From standard therapies to monoclonal antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors - an update for reconstructive surgeons on common oncological cases.

Malignancies represent a persisting worldwide health burden. Tumor treatment is commonly based on surgical and/or non-surgical therapies. In the recent decade, novel non-surgical treatment strategies involving monoclonal antibodies (mAB) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been successfully incorporated into standard treatment algorithms. Such emerging therapy concepts have demonstrated improved complete remission rates and prolonged progression-free survival compared to conventional chemotherapies. However, the in-toto surgical tumor resection followed by reconstructive surgery oftentimes remains the only curative therapy. Breast cancer (BC), skin cancer (SC), head and neck cancer (HNC), and sarcoma amongst other cancer entities commonly require reconstructive surgery to restore form, aesthetics, and functionality. Understanding the basic principles, strengths, and limitations of mAB and ICI as (neo-) adjuvant therapies and treatment alternatives for resectable or unresectable tumors is paramount for optimized surgical therapy planning. Yet, there is a scarcity of studies that condense the current body of literature on mAB and ICI for BC, SC, HNC, and sarcoma. This knowledge gap may result in suboptimal treatment planning, ultimately impairing patient outcomes. Herein, we aim to summarize the current translational endeavors focusing on mAB and ICI. This line of research may serve as an evidence-based fundament to guide targeted therapy and optimize interdisciplinary anti-cancer strategies.

Ensuring Racial and Ethnic Inclusivity in Facial Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.

Facial vascularized composite allotransplantation (fVCA) represents a valuable surgical option for reconstruction of the most devastating facial defects. There is a mounting body of evidence suggesting that healthcare disparities exist for a variety of other surgical and nonsurgical procedures. We aimed to investigate the potential existence of racial and ethnic disparities in the field of fVCA. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted by the authors of this review on PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase databases from database inception to December 1, 2022 for studies published in the English and French languages. The search terms were (1) "face" OR "facial" AND (2) "transplant" OR "VCA" OR "vascularized composite allotransplantation" OR "vascularized composite allograft" OR "graft." Results: Upon assessment of the racial and ethnic demographics of the 47 global cases of fVCA between 2005 and 2020, 36 were White, 10 were Asian, and one was Black. Sixteen of the 17 fVCA procedures performed in the United States involved White patients. The other patient self-identified as Black, equaling 6% of all US fVCA recipients. Conclusion: Our analysis showed that the ethnic and racial distribution of fVCA has not proportionally reflected the racial and ethnic demographics of the general US population, underscoring the risk of such healthcare imbalances. Although large-scale studies are needed before drawing definitive conclusions, leaders in the field should take preventive steps to avoid potential disparities. Further investigations into the factors that facilitate or prohibit access to fVCA referral and surgery will be necessary moving forward.

Novel Strategies in Transplantation: Genetic Engineering and Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the clinical success in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), systemic immunosuppression remains necessary to prevent allograft rejection. Even with potent immunosuppressive regimens (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids), most patients experience several rejection episodes, often within the same year. The risk of systemic side effects must constantly be weighed against the risk of under-immunosuppression and, thus, acute and chronic rejection. In this context, genomic editing has emerged as a potential tool to minimize the need for toxic immunosuppressive regimens and has gained attention in the fields of solid organ transplantation and xenotransplantation. This strategy may also be relevant for the future of VCA. METHODS: We discuss the topic of genetic engineering and review recent developments in this field that justify investigating tools such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 in the context of VCA. RESULTS: We propose specific strategies for VCA based on the most recent gene expression data. This includes the well-known strategy of tolerance induction. Specifically, targeting the interaction between antigen-presenting cells and recipient-derived T cells by CD40 knockout may be effective. The novelty for VCA is a discovery that donor-derived T lymphocytes may play a special role in allograft rejection of facial transplants. We suggest targeting these cells prior to transplantation (e.g., by ex vivo perfusion of the transplant) by knocking out genes necessary for the long-term persistence of donor-derived immune cells in the allograft. CONCLUSION: Despite the demonstrated feasibility of VCA in recent years, continued improvements to immunomodulatory strategies using tools like clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 could lead to the development of approaches that mitigate the limitations associated with rejection of this life-giving procedure.

Cellular activation pathways and interaction networks in vascularized composite allotransplantation.

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is an evolving field of reconstructive surgery that has revolutionized the treatment of patients with devastating injuries, including those with limb losses or facial disfigurement. The transplanted units are typically comprised of different tissue types, including skin, mucosa, blood and lymphatic vasculature, muscle, and bone. It is widely accepted that the antigenicity of some VCA components, such as skin, is particularly potent in eliciting a strong recipient rejection response following transplantation. The fine line between tolerance and rejection of the graft is orchestrated by different cell types, including both donor and recipient-derived lymphocytes, macrophages, and other immune and donor-derived tissue cells (e.g., endothelium). Here, we delineate the role of different cell and tissue types during VCA rejection. Rejection of VCA grafts and the necessity of life-long multidrug immunosuppression remains one of the major challenges in this field. This review sheds light on recent developments in decoding the cellular signature of graft rejection in VCA and how these may, ultimately, influence the clinical management of VCA patients by way of novel therapies that target specific cellular processes.

Tolerance Induction in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation-A Brief Review of Preclinical Models.

Pre-clinical studies are an obligatory tool to develop and translate novel therapeutic strategies into clinical practice. Acute and chronic rejection mediated by the recipient's immune system remains an important limiting factor for the (long-term) survival of vascularized composite allografts (VCA). Furthermore, high intensity immunosuppressive (IS) protocols are needed to mitigate the immediate and long-term effects of rejection. These IS regiments can have significant side-effects such as predisposing transplant recipients to infections, organ dysfunction and malignancies. To overcome these problems, tolerance induction has been proposed as one strategy to reduce the intensity of IS protocols and to thereby mitigate long-term effects of allograft rejection. In this review article, we provide an overview about animal models and strategies that have been used to induce tolerance. The induction of donor-specific tolerance was achieved in preclinical animal models and clinical translation may help improve short and long-term outcomes in VCAs in the future.