Ex vivo study of Ho:YAG and thulium fiber lasers for soft tissue surgery: which laser for which case?

The goal of this study was to assess the ablation, coagulation, and carbonization characteristics of the holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser and thulium fiber lasers (TFL). The Ho:YAG laser (100 W av.power), the quasi-continuous (QCW) TFL (120 W av.power), and the SuperPulsed (SP) TFL (50 W av.power) were compared on a non-frozen porcine kidney. To control the cutting speed (2 or 5 mm/s), an XY translation stage was used. The Ho:YAG was tested using E = 1.5 J and Pav = 40 W or Pav = 70 W settings. The TFL was tested using E = 1.5 J and Pav = 30 W or Pav = 60 W settings. After ex vivo incision, histological analysis was performed in order to estimate thermal damage. At 40 W, the Ho:YAG displayed a shallower cutting at 2 and 5 mm/s (1.1 ± 0.2 mm and 0.5 ± 0.2 mm, respectively) with virtually zero coagulation. While at 70 W, the minimal coagulation depth measured 0.1 ± 0.1 mm. The incisions demonstrated zero carbonization. Both the QCW and SP TFL did show effective cutting at all speeds (2.1 ± 0.2 mm and 1.3 ± 0.2 mm, respectively, at 30 W) with prominent coagulation (0.6 ± 0.1 mm and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm, respectively, at 70 W) and carbonization. Our study introduced the TFL as a novel efficient alternative for soft tissue surgery to the Ho:YAG laser. The SP TFL offers a Ho:YAG-like incision, while QCW TFL allows for fast, deep, and precise cutting with increased carbonization.

Rare diseases of esophagus: Surgical treatment of cysts in adults. Case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Esophageal cysts (EC) are congenital, extremely rare malformation. Up to 80% of EC are diagnosed in childhood, therefore, we can find only few clinical observations of EC in adults in literature. CASE PRESENTATION: During the period from October to December 2019, a successful surgical treatment of 2 patients (1 male and 1 female) with enterogenous and duplication cysts of esophagus was performed at the Clinic of Faculty Surgery at Sechenov University. In both cases thoracic tumors were incidental findings during routine health investigation. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Clinical manifestations of ECs are caused by compression or displacement of the adjacent anatomical structures, therefore, most often patients complain of dysphagia, vomiting, pain in the chest, which may be constant or occur during an act of breathing. There are also observations of neurological symptoms due to compression of the radicular nerves The method of choice in the treatment of ECs is their surgical removal. CONCLUSION: Patients with mediastinal tumors should be treated in specialized hospitals by experienced surgeons who can cope with an unexpected intraoperative finding and carry out the appropriate surgery.