Patient's informational needs and outreach preferences: A cross-sectional survey study in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies.

Objective: Hepatobiliary tumors have evolving management guidelines. Patient educational needs and interest in community engagement are unknown. This study serves as a needs assessment. Methods: A prospective, needs assessment, survey study of hepatobiliary patients was performed (2016-2019). Surveys (n = 169) were distributed covering three domains of interest: informational needs, interest in outreach, and engagement preferences. Results: Seventy patients completed the survey (response rate = 41.4%). Most patients had completed surgical treatment (84.3%). Cancer treatment was ranked as their primary topic of interest (n = 39, 55.7bold%), followed by symptom management, nutrition, and survivorship. Most patients did not participate in screening (n = 57, 81.4%), though were interested in learning more about these programs. Thirty-nine patients (55.7%) stated they would want to receive more education. Only 17 (24.3%) were interested in attending in-person events. Patients preferred online methods for education (n = 49, 70%). While patients were aware of their case presentation at tumor board, only 38 (54.3%) felt well-informed about recommendations. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary care is complex and difficult for patients to navigate. Most patients have interest in educational resources and prefer online modalities. Patients understand multidisciplinary tumor boards, but communication could be improved. Innovation: These data inform a new, innovative, approach to outreach efforts in this population.

Hospital Costs Following Surgical Complications: A Value-driven Outcomes Analysis of Cost Savings Due to Complication Prevention.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical complications have substantial impact on healthcare costs. We propose an analysis of the financial impact of postoperative complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Both complications and preoperative patient risk have been shown to increase costs following surgery. The extent of cost increase due to specific complications has not been well described. METHODS: A single institution's American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data was queried from 2012 to 2018 and merged with institutional cost data for each encounter. A mixed effects multivariable generalized linear model was used to estimate the mean relative increase in hospital cost due to each complication, adjusting for patient and procedure-level fixed effects clustered by procedure. Potential savings were calculated based on projected decreases in complication rates and theoretical hospital volume. RESULTS: There were 11,897 patients linked between the 2 databases. The rate of any American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication was 11.7%. The occurrence of any complication resulted in a 1.5-fold mean increase in direct hospital cost [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-1.58]. The top 6 most costly complications were postoperative septic shock (4.0-fold, 95% CI 3.58-4.43) renal insufficiency/failure (3.3-fold, 95% CI 2.91-3.65), any respiratory complication (3.1-fold, 95% CI 2.94-3.36), cardiac arrest (3.0-fold, 95% CI 2.64-3.46), myocardial infarction (2.9-fold, 95% CI 2.43-3.42) and mortality within 30 days (2.2-fold, 95% CI 2.01-2.48). Length of stay (6.5 versus 3.2 days, P < 0.01), readmission rate (29.1% vs 3.1%, P < 0.01), and discharge destination outside of home (20.5% vs 2.7%, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the population who experienced complications. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing complication rates through preoperative optimization will improve patient outcomes and lead to substantial cost savings.

Patient-centered Opioid Prescribing: Breaking Away From One-Size-Fits-All Prescribing Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Procedure-based opioid-prescribing guidelines have reduced the amount of opioids prescribed after surgery; however, many patients are still overprescribed opioids. The 24-h predischarge opioid consumption (PDOC) metric has been proposed to guide patient-centered prescribing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. We assessed the correlation between inpatient opioid use and discharge prescriptions using morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). The adequacy of discharge prescriptions for individual patients was assessed using 2 models, one assuming constant opioid use (based on 24-h PDOC) and the other assuming a linear taper. RESULTS: Of 596 included patients, gastric bypass and colectomy were the most common operations. Median length of stay was 3.5 d. Inpatient opioid use and discharge prescriptions were weakly correlated (r = 0.35). Patients with no opioid use 24 h before discharge (n = 133, 22.3%) were frequently discharged with opioid prescriptions. Patients with high opioid use (24-h PDOC >60 MME) were often discharged with prescriptions that would have lasted <48 h (164/200, 82%). Assuming constant opioid use, discharge prescriptions would have lasted patients a median of 5.1 d. With linear opioid tapering, 440 (72.9%) patients would have had leftover pills. A theoretical discharge prescription of 4 times 24-h PDOC would reduce the median prescription by 130 MMEs and allow a linear taper for 97.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, opioid prescribing was rarely patient-centered, with little correlation between patient's inpatient opioid use and discharge prescriptions. This leads to overprescribing for most patients and underprescribing for others.

