificial intelligence [AI]), timing themselves for both tasks. Five LLMs (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Claude 2, Bing, and Bard) also generated responses to each question. The original question along with anonymized and randomized Expert + AI, Expert, and LLM responses were evaluated by the other experts who did not write an expert response to the question. Evaluators judged quality and empathy (very poor, poor, acceptable, good, or very good) along with safety metrics (incorrect information, likelihood to cause harm, extent of harm, and missing content). Main Outcome: Mean quality and empathy score, proportion of responses with incorrect information, likelihood to cause harm, extent of harm, and missing content for each response type. Results: There were 4008 total grades collected (2608 for quality and empathy; 1400 for safety metrics), with significant differences in both quality and empathy (P < 0.001, P < 0.001) between LLM, Expert and Expert + AI groups. For quality, Expert + AI (3.86 ± 0.85) performed the best overall while GPT-3.5 (3.75 ± 0.79) was the top performing LLM. For empathy, GPT-3.5 (3.75 ± 0.69) had the highest mean score followed by Expert + AI (3.73 ± 0.63). By mean score, Expert placed 4 out of 7 for quality and 6 out of 7 for empathy. For both quality (P < 0.001) and empathy (P < 0.001), expert-edited LLM responses performed better than expert-created responses. There were time savings for an expert-edited LLM response versus expert-created response (P = 0.02). ChatGPT-4 performed similar to Expert for inappropriate content (P = 0.35), missing content (P = 0.001), extent of possible harm (P = 0.356), and likelihood of possible harm (P = 0.129). Conclusions: In this randomized, masked, multicenter study, LLM responses were comparable with experts in terms of quality, empathy, and safety metrics, warranting further exploration of their potential benefits in clinical settings. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of the article.

Appropriateness of Ophthalmology Recommendations From an Online Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence Model.

Objective: To determine the appropriateness of ophthalmology recommendations from an online chat-based artificial intelligence model to ophthalmology questions. Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional qualitative study from April 1, 2023, to April 30, 2023. A total of 192 questions were generated spanning all ophthalmic subspecialties. Each question was posed to a large language model (LLM) 3 times. The responses were graded by appropriate subspecialists as appropriate, inappropriate, or unreliable in 2 grading contexts. The first grading context was if the information was presented on a patient information site. The second was an LLM-generated draft response to patient queries sent by the electronic medical record (EMR). Appropriate was defined as accurate and specific enough to serve as a surrogate for physician-approved information. Main outcome measure was percentage of appropriate responses per subspecialty. Results: For patient information site-related questions, the LLM provided an overall average of 79% appropriate responses. Variable rates of average appropriateness were observed across ophthalmic subspecialties for patient information site information ranging from 56% to 100%: cataract or refractive (92%), cornea (56%), glaucoma (72%), neuro-ophthalmology (67%), oculoplastic or orbital surgery (80%), ocular oncology (100%), pediatrics (89%), vitreoretinal diseases (86%), and uveitis (65%). For draft responses to patient questions via EMR, the LLM provided an overall average of 74% appropriate responses and varied by subspecialty: cataract or refractive (85%), cornea (54%), glaucoma (77%), neuro-ophthalmology (63%), oculoplastic or orbital surgery (62%), ocular oncology (90%), pediatrics (94%), vitreoretinal diseases (88%), and uveitis (55%). Stratifying grades across health information categories (disease and condition, risk and prevention, surgery-related, and treatment and management) showed notable but insignificant variations, with disease and condition often rated highest (72% and 69%) for appropriateness and surgery-related (55% and 51%) lowest, in both contexts. Conclusion: This LLM reported mostly appropriate responses across multiple ophthalmology subspecialties in the context of both patient information sites and EMR-related responses to patient questions. Current LLM offerings require optimization and improvement before widespread clinical use.

