High vaccination coverage and infection rate result in a robust SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity in the majority of liver cirrhosis and transplant patients: A single-center cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In the third year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, little is known about the vaccine- and infection-induced immune response in liver transplant recipients (LTR) and liver cirrhosis patients (LCP). OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study assessed the vaccination coverage, infection rate, and the resulting humoral and cellular SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in a cohort of LTR and LCP at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany between March and May 2023. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data from 244 consecutive patients (160 LTR and 84 LCP) were collected via chart review and a patient survey. Immune responses were determined via standard spike(S)- and nucleocapsid-protein serology and a spike-specific Interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). RESULTS: On average, LTR and LCP were vaccinated 3.7 and 3.3 times, respectively and 59.4% of patients received ≥4 vaccinations. Altogether, 68.1% (109/160) of LTR and 70.2% (59/84) of LCP experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most infections occurred during the Omicron wave in 2022 after an average of 3.0 vaccinations. Overall, the hospitalization rate was low (<6%) in both groups. An average of 4.3 antigen contacts by vaccination and/or infection resulted in a seroconversion rate of 98.4%. However, 17.5% (28/160) of LTR and 8.3% (7/84) of LCP demonstrated only low anti-S titers (<1000 AU/ml), and 24.6% (16/65) of LTR and 20.4% (10/59) of LCP had negative or low IGRA responses. Patients with hybrid immunity (vaccination plus infection) elicited significantly higher anti-S titers compared with uninfected patients with the same number of spike antigen contacts. A total of 22.2% of patients refused additional booster vaccinations. CONCLUSION: By spring 2023, high vaccination coverage and infection rate have resulted in a robust, mostly hybrid, humoral and cellular immune response in most LTR and LCP. However, booster vaccinations with vaccines covering new variants seem advisable, especially in patients with low immune responses and risk factors for severe disease.

Stabilisation of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients before liver transplantation predicts post-transplant survival.

BACKGROUND: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a severe complication of liver cirrhosis associated with excess short-term mortality rates. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a potentially life-saving therapeutic modality for acute-on-chronic liver failure patients, but selection of transplant candidates with an acceptable post-transplant outcome is difficult. AIM: To assess the risk of liver transplantation in patients with ACLF, and to determine parameters that predict post-transplant survival in this patient cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all 250 patients with cirrhosis who underwent their first liver transplantation between 2009 and 2014 at our institution, and assessed post-transplant outcomes. RESULTS: Of 250 cirrhotic liver transplant recipients, 98 patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for acute-on-chronic liver failure in the 3-month pre-transplant period. Compared to non-ACLF patients, ACLF was associated with significantly higher short-term morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation (90-day patient survival 96.1% non-ACLF vs 72.4% ACLF patients, P < 0.0001). Clinical improvement in the pre-transplant period, as defined by recovery of at least one previously failed organ system, was observed in 37 of 98 acute-on-chronic liver failure patients, mostly within several days after diagnosis. Most notably, clinical improvement prior to liver transplantation was associated with excellent post-transplant survival rates that approximated non-ACLF transplant recipients. Following the 90-day post-transplant period, patient survival and long-term graft functions were comparable between ACLF and non-ACLF liver transplant recipients for up to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Acute-on-chronic liver failure predicts adverse outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation. Given the dismal prognosis without transplantation, however, our results indicate that ACLF patients can be transplanted with comparably good outcomes, in particular patients who improve under conservative therapeutic measures.

Outcome and natural course of renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients with severely impaired kidney function prior to transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Since introduction of the MELD score in the liver allograft allocation system, renal insufficiency has emerged as an increasing problem. Here we evaluated the course of kidney function in patients with advanced renal insufficiency prior to liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: A total of 254 patients undergoing LT at the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (2011-2015) were screened for renal impairment (GFR < 30 ml/min) prior to LT in this observational study. RESULTS: Eighty (32%) patients (median 60 years; M/F: 48/32) had significant renal impairment prior to LT. Median follow-up post-LT was 619 days. Patient survival at 90 days, one year and two years was 76%, 66% and 64%, respectively. Need for dialysis postoperatively but not preoperatively was associated with increased mortality (p < 0.05). Renal function improved in 75% of survivors, but 78% of patients had chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 3 at end of follow-up. Of eight (16%) survivors remaining on long-term dialysis, so far only four patients have received a kidney transplant. CONCLUSION: Postoperative dialysis affected long-term mortality. In 75% of survivors renal function improved, but still the majority of patients had an impaired renal function (CKD stage 3-5) at end of follow-up. Future studies should elucidate the impact of kidney dysfunction and dialysis on recipients' long-term survival.