Impact of Multimodality Treatment Sequence on Survival in Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The value of neoadjuvant treatment in combination with resection as multimodality therapy (MMT) for stage IIB non-small cell lung cancer remains controversial. METHODS: This was a national cohort study of patients with clinical stage IIB non-small cell lung cancer (2006 to 2015) that used the National Cancer Database. Cohorts were defined on the basis of the MMT sequence and were categorized as follows: surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), surgery plus adjuvant chemoradiation (ACRT), neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery (NA), surgery-alone, and definitive chemotherapy or chemoradiation (nonsurgical). The primary comparison was between the NA and AC cohorts. Propensity matching methods were used to match cohorts who had AC vs NA. Multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze the difference in risk of death between the NA and AC groups. RESULTS: There were 10,841 patients with stage IIB lung cancer: 2476 in the AC, 854 with ACRT, 1195 with NA, 2019 with surgery alone, and 4297 with nonsurgical treatment. Of the 6544 patients who underwent surgery, 37.8% had AC, 13.1% had ACRT, 18.3% had NA, and 30.9% had surgery alone. Relative to those patients treated with AC, nonsurgical treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.69 to 3.17) or surgery-alone (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.38) was associated with a significantly higher risk of death. After propensity matching, there was no difference in the risk of death between the NA and AC cohorts (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.31). CONCLUSIONS: MMT, including surgical resection, is associated with improved OS, regardless of treatment sequence, with no difference in survival on the basis of an NA or AC approach. The potential benefits of NA over AC to ensure that patients complete MMT warrant further prospective investigation.

Opioid Misuse and Dependence Screening Practices Prior to Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A majority of surgical patients are prescribed opioids for pain management. Many patients have pre-existing chronic pain managed with opioids and/or opioid use disorders (OUDs), which can complicate perioperative management. Patients who use opioids prior to surgery are at increased risk of developing OUD after surgery. To date, no studies have examined the prevalence of opioid screening and electronic medical record (EMR) documentation prior to surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 40-item survey was administered to 268 patients at their first postoperative care visit at a single tertiary academic center from October 2017 to July 2018. A chart review of a random sample of 100 patients was performed to determine provider opioid screening prevalence in the presurgical setting. Log-binomial models were used to calculate prevalence ratios (PRs) to determine the provider role (surgeon, advanced practice clinicians [APC], surgical trainee) association with opioid screening documentation. Exploratory qualitative interviews were conducted with surgical providers to identify barriers to screening and screening documentation. RESULTS: Only 7% of patients were screened preoperatively for opioid use. A total of 38% of patients self-reported that they had used opioids in the past year. Of that group, only 3% had screening by a surgical provider prior to surgery documented in their EMR. Provider role was not associated with likelihood of opioid screening (surgeon versus trainee, PR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.2-8.5) (surgeons versus APCs, PR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.17-8.53). EMRs were discordant with patient survey results for patients with no ICD-10 codes for opioid use. The most common perceived barriers to preoperative screening were insufficient clinic time; logistics of who should screen/not required as part of their clinical workflow; not perceiving screening as a priority; and lack of expertise in the area of chronic opioid use and OUD. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative screening for opioid use is uncommon, and EMRs are often discordant with patient self-reported use. Efforts to increase preoperative screening will need to address barriers screening practices and increasing health system support by incorporating screening into the clinical workflow and adding it to documentation templates.

Home Disposal Kits for Leftover Opioid Medications After Surgery: Do They Work?

