Heat can treat: long-term follow-up results after uterine-sparing treatment of adenomyosis with radiofrequency thermal ablation in 60 hysterectomy candidate patients.

BACKGROUND: Adenomyosis may induce pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding or bulk symptoms. If hormonal treatment proves ineffective or contraindicated, hysterectomy may be necessary. For patients who desire to conserve the uterus despite severe symptomatology, uterine-sparing techniques have been introduced. Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) consists of the local application of high temperature to eliminate diseased tissue, applied recently for adenomyosis treatment. The objective of the study was to analyze the efficacy of RFA for avoiding hysterectomy in patients with adenomyosis-related symptoms. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study performed in a referral center for endometriosis. The study population consisted of all consecutive patients who underwent Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) treatment as an alternative to hysterectomy for adenomyosis between March 2011 and June 2019 in our institution. RFA was performed using laparoscopic access. To evaluate the impact of RFA treatment on symptoms, follow-up findings were compared to preoperative symptomatology using the ten-point visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the study, 39 of them (65%), underwent a concomitant surgery for endometriosis in association to RFA. On a long-term follow-up (mean 56 months (range 10-115, SD 29), hysterectomy was performed in 8 patients (13%). The mean VAS score before vs after surgery was 7.4 vs 3.3 for dysmenorrhea, 3.7 vs 0.3 for dyschezia, 4.7 vs 0.7 for dyspareunia, and 4.0 vs 1.4 for chronic pelvic pain, being significantly reduced after RFA for all these pain components (p < 0.0001 in every case). Thirty-one patients (52%) suffered from AUB before RFA, this symptom persisted in 10 patients (16%) during follow-up (p < 0.001). Bulk symptoms were present in 16 patients (27%) and disappeared after RFA in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: RFA allows for hysterectomy avoidance in most cases. It leads to marked improvements in pain symptomatology, uterine bleeding and bulk symptoms.

"The Sword in the Stone": radical excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel shaving-a single-centre experience on 703 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic segmental bowel resection, disc excision and rectal shaving are described as surgical options for the treatment of bowel endometriosis, but the gold standard has not yet established. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of the laparoscopic bowel shaving technique in terms of pain symptomatology and to analyse early and late postoperative complications. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of a series of 703 consecutive patients treated between January 2014 and December 2019 in a tertiary care referral centre. All patients underwent laparoscopic bowel shaving with concomitant radical excision of DIE. RESULTS: Bilateral posterolateral parametrectomy and ureterolysis were performed, respectively, in 314 (44.7%) and 318 cases (45.2%). A radical hysterectomy was performed in 107 cases (82.9%). Postoperative complications were infrequent: 17 patients required a reoperation (2.4%) and in this subgroup we registered 2 rectovaginal fistulas (0.3%), 4 patients received blood transfusion (0.6%), 12 patients (1.7%) experienced postoperative fever, 6 patients experienced impaired bladder voiding (0.9%) after 6 months. Median follow-up was 14 months. The study reported good clinical and surgical results, with a regression of symptoms (p < 0.0001) and an overall rate of recurrence of 6.5%. Clinical and instrumental criteria of bowel endometriosis relapse were exclusively detected in 5 patients (0.8%). Eleven patients (1.7%) with relapsed endometriosis were reoperated. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel shaving is a feasible and valuable surgical procedure. It is only the last step of a complex surgery which is aimed to minimize the residual quote of infiltrating nodule and requires a multidisciplinary team to achieve optimal treatment preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively.

Role of ultrasonographic parameters for predicting tubal involvement in infertile patients affected by endometriosis: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Transvaginal ultrasound is fundamental for the mapping of endometriosis, and the imaging criteria have been clearly described for different organs study. However, no specific ultrasonographic signs of tubal endometriosis have been reported, with the exception of hydrosalpinx, which is the expression of an extreme tubal damage and obstruction. The detection of tubal pathology in infertile patients is fundamental, therefore the aim of the study was to evaluate incidence of tubal endometriosis in infertile patients, and to analyze ultrasonographic signs useful for detection of this condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. All 500 consecutive infertile women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis were included. The preoperative workup included transvaginal ultrasound and was compared to intraoperative findings and histologic study. RESULTS: The incidence of tubal endometriosis in our study was 8%. Using hydrosalpinx as the ultrasonographic marker for tubal involvement the overall pooled, sensitivity and specificity of TVU were 12% (95%CI, 5-23%) and 99% (95%CI, 98-100%), respectively. If at least one ultrasonographic parameter like hydrosalpinx, periadnexal adhesions or ovarian cyst was considered as a sign of tubal endometriosis, a sensitivity, VPN and specificity were 94% (95% IC, 85-98%), 97% (95%IC, 93-99%) and 31% (95%CI, 27-36%), respectively. DISCUSSION: Hydrosalpinx as ultrasonographic sign alone is characterized by a high specificity but low sensitivity for detection of tubal endometriosis; its sensitivity can be improved by the addition of other markers such as endometrioma and/or periadnexal adhesions.

Comparison of Virtual Ultrasonographic Hysteroscopy with Conventional Hysteroscopy in the Workup of Patients Who Are Infertile.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the tolerability and diagnostic accuracy of virtual ultrasonographic hysteroscopy (VUH) with that of conventional diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy in the workup of patients who are infertile. DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery Unit of Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria in Negrar, Italy. PATIENTS: A total of 120 consecutive women who underwent hysterosalpingosonography and subsequent VUH and conventional hysteroscopy for infertility evaluation were included. The inclusion criterion was infertility for at least 1 year, with evaluation in the early or intermediate follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. INTERVENTIONS: After the placement of an intracervical catheter, a Ringer Lactate solution was injected into the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and a 3D volume was obtained. The ultrasound volume acquired was successively elaborated offline, and a VUH was performed. Subsequently, a variable amount of air was introduced into the uterine cavity, and the patency of the salpinges was evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The VUH findings were compared with those of conventional hysteroscopy performed in the subsequent month. For the detection of endometrial pathology in the overall pool, the sensitivity and specificity of VUH in comparison with conventional hysteroscopy were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.6%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.3%-100%), respectively. For the detection of uterine cavity pathology and uterine malformations in the overall pool, the sensitivities of VUH were 80% (95% CI, 28.4%-99.5%) and 100% (95% CI, 75.3%-100%), respectively, with specificities of 100% (95% CI, 96.8%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.6%-100%), respectively, when compared with conventional hysteroscopy. The positive predictive values for endometrial pathology, uterine cavity alterations, and uterine malformations were 100% (95% CI, 84.6%-100%), 100% (95% CI, 39.8%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 75.3%-100%), respectively, with a receiver operating characteristic area of 100%, 90% (95% CI, 70%-100%), and 100%, respectively. There were no cases of severe vasovagal reactions or other complications. Most patients (67%, 81 of 120 women) described the examination as "less painful than expected," 25% (30 of 120 women) "just as expected," and only 7% (9 of 120 women) as "more painful than expected." CONCLUSION: VUH was well tolerated and showed a high accuracy (100%) in the study of the uterine cavity when compared with conventional hysteroscopy.