The killer cell lectin-like receptor B1 (KLRB1) 503T>C polymorphism (rs1135816) and acute rejection after liver transplantation.

The killer cell lectin-like receptor B1 (KLRB1) gene encodes for CD161 expressed by different subsets of leukocytes involved in the development of acute liver transplant rejection. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 503T>C (rs1135816) in the KLRB1 gene represents a missense mutation modifying functional properties of CD161. The aim of our study is to determine whether the SNP 503T>C is associated with acute liver transplant rejection. We genotyped the SNP for 163 liver recipients without acute rejection, 125 recipients with a single acute rejection, and 53 recipients with multiple acute rejections. The genotype frequencies within the groups did not show any significant difference. Our data suggest that the SNP 503T>C has no impact on the susceptibility of acute liver transplant rejection.

[Expert recommendations: Hepatitis C and transplantation]. / Empfehlungen zur antiviralen Therapie der chronischen Hepatitis C bei Patienten auf der Warteliste und nach Transplantation.

With the approval of new direct acting antiviral agents (DAA), therapeutic options for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are now generally available before and after liver transplantation (LT). Interferon-free DAA regimens are highly effective therapies and provide a good safety profile. However, the body of clinical evidence in this patient population is limited and the best treatment strategies for patients on the waiting list with (de)compensated cirrhosis and after LT are not well defined. The following recommendations for antiviral therapy in the context of LT are based on the currently available literature and clinical experience of experts in the field, and have been discussed in an expert meeting. The aim of this article is to guide clinicians in the decision making when treating patients before and after LT with DAAs.

Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir for the treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus re-infection after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with a particularly poor outcome after liver transplantation. In December 2014, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) fixed-dose combination (FDC) was approved for HCV genotype 1 and 4 in Europe. In orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) recipients, the interferon-free treatment of HCV re-infection with novel direct-acting antivirals has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in clinical trials, but real-world data are missing. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of SOF/LDV FDC in OLT recipients in the real-life setting. METHODS: All consecutive OLT patients started on SOF/LDV FDC for 12 or 24 weeks at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and Medical School Hannover between October 2014 and August 2015 were retrospectively analyzed (n = 30). The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR), i.e., absence of viremia 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR 12). Liver function tests, creatinine, blood count, and HCV RNA (by polymerase chain reaction assay) were determined at each visit. RESULTS: SVR was achieved in 29/30 patients (96.67%) treated with SOF/LDV ± ribavirin (RBV) for 12 (n = 4) or 24 weeks (n = 25). Twenty-five patients (86.2%) received RBV. However, in 15 of the 25 patients, RBV administration had to be discontinued because of severe anemia (57.7%). One RBV-treated patient died of a myocardial infarction during antiviral therapy; this event was most likely not directly related to SOF/LDV. Aside from RBV-associated anemia, no severe side effects of the antiviral regimen were observed. CONCLUSION: Antiviral treatment with SOF/LDV is highly effective, safe, and well tolerated in OLT recipients. The addition of RBV often results in severe anemia, requiring dose reduction or discontinuation.

Course of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and HCV core antigen testing are predictors for reaching sustained virologic response in liver transplant recipients undergoing sofosbuvir treatment in a real-life setting.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with reduced graft survival in orthotopic liver transplant recipients. Treatment with the new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) is safe and efficient, but no reliable predictive factors for sustained virologic response (SVR) have been identified so far. The HCV core antigen assay (HCV-core-Ag) is a new, inexpensive, and efficient method to detect viral antigens, but the value of this technique to predict treatment response in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients is still unclear. METHODS: All OLT patients who were treated with a sofosbuvir-based antiviral regimen at our center between March 2014 and August 2014 were included in the analysis (n = 20). HCV-core-Ag and HCV RNA (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) were determined at each visit. Primary endpoints of this study were SVR at 4 or 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR 4 and SVR 12). RESULTS: HCV-core-Ag tested negative after a median of 2 weeks (range 1-16 weeks) while PCR tests became negative after a median of 4 weeks (range 2-12 weeks). Time until PCR negativity and until HCV-core-Ag negativity showed a good correlation (R = 0.711, P < 0.001, Fig. ). Seventeen of 20 patients (85%) achieved SVR 12. SVR 12 was associated with a short time interval between treatment start and HCV PCR negativity (P = 0.005) or HCV-core-Ag negativity (P = 0.003, Mann-Whitney test). No severe side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: DAA treatment is safe and well tolerated in OLT. The time points of HCV-core-Ag loss and PCR negativity were predictors of SVR 12.