Apixaban to Prevent Recurrence After Cryptogenic Stroke in Patients With Atrial Cardiopathy: The ARCADIA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Atrial cardiopathy is associated with stroke in the absence of clinically apparent atrial fibrillation. It is unknown whether anticoagulation, which has proven benefit in atrial fibrillation, prevents stroke in patients with atrial cardiopathy and no atrial fibrillation. Objective: To compare anticoagulation vs antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cryptogenic stroke and evidence of atrial cardiopathy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 randomized clinical trial of 1015 participants with cryptogenic stroke and evidence of atrial cardiopathy, defined as P-wave terminal force greater than 5000 µV × ms in electrocardiogram lead V1, serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level greater than 250 pg/mL, or left atrial diameter index of 3 cm/m2 or greater on echocardiogram. Participants had no evidence of atrial fibrillation at the time of randomization. Enrollment and follow-up occurred from February 1, 2018, through February 28, 2023, at 185 sites in the National Institutes of Health StrokeNet and the Canadian Stroke Consortium. Interventions: Apixaban, 5 mg or 2.5 mg, twice daily (n = 507) vs aspirin, 81 mg, once daily (n = 508). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome in a time-to-event analysis was recurrent stroke. All participants, including those diagnosed with atrial fibrillation after randomization, were analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized. The primary safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and other major hemorrhage. Results: With 1015 of the target 1100 participants enrolled and mean follow-up of 1.8 years, the trial was stopped for futility after a planned interim analysis. The mean (SD) age of participants was 68.0 (11.0) years, 54.3% were female, and 87.5% completed the full duration of follow-up. Recurrent stroke occurred in 40 patients in the apixaban group (annualized rate, 4.4%) and 40 patients in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 4.4%) (hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.64-1.55]). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 0 patients taking apixaban and 7 patients taking aspirin (annualized rate, 1.1%). Other major hemorrhages occurred in 5 patients taking apixaban (annualized rate, 0.7%) and 5 patients taking aspirin (annualized rate, 0.8%) (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.29-3.52]). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with cryptogenic stroke and evidence of atrial cardiopathy without atrial fibrillation, apixaban did not significantly reduce recurrent stroke risk compared with aspirin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192215.

Hospitalization, Overdose, and Mortality After Opioid Prescriptions Tied to Ophthalmic Surgery.

