Use of an Aortic Valve Replacement Simulation Model to Understand Hospital Costs and Resource Utilization Associated With Rapid-deployment Valves.

PURPOSE: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common cause of adult valvular heart disease. In the past decade, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat AS has gained popularity, especially if performed in combination with rapid deployment valves (RDVs), which shorten cross-clamp time (XCT). This study examines specific outcomes and related costs of aortic valve replacement (AVR) before and after the introduction of RDVs. METHODS: We used the AVR simulator, an economic model developed to correlate cost and resource utilization associated with the adoption of RDVs, to compare 2 scenarios: (1) a current scenario based on standard AVR practices and (2) a proposed scenario based on increasing use of RDVs and an MIS approach. Both scenarios involved 3 subgroups of patients treated with (1) conventional AVR, (2) MIS, and (3) AVR combined with a coronary artery bypass graft. The current scenario (status quo) involved patients treated with traditional biological valves, and the proposed scenario involved patients who underwent implantation with an RDV. The AVR simulator was fed with real-world input data to estimate complication rates and resource consumption in the proposed scenario. Real-world input data for this analysis were obtained from patients diagnosed with a symptomatic heart valve disease between 2015 and 2018, at Clinica-San-Gaudenzio, Novara, Italy. Lastly, the AVR simulator estimated hospital savings by comparing the 2 scenarios. FINDINGS: A total of 132 patients underwent implantation with a traditional biological valve, and 107 were treated with a commercial valve system. The RDV was associated with an increase of 52% of patients undergoing MIS, which generated a 6.1-h reduction of XCT and a total savings of €6695. RDVs also reduced intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital ward length of stay (LOS), leading to savings of €677 and €595 per patient, respectively. Mortality and blood transfusions also improved. The savings for the hospital (related to shorter XCT, hospital ward LOS, and ICU LOS) amounted to €144.111. Our findings were consistent with data gathered from our real-word setting, and results of a sensitivity analysis indicate that our findings were robust across different possible situations. IMPLICATIONS: Switching to RDVs and MIS procedures for AVRs was associated with a reduction of costs related to XCT, hospital ward LOS, and ICU LOS. Hospitals can upload literature- and experience-based clinical and cost values to the AVR simulator to estimate a hospital's performance with the introduction of RDVs compared with standard biological valves. This study was not randomized, so more extensive studies could confirm our results in the future.

A new approach for severe aortic regurgitation in porcelain aorta with sutureless Perceval valve: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: The association of pure aortic regurgitation and porcelain aorta represents a challenging situation. In the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) era, porcelain aorta (PA) becomes an additional risk for patient treatment and sometimes serves as the primary indication for the TAVI approach, even in low-risk patients. Devices currently on the market are not yet validated for the treatment of pure aortic regurgitation (AR) in PA and mid/long-term results are still not available. Furthermore, small calcified sinotubular junction and the association of small Valsalva sinus with low origin of coronaries ostia represent a relative contraindication of TAVI. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a case of severe symptomatic AR associated with a PA in a patient successfully treated with a sutureless Perceval valve. DISCUSSION: The sutureless Perceval valve may represent an excellent option. This valve requires less manipulation of the ascending aorta and no manipulation of the aortic annulus except for the aortic valve leaflets removal. Furthermore, it can be implanted also in a small and calcified sino-tubular junction because the valve is collapsible before the implant. CONCLUSION: The present case represents a proof that self-expandable cardiac valve technology can be employed to treat, either by surgery or by catheter, selected cases of AR. We have observed an excellent mid term result with no paravalvular leak at 2 years.

Safe Reentry for False Aneurysm Operations in High-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of a standardized safe surgical reentry strategy for high-risk patients with large or anterior postoperative aortic false aneurysm (PAFA), we aimed to describe an effective and safe approach for such patients. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed patients treated for PAFA between 2006 and 2015. According to the preoperative computed tomography scan examination, patients were divided into two groups according to the anatomy and extension of PAFA: in group A, high-risk PAFA (diameter ≥3 cm) developed in the anterior mediastinum; in group B, low-risk PAFA (diameter <3 cm) was situated posteriorly. For group A, a safe surgical strategy, including continuous cerebral, visceral, and coronary perfusion was adopted before resternotomy; group B patients underwent conventional surgery. RESULTS: We treated 27 patients (safe reentry, n = 13; standard approach, n = 14). Mean age was 60 years (range, 29 to 80); 17 patients were male. Mean interval between the first operation and the last procedure was 4.3 years. Overall 30-day mortality rate was 7.4% (1 patient in each group). No aorta-related mortality was observed at 1 and 5 years in either group. The Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates at 1 and 5 years were, respectively, 92.3% ± 7.4% and 73.4% ± 13.4% in group A, and 92.9% ± 6.9% and 72.2% ± 13.9% in group B (log rank test, p = 0.830). Freedom from reoperation for recurrent aortic disease was 100% at 1 year and 88% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The safe reentry technique with continuous cerebral, visceral, and coronary perfusion for high-risk patients resulted in early and midterm outcomes similar to those observed for low-risk patients undergoing conventional surgery.

