RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Resilon (Resilon Research LLC, Madison, CT) with Epiphany Sealer (Pentron Clinical Technologies, Wallingford, CT) was introduced into the market in 2004 as a new method of root canal obturation. This material as well as the traditionally used gutta-percha with AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Maillefer, Tulsa, OK) were in use over a 9-year span in the University of North Carolina endodontic clinics. Although Resilon was initially thought to create a "monoblock" seal between the material and the canal, in vitro studies later suggested this concept not to be true. The long-term outcome of Resilon using a validated radiographic index and a systematic approach has not been reported. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to radiographically evaluate the outcome of Resilon/Epiphany-treated root canals compared with traditional gutta-percha/AH Plus. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five teeth were radiographically evaluated using the periapical index; 80 were treated with Resilon and 45 with gutta-percha. Age, sex, tooth position, and number of months to follow-up were documented, and a multivariate analysis with odds ratio was performed. RESULTS: Resilon-treated teeth were 5.3 times more likely to have a periapical index of 3 to 5 at follow-up compared with gutta-percha (P = .009). Teeth presenting with preoperative lesions, regardless of the material used, were also more likely to present with a lesion at follow-up (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Teeth obturated with Resilon were more likely to present with a lesion at follow-up compared with gutta-percha obturated teeth after controlling for the presence of a preoperative lesion and the length to follow-up.