Comparison of autochthonous and imported cases of hepatitis A or hepatitis E.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis A and hepatitis E are not limited to tropical countries but are also present in industrialized countries. Both infections share similar clinical features. There is no comparative study evaluating the clinical parameters of autochthonous and imported hepatitis A virus and hepatitis E virus infections. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine differences between autochthonous and imported hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections. METHODS: Medical charts of all patients at our center with acute HAV and HEV infections were analyzed retrospectively (n = 50, study period 01/2009 - 08/2013). RESULTS: Peak bilirubin (median 8.6 vs. 4.4 mg/dL, p = 0.008) and ALT levels (median 2998 vs. 1666 IU/mL, p = 0.04) were higher in patients with hepatitis A compared to hepatitis E. In comparison to autochthones hepatitis E cases, patients with imported infections had significantly higher peak values for AST, ALT, bilirubin and INR (p = 0.009, p = 0.002, p = 0.04 and p = 0.049, respectively). In HAV infection, AST levels tended to be higher in imported infections (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: (i) It is not possible to differentiate certainly between acute HAV and HEV infections by clinical or biochemical parameters, however, HAV infections might be associated with more cholestasis and higher ALT values. (ii) Imported HEV infections are associated with higher transaminases, INR and bilirubin levels compared to autochthonous cases and (iii) imported HAV infections tend to be associated with higher transaminases in comparison to autochthonous cases.

Relevance of chronic hepatitis E in liver transplant recipients: a real-life setting.

The chronic course of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients has been described previously, but prospectively collected data are rare. We aimed to study the role of chronic hepatitis E in OLT in a real-life setting. Therefore, 287 adult OLT recipients (169 male [59%], median age 56 years) were prospectively tested by HEV polymerase chain reaction assay (lower level of detection = 10 IU/mL), irrespective of their level of liver enzymes. In 4 patients (1.4%), chronic HEV infection was diagnosed. All 4 patients were male, and their age (median 48.5 years), the time since transplantation (median 45.5 months), and bilirubin level (median 0.6 mg/dL) did not differ significantly from the total cohort. However, alanine transaminase and aspartame transaminase levels were significantly higher in HEV-infected patients (75-646 U/L, median 216 U/L and 68-317 U/L, median 108 U/L) than in non-infected patients (6-617 U/L, median 41 and 6-355 U/L, median 36; P = 0.004 and 0.040, Mann-Whitney test). In 3 patients, liver biopsy was performed and revealed signs of inflammation and chronic liver disease, as enlarged densely infiltrated portal tracts with mild-to-moderate interface hepatitis. All infected patients were treated with ribavirin with the starting dose adjusted to renal function (400-800 mg/day). In 2 patients, dose reduction was necessary. Transaminases normalized in all 4 patients, and all patients cleared their infection within 3 months of ribavirin treatment. However, 1 patient experienced viral relapse 12 weeks after discontinuation. Ribavirin medication was re-started and viral clearance occurred within 8 weeks and persisted. Sequence analysis of the HEV genome of this patient revealed that he was infected with an HEV variant, which recently has been shown to have a reduced response to ribavirin in cell culture. The risk of chronic HEV infections in OLT recipients in low-endemic countries should not be overestimated. No case of chronic hepatitis E was observed in patients with normal liver enzymes, indicating that general screening of all OLT recipients is not necessary. However, if chronic hepatitis E develops, it can be treated efficiently with ribavirin.

Polymorphism in NFKBIA gene is associated with recurrent acute rejections in liver transplant recipients.

The nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer B-cells inhibitor-alpha (NFKBIA) gene encodes a member of the nuclear factor-kappa-B inhibitor family. Polymorphisms in this gene might be associated with a susceptibility to acute rejection episodes following liver transplantation, as they may cause an increased activation level of the proinflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells (NFκB). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the NFKBIA polymorphisms -297 C/T (rs2233409), -826 C/T (rs2233406) and 126 G/A (rs696) affect the incidence of acute liver graft rejection. A total of 199 liver transplant recipients was analyzed, 100 without (NAR) and 99 with early acute rejection (AR). Thirty-two individuals with multiple acute rejections (MAR) were analyzed as a subgroup of AR. Polymerase chain reaction-allele specific restriction enzyme analysis (PCR-ASRA) and allele-specific hybridization with fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) were used for genotyping. We identified the genotype NFKBIA 126 AA (P = 0.002) as well as the haplotype NFKBIA-126A-297T-826T (P = 0.002) as a potential risk factor for the occurrence of recurrent acute rejections. Furthermore, we assessed an association between the 126 A allele and susceptibility to recurrent acute rejections (P = 0.027). Our data suggest that the NFKBIA 126 G/A polymorphism might be potentially helpful to identify liver transplant recipients with an increased susceptibility to develop recurrent acute rejections.

Everolimus and early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal: 3-year results from a randomized trial in liver transplantation.

The feasibility of de novo everolimus without calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy following liver transplantation was assessed in a multicenter, prospective, open-label trial. Liver transplant patients were randomized at 4 weeks to start everolimus and discontinue CNI, or continue their current CNI-based regimen. The primary endpoint was adjusted estimated GFR (eGFR; Cockcroft-Gault) at month 11 post randomization. A 24-month extension phase followed 81/114 (71.1%) of eligible patients to month 35 post randomization. The adjusted mean eGFR benefit from randomization to month 35 was 10.1 mL/min (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.3, 21.5 mL/min, p = 0.082) in favor of CNI-free versus CNI using Cockcroft-Gault, 9.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (95% CI -0.4, 18.9, p = 0.053) with Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (four-variable) and 9.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (95% CI -1.1, 17.9, p = 0.028) using Nankivell. The difference in favor of the CNI-free regimen increased gradually over time due to a small progressive decline in eGFR in the CNI cohort despite a reduction in CNI exposure. Biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss and death were similar between groups. Adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in five CNI-free patients and five CNI patients (12.2% vs. 12.5%, p = 1.000) during the extension phase. Everolimus-based CNI-free immunosuppression is feasible following liver transplantation and patients benefit from sustained preservation of renal function versus patients on CNI for at least 3 years.

Improvement in gastrointestinal and health-related quality of life outcomes after conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in liver transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate improvement in gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in liver transplant recipients switched from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study was undertaken in maintenance liver transplant recipients who reported GI complications with MMF therapy. The patients were switched to equimolar doses of EC-MPS at baseline. The primary end point was the change in the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) total score after 6 to 8 weeks of treatment with EC-MPS. Other key assessments for GI symptoms and HRQoL included the GSRS subscores, the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Psychological General Well-Being Index, and the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE). Paired t-test was used to assess the difference in the mean score changes over time. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled and switched to equimolar doses of EC-MPS. After 6 to 8 weeks of EC-MPS treatment, mean GSRS total score improved significantly from 2.88 ± 0.66 to 2.10 ± 0.78. Mean improvement in GSRS total score (-0.77 score points; P = .001) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. Significant improvements were observed in all GSRS subscales (P < .05), GIQLI total scores (P = .001), and GIQLI subscales "GI symptoms" (P < .001) and "physical function" (0.013). Patients who continued EC-MPS reported sustained benefits compared with patients who switched back to MMF after 6 to 8 weeks of treatment with EC-MPS. On the OTE scale, improvement in symptoms was reported in 76.5% and 61.8% of the patients as perceived by the physicians and the patients. Improvement in HRQoL was reported by 41.2% of the patients. No deaths, biopsy proven acute rejections, or graft losses were reported during the study. CONCLUSION: Conversion from MMF to EC-MPS was associated with a significant improvement in GI symptoms and HRQoL in liver transplant recipients.

No association between transmembrane protein-tyrosine phosphatase receptor type C (PTPRC) exon A 77C>G transversion and liver transplant rejection.

This study was carried out to evaluate the association between 77C>G transversion (rs17612648) in exon A of the PTPRC gene and liver transplant rejection. No significant differences in genotype and allele frequencies of the 77C>G transversion were detected between recipients without rejection (n = 106) and recipients with rejection (n = 104). In conclusion, there was no evidence for the contribution of the 77C>G transversion in susceptibility to liver transplant rejection in a Caucasian population.

