Pain characteristics and management of inpatients admitted to a comprehensive cancer centre: a cross-sectional study.

AIMS: This prospective, cross-sectional study aimed to assess cancer pain and its management in an inpatient setting at a comprehensive cancer centre in Denmark. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-eight inpatients with cancer were invited to participate (May/June 2011). Demographics, diagnoses, World Health Organization performance status, health-related quality of life, pain and data regarding analgesic treatment were registered. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four (71.3%) patients agreed to participate in the study. Most frequent diagnoses were leukaemia (27.6%) and lung cancer (14.2%). A high prevalence of pain was observed, 65.7%. Thirty-two per cent reported moderate to severe pain when it was at its worst, 96% reported no or mild pain when it was at its least. Nearly 22% reported moderate to severe pain when the pain was categorised as average. Breakthrough pain episodes were reported by 30.5%. Adjuvant medication was sparsely used and not always correctly indicated. Out of 88 patients with pain, 62.5% were left untreated according to the Electronic Medication System. Higher health-related quality of life was associated with lower pain intensity. The use of opioids with or without adjuvants was associated with higher pain intensity and higher number of breakthrough pain episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two thirds of inpatients reported pain and one third had breakthrough pain. A substantial number of patients with pain were left untreated. Opioid-treated patients reported highest pain intensity and number of breakthrough episodes; however, analgesic medication seemed to be underused. Measures to improve pain assessment and management are highly required.

Symptomatology of cancer patients in palliative care: content validation of self-assessment questionnaires against medical records.

To elucidate which symptoms or problems to measure when evaluating palliative care, we assessed the content validity of selected patient self-assessment questionnaires used to evaluate palliative care: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS), the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL) and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). The content of the questionnaires was compared against the symptoms and problems noted in the medical records of 171 consecutive cancer patients on their first admission to a department of palliative medicine. From the records, 63 different symptoms were listed. Two questionnaires covered almost all of the prevalent symptoms/problems: the EORTC QLQ-C30 covered 10 and the MSAS 11 of the 12 most frequent problems. Researchers selecting instruments for evaluating palliative care may use the present study and other reviews to examine to what degree a given selection of instruments cover the symptoms/problems targeted by palliative care physicians.

Symptom recognition in advanced cancer. A comparison of nursing records against patient self-rating.

The aim of the study was to investigate the extent to which the symptoms experienced by advanced cancer patients were covered by the nursing records. On the day of the first contact with our palliative care department, a nursing record was taken, and on this or the following day, 56 patients filled in the questionnaires EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). In each patient, the symptomatology reported in the patient-completed questionnaires was compared with the symptomatology mentioned by the nurse in the nursing record. The analysis revealed good concordance concerning pain and poor physical functioning, but patients reported other symptoms or problems much more often than their nurses. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed. It is suggested that the nurse's knowledge of the patient's symptomatology might gain from more systematic screening or from transfer of information from patient self-assessment questionnaires to the nursing records.

Does the medical record cover the symptoms experienced by cancer patients receiving palliative care? A comparison of the record and patient self-rating.

The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which the symptoms experienced by advanced cancer patients were covered by the medical records. Fifty-eight patients participated in the study. On the day of first encounter with our palliative care department, a medical history was taken, and on this or the following day, the patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The symptomatology reported in the patient-completed questionnaires was compared with the symptomatology mentioned by the physician in the medical record. The analysis revealed good concordance concerning pain, but most other symptoms or problems were reported much more often by patients than by their doctors. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed. It is suggested that the doctor's knowledge of the patient's symptomatology might gain from more systematic screening and transfer of information from patient self-assessment questionnaires to the medical records.

A limited sampling method for estimation of the etoposide area under the curve.

A limited sampling method for estimation of the etoposide area under the curve (AUC) is presented. The method was developed and validated in 23 patients (42 pharmacokinetic studies) with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), limited disease. The patients received 100 mg/m2 etoposide as a 90-min intravenous infusion in combination with carboplatin, allowing for etoposide dose modification at a following course (25% increase or decrease) due to high or low nadir values for leukocytes or thrombocytes. Of the 42 pharmacokinetic studies, 27 were used in the model development and 15 were used in the model validation. Single regression analyses of the AUC versus the fitted concentrations for the model data set were performed at several time points. The analyses demonstrated high and essentially identical correlation coefficients in the interval between 2 and 21 h, with a maximal value of 0.96 being recorded at 4 h. Multiple regression analysis was then performed using fitted concentrations corresponding to 0.08-21 h. The best model for one sample was AUC = 1.01 x (dose level divided by 100 mg/m2) + 799 x C4 h, that for two samples was AUC = 1.43 x (dose level divided by 100 mg/m2) + 544 x C4 h + 1756 x C21 h, and that for three samples was AUC = 0.07 x (dose level divided by 100 mg/m2) + 110 x C5 min + 474 x C4 h + 1759 x C21 h. Not unexpectedly, the model validation revealed that the one-sample model was less precise than the two- or three-sample model [percentage of root mean squared error (RMSE%) = 11.6%, 7.1%, and 5.4%, respectively]. All models proved to be unbiased in the validation [percentage of mean predictive error (MPE%) +/- SE = 4.2% +/- 11.0%, 7.9% +/- 6.1%, and 6.3% +/- 5.3%, respectively]. The models were subsequently validated in 14 pharmacokinetic studies of patients with metastatic germ-cell tumours who were receiving combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and bleomycin plus 100 mg/m2 etoposide as a 90-min infusion. The RMSE% was 13.4%, 10.8%, and 9.0% and the MPE% +/- SE was -1.0% +/- 11.9%, 1.7% +/- 10.5%, and 2.7% +/- 7.9% for the one-, two-, and three-sample models, respectively. The limited sampling methods presented herein may prove to be a most valuable tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in regimens in which etoposide is given in combination with carboplatin or with cisplatin and bleomycin.

[Dry bed--but how? A follow-up study of children with enuresis treated with a bed alarm]. / Sengen tør--og hvad så? Efterundersøgelse af enuresisbørn behandlet med ringeapparat.

At follow-up, 29 young adults treated previously (ages 7-14 years) for nocturnal enuresis by means of conditioning, mostly with a bed alarm, showed no excess of mental abnormalities, including psychosomatic symptoms. Most of the probands recollected the treatment as positive and effective. It is concluded that conditioning is effective in the treatment of nocturnal enuresis and that it does not seem to leave any undesirable after-effects. Nothing seems to indicate that omission of more intensive, conflict-solving psychotherapy has implied any disadvantage for the patient. Thus, the bed alarm method can still be recommended as the treatment of first choice.