PURPOSE: Opioid prescriptions continue to carry significant short- and long-term systemic risks, even after ophthalmic surgery. The goal of this study was to identify any association of opioid prescription, after ophthalmic surgery, with postoperative hospitalization, opioid overdose, opioid dependence, and all-cause mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing an ophthalmic surgery in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. METHODS: We used deidentified administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse to create 3 cohorts of patients for analysis from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2022. The first cohort consisted of 1-to-1 propensity score-matched patients who had undergone ophthalmic surgery and had filled a prescription for an opioid and not filled a prescription for an opioid. The second cohort consisted of patients who were considered opioid naïve and had filled a prescription for an opioid matched to patients who had not filled a prescription for an opioid. The last cohort consisted of opioid-naïve patients matched across the following morphine milligram equivalents (MME) groups: ≤ 40, 41-80, and > 80. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short- and long-term risks of hospitalization, opioid overdose, opioid dependency/abuse, and death were compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: We identified 1 577 692 patients who had undergone an ophthalmic surgery, with 312 580 (20%) filling an opioid prescription. Among all patients, filling an opioid prescription after an ophthalmic surgery was associated with increased mortality (hazard rate [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.31; P < 0.001), hospitalization (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.49-1.53; P < 0.001), opioid overdose (HR, 7.31; 95% CI, 6.20-8.61, P < 0.001), and opioid dependency (HR, 13.05; 95% CI, 11.48-14.84; P < 0.001) compared with no opioid prescription. Furthermore, we found that higher MME doses of opioids were associated with higher rates of mortality, hospitalization, and abuse/dependence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who filled an opioid prescription after an ophthalmic surgery experienced higher rates of mortality, hospitalization, episodes of opioid overdose, and opioid dependence compared with patients who did not fill an opioid prescription. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Intracranial stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: A meta-analysis of multicenter randomized controlled trials and an expert assessment of the current data.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is associated with high risk of recurrent strokes despite best medical management (MM). We aimed to synthesize the evidence from randomized studies comparing intracranial stenting plus MM versus MM alone. METHODS: Comprehensive search of MEDLINE database was performed until May 2023. The data were extracted and pooled as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: We included three multicenter RCTs totaling 919 patients. As compared to MM alone, intracranial stenting was associated with statistically significant higher risks of any stroke or death (RR = 2.93, 95%CI [1.80-4.78], p < 0.0001), stroke in the same territory of qualifying artery (RR = 3.56, 95%CI [1.97-6.44], p < 0.0001), any ischemic stroke (RR = 2.22, 95%CI [1.27-3.87], p = 0.005), hemorrhagic stroke (RR = 13.49, 95%CI [2.59-70.15], p = 0.0002), and death (RR = 5.43, 95%CI [1.21-24.40], p = 0.003) within 30 days of randomization. There was a persistent lack of benefit and signals of harm at the last follow up within 1-3 years: any stroke or death (RR = 1.57, 95%CI [0.92-2.67], p = 0.1), stroke in the same territory of qualifying artery (RR = 1.84, 95%CI [0.97-3.50], p = 0.06), any ischemic stroke (RR = 1.56, 95%CI [1.11-2.20], p = 0.01), death (RR = 1.61, 95%CI [0.77-3.38], p = 0.2). The cumulative rate of stroke in the same territory of qualified artery with MM alone within the 1-3-year follow up was lower than expected, with only 47 out of the 450 (10.4%) MM alone patients suffering such events. CONCLUSION: The findings from this meta-analysis do not recommend stenting as a routine care option for the broader symptomatic ICAS patient population. The rates of recurrent strokes in ICAS patients managed with aggressive MM do not seem to be as high as anticipated. Additional multicenter RCTs including safer devices, larger sample sizes, and patients at higher risk of recurrent events are warranted.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Endophthalmitis Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and visual acuity outcomes of patients who presented with endophthalmitis prior to and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: This multicenter retrospective case series with historical controls included consecutive patients presenting with any form of endophthalmitis from March 1, 2019 to September 1, 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and from March 1, 2020 to September 1, 2020 (COVID-19) at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), Health System (MCHS), Arizona (MCA), and Florida (MCF) sites. Cases were divided into "pre-COVID-19" versus "COVID-19" groups depending on when they first presented with endophthalmitis. Results: Twenty-eight cases of endophthalmitis presented to all Mayo Clinic sites during the study period. Of these, 10 patients presented during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the same six-month period the year prior, 18 patients presented with endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis etiology (post-injection, post-cataract extraction, post-glaucoma filtering surgery, post-pars plana vitrectomy, endogenous, and others) was similar between both groups (P = 0.34), as was post-injection endophthalmitis rate (P = 0.69), days to presentation (P = 0.07), initial management (P = 0.11), culture-positivity rate (P = 0.70), and need for subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (P = 1). Visual acuity outcomes were similar between both groups at six months, however, the mean LogMAR visual acuity at presentation was worse in the COVID-19 group compared to the pre-COVID-19 group (2.44 vs 1.82; P = 0.026). Conclusion: Clinical characteristics and the post-injection endophthalmitis rate were similar during both periods, however, patients presented with worse vision during the pandemic suggesting that the pandemic may have contributed to delayed presentation, regardless, outcomes are still poor.

Scleral sutured toric intraocular lens with pars plana vitrectomy for the correction of corneal astigmatism without capsular support.