BACKGROUND: Postoperative overprescribing is common, and many patients will have excess medications. An effective method to encourage disposal is lacking. We hypothesized that a convenient home disposal kit will result in more appropriate disposal of excess opioids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective observational pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of a postoperative opioid disposal kit. Patients in the intervention group received an opioid disposal kit and educational handout before discharge from the hospital. At the first follow-up visit, patients completed a survey in which they reported the remaining amount of pain medications from their original prescription and their plan for the excess medication. Patients were asked about risk factors for chronic opioid use. We used multivariable Poisson regression to identify independent factors associated with an increased likelihood of appropriate opioid disposal. RESULTS: The survey was offered to 904 patients with a response rate of 91.7%. After excluding those with missing data, 571 patients were included in the study. Overall, 83 (14.5%) patients never filled an opioid prescription, and 286 (60.0%) patients had tablets remaining at the time of the follow-up visit. Among those with tablets remaining, 52 received a home disposal kit, whereas 234 patients with tablets remaining did not. Patients who received the kit were more likely to dispose of opioid medications (54.9% versus 34.8%, relative risk = 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5). No confounders were identified during multivariable analysis that increased a patient's likelihood of disposing excess medications. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of a convenient home disposal kit postoperatively increased patient-reported opioid disposal.

Clinical-Pathologic Correlation and Guideline Concordance in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Accurate staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is critical for identifying patients who will benefit from multimodality therapy. This study evaluated clinical-pathologic correlation and its effects on receipt of guideline-concordant therapy in a national cohort. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with surgically resected NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2014 was conducted. Primary tumor and nodal staging information was analyzed in patients who underwent upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy to calculate correlation between clinical and pathologic stages and estimate downstaging rate. Staging accuracy and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated. Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between receipt of guideline-concordant therapy and overall risk of death. RESULTS: Among 82,999 patients, correlation between clinical and pathologic stages was strong (r = 0.69). Correlation of primary tumor staging was high (71.2%-84.5%). The positive predictive value of nodal staging was 78.2%. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with downstaging in tumor stage (T1, 1.5%; T2, 22.6%; T3, 28%; T4, 42%) and 17.3% of positive nodes. Patients with stage I disease had high rates of guideline-concordant treatment (IA, 97.4%; and IB, 97.9%). Patients with stage IIA to IIIA disease had lower rates of guideline concordance. Receipt of guideline-concordant care was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical staging modalities are reasonably accurate. However, less than one half of patients with stage IIA to IIIA NSCLC receive guideline-concordant therapy, and this deficiency is associated with inferior survival. Identifying factors contributing to these differences is crucial to improve outcomes.

Optimizing health before elective thoracic surgery: systematic review of modifiable risk factors and opportunities for health services research.

Despite progress in many different domains of surgical care, we are still striving toward practices which will consistently lead to the best care for an increasingly complex surgical population. Thoracic surgical patients, as a group, have multiple medical co-morbidities and are at increased risk for developing complications after surgical intervention. Our healthcare systems have been focused on treating complications as they occur in the hopes of minimizing their impact, as well as aiding in recovery. In recent years there has emerged a body of evidence outlining opportunities to optimize patients and likely prevent or decrease the impact of many complications. The purpose of this review article is to summarize four major domains-optimal pain control, nutritional status, functional fitness, and smoking cessation-all of which can have a substantial impact on the thoracic surgical patient's course in the hospital-as well as to describe opportunities for improvement, and areas for future research efforts.

Impact of insurance status on receipt of definitive surgical therapy and posttreatment outcomes in early stage lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of insurance on outcomes in the modern era of evidence-based guidelines is unclear. We sought to examine differences in receipt of therapy and outcomes for early stage, non-small cell lung cancer patients by insurance coverage. METHOD: Clinical T1-3 N0-1 non-small cell lung cancer cases were identified in the 2004 to 2014 National Cancer Database and compared across 4 groups: private, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured. A multivariable, linear regression model was used to examine the effects of insurance status on time to curative surgical therapy, adjusting for patient and facility characteristics. Receipt of different therapies was examined with multivariable logistic regression. Survival analysis was conducted with Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 240,361 patients presented with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (60,532 private, 164,377 Medicare, 11,001 Medicaid, and 4,451 uninsured). After adjustment, Medicaid and uninsured patients received surgical therapy later than privately insured patients (9.5 days and 7.0 days, respectively, P < .001), were more likely to be delayed > 8 weeks (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.55-1.73 and odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.58), and were significantly less likely to receive surgery (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.56 and odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.55). Uninsured patients were more likely to receive no treatment (odds ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.92-2.41), followed by Medicaid patients (odds ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.53-1.80). The 5-year overall survival was significantly worse in the Medicaid and uninsured populations. CONCLUSION: Even in the modern era, uninsured and Medicaid early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients have decreased odds of receiving a potentially curative operation and experience inferior outcomes. Given substantial expenditures on the Medicaid program, strategies for increasing utilization of curative surgery in Medicaid patients with lung cancer are needed.