The efficacy and safety of extending the ischemic time with a modified cardioplegic technique for coronary artery surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The need to intermittently discontinue the administration of cardioplegia in order to complete the surgical procedure is a major drawback of antegrade warm blood cardioplegia. An ischemic time of 15 minutes is generally considered safe based on empirical observation. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of an intermittent warm blood cardioplegia with intervals between administrations prolonged to 25 minutes. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients undergoing primary elective coronary artery revascularization were prospectively randomized into two groups. The first, Intermittent Antegrade Warm Blood Cardioplegia (IAWBC) group, comprising 49 patients, received standard intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia repeated every 15 minutes. The second, Modified Intermittent Antegrade Warm Blood Cardioplegia (M-IAWBC) group, comprising 48 patients, received intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia supplemented with magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)), delivered in volumes proportional to the ventricular mass and repeated every 25 minutes. The clinical outcomes were evaluated. The levels of creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) isoenzyme, in addition to the echocardiographic assessment of septal dyskinesia and tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), have been used as markers of myocardial damage. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes, need for inotropes and vasodilators, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and postoperative levels of CK-MB between the two groups. Likewise, postoperative echocardiographic assessment showed no relevant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of warm antegrade cardioplegic solution supplemented with MgSO(4), delivered in volumes proportional to ventricular mass every 25 minutes, provides adequate myocardial protection for coronary artery surgery.

[Aortic valve replacement on two octogenarians awake patients without tracheal intubation, with thoracic epidural anesthesia]. / Sostituzione valvolare aortica in due pazienti ottuagenari coscienti senza intubazione tracheale in anestesia peridurale toracica.

The association of advanced age with various comorbidities increases the risk of mortality and morbidity in cardiac surgery. The utilization of high thoracic epidural anesthesia (HTEA) in this setting presents numerous potential benefits, including early recovery of consciousness and of spontaneous ventilation, hemodynamic stability, enhanced analgesia, improved pulmonary function, and earlier recovery. Moreover, this anesthesiological technique allows the performance of surgical procedures on the conscious patient, thus making continuous monitoring of the cerebral function feasible. We have employed HTEA without tracheal intubation on 2 gravely compromised octogenarian patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for critical aortic stenosis. Epidural anesthesia without tracheal intubation in these patients permitted the avoidance of general anesthetics and allowed the continuous evaluation of their cognitive function. Further, by avoiding the positive pulmonary pressures of mechanical ventilators, the technique contributed to preserve physiologic intrapulmonary pressures, thus positively affecting the pulmonary circulation. In our opinion, the utilization of HTEA without tracheal intubation may decrease the surgical risk in selected patients.

High thoracic epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgery: risk factors for arterial hypotension.

There is an interest in the use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgery, because experimental and clinical studies have suggested that central neuroaxial blockade attenuates the response to surgical stress and improves myocardial metabolism and perioperative analgesia-thus enabling earlier extubation and a smoother postoperative course. Matters of major concern in the adoption of high thoracic epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgery are neurologic injury secondary to neuroaxial hematoma and hypotension secondary to sympatholysis. The risk associated with possible neuraxial hematoma caused by high thoracic epidural anesthesia has been thoroughly investigated and largely discounted, but scant attention has been devoted to the onset of hypotensive episodes in the same setting. We analyzed the hypotensive episodes that occurred in a series of 144 patients who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery procedures. Among the patient variables that we tested in a multivariate logistic-regression model, only female sex was found to be significantly correlated with hypotension. In order to decrease the incidence and severity of hypotensive episodes resulting from anesthetic blockade, anesthesiologists need to monitor, with special care, women patients who are under high thoracic epidural anesthesia. Further studies are needed in order to determine why women undergoing open heart surgery under high thoracic epidural anesthesia are at a relatively greater risk of hypotension.