PURPOSE: To describe the repair of a patient with bilateral subluxed cataract and corneal astigmatism in the setting of a coloboma of the iris, zonules, lens, and retina. Pre-operatively his best corrected acuity was 20/500 OD and 20/200 OS. His pre-operative refraction was -7.25 +1.00 at 080 OD and -7.75 +3.00 at 040 OS. On corneal topography, he had 1.95D and 1.45D of regular astigmatism in the right and left eye respectively. METHODS: This technique involves pars plana vitrectomy in combination with the placement of a MX60 toric intraocular lens fixated to the sclera using 8-0 Gore-Tex in line with the axis of steep corneal astigmatism. The lens is affixed through two pair of nasal and temporal sclerotomies, with each pair located 3 mm posterior to the limbus and 5 mm apart, centered along the axis of steep astigmatism. RESULTS: Post-operatively the patient was 20/25 uncorrected OD and 20/20 uncorrected OS with a refraction of -0.75 +0.50 at 180 in the OD and -0.75 +1.00 at 180 in the OS. CONCLUSION: Scleral sutured toric intraocular lens placement and pars plana vitrectomy is a viable solution for patients with regular corneal astigmatism and cataract repair in the absence of zonular support.

Trends in Secondary Intraocular Lens Surgery among Vitreoretinal Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To identify changes in secondary lens techniques over time and to determine common complications of each technique. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All patients in the database from January 2015 to December 2021 who underwent secondary lens placement (anterior chamber intraocular lens [IOL, ACIOL], scleral-fixated IOL [SFIOL], or scleral-sutured IOL [SSIOL]). METHODS: Rates of secondary IOL surgery techniques were analyzed in 3597 participants in a nationwide aggregated electronic health care database using 2-sample independent t tests. Rates of postoperative rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) after secondary IOL surgery were assessed using chi-square test of proportion. Postoperative visual acuity (VA) was assessed using 2-sample independent t tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in IOL technique over time. Secondary data points examined were the development of postoperative RRD after secondary IOL surgery, VA changes, the development of endophthalmitis, suture erosion, haptic erosion, or corneal edema after IOL surgery. RESULTS: Anterior chamber IOL use decreased over the 7-year period from 93% of cases to 36% of cases (P < 0.0001), while SFIOL use increased from 3% to 34% (P < 0.0001) and SSIOL use increased from 4% to 30% (P < 0.0001). Visual acuity increased for each surgical technique (ACIOL: 44.1 vs. 49.2 ETDRS letters, P < 0.001; SFIOL: 48.7 vs. 57.6 letters, P < 0.001; SSIOL: 51.5 vs. 61.2 letters, P < 0.001), with larger VA gains seen in SFIOL and SSIOL use (ACIOL vs. SFIOL, P = 0.004; ACIOL vs. SSIOL, P = 0.002; SFIOL vs. SSIOL, P = 0.64). Average RRD rates did not significantly differ between techniques. Rates of endophthalmitis, haptic erosion, and suture erosion were low and did not significantly differ between techniques. Rates of corneal edema were significantly higher in ACIOL cases (vs. SFIOL, P < 0.0001; vs. SSIOL, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of ACIOL implantation performed by vitreoretinal surgeons have decreased over time with more vitreoretinal surgeons electing to place either an SFIOL or SSIOL toward the end of the study period; complication profiles among the 3 techniques may be similar. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Neurotrophic keratopathy following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical characteristics and visual outcomes of eyes developing neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. METHODS: All eyes with NK at Wills Eye Hospital following RRD repair from June 1, 2011, to December 1, 2020 were included. Patients with prior ocular procedures (other than cataract surgery), herpetic keratitis, and diabetes mellitus were excluded. RESULTS: During the study period, 241 patients were diagnosed with NK, and 8179 eyes underwent RRD surgery, giving a 9-year prevalence rate of 0.1% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.2%). Mean age was 53.4 ± 16.6 years during RRD repair and 56.5 ± 13.4 years during NK diagnosis. Mean time to NK diagnosis was 3.0 ± 5.6 years (range, 6 days to 18.8 years). Mean visual acuity before NK was 1.10 ± 0.56 logMAR (20/252 Snellen), and it was 1.01 ± 0.62 logMAR (20/205 Snellen) at final visit (p = 0.75). Six eyes (54.5%) developed NK <1 year following RRD surgery. Mean final visual acuity was 1.01 ± 0.53 logMAR (20/205 Snellen) in this group versus 1.01 ± 0.78 logMAR (20/205 Snellen) in the delayed NK group (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: NK may present acutely or up to several years following surgery, with severity of corneal defects ranging from stage 1 to stage 3 NK. Surgeons should be mindful of the potential for this rare complication following RRD repair.