Longitudinal analysis of hospital charges following injury in a level 1 pediatric trauma system.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of injured children contributes substantially to the financial burden of a health care system. The purpose of this study was to characterize these charges at a level-1 pediatric trauma center. METHODS: Financial data for children (<14 years) admitted for traumatic injury from 1/2009 to 12/2014 were analyzed. The charges of the index admission and first two years following discharge were evaluated. RESULTS: 5853 trauma patients were included with average annual charges of $11,128,730. The most common mechanisms of injury were fall (44%), sports (12%), and bike (9%). The median ISS was 6 (IQR 4-10) with a mortality rate of 1.8% and Z-score of 13.04 (p<0.001). The overall total charges per patient during the index admission were $9513. Spinal cord and major abdominal injuries had the greatest charges per patient ($55,560 and $23,618 respectively) primarily owing to hospital LOS. During the first year after discharge, the total charges per patient were $1733, of which spinal cord injury resulted in highest overall ($19,426), owing to inpatient rehabilitation. For all other injury patterns, mean total charges per patient were $2376 (range $791-$3573). CONCLUSIONS: The value proposition in health care requires us to define outcomes relative to costs. Injury severity, major injury location, and hospital length of stay are the highest contributors for the financial burden of pediatric traumatic injury, while inpatient readmissions and inpatient rehabilitation drove higher charges in the years following discharge. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical Research Paper. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II - Cohort Study.

Intussusception clinical pathway: a survey of pediatric surgery practices.

Therapeutic reduction of intussusception by air or contrast enema may require surgery if the bowel is irreducible or perforates. There is no standard for the involvement of a pediatric surgeon in the workup of the condition. A regional survey of clinical practices was therefore undertaken to attempt to establish a consensus as to when the presence of a pediatric surgeon is required. Distributed to pediatric surgeons at 32 institutions, a questionnaire asked the process of imaging and reduction of infants with intussusception and the extent of pediatric surgical involvement. Surgeons at 29 institutions responded (91%). Ultrasound was used in diagnosis in 16 (55%), 13 (45%) requiring a positive ultrasound diagnosis of intussusception before attempting reduction. Three-fourths (22 [76%]) required surgeon notification that enema reduction was taking place, and one-fourth (seven [24%]) required prior surgical consultation. Only three (10%) required the presence of a surgery team member. Most (21 [72%]) did not demand one, and five (18%) indicated that surgical presence was desirable but not a necessity. There is no consensus for pediatric surgical involvement before and during reduction of an intussusception.

Peritoneal drainage as the initial management of intestinal perforation in premature infants.

Complicated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) are major causes of mortality. We hypothesized that peritoneal drainage (PD) is more efficacious in SIP. Newborn infants with intestinal perforation treated with PD at our institution between 2007 and 2012 were divided into two groups: Group 1, infants with complicated NEC (n = 19), and Group 2, infants with SIP (n = 15). In Group 1, median birth weight was 705 g; median gestational age was 25.9 weeks. Median age at PD was 24 days. Six required laparotomy. Median time from PD to enteral feeds was 22.5 days. In Group 2, median birth weight was 685 g; median gestational age was 25.3 weeks. Median age at PD was 5 days. Two required laparotomy. Median time from PD to enteral feeds was 16 days. In Group 1, eight patients survived to discharge; median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 104.5 days. In Group 2, eight survived; median LOS was 109.5 days. Neither outcome was statistically significant (P = 0.73 and 0.878, respectively). Management of premature infants with intestinal perforation remains challenging. Mortality is high. Between our cohorts, there were no differences in regard to PD as definitive therapy, survival, and LOS.