A randomized, controlled study to assess the conversion from calcineurin-inhibitors to everolimus after liver transplantation--PROTECT.

Posttransplant immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with impaired renal function, while mTor inhibitors such as everolimus may provide a renal-sparing alternative. In this randomized 1-year study in patients with liver transplantation (LTx), we sought to assess the effects of everolimus on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after conversion from CNIs compared to continued CNI treatment. Eligible study patients received basiliximab induction, CNI with/without corticosteroids for 4 weeks post-LTx, and were then randomized (if GFR > 50 mL/min) to continued CNIs (N = 102) or subsequent conversion to EVR (N = 101). Mean calculated GFR 11 months postrandomization (ITT population) revealed no significant difference between treatments using the Cockcroft-Gault formula (-2.9 mL/min in favor of EVR, 95%-CI: [-10.659; 4.814], p = 0.46), whereas use of the MDRD formula showed superiority for EVR (-7.8 mL/min, 95%-CI: [-14.366; -1.191], p = 0.021). Rates of mortality (EVR: 4.2% vs. CNI: 4.1%), biopsy-proven acute rejection (17.7% vs. 15.3%), and efficacy failure (20.8% vs. 20.4%) were similar. Infections, leukocytopenia, hyperlipidemia and treatment discontinuations occurred more frequently in the EVR group. No hepatic artery thrombosis and no excess of wound healing impairment were noted. Conversion from CNI-based to EVR-based immunosuppression proved to be a safe alternative post-LTx that deserves further investigation in terms of nephroprotection.

Prevalence, incidence, and clinical relevance of the reverse transcriptase V207I mutation outside the YMDD motif of the hepatitis B virus polymerase during lamivudine therapy.

The reverse transcriptase V207I mutation within the hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase is associated with resistance to lamivudine in vitro. The prevalence of this mutation in treatment-naive patients was 1% (1/96). A follow-up of the patient carrying this mutation prior to treatment revealed no loss of sensitivity of HBV to lamivudine in vivo.

[Invasive fungal infections in patients after liver transplantation]. / Invasive Pilzinfektionen bei Patienten nach Lebertransplantation.

Advances in surgical technique, immunosuppression, and medical management have greatly improved clinical results after liver transplantation (LTx). Fungal infections in LTx-patients still represent serious complications and are associated with a significant decrease in survival. The majority of fungal infections in LTx-patients are caused by Candida species, which is explained by the major abdominal surgery. Aspergillus infections are second common, whereas other fungal infections such as pneumocystosis, cryptococcosis, or zygomycosis represent rare events. The high mortality of invasive fungal infections in LTx-recipients is explained by the severity of the underlying medical condition and by difficulties in diagnosis and medical therapy. Currently available diagnostic tests do not allow a timely and reliable diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in LTx-patients. Amphotericin B has been the standard treatment for invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis for many years but the high frequency of side effects limits its application. Fluconazole is widely used due to better tolerability and fewer drug interactions. Disadvantages are the lack of activity against Aspergillus species and the selection of resistant Candida strains. Progress is to be expected from new antimycotic agents belonging to azoles (voriconazole) and echinocandins (caspofungin) as these are less toxic and have a broad range of antimycotic activity. Analysis of prognostic factors allows identifying LTx-patients at high risk for invasive fungal infection. Antimycotic prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy may improve clinical outcome in this patient subgroup.

[Evaluation of potential liver living donors. Logistic and financial aspects]. / Evaluation potenzieller Leberlebendspender. Logistik und finanzieller Rahmen.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing shortage of cadaveric organs makes living-related liver transplantation a more and more important option. Safety for the donor has the highest priority, and therefore detailed and thorough evaluation is needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All potential donors who had been evaluated at our center from January 2001 to March 2002 ( n=100) were included in a retrospective study to analyse the qualitative, logistical, and economic aspects of the evaluation. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of the potential donors were found to be unsuitable for living donation during the evaluation process. The main reasons were: uncompatible blood group, availability of cadaveric transplant by Eurotransplant, steatosis of more than 10% of hepatocytes in liver biopsy, insufficient liver volume, and psychosocial reasons. The expenditure for all scheduled investigations was 4,469 euro for a complete evaluation. CONCLUSION: While on the one hand, high standards of the evaluation process must be guaranteed, insufficient reimbursement on the other should not lead centers to reduce either quantity or quality of necessary examinations entered in the evaluation protocol.