Trends in Ophthalmology Practice Consolidation: 2015-2022.

PURPOSE: To quantify trends in ophthalmology practice consolidation in the United States. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Providers in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) National Downloadable File with a primary specialty designation of ophthalmology. METHODS: We used the CMS database to determine national practice consolidation trends in ophthalmology on individual physician and group practice levels and analyzed by region, sex, and years spent in practice. We used the Cochran-Armitage test to determine the statistical significance of practice size differences between 2015 and 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Temporal practice size trends for physicians and practices in ophthalmology and regional, sex-specific, and age-related trends. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2022, the number of ophthalmologists decreased from 17 656 to 17 615 (-0.2%), whereas the number of practices decreased from 7149 to 5890 (-18%). The percentage of ophthalmologists in practices of 1 to 2 members decreased from 35% to 28%, whereas those in groups of 50 or more increased from 7% to 11%. The percentage of practices with 1 to 2 members decreased from 75% to 71%, and those with 50 or more increased from 0.2% to 0.4%. Consolidation trends were significant on individual ophthalmologist (P < 0.001) and group practice (P < 0.001) levels. All regions, sexes, and subgroups of years spent in practice demonstrated consolidation (P < 0.001). The Northeast showed the greatest increase in groups of 50 or more physicians (+7%) between 2015 and 2022. Proportionally fewer female than male ophthalmologists were associated with practice sizes of 1 to 2 members in 2015 (29% and 36%, respectively) and 2022 (23% and 30%, respectively). Proportionally fewer ophthalmologists with 0 to 10 years of experience in practice were associated with practice sizes of 1 to 2 members than those with more than 30 years in practice in 2015 (18% and 48%, respectively) and 2022 (14% and 40%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmology has undergone practice consolidation from 2015 to 2022. A decrease in the proportion of physicians affiliated with smaller practice sizes seems to have occurred. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Intracranial Hemorrhage as a Marker for Mycotic Aneurysm in Patients With Infective Endocarditis.

Background and Objective: Mycotic aneurysms are a significant complication of IE that can lead to intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and occasionally require intervention before valve surgery. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard for the detection of mycotic aneurysms but is an invasive procedure with contrasted dye exposure. Our objective was to determine predictive factors for the presence of mycotic aneurysms in patients with known infective endocarditis (IE). Methods: IRB exemption was obtained from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Patients with left-sided or right-sided endocarditis with patent foramen ovale (PFO) were identified. Records were retrospectively reviewed by an independent investigator. Patients were stratified by demographic information, diagnostic imaging, and clinical outcomes. Standard descriptive statistics were used for characterization. The χ2 analysis and Fisher exact test were used for categorical comparisons. The Student t test was used for group comparisons. Results: 36 cases of left-sided or right-sided endocarditis with PFO undergoing evaluation for valve surgery were identified. Twenty-seven patients underwent CNS imaging, and 24 underwent DSA. Six patients were found to have ICH on CNS imaging. Mycotic aneurysms were identified by DSA in 5 patients (13.9%), and of these patients, 4 (80%) presented with ICH and 1 with ischemic stroke. Notably, the patient who presented with ischemic stroke then developed ICH on follow-up CT imaging. The negative predictive value of the absence of ICH on initial CNS imaging for the presence of mycotic aneurysm was 97.4%. Discussion: Patients with left-sided and right-sided endocarditis with PFO and ICH on CNS imaging were more likely to have mycotic aneurysms detected through DSA than similar patients without ICH. Routine DSA screening for mycotic aneurysms may not be required in patients with endocarditis undergoing evaluation for valve surgery who present without ICH on CNS imaging.

18p Deletion Syndrome With Concurrent Frizzled-4 Mutation: Surgical Management of Bilateral Stage 5 Traction Retinal Detachment.

We report a case of a patient with 18p deletion syndrome and concurrent FZD4 (frizzled-4) mutation. A 6-month-old boy with known 18p deletion syndrome presented with abnormal eye movements in both eyes and an inability to track objects. The patient had a history of laryngomalacia, hypotonia, and developmental delay. Examination showed bilateral total exudative and traction retinal detachment with anomalous retinal vascular development noted on widefield fluorescein angiography. Genetic analysis identified a concurrent FZD4 mutation (c.205C>T [p.H69Y]). Both eyes underwent 25-gauge limbal vitrectomy, lensectomy, and membrane peeling, and the posterior pole successfully reattached with improvement in visual function. The 18p region contains the LAMA1, TGIF1, and APCDD1 genes, which are involved in the vascular basement membrane and Wnt/ß-catenin signaling, which may have potentiated the particularly severe familial exudative vitreoretinopathy phenotype. We present the clinical findings, imaging analyses, and surgical management of concurrent 18p deletion syndrome and FDZ4 mutation. The overlap in molecular mechanisms of the multiple gene products may potentiate the severe phenotype. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:284-290.].

From therapeutic nihilism to armamentarium: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy for acute large ischemic strokes.

BACKGROUND: Three recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigated the potential benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with large infarcts. We aimed to confirm the safety and efficacy of EVT in patients presenting with large infarcts and provide more precise estimations of the treatment effects using study-level meta-analysis. METHODS: Comprehensive search of MEDLINE database through PubMed till February 2023 was performed including RCTs only. The data were then extracted from the selected studies and pooled as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: There were a total of 1005 patients across the three qualifying RCTs. Regarding the functional outcomes assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, the analyzed data demonstrated statistically significant differences in favor of thrombectomy for both independent ambulatory status (mRS 0-3: RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.28, 2.48], p = 0.0006) and functional independence (mRS 0-2: RR = 2.54, 95% CI [1.85, 3.48], p < 0.001). The analyzed data did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between EVT and medical management alone in terms of 90-day mortality (RR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.78, 1.16], p = 0.61), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 1.83, 95% CI [0.95, 3.55], p = 0.07), and need for hemicraniectomy (RR = 1.22, 95% CI [0.43, 3.41], p = 0.71). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the benefit of EVT on functional outcomes of patients presenting with large ischemic infarcts without significant differences in the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, hemicraniectomy, or 90-day mortality.

Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes Study: summary of reports number 1 to number 18.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight the recent work published from the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes (PRO) Study Group. RECENT FINDINGS: The PRO database was a large dataset made up of patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) who had surgical repair during 2015. The database was constituted of nearly 3000 eyes from 6 centers across the United States and included 61 vitreoretinal surgeons. Nearly 250 metrics were collected for each patient, creating one of the richest datasets of patients with primary rhegmatogenous detachments and their outcomes. The importance of scleral buckling was demonstrated, particularly for phakic eyes, elderly patients, and those with inferior breaks. 360° laser may result in poorer outcomes. Cystoid macular edema was common, and risk factors were identified. We also found risk factors for vision loss in eyes presenting with good vision. A PRO Score was devised, to predict outcomes based on presenting clinical characteristics. We also identified characteristics of surgeons with the highest single surgery success rates. Overall, there were no major outcome differences between viewing systems, gauges, buckles sutured vs. scleral tunnels, drainage method, and techniques to address proliferative vitreoretinopathy. All incisional techniques were found to be very cost-effective treatment modalities. SUMMARY: Numerous studies resulted from the PRO database that significantly added to the literature regarding the repair of primary RRDs in the current era of vitreoretinal surgery.